American Tradition Partnership

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

American Tradition Partnership (ATP), formerly known as Western Tradition Partnership, is a conservative 501(c)4 advocacy group in the United States targeting what it describes as "environmental extremism."[1] ATP has also initiated litigation targeting campaign finance regulations.

The organization's mission, in its own words, is a dedication "to fighting environmental extremism and promoting responsible development and management of land, water, and natural resources in the Rocky Mountain West and across the United States." ATP promotes what it describes as voluntary, free-market solutions to environmental problems as the means to protect both the economy and the environment. It works to achieve its organizational goals through lobbying, public education, and grassroots mobilization.[1]

The group was first registered as Western Tradition Partnership as a 501(c)(4) in 2008.[2][3] In 2009, the group spun off a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, the Western Tradition Institute, which also does business as the American Tradition Institute.[2]

Donald Ferguson, the former executive director of ATP and manager of their Washington, D.C. office, resigned on January 3, 2013, as it continued to suffer adverse rulings in Montana courts over alleged campaign finance violations.[4][5]

Issues[edit]

Some prominent issues in which ATP has become involved include:

National monuments[edit]

In 2010, WTP filed a Freedom of Information Act request seeking documents related to President Barack Obama's potential use of the Antiquities Act to establish as many as fourteen new national monuments, one of which may include the Vermillion Basin in Colorado, which has significant natural gas and other mineral resources. Republican Congressmen Doug Lamborn and Mike Coffman, both of Colorado, have concurrently introduced legislation to prevent any additional national monuments from being established in their state.[6]

Emissions trading[edit]

ATP has strongly opposed legislation creating an emissions trading system in the United States, referring to such proposals as a "cap and tax." An online petition sponsored by ATP states that its position on emissions trading results from skepticism about global warming evidence and fears that such a system would lead to higher energy prices, higher government spending, lost jobs, and other economic costs.[7]

Utility alternative energy regulation[edit]

ATP has vehemently opposed Colorado House Bill 1001 which would require public utilities to use alternative energy sources. The group says the proposed law would create job losses and higher utility bills. "The renewable energy standard forces utility companies to buy more expensive utilities, so then they have to cut back on hiring and lay people off," according to ATP executive director Ferguson.[8] American Tradition said the standards were being implemented for the benefit of “politically-connected, higher-priced ‘green’ speculators.” ATP initially planned to overturn the law via ballot initiative but soon turned away from that effort. The group says it will lobby to have the law changed in 2011.[9]

Litigation[edit]

Montana Commissioner of Political Practices[edit]

In 2010, the Montana Commission of Political Practices ruled that ATP had broken state campaign laws by failing to register as a political committee or properly report its donors and spending. The commission investigation's revealed that the group had solicited unlimited contributions to support pro-mining, pro-logging and pro-development candidates in Montana and avoided disclosing the contributions.[2]

The opinion issued by Commissioner Dennis Unsworth in October 2010 followed investigation of a complaint filed in 2008 by an attorney from Great Falls. The complaint accused ATP of not properly disclosing financial information related to fliers it released that criticized a state senator. The opinion examined connections between ATP, a small group of political action committees, candidates for public office, and discrepancies in the campaign finance disclosures.[10][11]

In response, ATF filed suit challenging the ruling. The lawsuit alleged a violation of ATP's federal constitutional right to free speech and a state constitutional right to privacy. The suit demanded that all complaints against ATP be dismissed. Montana Commissioner of Political Practices Dennis Unsworth (who issued the contested ruling), the state attorney general, and prosecutors in Cascade and Lewis and Clark counties were named as defendants in the action.[10][12]

ATP criticized Unsworth for exceeding his authority by including names of organizations and individuals in his ruling without presenting any evidence of wrongdoing on their part. "Indeed, the commissioner's opinion itself finds no evidence of coordination," ATP wrote. "Yet, the opinion drags the names of ATP's counsel, the Republican Party, numerous political candidates, persons associated with different organizations, and lawful businesses into the mix and alleges that there is."[10][11]

John Sinrud, a former Bozeman lawmaker who worked with ATP in 2008, accused Unsworth of using a double standard, saying ATP's behavior was legal and that several union and conservation groups heavily involved in Montana politics used similar tactics. "Commissioner Unsworth is selectively going after organizations that do not meet his political muster," he said. "He should just stick to the facts and that's not what he's doing. He's violated his oath of office of being nonpartisan."[10][11]

Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Attorney General of Montana[edit]

