Academy (English school)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Mossbourne Community Academy, the successor to Hackney Downs School. (October 2005)

Academy schools are state funded schools in England which are directly funded by central government (specifically, the Department for Education) and independent of direct control by local government in England. Most are secondary schools, for pupils aged 11 to 16, but some cater for children from nursery age upwards, or for children aged 4 and upwards. All have a curriculum specialism within the English Specialist Schools Programme (SSP).[1] They are roughly equivalent to the charter schools in the USA.[citation needed]

Academies are self-governing and most are constituted as registered charities or operated by other educational charities, and may receive additional support from personal or corporate sponsors, either financially or in kind. They must meet the same National Curriculum core subject requirements as other state schools and are subject to inspection by Ofsted.

History[edit]

The Labour Government under Tony Blair established academies in 2000. The chief architect of the policy was Andrew Adonis (now Lord Adonis, formerly Secretary of State at the Department for Transport) in his capacity as education advisor to the Prime Minister in the late 1990s.[2]

The introduction of academy schools was opposed, notably by teachers' trade unions and some high-profile members within the Labour Party, such as former party leader Lord Kinnock.[3][4] There are no academies in Wales, as education policy there is devolved to the Welsh Assembly. To date [2013], the Welsh Government has followed a policy of having no academy-status schools in the country.

By May 2010 there were 203 academies in England.[5] The Academies Act 2010 sought to expand the number of academies and additionally extended academies with the introduction of the Free Schools Programme. By April 2011, the number of academies had increased to 629, and by August 2011, reached 1070.[6] As of July 2012 this number reached 1957, double that of the previous year.[7] and, at 1 November 2013, it stood at 3,444.[7]

Definition[edit]

An academy in the education system in England is a type of school that is independent of Local Education Authority control but is publicly funded, with some private sponsorship. It is roughly equivalent to the American charter school.[8] This type of school was initiated in 2000 and known as a city academy for the first few years, but the term was changed to academy by an amendment in the Education Act 2002.[9]

City academies were legally created by the Learning and Skills Act 2000,[10] which amended the section of the Education Act 1996 relating to City Technology Colleges.[11] They were first announced in a speech by David Blunkett, then Secretary of State for Education and Skills, in 2000.[12]

Academies are initially intended to address the problem of entrenched failure within English schools with low academic achievement,[13] or schools situated in communities with few or no academic aspirations. Often these schools have been placed in "special measures" after an OFSTED inspection, a term denoting a school that is "failing or likely to fail to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education".[14] This situation changed dramatically when a new Conservative Government stopped funding for each Specialism [i.e. Technology College Status] and meant that High Schools could have an average shortfall of £250K. The only way to possibly make up this shortfall was to become an Academy and receive the full funding direct from government and hopefully buy back services at a cheaper rate. This, along with some schools wanting more independence from LEA control, means that many state secondary schools in England have now converted to academies, or are in the process of converting.[15]

Features of an academy[edit]

Academies are established in a way that is intended to be "creative" and "innovative" in order to give them the freedoms considered necessary to deal with the long-term issues they are intended to solve. Each academy has a private sponsor who can be an individual (such as Sir David Garrard, who sponsors Business Academy Bexley) or an organisation (such as the United Learning Trust or Amey plc). These sponsors are intended to bring "qualities of success" to academies, again to help them change the long-term trend of failure in the schools they replace (known as predecessor schools).

In return for an investment of 10% of the academy's capital costs (up to a maximum of £2m), the sponsor is able to influence the process of establishing the school, including its curriculum, ethos, specialism and building (if a new one is being built). The Department has recently become more flexible about the requirement for this financial investment in a move to encourage successful existing schools and charities to become sponsors. The sponsor also has the power to appoint governors to the academy's governing body. Academies typically replace one or more existing schools, but some are newly established. The remainder of the capital and running costs are met by the state in the usual way for UK state schools through grants funded by the local authority.

Academies are expected to follow a broad and balanced curriculum but with a particular focus on one or more areas. Current specialisms include science; arts; business and enterprise; computing; engineering; maths and computing; modern foreign languages; performing arts; sport; and technology.[16] Academies can select up to 10% of pupils by aptitude for the school's specialism in a way similar to specialist schools. Although academies are required to follow the national curriculum in the core subjects of maths, English and science,[17] they are otherwise free to innovate, although they still participate in the same Key Stage 3 and GCSE exams as other English schools (which effectively means they teach a curriculum very similar to maintained schools, with small variations).

