Anglo-Norman language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Anglo-Norman
Region England and Wales, Scotland, Ireland
Extinct contributed to Middle English
Language codes
ISO 639-3 xno
Linguist list
xno
Glottolog angl1258[1]
This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters.

Anglo-Norman, also known as Anglo-Norman French, is a variety of the langues d'oïl that was used in England and, to a lesser extent, elsewhere in the British Isles during the Anglo-Norman period.[2]

When William the Conqueror led the Norman invasion of England in 1066, he, his nobles, and many of his followers from Normandy, but also those from northern and western France, spoke a range of Oïl dialects (Northern French dialects). One of these was Norman. Other followers spoke varieties of the Picard language or western French. This amalgam developed into the unique insular dialect now known as Anglo-Norman French, which was commonly used for literary and eventually administrative purposes from the 12th until the 15th century. It is difficult to know much about what was actually spoken, as what is known about the dialect is restricted to what was written. But it is clear that Anglo-Norman was to a large extent the spoken language of the higher social strata in medieval England.

It was spoken in the law courts, schools, and universities, and in due course amongst at least some sections of the gentry and the growing bourgeoisie. Private and commercial correspondence was carried out in Anglo-Norman or Anglo-French from the 13th to the 15th century, though its spelling forms were often displaced by continental spellings. Social classes other than the nobility became keen to learn French: manuscripts containing materials for instructing non-native speakers still exist, dating mostly from the late 14th century onwards.

Although Anglo-Norman and Anglo-French were eventually eclipsed by modern English, they had been used widely enough to influence English vocabulary permanently. Thus many original Germanic words, cognates of which can still be found in Nordic , German and Dutch, have either been lost or, more often, exist alongside synonyms of Anglo-Norman French origin. Grammatically, Anglo-Norman had little lasting impact on English, although it is still evident in official and legal terms where the noun and adjective are reversed, for example attorney general: the spelling is English but the word order (noun then adjective) is French. Other such examples are heir apparent, court martial, and body politic.[3]

The Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom still features in French the mottos of both the British Monarch, Dieu et mon droit ("God and my right"), and the Order of the Garter, Honi soit qui mal y pense ("Shamed be he who thinks evil of it").

Dieu et mon droit was first used by Richard I in 1198 and adopted as the royal motto of England in the time of Henry VI. The motto appears below the shield of the Royal Coat of Arms.

Use and development[edit]

The literature of the Anglo-Norman period forms the reference point for subsequent literature in the Norman language, especially in the 19th century Norman literary revival and even into the 20th century in the case of André Dupont's Épopée cotentine. The languages and literatures of the Channel Islands are sometimes referred to as Anglo-Norman, but this usage, derived from the French îles anglo-normandes, is wrong: the Channel Islanders spoke and still speak a variety of Norman, not Anglo-Norman.

Anglo-Norman was never the main administrative language of England: Latin was the major language of record in legal and other official documents for most of the medieval period. However, from the late 12th century until the early 15th century, Anglo-Norman French and Anglo-French were much used in law reports, charters, ordinances, official correspondence, and trade at all levels; they were the language of the King, his court and the upper class. There is evidence, too, that foreign words (Latin, Greek, Italian, Arabic, Spanish) often entered English via Anglo-Norman.

The language of later documents adopted some of the changes ongoing in continental French and lost many of its original dialectal characteristics, so that Anglo-French remained (in at least some respects and at least at some social levels) part of the dialect continuum of modern French, albeit often with distinctive spellings. Over time, the use of Anglo-French expanded into the fields of law, administration, commerce, and science, in all of which a rich documentary legacy survives, indicative of the vitality and importance of the language.

By the late 15th century, however, what remained of insular French had become heavily anglicised: see Law French. It continued to be known as "Norman French" until the end of the 19th century, even though philologically there was nothing Norman about it.[4]

One notable survival of influence on the political system is the use of certain Anglo-French set phrases in the Parliament of the United Kingdom for some endorsements to bills and the granting of Royal Assent to legislation.[5][6] These set phrases include:

  • Soit baille aux Communes ("Let it be sent to the Commons", on a bill sent by the House of Lords to the House of Commons)
  • A ceste Bille (avecque une amendement/avecque des amendemens) les Communes sont assentus ("To this Bill (with an amendment/with amendments) the Commons have assented", on a bill passed by the House of Commons and returned to the House of Lords)
  • A cette amendement/ces amendemens les Seigneurs sont assentus ("To this amendment/these amendments the Lords have assented", on an amended bill returned by the House of Commons to the House of Lords, where the amendments were accepted)
  • Ceste Bille est remise aux Communes avecque une Raison/des Raisons ("This Bill is returned to the Commons with a reason/with reasons", when the House of Lords disagrees with amendments made by the House of Commons)
  • Le Roy/La Reyne le veult ("The King/Queen wills it", Royal Assent for a public bill)
  • Le Roy/La Reyne remercie ses bons sujets, accepte leur benevolence et ainsi le veult ("The King/Queen thanks his/her good subjects, accepts their bounty, and wills it so", Royal Assent for a supply bill)
  • Soit fait comme il est désiré ("Let it be done as it is desired", Royal Assent for a private bill)
  • Le Roy/La Reyne s'avisera ("The King/Queen will consider it", if Royal Assent is withheld)

The exact spelling of these phrases has varied over the years; for example, s'avisera has been spelled as s'uvisera and s'advisera, and Reyne as Raine.

Among important writers of the Anglo-Norman cultural commonwealth is Marie de France.

Trilingualism in Medieval England[edit]

Much of the earliest recorded French is in fact Anglo-Norman French. In France, almost nothing was at that time being recorded in the vernacular because Latin was the language of the nobility, education, commerce and the Roman Catholic Church, and was thus used for the purpose of records. Latin did not disappear in medieval England either: it was used by the Church, the royal government and much local administration, as it had been before 1066, in parallel with Anglo-Saxon. The early adoption of Anglo-Norman as a written and literary language probably owes something to this history of bilingualism in writing.

Around the same time as a shift took place in France towards using Parisian French as a language of record in the mid-13th century, Anglo-Norman French also became a language of record in England, though Latin retained its pre-eminence for matters of permanent record. From around this point onwards, considerable variation begins to be apparent in Anglo-French, which ranges from the very local (and most Anglicized) to a level of language which approximates to and is sometimes indistinguishable from varieties of continental French. So, typically, local records will be rather different from continental French, with diplomatic and international trade documents closest to the emerging continental norm.[7] English remained the vernacular of the common people throughout this period.

