Andrew Joseph Galambos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Andrew J. Galambos)
Jump to: navigation, search

Andrew Joseph Galambos (born Ifj. Galambos Jozsef Andras, June 28, 1924, in Hungary; died in Orange County, California on April 10, 1997) was an astrophysicist and philosopher who innovated a social structure that seeks to maximize human peace and freedom. While Galambos had much in common with his classical liberal contemporaries, his most unique contributions concerned his theories on intellectual property, and his advocacy of a stateless society totally free of coercion, political or otherwise. He also is noteworthy for his integration of a wide variety of scientific, economic, and historical inputs in the creation of his ideal social structure, which he termed "The Natural Republic." [1] Galambos distinguished his theory from that of Ludwig von Mises, subscribing to the same 'subjective theory of value' in economics but deriving it from his own definition of property.[2]

The well-known libertarian author and 1996 Presidential candidate of the Libertarian Party, Harry Browne wrote of Andrew Galambos after his death:

“He was an influential libertarian, but I refer to him as ‘the unknown libertarian’ because he never wrote a book or appeared on national radio or TV. His renown will be limited mostly to those who came in personal contact with him. But he had a profound effect on thousands of individuals who took his courses — who in turn affected others. Undoubtedly the ripples from the stones he dropped eventually touched some of today's leading libertarians.”[3]

Early career[edit]

Galambos moved to Los Angeles in 1952 to work for North American Aviation. Beginning in 1958, Galambos worked in the Space Technology Laboratory (STL) division of Ramo-Wooldridge Corporation, which later became TRW Space Technology Laboratories.[4] There, Galambos worked as an astrophysicist calculating trajectories for Atlas ICBM’s before the advent of high-speed digital computers. On the side, Galambos partnered with colleague Donald H. Allen in a business known as Universal Shares, which was an insurance and securities dealership.[5]

As Galambos’ ideas on freedom and proprietary government crystallized, he became disillusioned with his work at STL, which had evolved almost exclusively to focus on the development of inter-continental ballistic missiles for military purposes. Galambos did not want to work on weapons of war.[6]

Around 1958-1959 Galambos formulated a proposal to the director of STL, George Mueller, for a project to develop rockets for space exploration, including lunar landings. Mueller turned it down. A few years later, however, Mueller took a position with NASA where he worked on the Apollo 11 manned lunar landing project, the same type of project he had turned down when Galambos proposed it to him at STL.[6]

In 1960, Galambos left the aerospace industry and joined the faculty of Whittier College to teach physics, astrophysics, and mathematics. While at Whittier, Galambos presented a popular extracurricular class entitled, "The Decline and Renaissance of Laissez-Faire Capitalism." He also taught previously at New York University, Brooklyn College, Stevens Institute of Technology of Hoboken, New Jersey, the University of Minnesota, and Carleton College of Northfield, Minnesota.[7]

In 1960, Galambos traveled with his colleague, Alvin Lowi Jr., to New York City where they met with Leonard Read of the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE) who introduced them to Henry Hazlitt, Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard, and Ayn Rand.[5]

The Free Enterprise Institute[edit]

In 1961, Galambos established The Free Enterprise Institute (FEI) which was the name he used for his teaching business. His initial course was entitled Course 100, Capitalism: The Key to Survival. He eventually taught courses on intellectual property, investments and insurance, financial planning, physics, and journalism, among others.[8][9]

Galambos had an important colleague in Jay Stuart Snelson (1936-2011). Snelson was the senior lecturer for FEI from 1964-1978, teaching both V-50 and V-201. In large part due to Snelson's teaching, at least 20,000 individuals attended courses offered by FEI during his tenure.

Courses V-50 and V-201[edit]

Course V-50T (the "T" was for Tape) was transcribed and published as Sic Itur Ad Astra (see below). Another course, V-201, focused on mechanisms for intellectual property protection for innovators. The initial letter “V” stands for volition, meaning the act of choosing, which is a fundamental characteristic of human beings.

V-50T and V-201T are occasionally offered as tape recorded courses by The Free Enterprise Institute.

In 1999 volume one of Sic Itur Ad Astra ("This is the Way to the Stars") (ISBN 0-88078-004-5) was first published. The book is a transcription of Course V-50. Volume two, for course V-201, as of January 2014 has not yet been published.