In terms of their governance, academies are established as companies limited by guarantee with a governing body that acts as a Trust. The governors also act as the Trust's Board of Directors (they are legally, but not financially, accountable for the operation of the academy). The Trust serves as the legal entity which the school is part of, and the governing body oversees the running of the school (although the day to day management of the school is, as in most schools, conducted by the principal and their senior management team, who are appointed by the sponsor).

Support for the academies scheme[edit]

Whilst still in the fairly early stage of development, supporters point to emerging data showing "striking"[18] improvements in GCSE results for academies compared to their predecessors,[13] with early results showing that "GCSE results are improving twice as fast in academies as in state schools".[2]

In an article in The Observer that regarded many of the Government's claims for academies with scepticism, journalist Geraldine Bedell conceded that:

They seem, so far, to be working – not all as spectacularly as Mossbourne, but much better than most of the struggling inner-city schools they replaced.[17]

The article singles out the cited academy, Mossbourne Community Academy in Hackney, as "apparently the most popular [school] in Britain – at least with politicians" and "the top school in the country for value-added results".[17]

Criticism of and opposition to the academies scheme[edit]

Academies are controversial,[17][19][20][21][22] and their existence has frequently been opposed and challenged by politicians,[22] commentators,[23] teachers, teachers' unions,[22][24] and parents.[14] Even after several years of operation and with a number of academies open and reporting successes,[17][24] the programme continues to come under attack for creating schools that are said to be, among other things, a waste of money,[25] selective,[26][27] damaging to the schools and communities around them,[17] forced on parents who do not want them,[14] and a move towards privatisation of education "by the back door".[26]

The House of Commons Education & Skills Select Committee reported in March 2005 that it would have been wiser to limit the programme to 30 or 50 academies in order to evaluate the results before expanding the programme, and that "the rapid expansion of the Academy policy comes at the expense of rigorous evaluation".[28] The Select Committee was concerned that the promising results achieved by some academies may be due to increased exclusions of harder-to-teach pupils. They noted that two Middlesbrough academies had expelled 61 pupils, compared to just 15 from all other secondary schools in the borough.[19]

The programme of creating academies has also been heavily criticised by some for handing schools to private sector entrepreneurs who in many cases have no experience of the education sector – most infamously, the Evangelical Christian car dealer, Sir Peter Vardy, who has been accused of promoting the teaching of creationism alongside macroevolution in his Emmanuel Schools Foundation academies.[14][17] This is also linked to the wider debate in the education sector as to the benefits or otherwise of the growing role of religion in the school system being promoted by the New Labour government in general, and Tony Blair in particular, with many[29][30] academies (one estimate puts it at "more than half"[31]) being sponsored either by religious groups or organisations/individuals with a religious affiliation.[32]

Former leader of the Labour Party Neil Kinnock has criticised the academies scheme saying that they were a "distortion of choice" because they allowed schools to choose pupils, not parents to choose schools. He said they risked creating a "seller's market" with "schools selecting parents and children instead of parents selecting schools".[4]

There are indications that several city academies are failing.[23] Ofsted has placed the Unity City Academy[33] in Middlesbrough and the Richard Rose Central Academy[34] in Carlisle under special measures, heavily criticised the West London Academy[35] in Ealing and condemned standards at the Business Academy in Bexley, Kent.[35]

The Richard Rose Central Academy in Carlisle, sponsored by Eddie Stobart owner Andrew Tinkler, and local businessman Brian Scowcroft opened in September 2008. By January 2009, there were protests by parents and pupils regarding poor quality education and school facilities. The school was found to be failing[34] and was placed in special measures, with the headmaster and chief executive being immediately replaced.[36]

The programme has further been attacked for its expense: it costs on average £25m[19] to build an academy, much of which is taken up by the costs of new buildings. Critics contend that this is significantly more than it costs to build a new local authority school.[37] Some operators are paying senior staff six-figure salaries, partly funded by central government.[38]

In 2012, the academy scheme was applied to primary schools, and the government began forcing some schools that had been graded satisfactory or lower into becoming academies, unilaterally removing existing governing bodies and head teachers in some cases. An example was Downhills Primary School in Haringey, where the head teacher refused to turn the school into an academy. OFSTED were called in to assess the school, failed it, and both the head and the governing body were removed and replaced with a Government-appointed board despite opposition from the school and parents.[39][40]

Party policies, and developments since the end of the Labour Government[edit]

The Conservative Party has supported the academy proposal from its inception but wants the scheme to go further.[41] This accord was reflected in a remark made by Conservative spokesman David Willetts in 2006:

I am more authentically Andrew Adonis than Andrew Adonis is

In 2004, the Liberal Democrats were reported as being "split" on the issue and so decided that academies should not be mentioned in the party's education policy.[43] The position of Phil Willis, the education spokesman at the time, was summarised as:

… there [are] no plans to abolish either city academies or specialist schools if the Lib Dems came to power, though "they would be brought under local authority control".