Language of the king and his court[edit]

French was the language of the king and his court until the end of the 14th century. During this period, marriages with French princesses reinforced the French status in the royal family. Nevertheless, during the 13th century, intermarriages with English people became more frequent. French became progressively a second language among the upper classes. Moreover, with the Hundred Years' War and the growing spirit of English nationalism, the status of French diminished.

French was the mother tongue of the English king until Henry IV (1399–1413). He was the first to take the oath in English, and his son, Henry V (1413–1422), was the first to write in English. By the end of the 15th century, French became the second language of a cultivated elite.[8]

Language of the royal charters and legislation[edit]

From the conquest (1066) until the end of the 13th century, Latin was the language of all official written documents, and Norman French was almost exclusively used as a spoken language. Nevertheless, some important documents had their official Norman translation, such as the Magna Carta signed in 1215. The first official document written in Anglo-Norman was a statute promulgated by the king in 1275. So from the 13th century, Anglo-Norman became used in official documents, such as those that were marked by the private seal of the king, whereas the documents sealed by the Lord Chancellor were written in Latin until the end of the Middle Ages. English became the language of Parliament and of legislation in the 15th century, half a century after it had become the language of the king and of most of the English upper classes.[8]

Language of administration and justice[edit]

During the 12th century, development of the administrative and judicial institutions took place. Because the king and the lawyers at the time habitually used Norman French, it also became the language of these institutions.[8]

In the royal and local courts[edit]

From the 12th century until the 15th century, the courts used three languages. Latin was used for writing, Norman French was the main oral language during the trial, and English was used in less formal exchanges between the judge, the lawyer, the complainant or the witnesses. The judge gave his sentence orally in Norman, which was then written in Latin. Only in the lowest level of the manorial courts were trials entirely in English.

During the 15th century, English became the main spoken language. But Latin and French continued to be exclusively used in official legal documents until the beginning of the 18th century. Nevertheless, the Norman language used in England changed from the end of the 15th century into law French. This variety of French was a technical language, with a specific vocabulary, where English words were used to describe everyday experience, and French grammatical rules and morphology gradually declined, with confusion of genders and the adding of s to form all plurals. Law French was banished from the courts of the common law in 1731, almost three centuries after the king ceased speaking French primarily.

Language of the people[edit]

Though the great mass of ordinary people spoke Middle English, French, because of its prestigious status, spread as a second language, encouraged by its long-standing use in the school system as a medium of instruction through which Latin was taught. In the courts, the members of the jury, who represented the population, had to know French in order to understand the plea of the lawyer. French was used by the merchant middle class as a language of business communication, especially when it traded with the continent, and several churches used French to communicate with the non-religious people.[8] A small but important number of documents survive which are associated with the Jews of medieval England, some featuring Anglo-Norman written in Hebrew script, and typically in the form of glosses to the Hebrew scriptures.[9]

Characteristics[edit]

As a langue d'oïl, Anglo-Norman had developed collaterally to the central Gallo-Romance dialects which would eventually become Parisian French, in terms of grammar, pronunciation, and vocabulary - it being also important to remember that before the signature of the Ordinance of Villers-Cotterêts in 1539, and indeed for long after in practice, French had not been standardised as an official administrative language of the kingdom of France.

Middle English was heavily influenced by both Anglo-Norman and, later, Anglo-French. W. Rothwell has called Anglo-French 'the missing link' because many etymological dictionaries seem to ignore the contribution of that language in English and because Anglo-Norman and Anglo-French can explain the transmission of words from French into English, and fill the void left by the absence of documentary records of English (in the main) between 1066 and c. 1380.[10]

Anglo-Norman morphology and pronunciation can be deduced from its heritage in English. Mostly this is done in comparison with continental Central French. English has many doublets as a result of this contrast:

  • warranty - guarantee
  • warden - guardian
  • catch - chase (see below)

Compare also:

  • wage (Anglo-Norman) - gage (French)
  • wait - guetter (French, Old French guaitier)
  • war (from Anglo-Norman werre) - guerre (French)
  • wicket (Anglo-Norman) - guichet (French, from Norman)

The palatalization of velar consonants before the front vowel produced different results in Norman to the central langue d'oïl dialects which developed into French. English therefore, for example, has fashion from Norman féchoun as opposed to Modern French façon (both developing from Latin factio, factiōnem).

The palatalization of velar consonants before /a/ that affected the development of French did not occur in Norman dialects north of the Joret line. English has therefore inherited words that retain a velar plosive where French has a fricative:

English < Norman = French
cabbage < caboche = chou
candle < caundèle = chandelle
castle < caste(l) = château
cauldron < caudron = chaudron
causeway < cauchie = chaussée
catch < cachi = chasser
wicket < viquet = guichet
plank < planque = planche
pocket < pouquette = poche
fork < fouorque = fourche
garden < gardin = jardin
cattle < *cate(l) = cheptel (Old French chetel)

Other words such as captain, kennel and canvas exemplify how Norman retained a /k/ sound from Latin that was not retained in French.

However, Anglo-Norman also acted as a conduit for French words to enter England: for example, challenge clearly displays a form of French origin, rather than the Norman calenge.

There were also vowel differences: compare Anglo-Norman profound with Parisian French profond, soun 'sound' - son, round - rond. The former words were originally pronounced something like 'profoond', 'soond', 'roond' respectively (compare the similarly denasalised vowels of modern Norman), but later developed their modern pronunciation in English.

Since many words established in Anglo-Norman from French via the intermediary of Norman were not subject to the processes of sound change that continued in parts of the continent, English sometimes preserves earlier pronunciations. For example, 'ch' used to be /tʃ/ in Medieval French; Modern French has /ʃ/ but English has preserved the older sound (in words like chamber, chain, chase and exchequer).

Similarly, 'j' had an older /dʒ/ sound which it still has in English and some dialects of modern Norman, but which has developed into /ʒ/ in Modern French.

The word veil retains the /ei/ (as does modern Norman in vaile and laîsi) that in French has been replaced by /wɑː/ voile, loisir.

The word mushroom preserves a hush sibilant in mousseron not recorded in French orthography, as does cushion for coussin. Conversely, the pronunciation of the word sugar resembles Norman chucre even if the spelling is closer to French sucre. It is possible that the original sound was an apical sibilant, like the Basque s, which is halfway between a sibilant and a shibilant.

Note the doublets catch and chase, both deriving from Low Latin *captiare. Catch demonstrates the Norman development of the velars, while chase is the French equivalent imported with a different meaning.

Distinctions in meaning between Anglo-Norman and French have led to many faux amis (words having similar form but different meanings) in Modern English and Modern French.

