Acoustic Doppler velocimetry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Acoustic Doppler velocimetry (ADV) is designed to record instantaneous velocity components at a single-point with a relatively high frequency. Measurements are performed by measuring the velocity of particles in a remote sampling volume based upon the Doppler shift effect.[1][2]

Probe specs and features[edit]

The probe head includes one transmitter and between two to four receivers. The remote sampling volume is located typically 5 or 10 cm from the tip of the transmitter, but some studies showed that the distance might change slightly.[3] The sampling volume size is determined by the sampling conditions and manual setup. In a standard configuration, the sampling volume is about a cylinder of water with a diameter of 6 mm and a height of 9 mm, although newer laboratory ADVs may have smaller sampling volume (e.g. Sontek microADV, Nortek Vectrino+). A typical ADV system equipped with N receivers records simultaneously 4.N values with each sample. That is, for each receiver, a velocity component, a signal strength value, a signal-to-noise (SNR) and a correlation value. The signal strength, SNR and correlation values are used primarily to determine the quality and accuracy of the velocity data, although the signal strength (acoustic backscatter intensity) may related to the instantaneous suspended sediment concentration with proper calibration.[4] The velocity component is measured along the line connecting the sampling volume to the receiver. The velocity data must be transformed into a Cartesian system of coordinates and the trigonometric transformation may cause some velocity resolution errors. Although acoustic Doppler velocimetry (ADV) has become a popular technique in laboratory in field applications, several researchers pointed out accurately that the ADV signal outputs include the combined effects of turbulent velocity fluctuations, Doppler noise, signal aliasing, turbulent shear and other disturbances. Evidences included by high levels of noise and spikes in all velocity components.[2][5] In turbulent flows, the ADV velocity outputs are a combination of Doppler noise, signal aliasing, velocity fluctuations, installation vibrations and other disturbances. The signal may be further affected adversely by velocity shear across the sampling volume and boundary proximity.[6] Lemmin and Lhermitte,[7] Chanson et al.,[8] and Blanckaert and Lemmin [9] discussed the inherent Doppler noise of an ADV system. Spikes may be caused by aliasing of the Doppler signal. McLelland and Nicholas [2] explained the physical processes while Nikora and Goring,[5] Goring and Nikora [10] and Wahl [11] developed techniques to eliminate aliasing errors called "spikes". These methods were developed for steady flow situations and tested in man-made channels. Not all of them are reliable, and the phase-space thresholding despiking technique appears to be a robust method in steady flows [11][12]). Simply, "raw" ADV velocity data are not "true" turbulent velocities and they should never be used without adequate post-processing (e.g.,[10][11][12]). Chanson [3] presented a summary of experiences gained during laboratory and field investigations with both Sontek and Nortek ADV systems.


  1. ^ VOULGARIS, G., and TROWBRIDGE, J.H. (1998). Evaluation of the Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) for Turbulence Measurements. Jl Atmosph. and Oceanic Tech., Vol. 15, pp. 272-289. 
  2. ^ a b c McLELLAND, S.J., and NICHOLAS, A.P. (2000). A New Method for Evaluating Errors in High-Frequency ADV Measurements. Hydrological Processes, Vol. 14, pp. 351-366. 
  3. ^ a b CHANSON, H. (2008). Acoustic Doppler Velocimetry (ADV) in the Field and in Laboratory: Practical Experiences. in Frédérique Larrarte and Hubert Chanson, Experiences and Challenges in Sewers: Measurements and Hydrodynamics. International Meeting on Measurements and Hydraulics of Sewers IMMHS'08, Summer School GEMCEA/LCPC, Bouguenais, France, 19–21 August 2008, Hydraulic Model Report No. CH70/08, Div. of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, Dec., pp. 49-66. ISBN 978-1-86499-928-0. 
  4. ^ CHANSON, H., TAKEUCHI, M., and TREVETHAN, M. (Sep 2008). "Using Turbidity and Acoustic Backscatter Intensity as Surrogate Measures of Suspended Sediment Concentration in a Small Sub-Tropical Estuary". Journal of Environmental Management 88 (4): 1406–1416. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.07.009. PMID 17716809. 
  5. ^ a b NIKORA, V.I., and GORING, D.G. (1998). "ADV Measurements of Turbulence: can we Improve their Interpretation ?". Jl of Hyd. Engrg., ASCE, Vol. 124, No. 6, pp. 630-634. Discussion: Vol. 125, No. 9, pp. 987-988. 
  6. ^ CHANSON, H., TREVETHAN, M., and KOCH, C. (2007). "Turbulence Measurements with Acoustic Doppler Velocimeters. Discussion". Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 131 (12): 1062. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:12(1062). 
  7. ^ LEMMIN, U., and LHERMITTE, R. (1999). "ADV Measurements of Turbulence: can we Improve their Interpretation ? Discussion". Jl of Hyd. Engrg., ASCE, 125 (6): 987–988. 
  8. ^ CHANSON, H., AOKI, S., and MARUYAMA, M. (2002). "Unsteady Two-Dimensional Orifice Flow: a Large-Size Experimental Investigation". Journal of Hydraulic Research, IAHR, 40 (1): 63–71. 
  9. ^ BLANCKAERT, K.,and LEMMIN, U. (2006). "Means of Noise reduction in Acoustic Turbulence Measurements". Journal of Hydraulic Research, IAHR, 44 (1): 3–17. 
  10. ^ a b GORING, D.G., and NIKORA, V.I. (2002). "Despiking Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter". Jl of Hyd. Engrg., ASCE, Vol. 128, No. 1, pp. 117-126. Discussion: Vol. 129, No. 6, pp. 484-489. 
  11. ^ a b c WAHL, T.L. (2003). "Despiking Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter. Discussion". Jl of Hyd. Engrg., ASCE, Vol. 129, No. 6, pp. 484-487. 
  12. ^ a b CHANSON, H., TREVETHAN, M., and AOKI, S. (2008). "Acoustic Doppler Velocimetry (ADV) in Small Estuary : Field Experience and Signal Post-Processing". Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 19 (5): 307. doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2008.03.003. 

External links[edit]