2011 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sonia Sotomayor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The table below lists all opinions filed by Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor during the 2011 term of the Supreme Court of the United States, which began October 3, 2011 and concluded September 30, 2012. This was the third term of Sotomayor's tenure on the Court. Sonia Sotomayor in SCOTUS robe.jpg
Sonia Sotomayor 2011 term statistics
6
Majority or Plurality
7
Concurrence
1
Other
7
Dissent
1
Concurrence/dissent Total = 22
Bench opinions = 19 Opinions relating to orders = 3 In-chambers opinions = 0
Unanimous opinions: 0 Most joined by: Ginsburg, Kagan (8) Least joined by: Kennedy, Alito (4)
Type Case Citation Issues Joined by Other opinions
4-01


Buck v. Thaler • [full text] 565 U.S. ___ (2011)

death penalty Kagan
Transparent.gif
Alito
Sotomayor dissented from the Court's denial of certiorari in a case involving the murder conviction and death sentence of an African-American in Texas state court. During the sentencing phase, a psychologist had improperly testified that blacks were more likely to be violent. Though the psychologist was a defense witness called to testify that the defendant would not pose a continuing threat to society behind bars, on cross-examination the prosecution further elicited statements from the psychologist regarding race as a predictor of future violence. In Sotomayor's view, "the salient fact was that the prosecution invited the jury to consider race as a factor in sentencing." Sotomayor also noted that the State had misrepresented to the lower courts the nature of other Texas death sentences that had involved the same psychologist but had already been set for resentencing, and she believed the District Court should have the opportunity to evaluate this case with a clear record.

Further reading

5-02


Cash v. Maxwell • [full text] 565 U.S. ___ (2012)

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act  • due process  • false testimony  • jailhouse informants
Transparent.gif
Scalia
Sotomayor filed a statement respecting the Court's denial of certiorari. A state court had found there was no credible or persuasive evidence that a jailhouse informant had lied in a murder trial when testifying that the defendant had confessed to him. Sotomayor agreed with the Ninth Circuit's finding that this was unreasonable, in light of voluminous evidence that the informant had lied about confessions in many other trials and had concededly lied about other matters in this trial, and therefore passed the high hurdle for setting aside a state court conviction under AEDPA. Disagreeing with Scalia's dissent, Sotomayor took issue with his characterization of the evidence that the informant lied as merely "circumstantial". She wrote that the dissent "insists that it is possible that Storch [the informant] repeatedly falsely implicated other defendants, and fabricated other material facts at Maxwell's trial, but uncharacteristically told the truth about Maxwell's supposed confession. Of course, that is possible. But it is not reasonable, given the voluminous evidence that Storch was a habitual liar who even the State concedes told other material lies at Maxwell's trial." She also noted that the Ninth Circuit had conducted the proper review under the law, and that the main purpose of granting certiorari is to clarify the law. "Mere disagreement with the Ninth Circuit's highly factbound conclusion is, in my opinion, an insufficient basis for granting certiorari."
2-03


CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood 565 U.S. ___ (2012)

Federal Arbitration Act Kagan
Transparent.gif
Scalia
Transparent.gif
Ginsburg
1-04


Gonzalez v. Thaler 565 U.S. ___ (2012)

Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Kagan
Transparent.gif
Scalia
4-05


Perry v. New Hampshire 565 U.S. ___ (2012)

Transparent.gif
Ginsburg
Transparent.gif
Thomas
2-06


United States v. Jones 565 U.S. ___ (2012)

Transparent.gif
Scalia
Transparent.gif
Alito
4-07


Messerschmidt v. Millender 565 U.S. ___ (2012)

Ginsburg
Transparent.gif
Roberts
Transparent.gif
Breyer
Transparent.gif
Kagan
3-08


Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp. 565 U.S. ___ (2012)

Ginsburg, Breyer
Transparent.gif
Thomas
Transparent.gif
Kagan
1-09


Roberts v. Sea-Land Services, Inc. 566 U.S. ___ (2012)

Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan
Transparent.gif
Ginsburg
2-10


Zivotofsky v. Clinton 566 U.S. ___ (2012)

Breyer (in part)
Transparent.gif
Roberts
Transparent.gif
Alito
Transparent.gif
Breyer
4-11


FAA v. Cooper 566 U.S. ___ (2012)

Ginsburg, Breyer
Transparent.gif
Alito
2-12


Filarsky v. Delia 566 U.S. ___ (2012)

qualified immunity
Transparent.gif
Roberts
Transparent.gif
Ginsburg
2-13


Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S 566 U.S. ___ (2012)

Transparent.gif
Kagan
2-14


Kappos v. Hyatt 566 U.S. ___ (2012)

patent law Breyer
Transparent.gif
Thomas
1-15


Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority 566 U.S. ___ (2012)

Torture Victim Protection Act Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Kagan; Scalia (in part)
Transparent.gif
Breyer
1-16


Hall v. United States 566 U.S. ___ (2012)

bankruptcy Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito
Transparent.gif
Breyer
4-17


Blueford v. Arkansas 566 U.S. ___ (2012)

double jeopardy Ginsburg, Kagan
Transparent.gif
Roberts
1-18


Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter 567 U.S. ___ (2012)

Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Kagan
Transparent.gif
Roberts
4-19


Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak 567 U.S. ___ (2012)

Transparent.gif
Kagan
4-20


Fairey v. Tucker 567 U.S. ___ (2012)

Sotomayor dissented from the Court's denial of certiorari.
2-21


Knox v. Service Employees 567 U.S. ___ (2012)

Ginsburg
Transparent.gif
Alito
Transparent.gif
Breyer
1-22


Southern Union Co. v. United States 567 U.S. ___ (2012)

Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg, Kagan
Transparent.gif
Breyer

References[edit]