An interesting question arises when one considers English vocabulary of Germanic, and specifically Scandinavian, origin. Since, although a Romance language, Norman contains a significant amount of lexical material from Norse, some of the words introduced into England as part of Anglo-Norman were of Germanic origin. Indeed, sometimes one can identify cognates such as flock (Germanic in English existing prior to the Conquest) and flloquet (Germanic in Norman). The case of the word mug demonstrates that in instances, Anglo-Norman may have reinforced certain Scandinavian elements already present in English. Mug had been introduced into northern English dialects by Viking settlement. The same word had been established in Normandy by the Normans (Norsemen) and was then brought over after the Conquest and established firstly in southern English dialects. It is therefore argued that the word mug in English shows some of the complicated Germanic heritage of Anglo-Norman.

Many expressions used in English today have their origin in Anglo-Norman (e.g. the expression before-hand derives from Anglo-Norman avaunt-main), as do many modern words with interesting etymologies. Mortgage, for example, literally meant death-wage in Anglo-Norman. Curfew (fr. couvre-feu) meant cover-fire, referring to the time in the evening when all fires had to be covered. The word glamour is derived, unglamorously, from Anglo-Norman grammeire, the same word which gives us modern grammar; glamour meant first book learning, and then the most glamorous form of book learning, magic or magic spell in Medieval times.

The influence of Anglo-Norman was very asymmetric, in that very little influence from English was carried over into the continental possessions of the Anglo-Norman kings. Some administrative terms survived in some parts of mainland Normandy: forlenc (from furrow, compare furlong) in the Cotentin Peninsula and Bessin, and a general use of the word acre for land measurement in Normandy until metrication in the 19th century, but these words are probably linguistic traces of Saxon or Anglo-Scandinavian settlements between the 4th and the 10th century in Normandy. Otherwise the direct influence of English in mainland Norman (such as smogler - to smuggle) is because of direct contact in later centuries with English, rather than Anglo-Norman.

Literature[edit]

When the Normans invaded England, the Anglo-Saxon literature had reached a very high level of development. The important Benedictine monasteries wrote Chronicles in Old English and guarded other works written in this language. But with the arrival of the Normans, the Anglo-Saxon literature came to an end and the literature written in Britain was in Latin or in Anglo-Norman. The Plantagenet kings encouraged this Anglo-Norman literature. Nevertheless, from the beginning of the 14th century, some authors chose to write in English, but it is only during the late 14th century that English literature was at its best with Geoffrey Chaucer. The authors of that period were influenced by the works of contemporary French writers, whose language was culturally and literally prestigious. Chaucer is considered to be the father of the English language and the creator of English as a literary language.[8]

Influence of Anglo-Norman French on English[edit]

The major Norman-French influence on English can still be seen in today's vocabulary. An enormous number of Norman-French words came into the language, and about three-quarters of them are still used today. Very often, the Norman-French word supplanted the Anglo-Saxon term. Or both words would co-exist, but with slightly different nuances, for example ox (describing the animal) and beef (describing the meat). In other cases, the Norman-French word was adopted to signify a new reality, such as judge, castle, warranty.[8]

In general, the Norman-French borrowings concerned the fields of culture, aristocratic life, politics and religion, and war, whereas the English words were used to describe everyday experience. When the Normans arrived in England, their copyists wrote English as they heard it, not realizing the peculiarities of the relationship between Anglo-Saxon pronunciation and spelling, and in this way the spelling changed. There appeared different regional Modern-English written dialects, of which the one that the king chose in the 15th century became the standard variety.[8]

In some remote areas agricultural terms used by the rural workers may have been derived from Norman French. An example is the Cumbrian term sturdy for diseased sheep that walk in circles, derived from etourdi meaning giddy.[11]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Nordhoff, Sebastian; Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin, eds. (2013). "Anglo-Norman". Glottolog 2.2. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. 
  2. ^ For a wide-ranging introduction to the language and its uses, see Anglo-French and the AND by William Rothwell
  3. ^ Amended version of: Crystal, David. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  4. ^ Pollock and Maitland, p. 87 note 3.
  5. ^ Bennion, Francis. "Modern Royal Assent Procedure at Westminister" (Word document). New Law Journal. Retrieved on 18 November 2007.
  6. ^ "Companion to the Standing Orders and guide to the Proceedings of the House of Lords". United Kingdom Parliament. Archived from the original on 21 November 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-18. 
  7. ^ see Lusignan 2005; Trotter 2009,
  8. ^ a b c d e f g Lusignan, Serge. La langue des rois au Moyen Âge: Le français en France et en Angleterre. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2004.
  9. ^ Fuderman
  10. ^ ROTHWELL, W. (1991), “The missing link in English etymology: Anglo-French”, Medium Aevum, 60, 173-96.
  11. ^ Rollinson, William Life and Tradition in the Lake District Dalesman 1987 p.82 ISBN 0852068859

References[edit]

Bibliography[edit]

