Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film
Awarded for Excellence in world cinema
Location Los Angeles
Country United States
Presented by Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences
First awarded 1956
Currently held by Paolo Sorrentino
The Great Beauty (Italy, 2013)
Official website http://www.oscars.org/

The Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film is one of the Academy Awards of Merit, or Oscars, handed out annually by the U.S.-based Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS). It is given to a feature-length motion picture produced outside the United States of America with a predominantly non-English dialogue track.[1]

When the first Academy Awards ceremony was held on May 16, 1929 to honor films released in 1927/28, there was no separate category for foreign language films. Between 1947 and 1955, the Academy presented Special/Honorary Awards to the best foreign language films released in the United States. These Awards, however, were not handed out on a regular basis (no Award was given in 1953), and were not competitive since there were no nominees but simply one winning film per year. For the 1956 (29th) Academy Awards, a competitive Academy Award of Merit, known as the Best Foreign Language Film Award, was created for non-English speaking films, and has been given annually since then.

Unlike other Academy Awards, the Best Foreign Language Film Award is not presented to a specific individual. It is accepted by the winning film's director, but is considered an award for the submitting country as a whole. Over the years, the Best Foreign Language Film Award and its predecessors have been given almost exclusively to European films: out of the 66 Awards handed out by the Academy since 1947 to foreign language films, fifty-four have gone to European films,[2] six to Asian films,[3] three to African films and three to films from the Americas. Italian filmmaker Federico Fellini directed four Best Foreign Language Film Academy Award–winning motion pictures during his lifetime, a record that remains unmatched as of 2007 (if Special Awards are taken into account, then Fellini's record is tied by his fellow countryman Vittorio De Sica). The most awarded foreign country is Italy, with 11 awards won, 3 Special Awards and 28 nominations, while Israel is the foreign country to have the most nominations, 10, without winning an award. Portugal has the highest number of submissions (30) without a single nomination.

History[edit]

When the first Academy Awards ceremony was held in 1929, no foreign language film was honored. During the early post-war era (1947–1955), eight foreign language films received Special or Honorary Awards. Academy leader and board member Jean Hersholt argued that "an international award, if properly and carefully administered, would promote a closer relationship between American film craftsmen and those of other countries." The first foreign language film honored with such an award was the Italian neorealist drama Shoe-Shine, whose citation read: "the high quality of this motion picture, brought to eloquent life in a country scarred by war, is proof to the world that the creative spirit can triumph over adversity." In the following years, similar awards were given to seven other films: one from Italy (The Bicycle Thief), two from France (Monsieur Vincent and Forbidden Games), three from Japan (Rashomon, Gate of Hell and Samurai, The Legend of Musashi), as well as a Franco-Italian co-production (The Walls of Malapaga). These awards, however, were handed out on a discretionary rather than a regular basis (no award was given at the 26th Academy Awards held in 1954), and were not competitive since there were no nominees but simply one winning film per year.[4]

A separate category for non-English-language films was created in 1956. Known as the Best Foreign Language Film Award, it has been awarded annually since then.[5] The first recipient was the Italian neorealist drama La Strada, which helped establish Federico Fellini as one of the most important European directors.[4]

Eligibility[edit]

Unlike other Academy Awards, the Foreign Language Film Award does not require films to be released in the United States in order to be eligible for competition. Films competing in the Foreign Language Film category must have been first released in the country submitting them during the eligibility period defined by the rules of the Academy, and must have been exhibited for at least seven consecutive days in a commercial movie theater.[1] The eligibility period for the Foreign Language Film category differs from that required for most other categories: the awards year defined for the Foreign Language Film category usually begins and ends before the ordinary awards year, which corresponds to an exact calendar year. For the 80th Academy Awards, for instance, the release deadline for the Foreign Language Film category was set on September 30, 2007, whereas the qualifying run for most other categories extended till December 31, 2007.[6]

Although the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film is commonly referred to simply as the Foreign Film Oscar in newspaper articles and on the Internet,[7] such a designation is misleading, since a film's nationality matters much less than its language. Although a film has to be "foreign" (i.e. non-American) in order to be nominated for the Award, it also has to be in a language other than English. Foreign films where the majority of the dialogue is in English cannot qualify for the Foreign Language Film Award, and the Academy has usually applied this requirement very seriously by disqualifying films containing too much English dialogue, the most recent case being that of the Israeli film The Band's Visit (2007).[8] Despite the basic importance of the foreign language requirement, a completely dialogueless film such as Le Bal (1983) was still able to get nominated in the Foreign Language Film category.[9]