Volitional science[edit]

Galambos rejected the term social science, in part because most social scientists do not employ the scientific method to test their hypotheses. Jay Snelson suggested the term "volitional science" for its implication that volition, meaning the act of choosing, is at the center of Galambos' philosophy.[10]

In course V-50, Galambos laid out his two postulates of volitional science:

  • "Postulate Number One: All volitional beings live to pursue happiness,"[11] and
  • "Postulate Number Two: All concepts of happiness pursued through moral action are equally valid."[12]

Galambos equates immoral action with coercion[13][14] and defines freedom as "the societal condition wherein every individual has one hundred percent control over his own property."[15][16] Galambos derives his theory from these postulates. The essence of Course V-50 is Galambos' elaboration of his theory of volitional science and his application of that science to solve the problems of human society.

Property[edit]

Galambos’ concept of property was basic to his philosophy. He defined property as a man’s life and all non-procreative derivatives of his life.

Galambos taught that property is essential to a non-coercive social structure. That is why he defined freedom as follows: “Freedom is the societal condition that exists when every individual has full (100%) control over his own property.”[17] Galambos defines property as having the following elements:

  • Primordial property, which is an individual’s life
  • Primary property, which includes ideas, thoughts, and actions
  • Secondary property, which includes all tangible and intangible possessions which are derivatives of the individual's primary property.

Property includes all non-procreative derivatives of an individual’s life; this means children are not the property of their parents,[18] and also "primary property" (a person's own ideas).[19]

Galambos emphasized repeatedly that true government exists to protect property and that the state attacks property.

For example, the state requires payment for its services in the form of taxes whether or not people desire such services. Since an individual’s money is his property, the confiscation of money in the form of taxes is an attack on property. Military conscription is likewise an attack on a person’s primordial property. In the U.S. as of the early 21st century, there is a widespread public impression that military conscription no longer exists. To the contrary, it is required that all men between ages 18 and 26 register for conscription. Failure to do so is punishable by imprisonment and substantial fines.

Intellectual property[edit]

In course V-201 Galambos focuses on primary property, which in his usage is quite similar to what has been called “intellectual property”. Galambos argued that intellectual property owners should have primary control over their own ideas and over how others might use those ideas. According to Galambos, all forms of property came from a combination of "primordial property" (a person's life)[18] and "primary property" (a person's own ideas).[19] By using the natural resources available in the physical universe, individuals use their primordial property, guided by primary property (actions, guided by ideas, respectively) to create "secondary property".[20][21]

Galambos posited that intellectual property deserved every bit as much, if not more, protection and recognition than secondary property. His rationale for this can be explained in the following example:

Few would question that Ludwig van Beethoven’s music was his intellectual property and that it should be protected. Current copyright laws do protect musical compositions but only for a limited period of time. Galambos taught that protection of artistic creations should be perpetual.

While most would acknowledge Beethoven's intellectual property in the form of his musical compositions, almost everyone would deny that Isaac Newton’s discovery and description of the universal law of gravitation is Newton’s property. Newton’s law of gravitation, as he expounded it, is no less a creation of his mind than Beethoven’s 5th symphony. Beethoven created his music by his unique skill in the musical arts of composition, melody, harmony, counterpoint, and orchestration. Newton created his description of the universal law of gravitation by his unique skill in integrating the discoveries of his intellectual antecedents such as Galileo Galilei and Johannes Kepler. Furthermore, in order to work out his theory of gravitation, Newton had to innovate a completely new form of mathematics, the calculus. (Newton's contemporary, Gottfried Leibniz, also developed the calculus independently of Newton.)

Galambos recognized that more than one person could create a specific new idea, including a scientific theory, independently of each other. He allowed for that in course V-201 by innovating a method to determine whether two or more innovators of the same thing are independent of each other.

In the spirit of his teaching on intellectual property, some of Galambos' students were required to acknowledge a "proprietary notice" which asked those students to give credit (both intellectually and financially) for the information gleaned from his courses; later he required that all participants in his lectures sign a non-disclosure agreement to prevent publication of his ideas before he published them himself. Students were allowed to take notes for their private use and most lectures were taped.

Galambos acknowledged and gave credit to antecedent sources such as Thomas Paine's writings, as typified by Common Sense and article 4 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen -- "4. Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights. These limits can only be determined by law.".