  • Anglo-Norman Dictionary, online version: www.anglo-norman.net. A–N édition revisée (2005–), O–Z de la première édition, avec 78 textes numérisés, et une douzaine d’articles scientifiques (surtout par W. ROTHWELL). (Anglo-Norman Dictionary. Fascicles i (1977), ii (1981), iii (1983), iv (1985), v (1988), vi (1990), vii (1992); London, MHRA. Ed. W. ROTHWELL et al.) Disponible: http://www.anglo-norman.net/
  • BRAND, Paul (1999), ‘The languages of the law in later medieval England’. In TROTTER (2000a).
  • BRAND, Paul. 2010. ‘The Language of the English Legal Profession: The Emergence of a Distinctive Legal Lexicon in Insular French’. In INGHAM (2010), 94–101.
  • BRUN, Laurent (2004), c.r. de Ruelle (1999), ZrP 120, 190-194.
  • BURGESS, Glyn S. (1995), ‘Französische Skriptaformen IV. England. Les scriptae françaises IV. Angleterre’. In HOLTUS, Günter/METZELTIN, Michael/SCHMIDT, Christian (eds.), Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik II, 2. Tübingen, 337-346.
  • BUTTERFIELD, Ardis. 2009. The Familiar Enemy. Chaucer, Language and Nation in the Hundred Years War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • CERQUIGLINI, Bernard (1991), La naissance du français, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • CERQUIGLINI, Bernard (2007), Une langue orpheline, Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
  • CHAPLAIS, Pierre. 1975-1982. English Medieval Diplomatic Practice. London: H.M.S.O..
  • CLANCHY, M.T. (1993), From Memory to Written Record: England 1066-1307. 2nd edn. Oxford.
  • COLLAS, J.P. (1964) (ed.), Year Books of Edward II, vol. xxv, London, ‘Problems of Language and Interpretation’, 14-127.
  • DA ROLD, Orietta. 2006. “English Manuscripts 1060 to 1220 and the Making of a Resource.” In Literature Compass 3, 750–766, en ligne: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/: (DOI:10.1111/j.1741-4113.2006.00344.x), consulté le 14 mai 2013.
  • DE JONG, Thera (1988), ‘L’anglo normand du 13e siècle’, in VAN REENEN, P. & VAN REENEN STEIN, K. (eds.), Distributions spatiales et temporelles, constellations des manuscrits. Etudes de variation linguistique offertes à Anthonij Dees à l’occasion de son 60ème anniversaire, Amsterdam, 103 12.
  • DE JONG, Thera (1996), ‘Anglo-French in the 13th and 14th Centuries: Continental or Insular Dialect’, in NIELSEN/SCHØSLER (1996), 55-70.
  • DEAN, Ruth J.. 1999. Anglo-Norman literature. A guide to texts and manuscripts, with the collaboration of Maureen B.M. Boulton. London: Anglo-Norman Text Society.
  • DEES, Anthonij (1980), Atlas des formes et des constructions des chartes françaises du 13e siècle (Beihefte zur ZrP, vol. 178), Tübingen, Niemeyer.
  • DEES, Anthonij (1985), Dialectes et scriptae à l’époque de l’ancien français, RLiR 49, 87-117.
  • DEES, Anthonij (1987), Atlas des formes linguistiques des textes littéraires de l’ancien français (Beihefte zur ZrP, vol. 212), Tübingen, Niemeyer.
  • DESSÌ SCHMID, Sarah/Hafner, Jochen/Heinemann, Sabine (2011) (edd.), Koineisierung und Standardisierung in der Romania, Heidelberg, Winter.
  • DMLBS = LATHAM, Ronald e., David HOWLETT, and Richard ASHDOWNE, Dictionary of Medieval Latin from British Sources. Oxford: British Academy. (1975-).
  • DODD, Gwilym. 2007. Justice and Grace: Private Petitioning and the English Parliament in the Late Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • DURKIN, Philip. 2012. “Etymological research on English words as a source of information about Anglo-French.” In Present and future research in Anglo-Norman: Proceedings of the Aberystwyth Colloquium, 21-22 July 2011, ed. David Trotter, 101–107. Aberystwyth: Anglo-Norman Online Hub.
  • DUVAL, Frédéric (2009), Le français médiéval (L’Atelier du médiéviste, 11), Turnhout, Brepols.
  • GEORGI, David. 2008. Language Made Visible: The Invention of French in England after the Norman Conquest. PhD diss., New York State University, UMI No. 3307998.
  • GERVERS, Michael/ MERRILEES, Brian (1979), A twelfth-century Hospitaller charter in Anglo-Norman, Journal of the Society of Archivists 6, 131-35.
  • GLESSGEN, Martin-Dietrich (2012), Trajectoires et perspectives en scriptologie romane, Medioevo Romanzo 36, 5-23.
  • GOEBL, Hans (1970), Die normandische Urkundensprache. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der nordfranzösischen Urkundensprachen des Mittelalter (Sitzungsberichte der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Phil.-hist.Klasse, 269), Vienne, Bohlau.
  • GOEBL, Hans (1998), Zu einer dialektometrischen Analyse der Daten des Dees-Atlasses von 1980, in: Werner, Edeltraudet al. (edd.), Et multum et multa. Festschrift für Peter Wunderli zum 60. Geburtstag, Tübingen, Narr, 293-309.
  • GOEBL, Hans (2008), Sur le changement macrolinguistique survenu entre 1300 et 1900 dans le domaine d’oïl. Une étude diachronique d’inspiraion dialectométrique, Dialectologia 1, 3-43 [disponible en ligneà l’adresse suivante: http://www.publicacions.ub.edu/revistes/dialectologia1/ (consulté le 02.02.14)]
  • GOSSEN, Charles Théodore (1968a), Graphème et phonème: le problème central de l’étude des langues écrites au Moyen Age, RLiR 32, 1-16.
  • GOSSEN, Charles Théodore (1968b), L’interprétation des graphèmes et la phonétique historique de la langue française, TraLiLi 6/i (1968), 149-168.
  • GOSSEN, Charles Théodore (1979), Méditations scriptologiques, CCM 22, 263-283.
  • GOYENS, Michèle/Verbeke, Werner (2003) (edd.), The Dawn of the Written Vernacular in Western Europe, Leuven, Leuven University Press.
  • GRÜBL, Klaus (2013), La standardisation du français au Moyen Âge: point de vue scriptologique, RLiR 77, 344-383.
  • HENRY, Albert (1986), Un texte œnologique de Jofroi de Waterford et Servais Copale, Romania 107, 1-37 [première publication: idem, Contribution à l’étude du langage œnologique en langue d’oïl, Bruxelle, Académie Royale de Belgique, I, 45-53 et II, 37-49].
  • HOWLETT, David (1996), The English Origins of Old French Literature, Dublin, Four Courts Press.
  • HUNT, Tony. (2000), ‘Code-switching in medical texts’. In TROTTER (2000a).
  • HUNT, Tony. 2003. “Anglo-Norman: Past and Future.” In The Dawn of the Written Vernacular in Western Europe, edd. Michèle GOYENS and Werner VERBEKE, 379–389. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
  • INGHAM, Richard (2012), The transmission of Anglo-Norman: Language History and Language Acquisition, Amsterdam, Benjamins.
  • INGHAM, Richard, ‘Mixing languages on the Manor’, Medium Aevum 78 (2009), 80-97 (=2009a).*INGHAM, Richard, ‘Syntactic change in Anglo-Norman and Continental French Chronicles: was there a ‘Middle’ Anglo-Norman?’, Journal of French Language Studies 16 (2006), 26-49.
  • INGHAM, Richard, ‘The status of French in medieval England: evidence from the use of object pronoun syntax’, Vox Romanica 65 (2006), 1-22.
  • JEFFERSON, Lisa (2000), ‘The Language and vocabulary of the fourteenth-and early fifteenth-century records of the Goldsmiths’ Company, in TROTTER (2000a), 175-211.
  • JEFFERSON, Lisa and ROTHWELL, William (1997), ‘Society and lexis: a study of the Anglo-French vocabulary in the fifteenth-century accounts of the Merchants Taylors Company’. Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur, 107, 273-301.
  • KABATEK, Johannes (2013), Koinés and scriptae, in: MAIDEN, Martin/ SMITH, John Charles/ LEDGEWAY, Adam (edd.), Cambridge History of the Romance Languages, 2: Contexts, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 143-186.
  • KOCH, Peter (2010), Sprachgeschichte zwischen Nähe und Distanz: Latein – Französisch– Deutsch, in: ÁGEL, Vilmos/HENNIG, Mathilde (edd.), Nähe und Distanz im Kontenxt variationslinguistischer Forschung, Berlin/ New York, De Gruyter, 155-205.
