Family and early career
Fitton was the eldest son of William Fitton of Awrice, County Limerick and his wife Eva Trevor, daughter of Sir Edward Trevor of Denbighshire. He was the great-grandson of Sir Edward Fitton, Vice-Treasurer of Ireland. The Irish Fittons were a junior branch of the Fittons of Gawsworth Hall, Cheshire; the dispute over the ownership of Gawsworth was to pre-occupy Alexander for most of his life. He married Anne Joliffe, daughter of Thomas Joliffe of Worcestershire and they had one surviving daughter; Anne died in 1687.
He entered Gray's Inn in 1654 and the Inner Temple in 1655; he was called to the Bar in 1662. Since he immediately became embroiled in the Gawsworth inheritance claim, it is doubtful if he ever practised law.
Gawsworth inheritance claim
Sir Edward Fitton, 2nd Baronet, of Gawsworth, died in 1643 without issue; he had seven sisters, but the nearest male Fitton was Alexander's father William. In 1641 Edward made a settlement creating an entail in favour of William and his male heirs. This was against the violent protests of Charles Gerard, son of Edward's sister Penelope. After Edward's death the Gerards tried to hold Gawsworth by force; but the progress of the English Civil War turned in the Fittons favour: as a staunch Royalist Gerard's own estates were forfeited and he left England about 1645, leaving the Fittons in possession until the Restoration.
By 1662 Gerard, now Baron Gerard of Brandon, had recovered his own estates and was in high favour at Court; inevitably he laid claim to Gawsworth. He brought a suit in the Court of Chancery exhibiting a will supposedly made by Edward Fitton just before his death. Alexander Fitton rather than simply rely on the entail produced a deed making the settlement on his father irrevocable. Gerard then dramatically produced a notorious forger, Abraham Granger, who testified that he had forged the deed on Fitton's behalf. The Court ordered a jury to find the facts: they found that the deed was indeed a forgery ; and while Fitton managed to get a second hearing before a Cheshire jury, the result was the same, and Gerard took possession.
Which party was in the right is now difficult to say: it is suspicious that both parties were relying on documents whose very existence had been previously unknown, and it is perfectly possible that both will and deed were forged. Fitton then made a serious mistake in publishing a pamphlet directly accusing Gerard of winning the case by bribing and threatening witnesses, and including what purported to be Granger's confession that he had committed perjury.Fitton was perhaps unaware that to libel a peer was scandalum magnatum, a serious offence. The House of Lords took a serious view of the matter and Fitton was committed to the King's Bench Prison until if ever he produced Granger to confirm his story. Given Granger's character, it is hardly surprising that Fittton never did produce him, and he might well have remained in prison for life. As it was (though accounts differ) he may still have been in prison in 1687. The petition to the House of Commons of England in 1668 mentioned in Pepys' Diary cane to nothing as did an attempt to prosecute Gerard's witnesses for perjury. The disgrace of Gerard, now Earl of Macclesfield, who supported the Exclusion Bill and was later suspected of complicity in the Monmouth Rebellion, encouraged Fitton to make one last effort to recover Gawsworth; somewhat surprisingly his case was dismissed for undue delay. The affair however caused the new King James II to look favourably on Fitton.
Lord Chancellor of Ireland
In 1687 the Irish Chancellor Sir Charles Porter, expressed reservations about the King's policy of toleration of Catholics and was dismissed; while Richard Nagle, the Attorney General for Ireland, a Roman Catholic, put forward his claim, James was persuaded that Fitton, a Protestant, would be a better choice. Fitton thought it advisable to convert to Catholicism. As Lord Chancellor he was accused of ignorance, prejudice and bias against Protestants, although some historians have questioned the accuracy of these charges. When James II arrived in Ireland Fitton presided over the Patriot Parliament of 1689; he was given a barony and inevitably chose the title Baron Fitton of Gawsworth. When James fled Ireland after the Battle of the Boyne Fitton was Lord Justice of Ireland and acted in his absence; the following year he joined James in France, although it is unclear if any proceedings were threatened against him. He died at St. Germain in 1698.
Fitton has been treated harshly by historians, especially Thomas Macaulay, who dismissed Fitton as a "pettifogger" without legal ability or commonsense and unfit by reason of his imprisonment for forgery to hold any office. O'Flanagan writing in 1870 took a more charitable view, stating that he had examined Fitton's decrees and found no evidence of ignorance or incapacity; on the contrary, they appeared to be the work of an experienced equity judge. On the accusation of forgery, the safest view perhaps is that Gerard and Fitton were both guilty of it; Ball remarks that "bad as Fitton's character may have been it can scarcely have been worse than that of Lord Gerard".
Sir Charles Porter
|Lord Chancellor of Ireland
Title next held by Sir Charles Porter
- See F. Elrington Ball The Judges in Ireland 1221–1921 John Murray London 1926
- See Diary of Samuel Pepys 21 February 1668
- Diary 21 February 1668
- O'Flanagan, J. Roderick Lives of the Lord Chancellors and Keepers of the Great Seal of Ireland 2 volumes London 1870
- Macaulay History of England Volume 3 pages 102–103
- O'Flanagan Lives of the Lord Chancellors
- Ball Judges in Ireland Volume 1 page 303