AMD Zodiac

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
AMD Zodiac
ZenairCH 601XLN601XC.jpg
Zenair CH 601 XL with Continental O-200 engine
Role Kit aircraft
Manufacturer Aircraft Manufacturing and Design
Designer Chris Heintz
Introduction 1984
Retired N/A
Status in production
Primary users recreational pilots/sport pilots
private pilots
Produced Eastman, Georgia
Number built More than 1,000
Unit cost
US$18,500 (kit only, December 2011)[1]
Zenair CH 601 HDS Zodiac
Zenair CH 601XL with tailwheel undercarriage, Rotax 912ULS engine and three blade propeller.
Zenair CH601XL

The Zodiac is a family of Canadian all-metal, two-seat, fixed landing gear airplanes that first flew in 1984. The aircraft have been produced as kits and completed aircraft by Zenair in Canada and Zenith Aircraft Company in the USA.[1][2]

The latest models in the Zodiac family are the ready-to-fly AMD Zodiac LS and LSi produced by Aircraft Manufacturing and Design.[3] The design has a single-piece bubble canopy.

Development[edit]

The Zodiac airplane was developed by Avions Pierre Robin engineer Chris Heintz in the early 1970s. The Zenair CH 200 kit plane was developed as a Homebuilt aircraft, meaning that consumers can purchase the plane as components to assemble it themselves.[3][4] Variants of the Zodiac has since been manufactured in Canada, Europe, USA and South America as a factory-assembled, ready-to-fly aircraft.[3]

Heintz drafted the regulations for light-sport aircraft in Canada around the time he designed the Zodiac. He also played an important role in drafting the current light-sport aircraft (LSA) rules for the United States.

Zenith Aircraft Company still produces kits and Quick-build kits for the Zodiac kit for the homebuilt-market.[5]

Operational history[edit]

Safety incidents and grounding[edit]

Wing-related incidents[edit]

In the Netherlands, the Dutch government grounded the 12 Dutch-registered CH 601 XLs on 24 October 2008. The planes were banned from flying pending an investigation into their structural strength, following the crash of a European variant of the design (Rotax powered and 450 kg (992 lb) maximum take-off weight) that killed two people. According to the Dutch government, since 2005 "at least seven accidents with Zenith CH601 XL's have happened in which one or both wings have failed".[6] Zenair Europe investigated these accidents,[7] concluded that none are due to a design defect and, after a first-hand review of the wreckage, also rejected suggestions that the aircraft in the Dutch accident experienced a structural failure.[8]

On 14 April 2009, the NTSB wrote an urgent letter to the FAA recommending that they ground all Zodiac CH 601 XLs, saying "It appears that aerodynamic flutter is the likely source of four of the U.S. accidents and of at least two foreign accidents".[9] The NTSB also wrote to ASTM International, the body responsible for developing standards for light sport aircraft, recommending that those standards be changed in light of the investigation. The NTSB says that the type has been involved "in six in-flight structural breakups since 2006".[9][10][11][12][13]

Zenith Aircraft disputed the NTSB's conclusions and stated in a response on their website that "[w]e continue to believe wing flutter will not occur if the control cables are adjusted properly."[14] They also cited Zenair Europe's disagreement with the Dutch government's conclusion that that accident was caused by flutter. AMD issued a safety alert in October 2008 mandating inspections of aileron control cable tensions.[15] The company hired an independent consultant, Dr. Uwe Weltin, an internationally recognized flutter and vibrations specialist and head of the Institut für Zuverlaessigkeitstechnik at the Technical University of Hamburg-Harburg who concluded that when the CH 601 XL is built and maintained to Zenair specifications, there is "no tendency to flutter or divergence found within the flight envelope of the CH 601 XL". The company claimed that the report clears the Zodiac design of flutter-related concerns as long as CH 601 XL is built and maintained to Zenair specifications.[16]

In reacting to the NTSB recommendations the FAA Administrator Randy Babbit declined to ground the aircraft and in a 13 July 2009 letter, stated "Data indicates the CH-601XL has a safety record similar to other S-LSA and appears capable of safe flight and operations if maintained according to the manufacturer’s recommendations."[17]