In October 2010, District Judge Jeffrey Sherlock ruled that the Montana Corrupt Practices Act of 1912, which prohibited independent expenditures to influence political campaigns by corporations, is unconstitutional. ATP had challenged the law after the United States Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling.[13] WTP was joined in its suit by Champion Painting and the Montana Shooting Sports Association.[14] Ruling Judge Sherlock said he agreed with U.S. District Judge Paul Magnuson, who overturned a similar ban in Minnesota. Magnuson wrote that Citizens United "is unequivocal: The government may not prohibit independent and indirect corporate expenditures on political speech."[15]

In Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Attorney General of Montana, 2011 MT 328, the Montana Supreme Court ruled 5-2 that the broad protections given to corporations in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission do not apply to Montana’s campaign finance laws.[16] The US Supreme Court June 25 summarily reversed the Montana Supreme Court ruling.[17]

Longmont[edit]

In 2009, ATP sued the city of Longmont, Colorado, seeking to prevent enforcement of the Longmont Fair Campaign Practices Act (LFCPA). An injunction suspending enforcement of the regulations was granted in October 2009, after as Senior U.S. District Judge Walker Miller held that ATP and its co-plaintiffs would likely prevail.[18] The LFCPA was revised in 2009 after a 2008 special election where a city council member received a $5,000 contribution from the Longmont Association of Realtors. The 2009 changes mandated that contributors' identities, contribution amounts, and other information must be disclosed in campaign advertisements.[18]

The suit was settled out of court in December 2009 with the town paying the plaintiffs $68,500. As part of the settlement, the city agreed to propose changing the contested portions of the LFCPA, which were subsequently repealed by the city council.[19]

Funding[edit]

In Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Attorney General of Montana, the Montana Supreme Court concluded that the organization's primary purpose is to allow donors to make unlimited contributions in complete secrecy, though the Office of Political Practices admitted they had no evidence to back up that claim. During the case, Western Tradition Partnership refused to provide information to the court as to its organizations, funding, activities or intent, citing its 501(c)4 status under federal tax law. The court concluded that the group represents "a threat to the political marketplace" and it has operated in complete disregard of the laws of Montana.[20] That ruling was overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Stolen documents[edit]

In 2011, documents allegedly stolen from a car and found in a Colorado meth house revealed the inner workings of WTP/ATC, including possible illegal coordination with Republican candidates.[21] The organization contacted the FBI after Colorado Democrats trafficked the stolen materials across state lines to Montana Democrats.[citation needed] After the FBI was contacted the Montana Commission on Political Practices restricted access to the materials, under which restriction the materials remain "public and reviewable upon request."[citation needed]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Mission, Western Tradition Partnership
  2. ^ a b c Sue Sturgis (2011-10-31). "SPECIAL INVESTIGATION: Who's behind the 'information attacks' on climate scientists?". Free Range Longmont. Retrieved 2011-11-20. 
  3. ^ "History and Documents (Corporations)". Colorado Secretary of State -. Retrieved 2011-11-20. "20081173078" 
  4. ^ American Tradition Partnership
  5. ^ 'Director of shadowy political group ATP resigns; group faces more legal troubles', Billings Gazette, By Mike Dennison, 4 January 2013
  6. ^ Western Tradition Partnership targets Salazar on alleged monument memo, by David O. Williams, The Colorado Independent, 31 March 2010
  7. ^ Petition Opposing Cap-and-Trade, Western Tradition Partnership
  8. ^ Attack mailer labels Snowmass senator 'The Appropriator', by Troy Hooper, Real Aspen, 8 October 2010
  9. ^ Sen. Schwartz Targeted In Mailing For Her Utility Vote, State Bill Colorado, 4 October 2010
  10. ^ a b c d Battle intensifies over Montana law, by Matt Gouras, The Spokesman Review, 31 October 2010
  11. ^ a b c Opinion meant to "score political points," WTP says, by Daniel Person, Bozeman Daily Chronicle, 22 October 2010
  12. ^ Conservative groups sue over campaign finance law, Bozeman Daily Chronicle, 23 November 2010
  13. ^ Court tosses ban on corporate donations, by Andy Malby, Belgrade News, 19 October 2010
  14. ^ Montana Politics 2010: Corporate Spending, by Marnee Bank, KXLH, 18 October 2010
  15. ^ Judge overturns Montana's 1912 ban on corporate campaign contributions, by Charles S. Johnson, Ravalli Republic, 18 October 2010
  16. ^ http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/MT-expenditures-decision.pdf
  17. ^ http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/american-tradition-partnership-inc-v-bullock/
  18. ^ a b Montana-based org. pours cash into conservative coffers in Longmont City Council race, by Jefferson Dodge, The Boulder Weekly, 29 October 2010
  19. ^ Longmont campaign finance suit over, by Rachel Carter, The Longmont Times-Call, 6 January 2010
  20. ^ Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Attorney General of Montana, 2011 MT 328
  21. ^ Documents Found in Meth House Reveal Workings of Dark Money Group

External links[edit]