Adam Kirsch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Adam Kirsch is an American poet and literary critic.

Life and career[edit]

Kirsch was born in Los Angeles in 1976.[1] He is the son of lawyer, author, and biblical scholar Jonathan Kirsch. He started writing poetry around the age of 14 after he read the poetry of T.S. Eliot, stating, "Eliot showed me the possibility of finding in poetry a source of complex intellectual and moral interest."[1] In 1997, he graduated from Harvard University with a B.A. in English.[2][3] After graduation, he worked as the assistant literary editor for The New Republic. Next he worked as the editor for Lipper Publications.[4]

For a while, Kirsch made his living as a freelance writer, and he has regularly written freelance articles for many different publications including Slate, The New Yorker, The Times Literary Supplement, The New York Times Book Review, and Poetry. Richard John Neuhaus, writing in First Things, called Kirsch “a literary critic of some distinction.”[5] Writing in The Nation, John Palattella describes Kirsch as “the intellectual offspring of the New Formalists.”[4] Currently, Kirsch is a contributing editor to Harvard Magazine and Tablet Magazine and the author of the weekly column "The Reader" on Nextbook. He also currently holds the position of senior editor for The New Republic, the publication where he started his writing career.

Over the course of his career, he has written reviews and feature articles on a diverse array of poets and novelists, including Charles Bukowski, Emily Dickinson, Kay Ryan, T.S. Eliot, Thomas Hardy, H.G. Wells, Richard Wilbur, Gerard Manley Hopkins, Dylan Thomas, John Keats, Saul Bellow, John Updike, Hart Crane, and David Foster Wallace. He has also written articles on assorted cultural issues, covering topics like rap music, America and the Roman Empire, the relationship between conservative politics in America and the writings of Ayn Rand, and the importance of literary criticism.

Kirsch has published two books of poems, The Thousand Wells and Invasions, as well as non-fiction books on Benjamin Disraeli and Lionel Trilling. The Thousand Wells won The New Criterion Poetry Prize in 2002. His poems have also appeared in many magazines including The Paris Review, Partisan Review, The Formalist, Harvard Review, and The New Criterion.

In an interview with Contemporary Poetry Review, Kirsch cited Derek Walcott, Glyn Maxwell, Gjertrud Schnackenberg, Adam Zagajewski, Rachel Wetzsteon, Dennis O'Driscoll, Geoffrey Hill, and Jacqueline Osherow as his favorite contemporary poets and Helen Vendler, Frank Kermode, Dana Gioia, William Logan, and Robert Potts as his favorite contemporary poetry critics.[3]

Critical response[edit]

Kirsch's book The Wounded Surgeon: Confession and Transformation in Six American Poets was reviewed in a number of major publications including Poetry, The New York Times Book Review, and others. The book received generally mixed reviews. Danielle Chapman, from Poetry, wrote the following assessment:

There’s both sense and power in Kirsch’s arguments. He skillfully distinguishes the poems that use life as material for poetry from those that use poetry in order to justify or condemn the poet’s real-life behavior. He convinces us that the former are art while the latter are exhibitions of narcissism, self-pity, and sentimentality; that a poem succeeds, no matter how brutal or amoral it may be, as long as it retains the integrity of its artifice; that a poem fails when the poet abandons the imaginative work of completing it in order to solicit the reader’s sympathy or reproach. What Kirsch doesn’t convince us of is his cold-blooded bottom line, which is that if art is to be great, it often must take precedence over life, regardless of the costs.[6]

The New York Times Book Review article by the poet David Lehman was far more negative. He characterized the book as having "a flawed thesis, a few valuable readings of poems and a mess of missed opportunities."[7] But in a review from The New York Times, the critic Michiko Kakutani praised the book, calling it "eloquent and very astute." She went on to write, "Mr. Kirsch. . .does a wonderfully nimble job of conveying each poet's individual achievement and the evolution of his or her style, as apprenticeship gave way to maturity, as new techniques and language were invented to accommodate new ideas and material. Writing in a manner that is at once erudite and accessible, Mr. Kirsch proves equally adept at dispensing the sort of close readings of individual poems championed by the New Critics and at explicating correspondences between a poet's life and art in a fashion that would have been anathema to the high modernists."[8]

The critic Ken Tucker wrote a highly critical review of Kirsch's first book of poetry, The Thousand Wells, writing, "Steely technical skill often contradicts the tender feelings and humility invoked throughout Adam Kirsch's first poetry collection. In 'A Love Letter,' he asserts, 'all my powers, poetic, analytical,/Cannot do justice to the theme,' but it's actually the stilted rhymes ('glosses/colossus'; 'momentous /portentous') and the familiarity of images like 'love waxes and wanes,/But, like the hide-and-go-seek of the moon,/It is only hiding, never really gone' that prevent Kirsch from sustaining his meditations on romantic love, city life and religion."[9] But Booklist gave the book a positive review, stating that the book contained no "bad" poems and that "regardless of subject and tone, these are, because of their forms, poems of wit."[10]

