1940 El Centro earthquake
|Date||May 18, 1940|
|Origin time||21:35 PST|
|Magnitude||6.9 Mw |
|Depth||16 km (9.9 mi) |
|Countries or regions||United States, Mexico|
|Total damage||$ 6 million |
|Max. intensity||X (Intense) |
The 1940 El Centro earthquake (or 1940 Imperial Valley earthquake) occurred at 21:35 Pacific Standard Time on May 18 (05:35 UTC on May 19) in the Imperial Valley in southeastern Southern California near the international border of the United States and Mexico. It had a moment magnitude of 6.9 and a maximum perceived intensity of X (Intense) on the Mercalli intensity scale. It was the first major earthquake to be recorded by a strong-motion seismograph located next to a fault rupture. The earthquake was characterized as a typical moderate-sized destructive event with a complex energy release signature. It was the strongest recorded earthquake to hit the Imperial Valley, and caused widespread damage to irrigation systems and led to the deaths of nine people.
The Salton Trough is part of the complex plate boundary between the Pacific Plate and the North American Plate where it undergoes a transition from the continental transform of the San Andreas Fault system to the series of short spreading centers of the East Pacific Rise linked by oceanic transforms in the Gulf of California. The two main right lateral strike-slip fault strands that extend across the southern part of the trough are the Elsinore Fault Zone/Laguna Salada Fault to the western side of the trough and the Imperial Fault to the east. The Imperial Fault is linked to the San Andreas Fault through the Brawley Seismic Zone, which is a spreading center beneath the southern end of the Salton Sea.
With the San Jacinto Fault Zone to the west, the Elsinore fault to the south-southwest, and the Imperial fault centered directly under the Imperial Valley, the area frequently encounters seismic activity, including moderate and damaging earthquakes. Other events in 1852, 1892, 1915, 1942, 1979, and 1987 have impacted the region in varying degrees.
The earthquake was the result of a rupture along the Imperial Fault, with its epicenter 5 miles (8.0 km) north of Calexico, California. A strong secondary quake with a magnitude of 5.5 followed a little more than an hour after the main shock and was centered near Brawley.
In an interview with the Los Angeles Times shortly after the earthquake, Dr. Beno Gutenberg, a geophysicist and professor at the Caltech Seismological Laboratory in Pasadena, prematurely reported that the source of the quake was the San Jacinto fault and compared the earthquake to the 1933 Long Beach earthquake saying "The energy of the Imperial Vally shock was less, and it should have done less damage, than the one of 1933, even had it occurred in an area of greater population." The Imperial Fault had not been previously differentiated from the other faults in the area by geologists until after the earthquake occurred.
The event caused significant damage in the towns of Brawley, Imperial, El Centro, Calexico and Mexicali and was responsible for the deaths of nine people. Imperial appeared to receive the most damage and was described as "razed" with at least 80% of the buildings in that city being damaged, and at least two people being killed there. It was felt as far afield as Los Angeles and Tucson, Arizona.
The earthquake also caused substantial damage to irrigation systems over a very wide area of the valley, with the canals of the Imperial Irrigation District being breached in multiple locations. With ninety percent of the damage done to the canals south of the international border, water rationing became necessary in Brawley and Imperial during the days following the earthquake spanning the restoration period. The canals brought water from the Mexican side of the border to the United States and supplied 3000 miles of irrigation waterways and ditches in the Imperial Valley. The primary trunkline was the Alamo Canal and it sustained nine breaks, each several hundred feet in length, along a twenty mile stretch between Sharp's heading and Cudahy check.
In Mexico, a 427 m (1,401 ft) long wooden flume was completely destroyed south of Mexicali where the Solfatara canal crossed the New River, and water storage tanks were destroyed at Imperial and Holtville. The railroad system also suffered damage, with bent rails and damage to several bridges. The heaviest damage in Mexicali, the capital of the State of Baja California, was a fire which destroyed a hotel there. The fire was blamed on a short circuit.
A strong-motion seismograph at El Centro recorded the earthquake and provided the first example of such a recording made very close to a fault rupture in a major earthquake. This gave a detailed record of the different types of shaking associated with the earthquake. It is often used in design of earthquake-proof structures today, particularly for the time history analysis method.
The recording showed that the earthquake consisted of several sub-events, with a total of 13 being recorded in just over five minutes. A 1970 report on the earthquake in the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America defined an event as "any occurrence of energy release which generates seismic phases that can be resolved and identified" then stated that the size of those discrete events were abnormally strong for regular aftershocks. The majority of the energy released during the earthquake occurred in the first fifteen seconds, although significant energy was released as late as the last of those events, near the 5:20 mark on the seismograph record.