On 6 November 2009 an amateur-built CH-601XL broke up in flight over Arkansas, resulting in the death of the pilot. Preliminary investigation of the accident revealed a failure mode similar to that seen in the earlier crashes, as both wings separated in flight. This brought the number of crashes to seven and deaths to 11.[18][19]

The FAA issued a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin on 7 November 2009 and strongly recommended that the aircraft not be flown until modifications detailed in an AMD Safety Alert are carried out. AMD and Zenith Aircraft issued documents the same day, mandating that the S-LSA version not be flown until the modifications were completed and recommended all aircraft be modified. The modifications included strengthening of the main and rear wing spar carrythroughs and the addition of aileron balance weights. The Experimental Aircraft Association also recommended grounding all affected aircraft until modifications are complete.[20][21][22][23][24]

In a statement issued by Zenith Aircraft, the designer, Chris Heintz in response to the question "Why are you recommending this Upgrade Package? What has prompted this "180- degree" shift, from insisting that the CH 601 XL design was fine "as is", to now mandating a list of upgrades requiring more than a dozen modifications?" stated:

The past two years have been challenging for the CH 601 XL community around the world. As we all know, a number of accidents have occurred over the span of a few years for which no common cause has been determined. This lack of a "smoking gun" has caused all kinds of conjectures and wild guesses as to probable cause, and each time a new "theory" or "solution" is proposed, I and numerous engineers spend long hours trying to validate or rebuke the latest round of speculation. To this date, after thousands of man-hours of investigations, multiple design reviews and an unheard-of amount of testing, the accidents in question still do not share a common cause. In offering this “Upgrade Package” I have had to set aside my own professional opinion (that the design is sound) as well as legal counsel’s advice in order to provide builders, owners and pilots the “fix” that they have been asking me for. With these upgrades (my "180° shift"), the safety margins of key airframe components have been dramatically increased...[25]

On 12 November 2009 the FAA ceased issuing new Certificates of Airworthiness, requiring new registrants to prove that they have complied with the modifications before being permitted to fly the aircraft.[19]

In addressing the 6 November 2009 accident NTSB Chairman Deborah A.P. Hersman said on 13 November 2009:

We are pleased that the FAA and the manufacturer have acted on the safety-of-flight issues that we identified with the Zodiac special light sport airplane. We are troubled, however, that no modifications are required on the amateur-built planes. We are very concerned that a lack of required compliance may lead to more accidents like the one in Arkansas, and others we've already seen.[18]

The FAA completed an in-depth review of the CH601 XL and 650 and issued a report entitled Zodiac CH601 XL Airplane Special Review Team Report January 2010. The FAA concluded:[26][27]

FAA review of the in-flight failures did not indicate a single root cause, but instead implicated the potential combination of several design and operation aspects. Our preliminary assessments focused on the strength and stability of the wing structure. Further analysis during the special review found the loads the manufacturer used to design the structure do not meet the design standards for a 1,320 lb (600kg) airplane. Static load test data verifies our conclusion. The special review also identified issues with the airplane’s flutter characteristics, stick force gradients, airspeed calibration, and operating limitations.[26]

In reacting to the FAA's report the Experimental Aircraft Association's Vice President of Industry and Regulatory Affairs, Earl Lawrence, said, "The FAA did an excellent job with this investigation and deserves credit for thoroughly exploring all possibilities. EAA had vigorously pushed for comprehensive data on these accidents. We wanted to see the data, so aircraft owners knew exactly what modifications were needed and why they were needed immediately."[28]

Variants[edit]

