The term was first commonly used in early photography to distinguish light that would expose the monochrome films from light that would not. A non-actinic safe-light (e.g., red or amber) could be used in a darkroom without risk of exposing (fogging) light-sensitive films, plates or papers.
Early 'non colour-sensitive' (NCS) films, plates and papers were only sensitive to the high-energy end of the visible spectrum from green to UV, i.e., shorter-wavelength light. This would render a print of the red areas as a very dark tone because the red light was not actinic. Typically, light from xenon flash lamps are highly actinic, as is daylight as both contain significant green-to-UV light.
In the first half of the 20th century, developments in film technology produced films sensitive to red and yellow light, known as orthochromatic and panchromatic, and extended that through to near infra-red light. These gave a truer reproduction of human perception of lightness across the color spectrum. In photography, therefore, actinic light must now be referenced to the photographic material in question.
Actinic is also applied to medical conditions triggered off by exposure, or excessive exposure to light, especially UV light.
- Wall, E.J. (1890). Dictionary of Photography. London: Hassel, Watson and Viney Ltd.
|This photography-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|