Another disqualifying factor is a film's television or Internet transmission prior to its theatrical release, hence the Academy's rejection of the Dutch film Bluebird (2004).[10] A film may also be refused if its submitting country has exercised insufficient artistic control over it. Several films have been declared ineligible by the Academy for the latter reason, the most recent of which is Lust, Caution (2007), Taiwan's entry for the 80th Academy Awards.[11] The disqualifications, however, generally take place in the pre-nomination stage, with the exception of A Place in the World (1992), Uruguay's entry for the 65th Academy Awards, which was disqualified because of insufficient Uruguayan artistic control after having secured a nomination. It is the only film so far to have been declared ineligible and removed from the final ballot after having been nominated for the Foreign Language Film Award.

Since the 2006 (79th) Academy Awards, submitted films no longer have to be in an official language of the submitting country.[12] This requirement had previously prevented countries from submitting films where the majority of the dialogue was spoken in a language that was non-native to the submitting country, and the Academy's executive director explicitly cited as a reason for the rule change the case of the Italian film Private (2004), which was disqualified simply because its main spoken languages were Arabic and Hebrew, neither of which are indigenous languages of Italy.[13] This rule change enabled a country like Canada to receive a nomination for a Hindi-language film, Water. Previously, Canada had been nominated for French-language films only, since films shot in Canada's other official language (English) were ineligible for consideration for the Foreign Language Film category. Before the rule change, Canada submitted one film in a different language—Atanarjuat (2001), shot in Inuktitut. That language, one of the country's aboriginal languages, is not official throughout Canada, but was (and still is) official in Nunavut and the Northwest Territories. Atanarjuat did not earn a nomination. The rule change, however, did not affect the eligibility of non-English speaking American films, which are still disqualified from the Foreign Language Film category due to their nationality. Because of this, a Japanese-language film like Letters from Iwo Jima (2006) or a Mayan-language film like Apocalypto (2006) were unable to compete for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film, even though they were both nominated for (and, in the case of Letters from Iwo Jima, won) the Golden Globe Award for Best Foreign Language Film, which does not have similar nationality restrictions.[14] The nationality restrictions also differ from the practice of the British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA) for their analogous award for Best Film Not in the English Language. While BAFTA Award eligibility requires a commercial release in the United Kingdom, that body does not impose a nationality restriction.[15]

As known, all films produced inside the United States have been ineligible for consideration for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film regardless of the language of their dialogue track. This fact also included films produced in U.S. overseas possessions. However, Puerto Rico is an unincorporated territory of the United States and used to be eligible due to Puerto Ricans having had American citizenship since 1917. Their best success in this award was receiving a nomination for Santiago, the Story of his New Life (1989). However, as of 2011, the Academy had decided not to allow submissions from the territory anymore.[16]

Submission and nomination process[edit]

Every country is invited to submit what it considers its best film to the Academy. The designation of each country's official submission has to be done by an organization, jury or committee composed of people from the film industry, whose members' names must be sent to the Academy. Only one film is accepted from each country.

After each country has designated its official entry, English-subtitled copies of all submitted films are shipped to the Academy, where they are screened by the Foreign Language Film Award Committee(s), whose members select by secret ballot the five official nominations. Final voting for the winner is restricted to active and life Academy members who have attended exhibitions of all five nominated films. Members who have watched the Foreign Language Film entries only on videocassette or DVD are ineligible to vote.[1] These procedures were slightly modified for the 2006 (79th) Academy Awards, with the Academy deciding to institute a two-stage process in determining the nominees: for the first time in the history of the award, a nine-film shortlist was published one week before the official nominations announcement.[17] In the meantime, a smaller thirty-member committee which included ten New York-based Academy members was formed, and spent three days viewing the shortlisted films before choosing the five official nominees. Residents of the city hosting the country's second largest film industry[18] were thus allowed to participate for the first time ever in the selection process for the Foreign Language Film Award nominees.[12]

Recipient[edit]

Unlike the Academy Award for Best Picture, which officially goes to the winning film's producers, the Foreign Language Film Award is not given to a specific individual but is considered an award for the submitting country as a whole. For example, the Oscar statuette won by the Canadian film The Barbarian Invasions (2003) was until recently on display at the Museum of Civilization in Quebec City.[19] It is now on display at the TIFF Bell lightbox.