  • KOWALESKI, Maryanne. 2007. “Alien” encounters in the maritime world of medieval England. Medieval Encounters 13:96–121.
  • KOWALESKI, Maryanne. 2009. “The French of England: A maritime lingua franca?” In WOGAN-BROWNE (2009) 103–117.
  • KRISTOL, Andres (1989), Le début du rayonnement parisien et l’unité du français au Moyen Âge: le témoignage des manuels d’enseignement du français publiés en Angleterre entre le XIIIe et le début du XVe siècle, RLiR 53, 335-367.
  • KRISTOL, Andres (1990), ‘L’enseignement du français en Angleterre (XIIIe-XVe siècles): les sources manuscrites’, Romania, 111, 298-330.
  • KRISTOL, Andres (2000), ‘L’intellectuel ‘anglo-normand’ face à la pluralité des langues: le témoignage implicite du Ms Oxford, Magdalen Lat. 188’, in TROTTER (2000a), 37- 52.
  • LEGGE, Dominica (1965), La précocité de la littérature anglo-normande, CCM 8, 327-349.
  • LODGE, Anthony R. (2004), A Sociolinguistic History of Parisian French, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • LODGE, Anthony R. (2010a), The Sources of Standardisation in French – Written or Spoken?, in: INGHAM (2010), 26-43.
  • LODGE, Anthony R. (2010b), Standardisation, koinéisation et l’historiographie du français, RLiR 74, 5-26.
  • LODGE, Anthony R. (2011), Standardisation et Koinéisation: Deux approches contraires à l’historiographie d’une langue, in: Dessì Schmid/Hafner/Heinemann (2011), 65-79.
  • LUSIGNAN, Serge (1986), Parler vulgairement. Les intellectuels et la langue française aux XIIIe et XIVe siècles. Paris/Montréal.
  • LUSIGNAN, Serge (2004), La langue des rois au Moyen Âge: le français en France et en Angleterre, Paris, Presses universitaires de France.
  • LUSIGNAN, Serge (2005) La Langue des rois au Moyen Âge. Paris: PUF.*LUSIGNAN, Serge (2011), Le français médiéval: perspectives historiques sur une langue plurielle, in: Lusignan, Serge/ Martineau, France/Morin, Yves Charles/Cohen, Paul, L’introuvable unité du français. Contacts et variations linguistiques en Europe et en Amérique (XIIe-XVIIIe siècle), Laval, Presses de l’Université Laval, 5-107.
  • MAITLAND F.W. (1903), Year Books of Edward II, Vol. I: 1 & 2 Edward II, London, Selden Society XVII, Introduction, III, ‘Of The Anglo-French Language in the Early Year Books’, xxxiii-lxxxi.
  • MATSUMURA, Takeshi (2004), c.r. de Ruelle (1999), RLiR 68, 284-285.
  • MCCLURE, Peter. 2010. “Middle English occupational bynames as lexical evidence: a study of names in the Nottingham borough court rolls 1303-1455.” Transactions of the Philological Society 108:164–177 et 213–231.
  • MENGER, L.E. (1904), The Anglo Norman Dialect, New York.
  • MÖHREN, Frankwalt (1974), ‘Apport des textes techniques à la lexicologie: terminologie anglo-normande de l’agriculture’, XIV Congresso Internazionale Di Linguistica e Filologia Romanza, Atti, t. 4, Napoli (Gaetano MACCHIAROLI, ed), Amsterdam, 143-157.
  • MÖHREN, Frankwalt (1981), ‘Agn. AFRE / AVER. Eine wortgeschichtliche und wissenschaftsgeschichtliche Untersuchung’, Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 218,129-136.
  • MÖHREN, Frankwalt (1986), Wort- und sachgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an französischen landwirtschaftlichen Texten, 13., 14. und 18. Jahrhundert (Seneschaucie, Menagier, Encyclopédie), Tübingen (Niemeyer).
  • MÖHREN, Frankwalt (1997), ‘Unité et diversité du champ sémasiologique – l’exemple de l’Anglo-Norman Dictionary’, in GREGORY, Stewart and TROTTER, David (eds), De mot en mot: Essays in honour of William Rothwell, Cardiff, 127-146.
  • MÖHREN, Frankwalt (2000), ‘One-fold lexicography for a manifold problem?’, In TROTTER (2000a), 157-168.
  • MÖHREN, Frankwalt (2007), Dictionnaire Étymologique de l’Ancien Français: Complément bibliographique 2007, Tübingen, Niemeyer.
  • MOLINELLI, Piera/ Guerini, Federica (2013) (edd.), Plurilinguismo e diglossia nella Tarda Antichità et nel Medio Evo (Traditio et Renovatio, 7), Firenze, SISMEL: Edizioni del Galluzzo
  • MONFRIN, Jacques (1968), La mode de tradition des actes écrits et les études de dialectologie, RLiR 32, 17-47.
  • NCA = Stein, Achim / Kunstmann, Pierre / Gleßgen, Martin-D. (ed.) (2010): Nouveau Corpus d'Amsterdam. Corpus informatique de textes littéraires d'ancien français (ca 1150-1350), établi par Anthonij Dees (Amsterdam 1987), Institut für Linguistik/Romanistik, version 2-2, disponible en ligne à l’adresse suivante: http://www.uni-stuttgart.de/lingrom/stein/corpus/#nc
  • NIELSEN, Hans-Frede and SCHØSLER, Lene (eds) (1996), The Origins and Development of Emigrant Languages. Proceedings from the Second Rasmus Rask Colloquium, Odense University, November 1994, Odense.
  • PÉPIN, Guilhem. 2009. “Petitions from Gascony. Testimonies of a Special Relationship.” In Medieval Petitions. Grace and Grievance, edd. W. Mark ORMROD, Gwilym DODD, et Anthony MUSSON, 120–134. York: York Medieval Press/Boydell Press.
  • PFISTER, Max (1973), Die sprachliche Bedeutung von Paris und der île-de-France vor dem 13. Jahrhundert, Vox Romanica 32, 217-253.
  • PFISTER, Max (1993), ‘Scripta’ et ‘koinè’ en ancien français aux XIIe et XIIIe siècles?, in: KNECHT, Pierre/MARZYS, Zygmunt (edd.), Écriture, langues communes et normes. Formation spontanée de koinès et standardisation dans la Galloromania et son voisinage, Genève/Neuchâtel, Droz/Faculté des lettres, 17-41.
  • PFISTER, Max (1999), L’area galloromanza, in: BOITANI, Piero/MANCINI, Mario/VARVARO, Alberto (edd.), Lo Spazio letterario del Medioevo: 2. Il medioevo volgare: I La produzione del testo, Rome, Salerno, 18-96.
  • POPE, Mildred K. (21952), From Latin to Modern French, with especial consideration of Anglo-Norman, Manchester, Manchester University Press.
  • POSTLES, Dave (1995), ‘Noms de personnes en langue française dans l’Angleterre du moyen âge’, Le Moyen Age, 101, 7-21.
  • RICHARDSON, Helen (1940), A Twelfth-Century Anglo-Norman Charter, Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library, 24, 168-172.
  • RICHTER, Michael (1979), Sprache und Gesellschaft im Mittelalter: Untersunchungen zur mündlichen Kommunikation in England von der Mitte des 11. bis zum Beginn des 14. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart.
  • ROBSON, Charles Alan (1955), Literary language, spoken dialect, and the phonological problem of Old French, Transactions of the Philological Society (1955), 117-180.
  • ROQUES, Gilles. 1997. “Des Interférences picardes dans l’Anglo-Norman Dictionary.” In De mot en mot: Essays in honour of William Rothwell, edd. Stewart GREGORY and D.A. TROTTER, 191–198. Cardiff: MHRA/University of Wales Press.
  • ROQUES, Gilles. 2007. “Les régionalismes dans quelques textes anglo-normands.” In Actes du XXIVe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes, ed. David TROTTER, 4, 279–292. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
  • ROTHWELL, William (1968), ‘The teaching of French in medieval England’, Modern Language Review, 63, 37-46.
  • ROTHWELL, William (1973), ‘Où en sont les études d’anglo-normand’, Zeitschrift fiir französische Sprache und Literatur, 83, 195-204.
  • ROTHWELL, William (1976a), ‘Medical and botanical terminology from Anglo-Nonnan sources’, Zeitschrift fiir französische Sprache und Literatur, 86, 221-60.
  • ROTHWELL, William (1976b), ‘The role of French in thirteenth-century England’, Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester, 58, 445-66.
  • ROTHWELL, William (1978), ‘A quelle époque a-t-on cessé de parler français en Angleterre?’ in Mélanges de philologie romane offerts d Charles Camproux (Montpellier, Centre d’estudis occitans), 1075-89.*