Zenair CH 600
The original version of the Zodiac, the CH 600, was designed by Chris Heintz and first flown in 1984. The aircraft was intended as a primary trainer.[2]
Zenair CH 601 HD
The CH 601 HD (for heavy duty) was the follow-on to the original CH 600 and incorporated many improvements to the design. The HD version had a gross weight of 1200 lbs and a standard empty weight of 530 lbs. Aircraft kits were marketed by Zenair of Midland, Ontario in Canada and by Zenith Aircraft of Mexico, Missouri.[29]
Zenair CH 601 HDS
The CH 601 HDS (for heavy duty speedwing) was a version of the HD with the wing span is reduced to 23 feet (7.0 m) and a wing area of just 98 square feet (9.1 m2). The wing also featured a tapered design with a 34 inch chord at the wing tip.[30]
Zenair CH 601 UL
The UL version of the CH 601 was specially designed for the Canadian Advanced Ultralight Aeroplane category that was introduced in 1991. Heintz was instrumental in the creation of the category as the author of the standards and used the CH 601 as a model for the category. The UL version had a reduced gross weight of 1058 lbs, the maximum allowed in the category. When the gross weight for the AULA category was increased to 1200 lbs in 2001 the CH 601 UL had its gross weight increased to the 1200 lb mark also. The UL version was supplied in 51% or 85% kit or completed form by Zenair in Canada and was designed for engines of 80–100 horsepower (60–75 kW). The aircraft did not neatly fit any US categories and US buyers were advised to consider the HD instead.[29][31][32]
Zenith CH 601 XL
The CH 601 XL was first flown in 1991 as an improved version of the HD developed for the amateur-built market and also for the American Light Sport Aircraft category. The XL features many incremental improvements over the HD, including a new wing design, wing fuel tanks to replace the fuselage tanks of the HD, new landing gear design and a new canopy.[5][29]
Zenith CH650 with a Covair engine
Zenith CH 650
Modernized version of the 601, with a larger cockpit, a larger canopy with more headroom, swept-back fin and rudder and engine options that include the 120 hp (89 kW) Jabiru 3300, 100 hp (75 kW) Continental O-200 and 100 hp (75 kW) Rotax 912ULS. One hundred had been completed and flown by December 2011.[1][33][34]
AMD Zodiac XL & XLi
The completed US Light Sport Aircraft compliant version of the XL is the AMD Zodiac produced by Aircraft Manufacturing and Design of Eastman, Georgia, USA. The aircraft is available in two versions, the XL, and the XLi. The XLi is IFR equipped for night flying and instrument flight conditions, while the XL is only equipped for VFR day and night flying.[3]
AMD Zodiac LS and LSi
Zodiac CH 650 in VFR and IFR versions. Standard engine is the 100 hp (75 kW) Continental O-200[3]

Production[edit]

There are over 1000 Zodiac aircraft flying worldwide.[3]

Specifications (AMD Zodiac XL)[edit]

Data from AMD website[3]