The rules currently governing the Foreign Language Film category state that "the Academy statuette (Oscar) will be awarded to the picture and accepted by the director on behalf of the film's creative talents" (emphasis added).[1] Therefore, the director does not personally win the Award, but simply accepts it during the ceremony. In fact, the Foreign Language Film Award has never been associated with a specific individual since its creation, except for the 1956 (29th) Academy Awards, when the names of the producers were included in the nomination for the Foreign Language Film category. A director like Federico Fellini is thus considered to have never officially won an Academy Award of Merit during his lifetime, even though four of his films received the Foreign Language Film Award (the only Academy Award that Fellini personally won was his 1992 Honorary Award). On the other hand, producers Dino De Laurentiis and Carlo Ponti are considered to have personally won the 1956 Foreign Language Film Award given to Fellini's La Strada (1954), since their names were explicitly included in the nomination.[citation needed]

By contrast, the BAFTA Award for Best Film Not in the English Language is personally awarded to the producers and director—that award's rules specifically state that the nomination is limited to a maximum of three producers plus the director(s).[15]

Criticisms and controversies[edit]

Because each country chooses its official submission according to its own rules, the decisions of the nominating bodies in each respective country are sometimes mired in controversy: for instance, the Indian selection committee (Film Federation of India) was recently accused of bias by Bhavna Talwar, the director of Dharm (2007), who claimed her film was rejected in favor of Eklavya: The Royal Guard (2007) because of the personal connections of the latter film's director and producer.[20]

Another object of controversy is the Academy's "one-country-one-film" rule, which has been criticized by filmmakers.[21] Although it allows films from small countries like Iceland or Bosnia and Herzegovina to get recognized by the Academy by putting them on an equal footing with major releases from established filmmaking nations, it also forces countries to exclude many motion pictures because they are forced to select only one film. For the submissions for the 75th Academy Awards, for instance, critically acclaimed films such as Pedro Almodóvar's Talk to Her were not eligible simply because Spain had to choose only one film to submit and opted instead for Mondays in the Sun (2002). Nevertheless, Talk to Her won the Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay and Almodóvar was nominated in the Best Director category, something very unusual for a film not in the English language. For the 82nd Academy Awards, Chile submitted Dawson Isla 10 (a war film) over The Maid (an indie drama), thinking it would give them more chances to win. This was heavily criticized, specially because The Maid had received better reviews, and, it had won in a lot of film festivals, including Sundance. Plus, it was the first ever Chilean movie to receive a Golden Globe nomination.

Moreover, the need for a film to be actually submitted by a specific country hinders the chances of international co-productions of getting nominated. For example, a multinational film such as The Motorcycle Diaries (2004) whose production involved nine different countries could not be specifically affiliated with any one of them. Therefore the film ended up being excluded from the race for the Foreign Language Film Award, even though it was successful and received numerous other awards, including an Academy Award for Best Original Song, an Academy Award nomination for Best Adapted Screenplay, and the BAFTA Award for Best Film Not in the English Language.

In recent years, the Academy's very definition of the term "country" itself has been polemical. The submissions for the 75th Academy Awards, for instance, became shrouded in controversy when it was reported that Humbert Balsan, producer of the critically acclaimed Palestinian film Divine Intervention (2002), tried to submit his picture to the Academy but was told it could not run for the Foreign Language Film Award since the State of Palestine is not recognized by the Academy in its rules. Because the Academy had previously accepted films from other political entities such as Hong Kong, the rejection of Divine Intervention triggered accusations of double standard from pro-Palestinian activists.[22] Three years later, however, another Palestinian-Arab film, Paradise Now (2005), succeeded in getting nominated for the Foreign Language Film Award. The nomination also caused protests, this time from pro-Israeli groups in the United States, who objected to the Academy's use of the name "Palestine" on its official website to designate the film's submitting country.[23] After intense lobbying from Jewish groups, the Academy decided to designate Paradise Now as a submission from the Palestinian Authority, a move that was decried by the film's director Hany Abu-Assad.[24] During the awards ceremony, the film was eventually announced by presenter Will Smith as a submission from the Palestinian Territories.[25]