ROTHWELL, William (1979), ‘Anglo-French lexical contacts, old and new’, Modern Language Review, 74, 287-96.

  • ROTHWELL, William (1980), ‘Lexical borrowing in a medieval context’, Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester, 63, 118-43.*ROTHWELL, William (1983), ‘Language and government in medieval England’, Zeitschrift fiir französische Sprache und Literatur, 93, 258-70.
  • ROTHWELL, William (1985a), ‘From Latin to Modern French: fifty years on’, Bulletin of the John RyIands University Library of Manchester, 68, 179-209.
  • ROTHWELL, William (1985b), ‘Stratford atte Bowe and Paris’, Modern Language Review, 80, 39-54.
  • ROTHWELL, William (1991), ‘The missing link in English etymology: Anglo-French’, Medium Aevum, 60, 173-96.
  • ROTHWELL, William (1992), ‘Chaucer and Stratford atte Bowe’, Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester, 74, 3-28.
  • ROTHWELL, William (1993a), ‘The Legacy of Anglo-French: faux amis in French and English’, Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 109: 16-46.
  • ROTHWELL, William (1993b), ‘The ‘Faus franceis d’Angleterre’: later Anglo-Norman’, In Short, Ian (ed.) Anglo-Norman Anniversary Essays, London, 309-326.
  • ROTHWELL, William (1993c), ‘From Latin to Anglo-French and Middle English: the role of the multi-lingual gloss’, Modern Language Review, 88, 581-99.
  • ROTHWELL, William (1994), ‘The trilingual England of Geoffrey Chaucer’, Studies in the Age of Chaucer, 16, 45-67.*ROTHWELL, William (1996a), ‘Adding insult to injury: the English who curse in borrowed French’, in NIELSEN/SCHØSLER (1996), 41-54.
  • ROTHWELL, William (1996b), ‘Playing follow my leader in Anglo-Norman studies’, Journal of French Language Studies, 6, 177-210.
  • ROTHWELL, William (1996c), ‘The Anglo-French element in the vulgar register of Late Middle English’, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 97, 423-36.
  • ROTHWELL, William (1999), ‘Sugar and Spice and All Things Nice: From Oriental Bazar to English Cloister in Anglo-French’, Modern Language Review 94, 647-659.
  • ROTHWELL, William (1999b), ‘Aspects of lexical and morphosyntactical mixing in the languages of medieval England’. In TROTTER (2000a).
  • ROTHWELL, William (2000), ‘The Trial Scene in Lanval and the Development of the Legal Register in Anglo-Norman’, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 101, 17-36.
  • ROTHWELL, William (2001a), ‘Stratford atte Bowe Revisited’, Chaucer Review 36, 184-207.
  • ROTHWELL, William (2001b) ‘English and French in England after 1362’, English Studies 82, 539-559.
  • ROTHWELL, William (2001c), ‘Arrivals and departures: the adoption of French terminology into Middle English’, in English Studies, 144-165.
  • ROTHWELL, William (2001d), ‘OED, MED, AND: the making of a new dictionary of English’, Anglia, Zeitschrift für Englische Philologie 119, 527-553.
  • ROTHWELL, William (2002), ‘The semantic field of Old French Astele: the pitfalls of the medieval gloss in lexicography’, Journal of French Language Studies 12, 203-220.
  • ROTHWELL, William (2004) ‘Henry of Lancaster and Geoffrey Chaucer: Anglo-French and Middle English in Fourteenth-Century England’, Modern Language Review 99, 313-27.
  • ROTHWELL, William (2005b) ‘The Problem of the English Dribble, Drivel, Drizzle and Trickle: The Role of Semantics in Etymology’, Anglia: Zeitschrift für Englische Philologie 123, 191-203.
  • ROTHWELL, William (2006) ‘Anglo-French and English Society in Chaucer’s ‘The Reeve’s Tale’’, English Studies: A Journal of English Language and Literature 87, 511-38.
  • ROTHWELL, William (2007) ‘Synonymity and Semantic Variability in Medieval French and Middle English’, Modern Language Review 102:2, 363-80.
  • ROTHWELL, William (2008) ‘Anglo-French in Rural England in the Later Thirteenth Century: Walter of Bibbesworth’s Tretiz and the Agricultural Treatises’, Vox Romanica 67, 100-132.
  • ROTHWELL, William [2005a], ‘Anglo-French and the AND’, http://www.anglo-norman.net/sitedocs/main-intro.html#sec1.
  • RUELLE, Pierre (1999), Recueil général des isopets. Tome quatrième: Les Fables d’Eude de Cheriton, Paris, Société des Anciens Textes Français.
  • SCHAUWECKER, Yela (2007), Die Diätetik nach dem Secretum secretorum in der Version von Jofroi de Waterford. Teiledition und lexikalische Analyse, Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann.
  • SCHENDL, Herbert (1999), ‘Linguistic aspects of code-switching in medieval English texts’. In TROTTER (2000a).
  • SCHWAN, Eduard/BEHRENS, Dietrich (41932), Grammaire de l’ancien français, Troisième partie: Matériaux pour servir d’introduction à l’étude des dialectes de l’ancien français, Lepizig, Reisland [traduction par Oscar Bloch de la 12e édition de l’original allemand: Grammatik des Altfranzösischen. Laut- und Formenlehre, Leipzig, Reisland, 1888].
  • SELIG, Maria (2008), Koineisierung im Altfranzösischen? Dialektmischung, Verschriftlichung und Überdachung im französischen Mittelalter, in: HEINEMANN, Sabine/VIDESOTT, Paul (edd.), Sprachwandel und (Dis )Kontinuität in der Romania, Tübingen, Niemeyer, 71-85.
  • SHARPE, Richard (2012), Peoples and languages in eleventh- and twelfth-century Britain and Ireland: reading the charter evidence, in: BROUN, Dauvid (ed.), The Reality behind Charter Diplomatic in Anglo-Norman Britain, disponible en ligne: http://paradox.poms.ac.uk/redist/pdf/chapter1.pdf.
