A. C. Bradley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Andrew Cecil Bradley)
Jump to: navigation, search
Andrew Cecil Bradley in 1891

Andrew Cecil Bradley (March 26, 1851 – September 2, 1935) was an English literary scholar,[1] best remembered for his work on Shakespeare.

Life[edit]

Bradley was born at Park Hill, Clapham, Surrey. He was the youngest of the twenty-one children born to the preacher Charles Bradley (1789–1871) and his second wife Emma Linton. Among his siblings was the philosopher Francis Herbert Bradley.[2] Bradley studied at Balliol College, Oxford. He obtained a Balliol Fellowship in 1874 and lectured first in English and subsequently in philosophy until 1881. He then took a permanent position at the University of Liverpool where he lectured on literature. In 1889 he moved to Glasgow as Regius Professor. In 1901 he was elected to the Oxford professorship of poetry. During his five years in this post he produced Shakespearean Tragedy (1904) and Oxford Lectures on Poetry (1909). He was later made an honorary fellow of Balliol and was awarded honorary doctorates from Liverpool, Glasgow, Edinburgh, and Durham, and was offered (but declined) the King Edward VII chair at Cambridge. Bradley never married; he lived in London with his sister and died at 6 Holland Park Road, Kensington, London, on 2 September 1935.[2] His will established a research fellowship for young scholars of English Letters.[3]

Work[edit]

The outcome of his five years as Professor of Poetry at Oxford University were A. C. Bradley’s two major works, Shakespearean Tragedy (1904), and Oxford Lectures on Poetry (1909). All of his published work was delivered earlier as lectures. Bradley's pedagogical manner and his self-confidence made him a real guide for many students to the meaning of Shakespeare. His influence on Shakespearean criticism was so great that the following anonymous poem appeared:

I dreamt last night that Shakespeare’s Ghost
Sat for a civil service post.
The English paper for that year
Had several questions on King Lear
Which Shakespeare answered very badly
Because he hadn’t read his Bradley.
(Hawkes 1986 as cited in Taylor 2001: 46)[4]

Though Bradley has sometimes been criticised for writing of Shakespeare's characters as though they were real people, his book is probably the most influential single work of Shakespearean criticism ever published.[5]

Reputation[edit]

Shakespearean Tragedy has been reprinted more than two dozen times and is itself the subject of a scholarly book, Katherine Cooke's A. C. Bradley and His Influence in Twentieth-Century Shakespeare Criticism.[6] By the mid-twentieth century his approach became discredited for many scholars; often it is said to contain anachronistic errors and attempts to apply late 19th century novelistic conceptions of morality and psychology to early 17th century society. Kenneth Burke's 1951 article "Othello: An Essay to Illustrate a Method"[7] counters a Bradleyan reading of character, as L. C. Knights had earlier done with his 1933 essay "How Many Children Had Lady Macbeth?" (John Britton has pointed out that this was never a question actually posed by Bradley, and apparently was made up by F. R. Leavis as a mockery of "current irrelevancies in Shakespeare criticism."[8]) Since the 1970s, the prevalence of poststructuralist methods of criticism resulted in students turning away from his work, although a number of scholars have recently returned to considering 'character' as a historical category of evaluation (for instance, Michael Bristol). Recently, the distinguished critic Harold Bloom has paid tribute to Bradley's place in the great tradition of critical writing on Shakespeare: 'This book – Shakespeare: the Invention of the Human – is a latecomer work, written in the wake of the Shakespeare critics I most admire: Johnson, Hazlitt, Bradley.'[9] There has also been a renewed interest in the German idealist philosopher Hegel, who influenced Bradley's theory of tragedy.[10]

Bradley delivered the 1907–1908 Gifford Lectures at the University of Glasgow, entitled "Ideals of Religion." Bradley's other works include "Aristotle's Conception of the State" in Hellenica, ed. Evelyn Abbott, London : Longmans, Green, 1st ed. 1880, 2nd ed., 1898, Poetry for Poetry's Sake (1901), A Commentary on Tennyson's In Memoriam (1901), and A Miscellany (1929).

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "BRADLEY, Andrew Cecil". Who's Who, 59: p. 202. 1907. 
  2. ^ a b Bradley, Francis Herbert, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
  3. ^ Hancock, Brannon. Andrew Cecil Bradley -- Gifford Lectures.
  4. ^ Taylor, Michael. Shakespeare Criticism in the Twentieth Century, p. 40. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
  5. ^ Gauntlett, Mark. "The Perishable Body of the Unpoetic: A. C. Bradley Performs Othello." Shakespeare Survey Volume 47: Playing Places for Shakespeare. Ed. Stanley Wells. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  6. ^ Cooke, Katherine. A. C. Bradley and His Influence in Twentieth-Century Shakespeare Criticism. Oxford: Clarendon, 1972.
  7. ^ Burke, Kenneth. Kenneth Burke on Shakespeare. Parlor Press, 2007.
  8. ^ Britton, John. "A. C. Bradley and those Children of Lady Macbeth." Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 3 (Summer 1961), pp. 349–351.
  9. ^ p. 717.
  10. ^ See Slavoj Zizek, Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism; Bradley's essay 'Hegel's Theory of Tragedy' in Oxford Lectures on Poetry, pp. 69-99.

Sources[edit]

External links[edit]

Academic offices
Preceded by
John Nichol
Regius Professor of English Language and Literature,
University of Glasgow

1889–1900
Succeeded by
Sir Walter Raleigh
Preceded by
William Courthope
Oxford Professor of Poetry
1901–1906
Succeeded by
John William Mackail