General characteristics

Performance

Avionics

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Vandermeullen, Richard: 2011 Kit Aircraft Buyer's Guide, Kitplanes, Volume 28, Number 12, December 2011, page 77. Belvoir Publications. ISSN 0891-1851
  2. ^ a b Zenith Aircraft Company (November 2006). "ZODIAC CH 601 HD". Archived from the original on 12 April 2008. Retrieved 2008-03-01. 
  3. ^ a b c d e f g Aircraft Manufacturing & Design (September 2008). "Zodiac 650". Archived from the original on 27 September 2010. Retrieved 7 October 2010. 
  4. ^ Howard Levy (Summer 1971). "Zenith French homebuilt with factory flavor". Air Trails. 
  5. ^ a b Zenith Aircraft Company (February 2008). "ZODIAC XL". Archived from the original on 2 March 2008. Retrieved 2008-03-01. 
  6. ^ Inspectie houdt twaalf sportvliegtuigjes aan de grond http://www.ivw.nl/actueel/nieuws/inspectiehoudttwaalfsportvliegtuigjesaandegrond.aspx (in Dutch)
  7. ^ Zenair Europe News http://www.zenairulm.com/News/index_files/Page555.htm
  8. ^ Zenair Europe News http://www.zenairulm.com/News/index_files/Page802.htm
  9. ^ a b National Transportation Safety Board (April 2009). "Safety Recommendation". Archived from the original on 14 May 2009. Retrieved 2009-04-15. 
  10. ^ CNN news story on NTSB letter http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/04/14/ntsb.small.plane/index.html
  11. ^ NTSB letter to ASTM http://www.ntsb.gov/recs/letters/2009/A09_38_40.pdf
  12. ^ National Transportation Safety Board (April 2009). "NTSB ASKS FAA TO ‘PROHIBIT FURTHER FLIGHT’ OF LIGHT SPORT AIRPLANE TIED TO IN-FLIGHT BREAKUPS". Archived from the original on 18 April 2009. Retrieved 2009-04-15. 
  13. ^ Lowy, Joan (April 2009). "NTSB: Light sport plane can break apart in flight". Archived from the original on 18 April 2009. Retrieved 2009-04-15. 
  14. ^ Zenith Aircraft Company (April 2009). "News from Zenith Aircraft Company". Archived from the original on 20 April 2009. Retrieved 2009-04-15. 
  15. ^ Aircraft Manufacturing & Design, LLC (October 2008). "AMD Safety Alert, October 29, 2008". Retrieved 2009-04-15. 
  16. ^ Zenair Europe (July 2009). "http://www.zenairulm.com/News/index_files/Page372.htm". Archived from the original on 20 June 2009. Retrieved 2009-07-03. [dead link]
  17. ^ Zenith Aircraft (August 2009). "Zodiac CH 601 XL / CH 650 update – July 27, 2009". Retrieved 2009-08-08. 
  18. ^ a b National Transportation Safety Board (November 2009). "AIRPLANE TYPE NTSB RECOMMENDED TO BE GROUNDED INVOLVED IN ANOTHER FATAL ACCIDENT". Retrieved 2009-11-14. 
  19. ^ a b Pew, Glenn (November 2009). "New Zodiac In-Flight Break-up Shows FAA/NTSB Rift". Archived from the original on 19 November 2009. Retrieved 2009-11-16. 
  20. ^ Federal Aviation Administration (November 2009). "Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin CE-10-08". Retrieved 2009-11-09. 
  21. ^ Aircraft Manufacturing & Design, LLC (November 2009). "AMD Safety Alert - Directive, November 7, 2009". Archived from the original on 27 November 2009. Retrieved 2009-11-09. 
  22. ^ Pew, Glenn (November 2009). "EAA Recommends Grounding Zodiacs Until Fixed". Retrieved 2009-11-10. 
  23. ^ Experimental Aircraft Association (November 2009). "FAA Issues Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin on Zodiac CH601XL and CH650 Aircraft". Retrieved 2009-11-10. 
  24. ^ Zenith Aircraft (November 2009). "FAA Issues Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin CE-10-08 (Nov. 7, 2009): Zodiac CH601 XL". Retrieved 2009-11-10. 
  25. ^ Zenith Aircraft (November 2009). "Q&A with Chris Heintz". Retrieved 2009-11-10. 
  26. ^ a b Federal Aviation Administration (January 2010). "Zodiac CH601 XL Airplane Special Review Team Report". Archived from the original on 7 March 2010. Retrieved 2010-02-27. 
  27. ^ Grady, Mary (February 2010). "FAA Issues Special Report On Zodiac Accidents". Retrieved 2010-02-27. 
  28. ^ Experimental Aircraft Association (February 2010). "FAA’s Zodiac Aircraft Report Sets Future Direction". Retrieved 2010-02-27. 
  29. ^ a b c Kitplanes Staff: 1999 Kit Aircraft Directory, page 76. Primedia Publications, December 1998.
  30. ^ Zenith Aircraft Company (May 2004). "ZODIAC CH 601 HDS". Retrieved 2008-03-01. 
  31. ^ Canadian Owners and Pilots Association: COPA Guide to Ultralights 10th Edition, October 2006, pages 9-10. Canadian Owners and Pilots Association
  32. ^ Zenith Aircraft Company (May 2002). "ZODIAC CH 601 UL". Archived from the original on 4 April 2008. Retrieved 2008-03-01. 
  33. ^ Zenith Aircraft (December 2009). "The Zodiac CH 650: New and updated features with modern new styling". Retrieved 2010-02-27. 
  34. ^ Bayerl, Robby; Martin Berkemeier; et al: World Directory of Leisure Aviation 2011-12, page 129. WDLA UK, Lancaster UK, 2011. ISSN 1368-485X
  35. ^ Lednicer, David (October 2007). "The Incomplete Guide to Airfoil Usage". Retrieved 2008-03-01. 

External links[edit]