For example, buyers and sellers are two common types of agents in partial equilibrium models of a single market. Macroeconomic models, especially dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models that are explicitly based on microfoundations, often distinguish households, firms, and governments or central banks as the main types of agents in the economy. Each of these agents may play multiple roles in the economy; households, for example, might act as consumers, as workers, and as voters in the model. Some macroeconomic models distinguish even more types of agents, such as workers and shoppers or commercial banks.
In agent-based computational economics, corresponding agents are "computational objects modeled as interacting according to rules" over space and time, not real people. The rules are formulated to model behavior and social interactions based on stipulated incentives and information. The concept of an agent may be broadly interpreted to be any persistent individual, social, biological, or physical entity interacting with other such entities in the context of a dynamic multi-agent economic system.
Representative vs. heterogenous agents
An economic model in which all agents of a given type (such as all consumers, or all firms) are assumed to be exactly identical is called a representative agent model. A model which recognizes differences among agents is called a heterogeneous agent model. Economists often use representative agent models when they want to describe the economy in the simplest terms possible. In contrast, they may be obliged to use heterogeneous agent models when differences among agents are directly relevant for the question at hand. For example, considering heterogeneity in age is likely to be necessary in a model used to study the economic effects of pensions; considering heterogeneity in wealth is likely to be necessary in a model used to study precautionary saving or redistributive taxation.
- Lucas, Robert, Jr. (1980). "Equilibrium in a pure currency economy". Economic Inquiry 18 (2): 203–220. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.1980.tb00570.x.
- Fuerst, Timothy S. (1992). "Liquidity, loanable funds, and real activity". Journal of Monetary Economics 29 (1): 3–24. doi:10.1016/0304-3932(92)90021-S.
- Stiglitz, Joseph E. (1987). "Principal and Agent". The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics 3. pp. 966–971.
- Page, Scott E. (2008). "Agent-based models". The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2nd ed.).
- Ríos-Rull, José-Víctor (1995). "Models with Heterogeneous Agents". In Cooley, T. Frontiers of Business Cycle Theory. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-04323-X.
- Altig, David; Auerbach, Alan; Kotlikoff, Laurence; Smetters, Kent; Walliser, Jan (2001). "Simulating Fundamental Tax Reform in the United States". American Economic Review 91 (3): 574–595. doi:10.1257/aer.91.3.574. JSTOR 2677880.
- Carroll, Christopher (1997). "Buffer-Stock Saving and the Life Cycle/Permanent Income Hypothesis". Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (1): 1–55. doi:10.1162/003355397555109.
- Bénabou, Roland (2002). "Tax and Education Policy in a Heterogeneous-Agent Economy: What Levels of Redistribution Maximize Growth and Efficiency?". Econometrica 70 (2): 481–517. doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00293.
- Hartley, James E. (1997). "Retrospectives: The Origins of the Representative Agent". Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (2): 169–177. doi:10.1257/jep.10.2.169. JSTOR 2138488.
- Kirman, Alan P. (1992). "Whom or What Does the Representative Individual Represent?". Journal of Economic Perspectives 6 (2): 117–136. doi:10.1257/jep.6.2.117. JSTOR 2138411.