Action-specific perception

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Action-specific perception, or perception-action, is a psychological theory that people perceive their environment and events within it in terms of their ability to act.[1][2] For example, softball players who are hitting better see the ball as bigger.[3] Tennis players see the ball as moving slower when they successfully return the ball.[4] Furthermore, the perceiver’s intention to act is also critical; while the perceiver’s ability to perform the intended action influences perception, the perceiver’s abilities for unintended actions have little or no effect on perception.[5]

Overview[edit]

Action-specific effects have been documented in a variety of contexts and with a variety of manipulations.[6] The original work was done on perceived slant of hills and perceived distance to targets. Hills look steeper and targets look farther away when wearing a heavy backpack.[7][8] In addition to walking, many other actions influence perception such as throwing, jumping, falling, reaching, grasping, kicking, hitting, blocking, and swimming. In addition to perceived slant and perceived distance, other aspects of perception are influenced by ability such as size, shape, height, and speed. These results have been documented in athletes such as softball players, golfers, tennis players, swimmers, and people skilled in parkour.

Background[edit]

The action-specific perception account has roots in Gibson’s (1979) ecological approach to perception.[9] According to Gibson, the primary objects of perception are affordances, which are the possibilities for action. Affordances capture the mutual relationship between the environment and the perceiver. For example, a tall wall is a barrier to an elderly midget but affords jumping-over to someone trained in parkour, or urban climbing. Like the ecological approach, the action-specific perception account favors the notion that perception involves processes that relate the environment to the perceiver’s potential for action. Consequently, similar environments will look different, depending on the abilities of each perceiver. Since abilities change over time, an individual's perception of similar environments will also change as their abilities change.

Criticisms[edit]

The claim that activity and intention influence perception is controversial.[citation needed] These findings challenge traditional theories of perception, nearly all of which conceptualize perception as a process that provides an objective and behaviorally-independent representation of the environment.[attribution needed] The fact that the same environment looks different depending on the perceiver’s abilities and intentions implies that perception is not behaviorally-neutral.

Alternative explanations for apparent action-specific effects have been proposed, most commonly that the perceiver’s ability affects the perceiver’s judgment about what they see, rather than affecting perception itself. In other words, perceivers see the world similarly but then report their impressions differently.[10]

Problems[edit]

Perception cannot be measured directly. Instead, researchers must rely on reports, judgments, and behaviors. However, many attempts have been made to resolve this issue. One technique is to use many different kinds of perceptual judgments.[11] For example, action-specific effects have been found when verbal reports and visual matching tasks.[clarification needed] Action-specific effects are also apparent with indirect measures such as perceived parallelism as a proxy for perceived distance. Action-specific effects have also been found when using action-based measures such as Blindwalking.

See also[edit]

  • Active inference - a generic formulation of embodied perception based on variational (Bayesian) free energy minimisation
  • Active vision - an area of computer vision and machine learning concerned with active sampling of sensory data
  • Affordance
  • Ecological Psychology
  • James J. Gibson
  • Motor cognition - the notion that cognition is embodied in action, and that the motor system participates in what is usually considered as mental processing.
  • Motor theory of speech perception - the hypothesis that people perceive spoken words by identifying the vocal tract gestures with which they are pronounced rather than by identifying the sound patterns that speech generates.
  • Perception

References[edit]

  1. ^ Witt, J. K. (2011). Action's effect on perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science.
  2. ^ Proffitt, D. R. (2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives on Psychological Science.
  3. ^ Witt, J. K., & Proffitt, D.R. (2005). See the ball, hit the ball: Apparent ball size is correlated with batting average. Psychological Science, 16, 937-938.
  4. ^ Witt, J. K., & Sugovic, M. (2010). Performance and ease influence perceived speed. Perception, 39, 1341-1353.
  5. ^ Witt, J. K., Proffitt, D. R., & Epstein, W. (2010). How and when does action scale perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1153-1160.
  6. ^ Witt, J. K. (2011). Action's effect on perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science.
  7. ^ Bhalla, M., & Proffitt, D. R. (1999). Visual-Motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. ‘’Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25’’, 1076-1096.
  8. ^ Proffitt, D.R., Stefanucci, J., Banton, T., & Epstein, W. (2003). The role of effort in perceiving distance. ‘’Psychological Science, 14’’, 106-112.
  9. ^ Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception (Boston: Houghton Mifflin)
  10. ^ Loomis J M, Philbeck J W, (2008). Measuring spatial perception with spatial understanding and action”, in Embodiment, Ego-Space, and Action Eds. R L Klatzky, B MacWhinney, M Behrmann (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press) pp. 1–44, here: p. 33.
  11. ^ Witt, J. K. (2011). Action's effect on perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science.