In 2005, Willis' successor, Ed Davey, argued that academies were creating a "two-tier education system"[44] and called for the academy programme to be halted until "a proper analysis can be done".[45]

As of 2008, academies are supported by all three main political parties,[46] with a further cross-party initiative to extend the programme into primary schools currently being considered.[47]

In 2010 the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats coalition government announced plans to expand the academy programme with the Academies Act 2010. In May 2010 the Education secretary Michael Gove wrote to all state schools in England inviting them to opt out of Local Authority Control and convert to academy status. Gove also stated that some academies could be created in time for the new Academic year in September 2010.[48] As of 23 July 2010, 153 schools in England had applied for academy status, lower than the prediction that more than 1,000 would do so.[49] In spite of the expanding Academy programme, in August 2010 Gove announced that 75 existing academy rebuild projects were likely to be scaled back.[50] Nevertheless, by September 2012, the majority of state secondary schools in England had become Academies.[51]

Comparisons[edit]

The city academy programme was originally based on the programme of City Technology Colleges (CTCs) created by the Conservative government under Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s, which were also business-sponsored.

Currently, the Government is encouraging CTCs to convert to academies; several have already done so (for example, Djanogly CTC is now Djanogly City Academy).

Academies differ from CTCs in several ways; most notably, academies cannot select more than 10% of pupils by ability, whereas CTCs can.

Academies have been compared to US charter schools,[8] which are publicly funded schools largely independent of state and federal control.

Operators of academies[edit]

