2011 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Elena Kagan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The table below lists all opinions filed by Associate Justice Elena Kagan during the 2011 term of the Supreme Court of the United States, which began October 3, 2011 and concluded September 30, 2012. This was the second term of Kagan's tenure on the Court. Kagan 10-1-2010.jpg
Elena Kagan 2011 term statistics
7
Majority or Plurality
1
Concurrence
0
Other
1
Dissent
1
Concurrence/dissent Total = 10
Bench opinions = 10 Opinions relating to orders = 0 In-chambers opinions = 0
Unanimous opinions: 5 Most joined by: Ginsburg (8) Least joined by: Roberts, Thomas, Alito (6)
Type Case Citation Issues Joined by Other opinions
1-01


Judulang v. Holder • [full text] 565 U.S. ___ (2011)

deportation  • discretionary relief  • comparable-grounds rule  • Administrative Procedure Act Unanimous
The Court ruled that the Board of Immigration Appeals' "comparable-grounds rule" was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. The rule was used by the agency to determine the eligibility for discretionary relief of a long-term resident alien facing deportation for a past criminal conviction. The comparable-grounds rule asked whether the statutory deportation ground corresponded, in type and breadth, to a statutory exclusion ground under which a long-term resident alien who left the U.S. could be barred from re-entry. "But so what if it does?", the Court asked. "Each of these statutory grounds contains a slew of offenses. Whether each contains the same slew has nothing to do with whether a deportable alien whose prior conviction falls within both grounds merits the ability to seek a waiver." Comparing the comparable-grounds rule to decisionmaking by coin toss, the Court wrote that the rule was "unmoored from the purposes and concerns of the immigration laws. It allows an irrelevant comparison between statutory provisions to govern a matter of the utmost importance—whether lawful resident aliens with longstanding ties to this country may stay here." The rule was made further arbitrary by the fact that an official's choice of which of overlapping statutory deportation grounds covered a particular prior crime would itself determine the outcome of the comparison.
1-02


National Meat Assn. v. Harris 565 U.S. ___ (2012)

Unanimous
3-03


Messerschmidt v. Millender 565 U.S. ___ (2012)

Transparent.gif
Roberts
Transparent.gif
Breyer
Transparent.gif
Sotomayor
2-04


Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp. 565 U.S. ___ (2012)

Transparent.gif
Thomas
Transparent.gif
Sotomayor
1-05


Martel v. Claire 565 U.S. ___ (2012)

Unanimous
1-06


Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S 566 U.S. ___ (2012)

Unanimous
Transparent.gif
Sotomayor
1-07


Holder v. Martinez Gutierrez 566 U.S. ___ (2012)

Unanimous
4-08


Williams v. Illinois 567 U.S. ___ (2012)

Confrontation Clause Scalia, Ginsburg, Sotomayor
Transparent.gif
Alito
Transparent.gif
Thomas
Transparent.gif
Breyer
1-09


Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak 567 U.S. ___ (2012)

Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito
Transparent.gif
Sotomayor
1-10


Miller v. Alabama 567 U.S. ___ (2012)

Eighth Amendment  • Cruel and Unusual Punishment  • sentencing of juveniles to life without parole Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
Transparent.gif
Breyer
Transparent.gif
Roberts
Transparent.gif
Thomas
Transparent.gif
Alito

References[edit]