Government versus the State[edit]

Galambos defined government as “any person or organization that sells services to protect property to which the owner of the property can voluntarily subscribe.” He described the term "state" as any person or organization that claims to protect property by coercing the owner of the property to use and pay for its services, claiming ‘legality’ as justification. According to these definitions, a government mechanism can be an insurance company that protects an individual’s home from criminal activity and casualty loss such as fire or storm damage. A state is any political entity with coercive power, from a municipality to the political organization known as the United States of America.[22]

Golden Rule[edit]

Galambos explained that the positive version of the Golden Rule (“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”) was problematic because it implied that it was acceptable for person A to “meddle” in the affairs of another provided person A would likewise appreciate the same thing done “unto” him/her. Galambos instead preferred the double negative version of the Golden Rule as the foundation for his philosophy. The double negative version is: “Do not do unto others as you would not have them do unto you.” Galambos explained that this version is “not subject to meddlesome interpretation.”[23]

Evolution of Galambos' philosophy[edit]

Early in his career Galambos supported Barry Goldwater's candidacy for the Republican nomination as president in 1960.[24] However, as Galambos' understanding of the destruction and violence caused by the political state deepened, he ultimately rejected politics as a means of solving social problems. He instead advocated proprietary, profit-seeking companies as the best means for protection of all forms of property. He supported private property protection and defense, the absolute rights of the owner of private property, and was opposed to political voting and other forms of political activism.[25]

Galambos' first lectures given in 1961 focused on limited government. His early societal models were modified versions of the United States republic, with the addition of the "Resistor," a body empowered to repeal laws passed by Congress if it judged them to be contrary to the Constitution.”[25]

Beginning around 1963, Galambos modified his lectures as a result of exposure to ideas from several of his contemporaries. Through his student, engineer Charles Estes and others including his colleague Alvin Lowi, Galambos came into contact with the ideas of Robert LeFevre, who advocated the idea that the state was absurd at best, and was actually an enemy of human freedom.[5]

Whereas Galambos highlighted in his lectures the state’s abysmal performance in protecting life and property, Peter Bos (a colleague of Lowi who attended FEI lectures) suggested that insurance companies could replace the state in this vital role.[26] Bos and Galambos envisioned a broader concept of insurance than the word implies to most people. In his lectures, Galambos theorized that insurance could include not only reimbursement for loss, but also prevention of loss, detection of individuals who cause loss, and the seeking of restitution from such individuals.[26]

Charles Estes had innovated an idea of restitution-based justice and a private, non-state justice system, to which Galambos was exposed in 1963. By 1964, the idea of restitution-based justice was incorporated firmly into Course V-50. When Alvin Lowi terminated his employment with FEI in 1963, he recommended Jay Stuart Snelson as his substitute. Snelson agreed to lecture for FEI provided the course was amended to incorporate the ideas of LeFevre, Bos, and Estes.[5] Galambos eventually agreed. His original philosophy, which was undergoing major changes during that period, was modified to incorporate the respective ideas of LeFevre, Bos, and Estes on the disutility of government, the application of the insurance mechanism for protecting property, and a private-based justice system focused on restitution as opposed to incarceration.

Criticism and controversy[edit]

Galambos' teaching was controversial from the outset. The mere idea of a stateless society is controversial because the vast and overwhelming number of people cannot conceive of such a thing. Most believe that regrettable as it may be, coercion in the form of a political state is necessary for peace and security; that a stateless society would degenerate immediately into chaos.[27] Galambos taught that the state was really not a protector of property, but in effect was a protection racket, no different in principle than the mafia or the drug cartels plaguing Mexico, Central America and the United States.[22]

Galambos’ idea of according property rights to ideas is controversial. Among the most passionate opponents of this idea are libertarian intellectuals who are aghast at the idea that anyone could limit their access to ideas of others.[28]

Early life[edit]

Galambos was born in Hungary in 1924. His father, Joseph Galambos-Brown, had been an officer in the Austro-Hungarian army in World War I and then became a highly regarded architect. After the war, Galambos' father decided to emigrate to America to avoid his son becoming "cannon fodder" in a second world war, which he saw coming.[29]

Despite his father's wish to keep his son out of war, Galambos volunteered to serve in the U.S. Army during WWII. After completing his undergraduate work at City College of New York, he moved to Minnesota in 1948 where he met his future wife, Suzanne Siegel, a fellow student at the University of Minnesota. They married in 1949.[30]

Education[edit]

Galambos earned degrees in physics from City College of New York (now City University of New York) and the University of Minnesota.[7]

Death[edit]

In the 1980s, Galambos was diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease. He died on April 10, 1997.

