American Association of University Professors
|Motto||Academic freedom for a free society|
|Type||Nonprofit charitable organization|
|47,000 professors and professional university staff|
Arthur O. Lovejoy
The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) is an organization of professors and other academics in the United States. AAUP membership is about 47,000, with over 500 local campus chapters and 39 state organizations.
The AAUP's stated mission is to advance academic freedom and shared governance, to define fundamental professional values and standards for higher education, and to ensure higher education's contribution to the common good. Founded in 1915 by Arthur O. Lovejoy and John Dewey, the AAUP has helped to shape American higher education by developing the standards and procedures that maintain quality in education and academic freedom in the country's colleges and universities. Rudy Fichtenbaum is the current president.
Among the events that led to its founding was the dismissal of eugenicist, economics professor and sociologist Edward Alsworth Ross from Stanford University. Ross' work criticizing the employment of Chinese laborers by the Southern Pacific Railroad, run by Stanford's founder Leland Stanford, led Leland's widow Jane Stanford to intervene and eventually, over the objections of the president and the faculty, succeed in getting Ross dismissed.
Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure
As the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) details the history of their policy on academic freedom and tenure, the association maintains that there “are still people who want to control what professors teach and write.” The AAUP's "Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure" is the definitive articulation of these principles and practices, and is widely accepted throughout the academic community. The association's procedures ensuring academic due process remain the model for professional employment practices on campuses throughout the country.
The association suggests that "The principles of Academic Freedom and Tenure" date back to a 1925 conference. R.M. O'Neil's history suggests that the formal origins of the statement of academic freedom in the United States begins with an earlier 1915 “declaration of principles,” when the “fledgling” AAUP first convened.
While it seems common sense that academic freedom aligns with the values of democratic rights and free speech, O'Neil also notes the ideas of academic freedom at the time were not entirely well received, where even the New York Times criticized the declaration, but that today the statement remains “almost as nearly inviolate as the U.S. Constitution”, The AAUP notes that following a series of conferences beginning in 1934, the association officially adopted the "1925 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure," which then started to become institutionalized in universities only since the 1940s.
The AAUP offers the original principles, including the 1940 interpretations of the statement and a 1970 interpretation, which codified evaluation of the principles since the time they were adopted. The statement is straightforward, based on three principles of academic freedom. Briefly summarized, the first principle states that teachers are entitled to “full freedom in research and in publication of the results," and that the issue of financial gains from research depends on the relationship with the institution. The second principle of academic freedom is that teachers should have the same freedom in the classroom. The third asserts that college and university professors are citizens and should be free to speak and write as citizens “free from institutional censorship.”
Based upon five principles, the statement on academic tenure is equally simple and to the point. The first principle maintains that the terms of appointment are to be stated in writing. The second details the conditions and length of time professors are given to attain tenure. The third notes that during the probationary period before attaining tenure, the teacher "should have all the academic freedom that all other members of the faculty have." Detailing terms for appeal of the decision to deny tenure, the fourth point notes that both faculty and the institution’s governing board should judge whether tenure is to be granted or denied. The final point suggests that if the faculty member is not granted tenure appointment for reasons of financial restraint upon the university, the "financial exigency should be demonstrably bona fide."
Noting the Supreme Court Case Keyishian v. The Board of Regents (1967) which established the constitutionality and legal basis for the AAUP's principles of academic freedom, the 1970 interpretations believes that the statement is not a "static code but a fundamental document to set a framework of norms to guide adaptations to changing times and circumstances." The commentary iterates key points of the 1940 interpretations. The statement does not discourage controversy but emphasizes professionalism, believing that professors should be careful "not to introduce into their teaching controversial matter which has no relation to their subject."
The interpretive statement also maintains that while professors have the rights of citizens, both scholars and educational officers "should remember that the public may judge their profession and their institution by their utterances," noting that every effort should be made "to indicate they are not speaking for the institution." The comments provide for further insights into the evaluation for tenure appointment and direct to the "1968 Recommended Institutional Regulations on Academic Freedom and Tenure," which recommends policy based upon the 1940 statement and a later documents on standards for faculty dismissal.
Statement on Government of Colleges and Universities
The American Association of University Professors published its first "Statement on Government of Colleges and Universities" in 1920, “emphasizing the importance of faculty involvement in personnel decisions, selection of administrators, preparation of the budget, and determination of educational policies. Refinements to the statement were introduced in subsequent years, culminating in the 1966 "Statement on Government of Colleges and Universities”.