A surface rupture was formed during the earthquake of 40–60 km (25–37 mi), with a maximum recorded displacement of 4.5 m (15 ft) close to the border. The sense of movement along the rupture was almost pure strike-slip, with no vertical displacement seen. During the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake the same section of the fault ruptured on the US side of the border, but this time there was no sign of rupture on the Mexican side. The displacement pattern of the two earthquakes was very similar on the US side, suggesting that the Imperial Fault slips in discrete patches. Two of these patches are thought to have ruptured in 1940 but only the northern one in 1979.
Soon after the earthquake, reconstruction efforts were concentrated on repairing the Alamo and Solfatara irrigation canals to save the cantaloupe crop, and the water supply was restored in less than four days.
- Stover & Coffman 1993, p. 81
- Stover & Coffman 1993, pp. 135–136
- Hough, S.E. (2004). Finding fault in California: an earthquake tourist's guide. Mountain Press Publishing. p. 185. ISBN 978-0-87842-495-5.
- Trifunac & Brune 1970, p. 138
- "Imperial Valley Earthquake". Southern California Earthquake Data Center. Retrieved July 30, 2010.
- Mueller, K.J.; Rockwell T.K. (1995). "Late quaternary activity of the Laguna Salada fault in northern Baja California, Mexico". Geological Society of America Bulletin (Geological Society of America) 107 (1): 8–18. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1995)107<0008:LQAOTL>2.3.CO;2.
- Elizabeth Varin (April 2, 2011). "Historic Imperial County earthquakes". Imperial Valley Press. Retrieved January 20, 2012.
- "Historic World Earthquakes". U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Hazards Program. Retrieved July 30, 2010.
- "Shock Lighter Than in 1933; Scientist Lays Temblor to Earth Movement Along San Jacinto Fault", Los Angeles Times, May 20, 1940
- Sharp, R.V.; Lienkaemper, J.J.; Bonilla, M.G.; Burke D.B., Fox B.F., Herd D.G., Miller D.M., Morton D.M., Ponti D.J., Rymer M.J., Tinsley J.C., Yount J.C., Kahle J.E., Hart E.W. & Sieh K. (1982). "Surface faulting in the central Imperial Valley". The Imperial Valley, California, Earthquake of October 15, 1979. Geological Survey professional paper 1254. United States Government Printing Office. p. 120. Retrieved December 6, 2013.
- Trifunac & Brune 1970, p. 139
- "Quake Razes Imperial; Three Killed; Brawley and El Centro Damaged by Temblor; All Southland Jarred", Los Angeles Times, May 19, 1940
- "Quake Zone Acts to Solve Water Crisis; Imperial Valley Rationed as Crews Start Repairs on Nine Canal Breaks", Los Angeles Times, May 21, 1940
- Jerry L. Coffman & Carl A. von Hake, ed. (1970). Earthquake History of the United States – Publication 41-1. United States Department of Commerce / United States Department of the Interior. p. 153.
- Gunn, A.M. (2007). "Imperial Valley, California. earthquake". Encyclopedia of Disasters: Environmental Catastrophes and Human Tragedies, Volume 1. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 364–365. ISBN 978-0-313-34002-4.
- "Seismology and Earthquake Engineering". Retrieved July 30, 2010.
- Trifunac & Brune 1970, p. 137
- Trifunac & Brune 1970, pp. 143, 153
- Sieh, K. (1996). "The repetition of large-earthquake ruptures". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (National Academy of Sciences) 93: 3764–3771. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.9.3764.
- Rockwell, Thomas K.; Klinger, Yann (2013), "Surface Rupture and Slip Distribution of the 1940 Imperial Valley Earthquake, Imperial Fault, Southern California Implications for Rupture Segmentation and Dynamics", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (Seismological Society of America) 103 (2A): 629–640, doi:10.1785/0120120192
- Stover, C.W.; Coffman, J.L. (1993), Seismicity of the United States, 1568–1989 (Revised), U.S. Geological Survey professional paper 1527, United States Government Printing Office
- Trifunac, M.D.; Brune, J.N. (1970), "Complexity of energy release during the Imperial Valley, California, earthquake of 1940", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (Seismological Society of America) 60 (1): 137–160
- Ulrich, Franklin P. (1941), "The Imperial Valley Earthquakes of 1940", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (Seismological Society of America) 31: 13–30