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Galambos 1999 p.73 property is the most fundamental parameter of volitional science, where volition refers to the act of choosing (p. 11).
  2. ^ Galambos 1999 pp.198-199 Galambos emphasized that von Mises failed to cover the production and marketing of intellectual property, that is, Primary Property, as noted in this article.
  3. ^ Browne, Harry (November 1977). "Andrew Galambos — the Unknown Libertarian". Liberty. 
  4. ^ Browne 1997
  5. ^ a b c d Lowi, Alvin. "Galambos - A Lasting Encounter". Retrieved 15 January 2014. 
  6. ^ a b Marks, Frederic. "History of the Origins of the V-50 and V-201 lectures". Capitalism: The Liberal Revolution. Retrieved 15 January 2014. 
  7. ^ a b Marks, Frederic. "A History of the Origins of the V-50 and V-201 lectures". Capitalism: The Liberal Revolution. Retrieved 15 January 2014. 
  8. ^ Marks, Frederic. "A History of the Origins of the V-50 an dV-201 Lectures". Capitalism: The Liberal Revolution. Retrieved 15 January 2014. 
  9. ^ "The Free Enterprise Institute". Retrieved 15 January 2014. 
  10. ^ Galambos 1999 p.50
  11. ^ Galambos 1999, p. 96, also called the Pursuit of Happiness Postulate, p. 745
  12. ^ Galambos 1999, phraseology from p. 756, also called this the Moral Postulate
  13. ^ Galambos 1999, p. 78
  14. ^ Galambos 1999, p. 633 notes that a contract, or "voluntary agreement between two or more people" is a proper alternative to coercion
  15. ^ Galambos 1999, p. 115
  16. ^ Thus making the enslavement of others immoral by definition.
  17. ^ Galambos, Andrew (1999). Sic Itur Ad Astra. San Diego, California: The Universal Scientific Publications Company, Inc. pp. 868–869. ISBN 0-88078-004-5. 
  18. ^ a b Galambos 1999, p. 23
  19. ^ a b Galambos 1999, pp. 39, 52, 84, 92, 93, 153, 201, 326.
  20. ^ Galambos 1999, pp. 104, 201, 326
  21. ^ Galambos 1999, p. 671 notes that land cannot be owned, whereas the rights and claims of access to land, and use of land is secondary property
  22. ^ a b Galambos, Andrew (1999). Sic Itur Ad Astra. San Diego, California: Universal Scientific Publications Company, Inc. pp. 882–883. ISBN 0-88078-004-5. 
  23. ^ Galambos, Andrew (1999). Sic Itur Ad Astra. San Diego, California: The Universal Scientific Publications Company, Inc. p. 92. ISBN 0-88078-004-5. 
  24. ^ Galambos 1999, pp. 874-875 "The point at which CONSERVATISM becomes destructive is when it employs coercion to stifle the acceptance of a new idea."
  25. ^ a b Estes, Chuck (February 1996). "We Never Called Him 'Andy' - My Recollections of the Person and philosophy of the Earlier Joseph A. Galambos Alias Andrew Joseph Galambos—The Liberal". The Voluntaryist (78): 6. 
  26. ^ a b Marks, Frederic. "A History of the Origin of the V-50 and V-201 Lectures". Capitalism: The Liberal Revolution. Retrieved 15 January 2014. 
  27. ^ "Statism". Wikipedia. Retrieved 15 January 2014. 
  28. ^ Kinsella, Stephan (2001). "Against Intellectual Property". Journal of Libertarian Studies 15 (2): 1–53. 
  29. ^ Galambos, Andrew J. and Suzanne J. (1991). More Lasting Than Bronze. p. 60. ISBN 0880780002. 
  30. ^ Frederic G. Marks, attorney for Andrew J. Galambos from 1968-1989 and author of the internet book www.CapitalismTheLiberalRevolution.com is the source of this statement.

Sources[edit]

External links[edit]