  • SHORT, Ian (1980), ‘On Bilingualism in Anglo Norman England’, Romance Philology, 33, 467 79.
  • SHORT, Ian (1992), Patrons and Polyglots: French Literature in Twelfth-Century England, Anglo-Norman Studies 14, 327-349.
  • SHORT, Ian (1995), ‘Tam Angli quam Franci: Self-definition in Anglo-Norman England’, Anglo-Norman Studies xviii, 153-175.
  • SHORT, Ian (2007), Manual of Anglo-Norman (ANTS, Occasional Publications Series, 7; London: Anglo-Norman Text Society).
  • STANOVAÏA, Lydia (2003), La standardisation en ancien français, in: Goyens/Verbeke (2003), 241-272.
  • TIDDEMAN, Megan (2012). “Mercantile multilingualism: two examples of Anglo-Norman and Italian contact in the fourteenth century.” In Present and future research in Anglo-Norman: Proceedings of the Aberystwyth Colloquium, 21-22 July 2011, ed. David TROTTER, 91-99. Aberystwyth: Anglo-Norman Online Hub.
  • TROTTER, David (1994), ‘L’anglo-français au Pays de Galles: une enquête préliminaire’, Revue de linguistique romane, 58: 461-88.
  • TROTTER, David (1996), ‘Language contact and lexicography: the case of Anglo Norman’, in NIELSEN/SCHØSLER (1996), 21-39.
  • TROTTER, David (1997), ‘Mossenhor, fet metre aquesta letra en bon francés: Anglo-French in Gascony’, in GREGORY, Stewart and TROTTER, David (eds), De mot en mot: Essays in honour of William Rothwell, Cardiff, 199-222.
  • TROTTER, David (1998b), ‘Les néologismes de l’anglo-français et le FEW’, Le Moyen Français 39-41, 577-636.
  • TROTTER, David (1998c), ‘Some Lexical Gleanings from Anglo-French Gascony’, Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 114, 53-72.
  • TROTTER, David (1998d), ‘Translations and loanwords: some Anglo-Norman evidence’, In ELLIS, R., TIXIER, R. and WEITEMEIER, B. (eds), The Medieval Translator 6: Proceedings of the International Conference of Göttingen (22-25 July 1996), Louvain-la-Neuve, 20-39.
  • TROTTER, David (2000a), Multilingualism in Later Medieval Britain: Proceedings of the 1997 Aberystwyth Colloquium, Cambridge.
  • TROTTER, David (2000b), ‘L’avenir de la lexicographie anglo-normande: vers une refonte de l’Anglo-Norman Dictionary?’, Revue de linguistique romane, 64 (2000), 391-407.
  • TROTTER, David (2000c), ‘Anglo-Norman’, in Glanville PRICE (ed.), Languages of the British Isles (Oxford: Blackwell), 197-206.
  • TROTTER, David (2003a), L’anglo-normand: variété insulaire, ou variété isolée?, Médiévales, 45, 43-54.
  • TROTTER, David (2003b), ‘The Anglo-French lexis of the Ancrene Wisse: a re-evaluation’, in A Companion to ‘Ancrene Wisse’, ed. Yoko WADA (Cambridge: Boydell & Brewer, 2003), 83-101
  • TROTTER, David (2003c), ‘Langues en contact en Gascogne médiévale’, in Actas del XXIII Congreso Internacional de Lingüística y Filología Románica, Salamanca, 2001, III. Tübingen.
  • TROTTER, David (2003d), ‘Not as eccentric as it looks: Anglo-Norman and French French’, Forum for Modern Language Studies, 39, 427-438.
  • TROTTER, David (2003e), ‘Oceano vox: you never know where a ship comes from. On multilingualism and language-mixing in medieval Britain’, in Kurt BRAUNMÜLLER & Gisella FERRARESI (eds.), Aspects of Multilingualism in European Language History (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 18-33.
  • TROTTER, David (2006a) ‘Language Contact, Multilingualism, and the Evidence Problem’, in: SCHAEFER, U. (ed.), The Beginnings of Standardization: Language and Culture in Fourteenth-Century England (Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2006), 73–90.
  • TROTTER, David (2006b) ‘Si le français n’y peut aller: Villers Cotterêts and mixed language documents from the Pyrenees’, in: COWLING, D.J. (ed.), Conceptions of Europe in Renaissance France: a Festschrift for Keith Cameron (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2006), 77–97.
  • TROTTER, David (2008), L’anglo-normand en France: les traces documentaires, Académie des Inscriptions & Belles-Lettres: Comptes rendus des séances de l’année 2008, avril-juin, II, 893-904.
  • TROTTER, David (2009), ‘English in Contact: Middle English creolization’, in A. Bergs/L. Brinton (eds.), Historical Linguistics of English (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2012), 2, 1781-1793.
  • TROTTER, David (2010): Bridging the Gap: The (Socio-)linguistic Evidence of Some Medieval English Bridge Accounts. In: INGHAM (2010), 52-62.
  • TROTTER, David (2011a), ‘Il sount aliens: marchands étrangers et contact linguistique en Angleterre au Moyen Âge’, in W. Schweickard/A. Overbeck/H. Völker (eds.), Lexikon, Varietät, Philologie: Romanistische Studien Günter Holtus zum 65. Geburtstag (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011), 307-315.
  • TROTTER, David (2011b), ‘L’anglo-normand et le français, et les emprunts en anglais’, Actes du colloque international ‘Les emprunts lexicaux au français dans les langues européennes’, Craiova, 10-12 novembre 2011 (Craiova: Editura Universitaria, 2011), 299-309.
  • TROTTER, David (2011c), ‘Death, taxes and property: some code-switching evidence from Dover, Southampton, and York’, in H. Schendl/L. Wright (eds.), Code-Switching in Early English (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2011), 155-189.

