19 equal temperament

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Figure 1: 19-edo on the syntonic temperament’s tuning continuum at P5= 694.737 cents, from (Milne et al. 2007).[1]
Easley Blackwood's[2] and Wesley Woolhouse's[3] notation system for 19 equal temperament: intervals are notated similarly to those they approximate and there are only two enharmonic equivalents without double sharps or flats (E/F & B/C).[4] About this sound Play 
19 equal temperament keyboard, after Woolhouse (1835).
Major chord on C in 19 equal temperament: all notes within 8 cents of just intonation (rather than 14 for 12 equal temperament). About this sound Play 19-et , About this sound Play just , or About this sound Play 12-et 

In music, 19 equal temperament, called 19-TET, 19-EDO ("Equal Division of the Octave"), or 19-ET, is the tempered scale derived by dividing the octave into 19 equal steps (equal frequency ratios). Each step represents a frequency ratio of 21/19, or 63.16 cents (About this sound Play ). Because 19 is a prime number, one can use any interval from this tuning system to cycle through all possible notes; just as one may cycle through 12-edo on the circle of fifths, the number 7 (of semitones in a fifth in 12-edo) being coprime to 12.

19-edo is the tuning of the syntonic temperament in which the tempered perfect fifth is equal to 694.737 cents, as shown in Figure 1 (look for the label "19-TET"). On an isomorphic keyboard, the fingering of music composed in 19-edo is precisely the same as it is in any other syntonic tuning (such as 12-edo), so long as the notes are spelled properly—that is, with no assumption of enharmonicity.

History[edit]

Division of the octave into 19 equal-width steps arose naturally out of Renaissance music theory. The greater diesis, the ratio of four minor thirds to an octave (648:625 or 62.565 cents) was almost exactly a nineteenth of an octave. Interest in such a tuning system goes back to the 16th century, when composer Guillaume Costeley used it in his chanson Seigneur Dieu ta pitié of 1558. Costeley understood and desired the circulating aspect of this tuning. In 1577, music theorist Francisco de Salinas in effect proposed it. Salinas discussed 1/3-comma meantone, in which the fifth is of size 694.786 cents. The fifth of 19-edo is 694.737, which is less than a twentieth of a cent narrower, imperceptible and less than tuning error. Salinas suggested tuning nineteen tones to the octave to this tuning, which fails to close by less than a cent, so that his suggestion is effectively 19-edo. In the 19th century, mathematician and music theorist Wesley Woolhouse proposed it as a more practical alternative to meantone temperaments he regarded as better, such as 50-edo.[3]

The composer Joel Mandelbaum wrote his Ph.D. thesis (1961) on the properties of the 19-edo tuning, and advocated for its use. In his thesis, he argued that it is the only viable system with a number of divisions between 12 and 22, and furthermore that the next smallest number of divisions resulting in a significant improvement in approximating just intervals is the 31 equal temperament.[5] Mandelbaum and Joseph Yasser have written music with 19-edo.[6] Easley Blackwood has stated that 19-edo makes possible, "a substantial enrichment of the tonal repertoire."[7]

Scale diagram[edit]

Circle of fifths in 19 equal temperament

The 19-tone system can be represented with the traditional letter names and system of sharps and flats by treating flats and sharps as distinct notes, but identifying B as enharmonic with C and E with F. With this interpretation, the 19 notes in the scale become:

Step (cents) 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63
Note name A A B B B/
C
C C D D D E E E/
F
F F G G G A A
Interval (cents)   0    63  126 189 253 316 379 442 505 568 632 695 758 821 884 947 1011 1074 1137 1200

The fact that traditional western music maps unambiguously onto this scale makes it easier to perform such music in this tuning than in many other tunings.

Interval size[edit]

Here are the sizes of some common intervals and comparison with the ratios arising in the harmonic series; the difference column measures in cents the distance from an exact fit to these ratios. For reference, the difference from the perfect fifth in the widely used 12 equal temperament is 1.955 cents, and the difference from the major third is 13.686 cents.