Awards by nation[edit]

See also[edit]

Notes and references[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d 80th Academy Awards – Special Rules for the Best Foreign Language Film Award. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Retrieved November 2, 2007.
  2. ^ Europe's tally includes 14 nominations and 4 wins for the U.S.S.R. and its successor states. It also includes 5 Special/Honorary Awards: 2 won by Italy, 2 won by France and 1 shared between them for The Walls of Malapaga (1949). The latter Award is counted only once in Europe's tally, whereas it is included twice in the country-based table as it figures in both Italy's and France's tallies.
  3. ^ Number includes 3 Honorary Awards for Japan.
  4. ^ a b Levy, Emanuel (2003). "Chapter 11: The Oscar and the Foreign-Language Picture". All About Oscar: The History and Politics of the Academy Awards (2nd ed.). New York: Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 207. ISBN 978-0-8264-1452-6. Retrieved 2010-07-16. 
  5. ^ Pryor, Thomas M. (October 2, 1956). "'Oscar' Created For Foreign Films" (fee required). The New York Times: p. 39. Retrieved 2010-07-16. 
  6. ^ 80th Academy Awards – The Awards Year and Deadlines. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Retrieved November 2, 2007.
  7. ^ "Countries choose Oscar contenders", BBC News, 2005-09-27. Retrieved November 19, 2007.
  8. ^ "The Band's Visit dropped from Oscar race", The Jerusalem Post, 2007-10-11. Retrieved November 2, 2007.
  9. ^ Le Bal at the Internet Movie Database. Retrieved December 3, 2007.
  10. ^ Dore, Shalini. "Academy grounds Holland's Bluebird", Variety, 2005-12-12. Retrieved November 2, 2007.
  11. ^ Dore, Shalini. "Academy rejects Lust Caution as Taiwan Oscar entry", Variety, 2007-10-18. Retrieved November 5, 2007.
  12. ^ a b 79th Academy Awards – Rule Changes. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, 2006-06-30. Retrieved November 2, 2007.
  13. ^ "More Academy Resistance to Films from or About Palestine", The Jerusalem Times, 2005-10-26. Retrieved November 2, 2007.
  14. ^ Kilday, Gregg. "Apocalypto on foreign Globes list", The Hollywood Reporter, 2006-11-28. Retrieved November 9, 2007.
  15. ^ a b "Orange British Academy Film Awards: Rules and Guidelines 2011–2012". British Academy of Film and Television Arts. October 10, 2011. Retrieved February 13, 2012.  See "Eligibility", p. 4, for general eligibility, and "Award 16: Film Not in the English Language", p. 9.
  16. ^ Puerto Rico queda excluido de la carrera por el Oscar; El Nuevo Día (October 5, 2011)
  17. ^ Zeitchik, Steven. "Foreign Oscar list down to nine", Variety, 2007-01-16. Retrieved November 2, 2007.
  18. ^ NYC Film Statistics. Mayor's Office of Film, Theatre, and Broadcasting. Retrieved November 19, 2007.
  19. ^ Québec Cinema: The Whole Story – A major exhibition on Québec film. Musée de la civilisation, 2006-05-03. Retrieved November 2, 2007.
  20. ^ "India's entry to Oscars caught in a legal tangle", Reuters India, 2007-09-29. Retrieved November 14, 2007.
  21. ^ Galloway, Stephen. "Filmmakers questions Oscar's foreign movie rules", Reuters, 2007-11-09. Retrieved November 14, 2007.
  22. ^ Doherty & Abunimah. "Oscars' double standard turns Palestinian film into refugee", The Electronic Intifada, 2002-12-10. Retrieved November 20, 2007.
  23. ^ 78th Academy Awards – Nominees and Winners. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Retrieved November 20, 2007.
  24. ^ Agassi, Tirzah. "Middle East tensions hang over Palestinian nominee for an Oscar", The San Francisco Chronicle, 2006-02-26. Retrieved November 20, 2007.
  25. ^ Paradise Now at the Internet Movie Database. Retrieved November 20, 2007.

External links[edit]