Argument from setting a precedent
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (December 2009) |
 |
This article is an orphan, as few or no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; suggestions may be available. (February 2009) |
Argument from precedent is a common fallacy in discussion, for example on committees or in meetings. It consists in saying that to act correctly in circumstances X would be inadvisable, in case others consider that this would set a precedent for acting in circumstances Y, where (it is argued) X and Y are superficially similar but (on close examination) are radically different. The Microcosmographia Academica, published in 1908, cited this as one of the reasons why "nothing should ever be done for the first time".
The fallacy is similar to the slippery slope argument.
 |
This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