Interval Name Size (steps) Size (cents) Midi Just Ratio Just (cents) Midi Error (cents)
Perfect fifth 11 694.74 About this sound play  3:2 701.96 About this sound play  −7.22
Greater tridecimal tritone 10 631.58 13:9 636.62 −5.04
Greater septimal tritone, diminished fifth 10 631.58 About this sound play  10:7 617.49 About this sound play  +14.09
Lesser septimal tritone, augmented fourth 9 568.42 About this sound play  7:5 582.51 −14.09
Lesser tridecimal tritone 9 568.42 18:13 563.38 +5.04
Perfect fourth 8 505.26 About this sound play  4:3 498.04 About this sound play  +7.22
Tridecimal major third 7 442.11 13:10 454.12 −10.22
Septimal major third 7 442.11 About this sound play  9:7 435.08 About this sound play  +7.03
Major third 6 378.95 About this sound play  5:4 386.31 About this sound play  −7.36
Inverted 13th harmonic 6 378.95 16:13 359.47 +19.48
Minor third 5 315.79 About this sound play  6:5 315.64 About this sound play  +0.15
Septimal minor third 4 252.63 7:6 266.87 About this sound play  −14.24
Tridecimal 5/4-tone 4 252.63 15:13 247.74 +4.89
Septimal whole tone 4 252.63 About this sound play  8:7 231.17 About this sound play  +21.46
Whole tone, major tone 3 189.47 9:8 203.91 About this sound play  −14.44
Whole tone, minor tone 3 189.47 About this sound play  10:9 182.40 About this sound play  +7.07
Greater tridecimal 2/3-tone 2 126.32 13:12 138.57 −12.26
Lesser tridecimal 2/3-tone 2 126.32 14:13 128.30 −1.98
Septimal diatonic semitone 2 126.32 15:14 119.44 About this sound play  +6.88
Diatonic semitone, just 2 126.32 16:15 111.73 About this sound play  +14.59
Septimal chromatic semitone 1 63.16 About this sound play  21:20 84.46 −21.31
Chromatic semitone, just 1 63.16 25:24 70.67 About this sound play  −7.51
Septimal third-tone 1 63.16 About this sound play  28:27 62.96 +0.20

See also[edit]

Sources[edit]

  1. ^ Milne, A., Sethares, W.A. and Plamondon, J.,"Isomorphic Controllers and Dynamic Tuning: Invariant Fingerings Across a Tuning Continuum", Computer Music Journal, Winter 2007, Vol. 31, No. 4, Pages 15-32.
  2. ^ Myles Leigh Skinner (2007). Toward a Quarter-tone Syntax: Analyses of Selected Works by Blackwood, Haba, Ives, and Wyschnegradsky, p.52. ISBN 9780542998478.
  3. ^ a b Woolhouse, W. S. B. (1835). Essay on Musical Intervals, Harmonics, and the Temperament of the Musical Scale, &c.. J. Souter, London.
  4. ^ http://tonalsoft.com/enc/number/19edo.aspx
  5. ^ C. Gamer, Some Combinational Resources of Equal-Tempered Systems. Journal of Music Theory, Vol. 11, No. 1 (Spring, 1967), pp. 32–59
  6. ^ Myles Leigh Skinner (2007). Toward a Quarter-tone Syntax: Analyses of Selected Works by Blackwood, Haba, Ives, and Wyschnegradsky, p.51n6. ISBN 9780542998478. Cites Leedy, Douglas (1991). "A Venerable Temperament Rediscovered", Persepctives of New Music 29/2, p.205.
  7. ^ Skinner 2007, p.76.

Further reading[edit]

  • Levy, Kenneth J.,Costeley's Chromatic Chanson, Annales Musicologues: Moyen-Age et Renaissance, Tome III (1955), pp. 213–261.

External links[edit]