The discovery of the crater and independent discovery of its ejecta were first reported in the journal Science in 1986. The evidence for impact includes the presence of shatter cones and shocked quartz in shattered bedrock on islands within Lake Acraman.
The crater is deeply eroded and its original size must be inferred by indirect means. Some authors estimate an original diameter of up to 85–90 km, while other suggest a smaller size, perhaps only 35–40 km, closer to that of the depression in which Lake Acraman is centred. The larger size estimate would imply an energy release of 5.2 × 106 megatons of TNT.
The impact event is estimated to have occurred about 580 million years ago during the Ediacaran Period; this age is not derived from the crater itself but from the position of ejecta within nearby sedimentary basins.
A widespread layer of ejecta, believed to be from the Acraman crater, is found within Ediacaran rocks of the Flinders Ranges at least 300 km east of the crater, and in drill holes from the Officer Basin to the north. At the time these areas were shallow sea, and the ejecta settled into mud on the sea floor. The ejecta contains shocked minerals and small shatter cones, is composed of rock similar in age and composition to that at the crater, and is associated with an iridium anomaly suggesting contamination with extraterrestrial material. An evolutionary radiation within marine microorganisms (acritarchs) occurs just above the level as the ejecta layer, and some authors believe there may be a connection. The proximity of the crater to the type area for the Ediacara Biota is noted, though probably not significant given the likely global consequences of the impact.
Landsat image of Lake Acraman; screen capture from NASA World Wind.
Acraman lake (circle, just lower right of center), is ringed by Lake Gairdner and others, outlining the Acraman crater depression.
- "Acraman". Earth Impact Database. University of New Brunswick. Retrieved 2008-12-30.
- Williams, G.E. (1986). "The Acraman Impact Structure: Source of Ejecta in Late Precambrian Shales, South Australia". Science 233 (4760): 200–3. Bibcode:1986Sci...233..200W. doi:10.1126/science.233.4760.200. PMID 17737291.
- Gostin, V.A.; Haines, P.W.; Jenkins, R.J.F.; Compston, W.; Williams, I.S. (1986). "Impact Ejecta Horizon Within Late Precambrian Shales, Adelaide Geosyncline, South Australia". Science 233 (4760): 198–200. Bibcode:1986Sci...233..198G. doi:10.1126/science.233.4760.198. PMID 17737290.
- Williams, G.E.; Gostin, V.A. (2005). "Acraman-Bunyeroo impact event (Ediacaran), South Australia, and environmental consequences: twenty-five years on". Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 52 (4-5): 607–620. Bibcode:2005AuJES..52..607W. doi:10.1080/08120090500181036.
- Shoemaker, E.M.; Shoemaker, C.S. (1996). "The Proterozoic impact record of Australia". AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics 16: 379–398. Bibcode:1990LPICo.746...47S.
- Wallace, M.W.; Gostin, V.A.; Keays, R.R. (1989). "Geological Note: Discovery of the acraman impact ejecta blanket in the officer basin and its stratigraphic significance". Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 36 (4): 585–587. Bibcode:1989AuJES..36..585W. doi:10.1080/08120098908729511.
- Gostin, V.A.; Keays, R.R.; Wallace, M.W. (1989). "Iridium anomaly from the Acraman impact ejecta horizon: impacts can produce sedimentary iridium peaks". Nature 340 (6234): 542–544. Bibcode:1989Natur.340..542G. doi:10.1038/340542a0.
- Grey, K.; Walter, M.R.; Calver, C.R. (2003). "Neoproterozoic biotic diversification: Snowball Earth or aftermath of the Acraman impact?". Geology 31 (5): 459–462. Bibcode:2003Geo....31..459G. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031<0459:NBDSEO>2.0.CO;2.
- Williams & Wallace, Malcolmw (2003). "The Acraman asteroid impact, South Australia: magnitude and implications for the late Vendian environment". Journal of the Geological Society of London 160 (4): 545–554. doi:10.1144/0016-764902-142. More than one of