Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Valentine's Day card

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
(Valentine's Day card)
(Valentine's Day card: Support)
Line 10: Line 10:
* '''Support''' A good image, still creeping me out, but with decent EV and of high caliber. <u>&nbsp;<font face="Courier">[[User:Nezzadar|<span style="color:OrangeRed">'''Nezzadar'''</span>]]&nbsp;</font face>[[User talk:Nezzadar|<span style="color:Black;"><small>[SPEAK]</small></span>]]&nbsp;</u> 04:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
* '''Support''' A good image, still creeping me out, but with decent EV and of high caliber. <u>&nbsp;<font face="Courier">[[User:Nezzadar|<span style="color:OrangeRed">'''Nezzadar'''</span>]]&nbsp;</font face>[[User talk:Nezzadar|<span style="color:Black;"><small>[SPEAK]</small></span>]]&nbsp;</u> 04:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
:'''Comment''': I understand your feeling - the image is quite surreal. Is that the way [[Valentine's Day]] is described in the article? [[User:Elekhh|Elekhh]] ([[User talk:Elekhh|talk]]) 06:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
:'''Comment''': I understand your feeling - the image is quite surreal. Is that the way [[Valentine's Day]] is described in the article? [[User:Elekhh|Elekhh]] ([[User talk:Elekhh|talk]]) 06:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
-
*'''Comment''': Nothing makes me want to buy flowers and have sex like babies on string. Do we not have an article on the company? Is it [[Louis Prang]]? If so, this would drastically include his article... [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 11:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
+
*'''Comment''': Nothing makes me want to buy flowers and have sex like babies on string. Do we not have an article on the company? Is it [[Louis Prang]]? If so, this would drastically <s>include</s> ''improve'' his article... [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 11:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
**Possibly; will double check. :) <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|348]]''</sup> 14:57, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
**Possibly; will double check. :) <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|348]]''</sup> 14:57, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
***You appear to be quite right.[http://books.google.com/books?id=lJIVAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA317&dq=Louis+Prang&ei=-bfpSoybEojylQTC6IWWDA#v=onepage&q=Louis%20Prang&f=false] Think it would be on the safe side of NOR to attribute this to his firm and use at his article? <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|348]]''</sup> 16:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
***You appear to be quite right.[http://books.google.com/books?id=lJIVAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA317&dq=Louis+Prang&ei=-bfpSoybEojylQTC6IWWDA#v=onepage&q=Louis%20Prang&f=false] Think it would be on the safe side of NOR to attribute this to his firm and use at his article? <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|348]]''</sup> 16:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
****Why not, spread the creepy babies around! <u>&nbsp;<font face="Courier">[[User:Nezzadar|<span style="color:OrangeRed">'''Nezzadar'''</span>]]&nbsp;</font face>[[User talk:Nezzadar|<span style="color:Black;"><small>[SPEAK]</small></span>]]&nbsp;</u> 19:16, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
****Why not, spread the creepy babies around! <u>&nbsp;<font face="Courier">[[User:Nezzadar|<span style="color:OrangeRed">'''Nezzadar'''</span>]]&nbsp;</font face>[[User talk:Nezzadar|<span style="color:Black;"><small>[SPEAK]</small></span>]]&nbsp;</u> 19:16, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
*****Okay, done. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|348]]''</sup> 19:40, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
*****Okay, done. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova|348]]''</sup> 19:40, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
  +
******Cool. '''Support''' for the use on the Prang article. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 10:59, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
*'''Support''' I'll pretend to take credit for finding this even though you already had it. [[User:Staxringold|Staxringold]] <sub>[[User talk:Staxringold|talk]]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">[[Special:Contributions/Staxringold|contribs]]</span></sup> 20:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
*'''Support''' I'll pretend to take credit for finding this even though you already had it. [[User:Staxringold|Staxringold]] <sub>[[User talk:Staxringold|talk]]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">[[Special:Contributions/Staxringold|contribs]]</span></sup> 20:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
*'''Support''' on basis of EV for [[Louis Prang]]. [[User:Elekhh|Elekhh]] ([[User talk:Elekhh|talk]]) 23:41, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
*'''Support''' on basis of EV for [[Louis Prang]]. [[User:Elekhh|Elekhh]] ([[User talk:Elekhh|talk]]) 23:41, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:59, 30 October 2009

Valentine's Day card

Original - 1883 advertisement for a greeting card company's Valentine's Day cards.
Reason
Getting a bit of lead time in for the 2010 Valentine's Day POTD, to avoid the hilarious chaos of 2008.[1] ;) Restored version of File:Prang's Valentine Cards.jpg.
Articles this image appears in
Valentine's Day, Louis Prang
Creator
L. Prang & Co.
  • Support as nominator --Durova348 03:41, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment Words cannot describe how much this image creeps me out. The strangest thing is that I have no idea why.  Nezzadar [SPEAK]  04:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Support A good image, still creeping me out, but with decent EV and of high caliber.  Nezzadar [SPEAK]  04:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Comment: I understand your feeling - the image is quite surreal. Is that the way Valentine's Day is described in the article? Elekhh (talk) 06:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment: Nothing makes me want to buy flowers and have sex like babies on string. Do we not have an article on the company? Is it Louis Prang? If so, this would drastically include improve his article... J Milburn (talk) 11:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
    • Possibly; will double check. :) Durova348 14:57, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
      • You appear to be quite right.[2] Think it would be on the safe side of NOR to attribute this to his firm and use at his article? Durova348 16:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
        • Why not, spread the creepy babies around!  Nezzadar [SPEAK]  19:16, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
          • Okay, done. Durova348 19:40, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
            • Cool. Support for the use on the Prang article. J Milburn (talk) 10:59, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Support I'll pretend to take credit for finding this even though you already had it. Staxringold talkcontribs 20:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Support on basis of EV for Louis Prang. Elekhh (talk) 23:41, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Support The old advertising could be used in present for campaigns like "make a love, more children" :-) I thought the flying babies with wigs are angels or a sort of Cupid. --Caspian blue 00:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)