A number of private and charitable organisations run groups of academies. These major operators include ARK Schools, Academies Enterprise Trust,[52] E-ACT (formerly Edutrust Academies Charitable Trust), Emmanuel Schools Foundation, Harris Federation, Learning Schools Trust, Oasis Trust, Ormiston Academies Trust, Priory Federation, Schools Partnership Trust and United Learning Trust.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Specialist Schools". The Standards Site. Department for Children, Schools and Families. Archived from the original on 18 December 2008. Retrieved 15 December 2008. 
  2. ^ a b Garner, Richard (8 October 2008). "The Big Question: What are academy schools, and is their future under threat?". London: The Independent. Retrieved 31 December 2009. 
  3. ^ Teachers' leader slams academy school plan, The Observer, 23 March 2008.
  4. ^ a b "Kinnock criticises city academies". BBC News. 18 April 2006. Retrieved 29 November 2009. 
  5. ^ "Q&A: Academies and free schools". BBC News. 26 May 2010. 
  6. ^ "Open academies and academy projects in development – The Department for Education". Education.gov.uk. 19 August 2011. Retrieved 29 August 2011. 
  7. ^ a b http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/leadership/typesofschools/academies/b00208569/open-academies
  8. ^ a b Rebecca Smithers, The Guardian, 6 July 2005, "Hedge fund charity plans city academies"
  9. ^ "Education Act 2002 (c. 32)". Opsi.gov.uk. 17 August 2011. Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  10. ^ "Learning and Skills Act 2000 (c. 21)". Opsi.gov.uk. 17 August 2011. Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  11. ^ "Education Act 1996 (c. 56)". Opsi.gov.uk. 17 August 2011. Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  12. ^ "EDUCATION | 'City academies' to tackle school failure". BBC News. 15 September 2000. Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  13. ^ a b Smith, Jacqui (15 November 2005). "This is a comprehensive success story". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 31 December 2009. 
  14. ^ a b c d Harris, John (15 January 2005). "What a creation ...". The Guardian (London). Archived from the original on 30 November 2009. Retrieved 31 December 2009. 
  15. ^ "Huge increase in academies takes total to more than 2300", Dept. for Education Press Notice, Sept. 7 2012. (http://www.education.gov.uk/inthenews/inthenews/a00213703/huge-increase-in-academies-takes-total-to-more-than-2300)
  16. ^ The Standards Site: Curriculum and Assessment
  17. ^ a b c d e f g Bedell, Geraldine (31 August 2008). "Children of the revolution". London: The Observer. Archived from the original on 1 September 2008. Retrieved 2 September 2008. 
  18. ^ Adonis, Andrew (31 December 2009). "Academies are a success story". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 3 September 2008. 
  19. ^ a b c Parkinson, Justin (17 March 2005). "Education | Why the fuss over city academies?". BBC News. Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  20. ^ Adams, Stephen (24 August 2008). "City academies: Lord Adonis announces plan to step up expansion plan". London: Telegraph. Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  21. ^ Academies reverse years of failure in city schools – Times Online[dead link]
  22. ^ a b c Rebecca Smithers, education editor (19 January 2006). "Half of city academies among worst-performing schools | Education". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  23. ^ a b Roy Hattersley, The Guardian, 6 June 2005, "And now, over to our sponsors"
  24. ^ a b Polly Curtis, The Guardian, 1 November 2004, "Academies 'gagging' teachers"
  25. ^ Rebecca Smithers, The Guardian, 31 August 2004, "Flagship schools attacked over costs"
  26. ^ a b Bob Roberts (28 July 2006). "Exclusive: Flushed Out". Daily Mirror. Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  27. ^ "Education | Teachers 'oppose city academies'". BBC News. 14 March 2005. Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  28. ^ The Committee Office, House of Commons. "House of Commons – Education and Skills – Fifth Report". Publications.parliament.uk. Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  29. ^ "Education | Faith groups back more academies". BBC News. 17 July 2004. Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  30. ^ Gaby Hinsliff, political editor (8 August 2005). "City schools could be front for evangelists | UK news | The Observer". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  31. ^ "Root of All Evil? Part 2: The Virus of Faith" by Richard DawkinsChannel 4 – RichardDawkins.net
  32. ^ Garner, Richard (12 April 2006). "Faith schools are 'at odds with reason', says chaplain – Education News, Education". The Independent (London). Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  33. ^ Smithers, Rebecca (28 May 2005). "New-style academy condemned as failure". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 27 March 2010. 
  34. ^ a b "Ofsted inspection report, Richard Rose Central Academy". Retrieved 9/2/09. 
  35. ^ a b Press Association (7 March 2006). "Ofsted criticises London academy standards | Education". The Guardian. Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  36. ^ "Richard Rose Central Academy: Press Release". Retrieved 9/2/09. 
  37. ^ Behr, Rafael. "How car dealers can run state schools". New Statesman. Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  38. ^ Shepherd, Jessica (14 November 2011). "Academies pay £200k salaries". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 15 November 2011. "Charities that run chains of academy schools are using public funds to pay senior staff six-figure salaries, with some on £240,000 or more." 
  39. ^ "Academy row school governors sacked by Michael Gove". BBC News. 15 March 2012. 
  40. ^ "Protesting Tottenham parents 'disgusted' with Downhills Primary School governors' removal". Retrieved 18 May 2013. 
  41. ^ "Education | Parents back academies says Blair". BBC News. 12 September 2005. Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  42. ^ Baker, Mike (19 May 2006). "Education | Blair's legacy for schools". BBC News. Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  43. ^ a b Hélène Mulholland in Bournemouth (21 September 2004). "Lib Dems split over city academies | Politics". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  44. ^ Matthew Taylor, education correspondent (31 October 2005). "City academies accused of deserting poor | Politics". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  45. ^ "Doubts grow over city academies – Education News, Education". The Independent (London). 28 May 2005. Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  46. ^ Polly Curtis, education editor (30 August 2008). "As 51 academy schools prepare for first day, GCSEs show work still to be done | Education". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  47. ^ Polly Curtis, education editor (16 July 2008). "Education: Expand academy model into primary sector, says thinktank | Education". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 21 August 2011. 
  48. ^ Angela Harrison (30 July 2010). "Michael Gove defends academy schools list". BBC. Archived from the original on 6 August 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2010. 
  49. ^ Shepherd, Jessica; Wintour, Patrick (29 July 2010). "Michael Gove's academy plan under fire as scale of demand emerges". The Guardian (London). Archived from the original on 1 August 2010. Retrieved 31 July 2010. 
  50. ^ Hannah Richardson (6 August 2010). "Rebuild plans for 75 schools scaled back". BBC. Archived from the original on 6 August 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2010. 
  51. ^ Jessica Shepherd (5 April 2012). "Academies to become a majority among state secondary schools". Manchester Guardian. Retrieved 15 April 2014. 
  52. ^ "Academies Enterprise Trust". Academies Enterprise Trust. Archived from the original on 24 July 2011. Retrieved 21 August 2011. 

External links[edit]