This statement was jointly formulated by the American Association of University Professors, the American Council on Education (ACE), and the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges (AGB). The statement clarifies the respective roles of governing boards, faculties, and administrations. The document does not provide for a “blueprint” to the governance of higher education.
Nor was the purpose of the statement to provide principles for relations with industry and government (though it establishes direction on “the correction of existing weaknesses”). Rather, the statement aimed to establish a shared vision for the internal governance of institutions. Student involvement is not addressed in detail. The statement concerns general education policy and internal operations with an overview of the formal roles for governing structures in the organization and management of higher education.
Conflict with Religious Institutions
Some scholars have criticized the AAUP's "antipathy toward religious colleges and universities." And the AAUP has censured numerous religious institutions, including Brigham Young University and The Catholic University of America. Others have criticized the AAUP's current stance regarding academic freedom in religious institutions as contradicting its 1940 statement on academic freedom, which permits religious institutions to place limits on academic freedom if those limitations are clearly stated. In 1970, the AAUP criticized its 1940 statement, positing that most religious institutions "no longer need or desire" to place limits on academic freedom.
In 1988, the AAUP offered up another interpretation, stating that the "1970 de-endorsement clause" requires a religious institution to forfeit its "right to represent itself as an 'authentic seat of higher learning.'" But the AAUP's Committee A did not endorse it, thus the issue on whether a religious institution can place limits on academic freedom if those limitations are clearly stated appears to be unresolved.
In recent decades, the AAUP has added a focus on addressing the dramatic increase in faculty positions off the tenure track. An increasing percentage of faculty has become "contingent," or non-tenure track. Many are hired into part-time positions, often multiple part-time positions which together equal a full-time load or more, but with dramatically lower pay, little job security, and few or no fringe benefits. As of 2005, 48 percent of all faculty served in part-time appointments, and non-tenure-track positions of all types accounted for 68 percent of all faculty appointments in American higher education.
The AAUP has released a number of reports on contingent faculty: in 2008 a report on accreditors' guidelines pertaining to part-time faculty and a report of an investigation involving alleged violations of the academic freedom and due process rights of a full-time contingent faculty member; and in 2006 an index providing data on the number of contingent faculty at various colleges. also in 2006, the AAUP adopted a new policy dealing with the job protections that should be afforded to part-time faculty members. in 2003, it released its major policy statement Contingent Appointments and the Academic Profession. The statement makes new recommendations in two areas: increasing the proportion of faculty appointments that are on the tenure line, and improving job security and due process protections for those with contingent appointments.
In 2009 AAUP began its reorganization to formally separate the previously muddied relationship between its think tank, its lobbying in non-organized chapters (called Advocacy), and its support for Collective Bargaining Chapters. AAUP currently represents approximately 70 affiliates across the United States in such institutions as University of Connecticut, Portland State University, University of Alaska, the California State University system, Rutgers, University of Oregon, Eastern Michigan University, University of Illinois Chicago, University of Rhode Island, State University of New York, and many others in both the public and private sector, as well as a large number of affiliate organizations where affiliation is shared with other labor unions, the most common dual affiliation being with the American Federation of Teachers (AFT).
Unlike the American Federation of Teachers and other more traditional labor unions, AAUP is not a servicing parent organization; all of its affiliates (at least those that are not affiliated with any other labor union) are independent organizations that completely provide for all their own services, such as staff, attorneys, consultants and organizers. Further, the AAUP does not have the power of receivership in its constitution, so it can not take over any of its affiliates, supplant any of its elected leaders, nor dictate policy or bargaining proposals or agenda upon them.
Investigations by the AAUP of the administrations of the institutions listed below show that, as evidenced by a past violation, they are not observing the generally recognized principles of academic freedom and tenure approved by this Association, the Association of American Colleges and Universities, and more than two hundred other professional and educational organizations which have endorsed the 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure.