TROTTER, David (2011d), ‘Intra-textual multilingualism and diaphasic/diastratic variation in Anglo-Norman’, in Elizabeth Tyler (ed.), Conceptualizing Multilingualism in England, 800-1250, University of York, July 2006 (Amsterdam: Brepols, 2011), 357-368.

  • TROTTER, David (2011e), ‘Italian merchants in London and Paris: evidence of language contact in the Gallerani accounts, 1305-08’, in D. Lagorgette/T. Pooley (eds.), On linguistic change in French: socio-historical approaches. Le changement linguistique en français: aspects socio-historiques Studies in Honour of R. Anthony Lodge. Etudes en hommage au Professeur R. Anthony Lodge (Chambéry: Presses Universitaires de Savoie, 2011), 209-226.
  • TROTTER, David (2011f), ‘Bytes, words, texts: the Anglo-Norman Dictionary and its text-base’, in Christine McWebb/Helen Swift (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the "Third International MARGOT Conference, The Digital Middle Ages: Teaching and Research, special issue of Digital Medievalist, summer 2011, at http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/journal/7/trotter/.
  • TROTTER, David (2012a): Saunz desbriser de hay ou de clos: clos(e) in Anglo-French and in English. In: Claudia LANGE/Beatrix WEBER/Göran WOLF (eds.), Communicative Spaces: Variation, Contact, and Change: Papers in Honour of Ursula Schaefer, Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 197-214.
  • TROTTER, David (2012b): L’anglo-normand dans le Middle English Dictionary. In: Stephen DÖRR/Thomas STÄDTLER (eds.), Ki bien voldreit raisun entendre: Mélanges en l’honneur du 70e anniversaire de Frankwalt Möhren, Strasbourg: Éditions de Linguistique et de Philologie, 323-337.
  • TROTTER, David (2013a): Une rencontre germano-romane dans la Romania Britannica. In: Emili CASANOVA HERRERO/Cesáro CALVO RIGUAL (edd.), Actas del XXVI Congreso Internacional de Lingüística y de Filología Románicas, Berlin: De Gruyter, I, 441-456.
  • TROTTER, David (2013b): L’anglo-normand à la campagne. In: Comptes-rendus de l’Académie des Inscriptions 2012, II (avril-juin), 1113-1131.
  • TROTTER, David (à paraître a) ‘Trové l’avum mis en tiste: comment réduire notre ignorance du lexique de l’anglo-normand’, in Oreste Floquet/Gabriele Giannini (eds.), Anglo-Français: linguistique et philologie/Anglo-francese: filologia e linguistica (Paris: Garnier).
  • TROTTER, David (à paraître b): Tout feu tout flamme: le FEW et l’anglais few. Dans un volume de mélanges.
  • TROTTER, David (à paraître c): Noms de lieux, lieux des noms: l’influence anglo-normande dans la toponymie anglaise. Dans un volume de mélanges.
  • TROTTER, David (à paraître d), Trop fidèle pour être belle: l’édition historique en anglo-normand, dans un volume de mélanges.
  • URELAND, P. Sture (ed.) (1991), Language Contact in the British Isles, Tübingen.
  • VAN ACKER, Marieke (2010), La transition latin / langues romanes et la notion de «diglossie», ZrP 126, 1-38.*VIDESOTT, Paul (2013), Les débuts du français à la Chancellerie royale: analyse scriptologique des chartes de Philippe III (1270-1285), RLiR 77, 3-50.
  • VISING, Johan (1923), Anglo Norman Language and Literature, London.
  • VÖLKER, Harald (2000), Chartes luxembourgeoises du XIIIe siècle: Scripta régionale, locale ou «individuelle»?, in: Actes du XXIIe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philo¬logie Romanes, Bruxelles, 23–29 juillet 1998, Tübingen, Niemeyer, 2000, 5, 159-166.
  • WEINER, Edmund S.C. (2000), ‘Medieval multilingualism and the revision of the OED’. In TROTTER (2000a), 169-174.
  • WOGAN-BROWNE, Jocelyn et al. (eds.) (2009), Language and Culture in Medieval Britain: the French of England c.1100-c.1500, York: York Medieval Press/Boydell & Brewer.
  • WOLEDGE, Brian (1970), Un scribe champenois devant un texte normand: Guiot copiste de Wace, in: Mélanges de langue et de littérature du Moyen Âge et de la Renaissance offerts à Jean Frappier, Genève, Droz, 2, 1139-1154.
  • WRIGHT, Laura (1996), Sources of London English: Medieval Thames Vocabulary. Oxford.
  • WÜEST, Jakob (1979), La dialectalisation de la Gallo-Romania. Études phonologiques, Berne, Francke.
  • WÜEST, Jakob (2001), Sind Schreibdialekte phonologisch interpretierbar? in: Holtus/Rapp/Völker (2001), 37-51.
  • WÜEST, Jakob (2003), Le rapport entre la langue parlée et la langue écrite: les scriptae dans le domaine d’oïl et le domaine d’oc, in: Goyens/Verbeke (2003), 51-70.**

External links[edit]