Afterwardsness

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Afterwardness is a concept in the psychoanalysis of Sigmund Freud, used to describe a 'mode of belated understanding or retroactive attribution of sexual or traumatic meaning to earlier events... [from the German word] Nachträglichkeit, translated as deferred action, retroaction, après-coup, afterwardsness'.[1] As summarized by another scholar, 'In one sense, Freud's theory of deferred action can be simply stated: memory is reprinted, so to speak, in accordance with later experience'.[2]

History and development of the term[edit]

Freud[edit]

The psychoanalytical concept of afterwardsness ( Nachträglichkeit) appeared initially in Freud’s writings in the 1890s in the commonsense form of the German adjective-adverb "afterwards" or "deferred" (nachträglich): as Freud wrote in the unfinished and unpublished "A Project for a Scientific Psychology" of 1895, 'a memory is repressed which has only become a trauma after the event '.[3] However the 'theory of deferred action had already been [publicly] put forward by Freud in the Studies on Hysteria (1895)',[4] and in a paper of 1896 'he elaborates on the idea of deferred action: the pathogenic effect of a traumatic event occurring in childhood...[manifesting] retrospectively when the child reaches a subsequent phase of sexual development'.[5]

The same idea would feature prominently a couple of decades later in his study of the "Wolf Man": 'The effects of the scene were deferred, but...had the same effect as though it were a recent experience'.[6] 'Thus although he never offered a definition, much less a general theory, of the notion of deferred action, it was indisputably looked on by Freud as part of his conceptual equipment'.[7]

Lacan[edit]

It has been suggested that it was Lacan who brought the term back from obscurity after Freud's death - his translation in the French language as the « après-coup » fits into the context of his « return to Freud » (1953, « rapport de Rome » ) - and certainly French psychoanalysis has since taken the lead in its explication. Lacan himself claimed in his Seminar that 'the real implication of the nachträglich, for example, has been ignored, though it was there all the time and had only to be picked up',[8] while writing in Ecrits of '"Deferred action" (Nachtrag), to rescue another of these terms from the facility into which they have since fallen...they were unheard of at that time'.[9]

Jean Laplanche[edit]

After Lacan’s «après-coup», Jean Laplanche’s contribution to the concept of the afterwardsness signifies «something very different»:[10] With Jean Laplanche and in the relation to Freud (theory of the seduction, neurotica), Lacan's "Other" loses its capital letter of the "Symbolic", that links Lacan to (French) structuralism (Saussure's linguistics, Lévi-Strauss's ethnology), and that links also "Lacan" afterwards, in the history of the ideas (from the 1960s in France) - by "inversion in the opposite" (a "destiny of the drive" in psychoanalytic theory) -, to the French theory at the place of Jacques Derrida's deconstruction.[11] [12]

"Afterwardsness" becomes the key concept in Laplanche’s «theory of the general seduction» (théorie de la séduction généralisée) and of the corresponding importance of 'the act of psychic translation... of [enigmatic] deposits by the other'[13] - an approach which develops further Freud’s letter 52/112 (to Wilhelm Fliess). In his "Notes on Afterwardsness" (1992), based on a conversation of Jean Laplanche with Martin Stanton,[14] there is an excellent definition of afterwardsness in Laplanche's sense, including the category of the enigmatic message, that highlights Laplanche's contribution to Freud's concept:

Freud's concept of afterwardsness contains both great richness and great ambiguity between retrogressive and progressive directions. I want to account for this problem of the directional to and fro by arguing that, right at the start, there is something that goes in the direction from the past to the future, and in the direction from the adult to the baby, which I call the implantation of the enigmatic message. This message is then retranslated following a temporal direction which is sometimes progressive and sometimes retrogressive (according to my general model of translation).[15]

Senses[edit]

As deferred action[edit]

Deferred obedience[edit]

Closely related for Freud to deferred action was deferred obedience: again, 'a deferred effect...a "deferred obedience" under the influence of repression'.[16] Thus for instance Freud explored the different phases of a man's infantile attitude to his father: 'As long as his father was alive it showed itself in unmitigated rebelliousness and open discord, but immediately after his death it took the form of a neurosis based on abject submission and deferred obedience to him'.[17]

In Totem and Taboo he generalised the principle and 'depicted the social contract also as based on posthumous obedience to the father's authority'[18] - offset at times by its converse, occasional Carnival-like licence such as 'the memorial festival of the totem meal, in which the restrictions of deferred obedience no longer held'.[19]

Bibliography[edit]

Notes and references[edit]

  1. ^ Teresa de Lauretis, Freud's Drive: Psychoanalysis, Literature and Film (Basingstoke 2008) p. 118
  2. ^ Adam Phillips, On Flirtation (London 1994) p. 33
  3. ^ Quoted in Jean Laplanche, Life and Death in Psychoanalysis (London 1976) p. 41
  4. ^ Sigmund Freud, Case Histories II (London 1991) p. 278n
  5. ^ Jean-Michel Quinodoz, Reading Freud (London 2006) p. 34
  6. ^ Freud, Histories II p. 276-7
  7. ^ Jean Laplanche and J.-B.Pontalis, in Phillips, Flirtation p. 33
  8. ^ Jacques Lacan, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis (London 1994) p. 216
  9. ^ Jacques Lacan, Ecrits: A Selection (London 1996) p. 281
  10. ^ See particularly: Jean Laplanche, "Sa reviviscence en France", "Chez Lacan avec Heidegger" in: Jean Laplanche, Problématiques VI. L'après-coup, Paris, PUF, 2006, p. 16-22.
  11. ^ Roseline Bonnellier, " De Hölderlin et la question du père à la théorie de la séduction généralisée de Jean Laplanche: Avancée paradoxale de la traduction d’Œdipe en psychanalyse ", thèse du Doctorat de psychologie, Université Paris-XIII, 2007, 1050 pages
  12. ^ Roseline Bonnellier, Sous le soleil de Hölderlin: Oedipe en question - Au premier temps du complexe était la fille, Paris, L'Harmattan, Collection "Études psychanalytiques" (dirigée par Alain Brun et Joël Bernat), février 2010, 360 pages, ISBN 978-2-296-10411-2
  13. ^ Anthony Elliott, Social Theory since Freud (London 20040 p. 13 and p. 64.
  14. ^ Jean Laplanche: Seduction, Translation, Drives, A dossier compiled by John Fletcher and Martin Stanton, Translations by Martin Stanton, Psychoanalytic Forum, Institute of Contemporary Arts London, 1992, p. 217-223. ISBN 0-905263-68-5
  15. ^ Jean Laplanche in Jean Laplanche: Seduction, Translation, Drives, A dossier compiled by John Fletcher and Martin Stanton, Translations by Martin Stanton, Psychoanalytic Forum, Institute of Contemporary Arts London, 1992, p. 222.
  16. ^ Sigmund Freud, Standard Edition X (London 1955) p. 35
  17. ^ Freud, Histories II p. 191
  18. ^ Jose Bruner, Freud and the Politics of Psychoanalysis (2001) p. 161
  19. ^ Julia Kristeva/Jeanine Herman, The Sense and Non-Sense of Revolt (Columbia 2001) p. 13