|Institution Name||Report Published||Year|
|Grove City College||March 1963, 15-24||1963|
|Frank Phillips College||Dec. 1968, 433-38||1969|
|Concordia Seminary||April 1975, 49-59||1975|
|Murray State University||Dec. 1975, 322-28||1976|
|State University of New York||Aug. 1977, 237-60||1978|
|Phillips Community College of the University of Arkansas||May 1978, 93-98||1978|
|Nichols College||May 1980, 207-12||1980|
|Yeshiva University||Aug. 1981, 186-95||1982|
|American International College||May–June 1983, 42-46||1983|
|Metropolitan Community College (KS)||Mar.-Apr. 1984, 23a-32a||1984|
|Talladega College||May–June 1986, 6a-14a||1986|
|Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico||May–June 1987, 33-38||1987|
|Husson University||May–June 1987, 45-50||1987|
|Hillsdale College||May–June 1988, 29-33||1988|
|Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary||May–June 1989, 35-45||1989|
|The Catholic University of America||Sept.-Oct. 1989, 27-40||1990|
|Dean College||May–June 1991, 27-32||1992|
|Baltimore City Community College||May–June 1992, 37-41||1992|
|Loma Linda University||May–June 1992, 42-49||1992|
|Clarkson College||May–June 1993, 46-53||1993|
|North Greenville College||May–June 1993, 54-64||1993|
|Savannah College of Art and Design||May–June 1993, 65-70||1993|
|University of Bridgeport||Nov.-Dec. 1993, 37-45||1994|
|Benedict College||May–June 1994, 37-46||1994|
|Supplementary Report||Jan.-Feb. 2005, 51-54|
|Bennington College||Mar.-Apr. 1995, 91-103||1995|
|Supplementary Report||Jan.-Feb. 1998, 70-75|
|Alaska Pacific University||May–June 1995, 32-39||1995|
|St. Bonaventure University||July-Aug. 1995, 65-73||1996|
|National Park Community College||May–June 1996, 41-46||1996|
|Saint Meinrad School of Theology||July-Aug. 1996, 51-60||1997|
|Minneapolis College of Art and Design||May–June 1997, 53-58||1997|
|Brigham Young University||Sept.-Oct 1997, 52-71||1998|
|University of the District of Columbia||May–June 1998, 46-55||1998|
|Lawrence Technological University||May–June 1998, 56-62||1998|
|Johnson & Wales University||May–June 1999, 46-50||1999|
|Albertus Magnus College||Jan.-Feb. 2000, 54-63||2000|
|Charleston Southern University||Jan.-Feb. 2001, 63-77||2001|
|University of Dubuque||Sept.-Oct. 2001, 62-73||2002|
|Meharry Medical College||Nov.-Dec. 2004, 56-78||2005|
|University of the Cumberlands||Mar.-Apr. 2005 99-113||2005|
|Virginia State University||May–June, 2005, 47-62||2005|
|Our Lady of Holy Cross College||Jan.-Feb, 07, 60-68||2007|
|Bastyr University||Mar.-Apr. 2007, 106-120||2007|
|Cedarville University||May–June 2009, 58-84||2009|
|Nicholls State University||Nov-Dec 2008, 60-69||2009|
|North Idaho College||May–June 2009, 85-92||2009|
|Stillman College||March–April 2009, 94-101||2009|
|Clark Atlanta University||February 2010||2010|
|University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston||April 2010||2010|
|Bethune-Cookman University||October 2010||2011|
|Idaho State University||July 2011||2011|
a. ^ Published online.
- Academic freedom
- Governance in higher education
- Higher education
- National Conference of University Professors (UK)
- University organizations (annotated list)
||Constructs such as ibid., loc. cit. and idem are discouraged by Wikipedia's style guide for footnotes, as they are easily broken. Please improve this article by replacing them with named references (quick guide), or an abbreviated title. (May 2010)|
- AAUP: Mission & description
- Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure
- Campus Watch: AAUP's 1915 Declaration of Principles
- O’Neil, R.M., "Academic Freedom: Past, Present, and Future beyond September 11," in P.G. Altbach, R.O. Berdahl, and P.J. Gumport, (eds.), American Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Social, Political, and Economic Challenges, 2nd ed. (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005), 92
- Ibid., 92-94
- American Association of University Professors, "1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure"
- “Statement on Government of Colleges and Universities.”
- The Issue of Academic Freedom: An Interview with Jim Gordon
- The Idol of Academic Freedom
- The Value of Limitations
- Trends in Faculty Status, 1975-2005
- American Association of University Professors
- 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure
- AAUP Statement on Government of Colleges and Universities
- AAUP Statement on Shared Governance
- "The Yeshiva Case: Special Analysis; The Impact of the Supreme Court Decision", by Aaron E. Levenstein, National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education Newsletter, v8 n1 (Jan-Feb 1980)
- "Academic Unions: The Legal Landscape",[dead link] by Donna Euben, Academe (Jan/Feb 2001)
- "The Constitutional Context: Universities, New Information Technologies and the US Supreme Court" (Abstract), by Sandra Braman Information, Communication & Society, Volume 3, Issue 4 (December 2000)
- AAUP Collection (MUM00513) owned by the University of Mississippi, Archives and Special Collections