In Poetry, the poet Carmine Starnino wrote a review of two of Kirsch's books published around the same time: Invasions (a book of poems) and The Modern Element (a book of literary criticism). In his review, Starnino focused on Kirsch's status as a poet-critic and how the role of poet-critics in America's literary culture had changed since the heyday of poet-critics in the first half of the 20th century. Regarding The Modern Element, Starnino wrote that Kirsch is "an incomparable context builder, with a near-perfect nose for comparisons. . . [and] is excellent at placing poets in their historical moment, aided by an ability to evoke the way the climate of a period manner can suddenly be made to pivot into the private weather of a poem."[11] Starnino also had mostly positive things to say regarding Invasions which he called "an advance on the 'silent, parcelled, and controlled' poems of the award-winning The Thousand Wells." Startino also noted that the style and form of the poems in Invasions was heavily influenced by the work of Robert Lowell, particularly Lowell's sonnet sequence in the book History. Starnino's only criticism of the poems was that he believed that Kirsch's wording could sometimes seem antiquarian and that his strictness with regard to form could be limiting. Starnino also implied that Kirsch's commitment to strict formalism would guarantee his work a very limited audience.[11]

In The New York Times Book Review, Langdon Hammer also reviewed Invasions and The Modern Element, but unlike Starnino's review, Hammer's was extremely negative. First, in The Modern Element, Hammer took issue with Kirsch's aesthetic literary arguments which he viewed as "narrow and formulaic." He also took issue with Kirsch's criticisms of free-verse poets like Frank O'Hara and Allen Ginsberg and opined that Kirsch was only skilled at criticizing those formalist poets, like Richard Wilbur and Donald Justice, who shared the same conversative approach as Kirsch uses in his own poetry, employing regular rhyme and meter.

With regard to Kirsch's poetry in Invasions, Hammer wrote, "Kirsch’s brooding on the end of things [in poems about 9/11 and the Iraq War] becomes as predictable as his iambic pentameter lines, which unroll smoothly without syntactic surprises."[12] Hammer also criticized the poems for being too "cautious and rueful" and without passion.

In a review of Kirsch's non-fiction book Why Trilling Matters, William Giraldi of The Daily Beast praised the Trilling book as well as Kirsch's previous non-fiction works:

[Kirsch's] Benjamin Disraeli is an expert, emotionally astute study of the complicated Jewish-English statesman and novelist, and The Wounded Surgeon and The Modern Element, his two books on English-language poets, rise to Dr. Johnson’s criterion for lasting criticism: the conversion of mere opinion into universal knowledge. . .[and] in Why Trilling Matters, Kirsch has turned his considerable gifts to the mind he most resembles in comprehensive literary and cultural understanding.[13]

Bibliography[edit]

Books[edit]

Articles[edit]

Reviews Blom, Philipp (2008). The Vertigo Years: Europe, 1900-1914. Basic Books. ISBN 0-465-01116-0. 

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Davis, Garrick. "Adam Kirsch and the Role of the Poet-Critic: An Interview." Contemporary Poetry Review.[1]
  2. ^ A Poet's Warning (November-December 2007)
  3. ^ a b Davis, Garrick. "Adam Kirsch and the Role of the Poet-Critic: An Interview." Contemporary Poetry Review. [2]
  4. ^ a b Prosaic Judgments
  5. ^ FIRST THINGS: On the Square » Blog Archive » RJN: 2.24.06 Adam Kirsch is books…
  6. ^ Chapman, Danielle. "Eight Takes." Poetry Magazine
  7. ^ Lehman, David. "'The Wounded Surgeon': Tradition and Individual Talents." NY Times Book Review. May 29, 2005. [3]
  8. ^ Kakutani, Michio. "Poets Escaping the Shadows of Greats Who Preceded Them." NY Times Book Review. June 28, 2005.
  9. ^ Tucker, Ken. "The Ties That Bind." NY Times Book Review. December 22, 2002. [4]
  10. ^ Olson, Ray. Booklist. American Library Association. 2005.
  11. ^ a b Starnino, Carmine. "The Plight of the Poet-Critic." Poetry
  12. ^ Hammer, Langdon. "Theory and Practice. The New York Times Book Review. August 29, 2008
  13. ^ Giraldi, William. "Adam Kirsch's Why Trilling Matters Reminds Us of Power of Reading." The Daily Beast. December 2011. [5]

External links[edit]