Army General Classification Test

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The Army General Classification Test (AGCT) has a long history that runs parallel with research and means for attempting the assessment of intelligence or other abilities.[1]

World War I and World War II created the need for this type of testing and provided a large body of test subjects. The early emphasis (World War I) was on determining the level of literacy (Alpha test) amongst a heterogeneous group. Illiterates were given another test (Army Beta); some enrollees were interviewed. Subsequent testing targeted aptitude in order to better fill roles, such as those provided by officers who obtained commissions from other than the United States military academies, or to meet the need for increasingly complicated skills that came along with technological progress, especially after World War II.[2]

As with other measurement attempts, the AGCT ran into controversy during the era of the Vietnam War.[3][4] Yet, the requirement did not abate, leading to improvements in the application and use of the standard testing methodology.

The modern variant of this test is the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) that was first administered in 1960.[5]

Many high IQ societies, such as Mensa, can map their entrance requirements to early AGCT scores.[6] The AGCT was of interest to researchers due to the broad nature of the testee domain (1.75 million men took the original test). The Triple Nine Society accepts a minimum qualifying score of 157 (raw) for membership in its ranks, but only if the test was taken prior to 1976. Also, the TNS accepts a minimum qualifying score of 74 from the similar Naval General Classification Test (NGCT), but only from the years 1954–1977.[7]

The army called this test "GT" around 1969, if you scored 136 or higher before 1978 Mensa will accept the result as proof of being in the 98th percentile.

The Alpha and Beta Army Intelligence Test[edit]

Intelligence testing plays a very important role in how school psychologist and special educators evaluate and assess children for placement in special education programs. Many Educational systems in the modern society use the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children to assess the intellectual functioning of children. However, just because intelligence testing is a huge phenomena in the education world, the creation on intelligence testing was not intended for educational use. Rather, the first intelligence tests where created during World War I to screen the thousands of soldiers being recruited by the United States Military.[8]

Robert Yerkes and a committee of six representatives developed two intelligence tests; the Army Alpha Test and the Army Beta Test to help the United States Military screen incoming soldiers for "intellectual deficiencies, psychopathic tendencies, nervous intangibility, and inadequate self-control".[9] The Alpha test was a verbal test for literate recruits and was divided into eight test categories, which included: following oral directions, arithmetical problems, practical judgments, synonyms and antonyms, disarranged sentences, number series completion, analogies and information.[10] Whereas the Beta test was a nonverbal test used for testing illiterate or non-English speaking recruits. The Beta test did not require those being tested to use written language, but rather the examinee's completed tasks by using visual aids.[11] The Beta Intelligence test was divided into seven subtests, which included: "Test 1- assessed the ability of army recruits to trace the path of a maze; Test 2- assessed the ability of cube analysis; Test 3-assessed the ability of pattern analysis using an X-O series; Test 4- assessed the ability of coding digits with symbols; Test 5- assessed the ability of number checking; Test 6-assessed the ability of pictorial completion; and Test 7- assessed the ability of geometrical construction".

Overall, the Army Alpha Tests and the Army Beta Tests were designed to find the mental age of military recruits and to assess incoming recruits for success in the US Military by testing ones ability to: (understand language, to perform reasoning with semantic and quantitative relationships, to make practical judgments, to infer rules and regulations, and to recall general information)[12] The Army Alpha and the Army Beta tests were heavily criticized for being bias, and for not pedicuring that actual success of incoming soldiers. Nevertheless, Robert Yerkes's innovations in the standardized testing and the use of psychometrics to calculate test those standardized tests are still seen in intelligence testing today.[9]

See also[edit]

The Mismeasure of Man

References[edit]

  1. ^ Paul F. Ballantyne, Psychology, Society, and Ability Testing (1859-2002): Transformative alternatives to Mental Darwinism and Interactionism "Chapter 4, Rise of Group Ability Testing ... (1918–1932)'
  2. ^ Paul F. Ballantyne, Psychology, Society, and Ability Testing (1859-2002): Transformative alternatives to Mental Darwinism and Interactionism "Chapter 5, From Training Programs to World War II Testing ... (1933–1946)"
  3. ^ Morris J MacGregor, Jr Integration of the Armed Forces 1940–1965 Chapter 5. United States Army Center of Military History.
  4. ^ Paul F. Ballantyne, Psychology, Society, and Ability Testing (1859-2002): Transformative alternatives to Mental Darwinism and Interactionism "Chapter 7, Questioning the Ideology of Testing ... (1964–1981)"
  5. ^ USMEPCOM Your Future Begins Now, Testing
  6. ^ American MENSA Qualifying Test Scores
  7. ^ http://www.triplenine.org/main/admission.asp
  8. ^ "A Brief History of the SAT". Frontline. Retrieved March 10, 2014. 
  9. ^ a b Carson, John (June 1993). "Alpha Army, Army Brass, and the Search for Army Inelligence". Isis 84 (2): 278–309. 
  10. ^ Gould, S. J. "A nation of morons". Mark Holah. Retrieved March 10, 2014. 
  11. ^ Ernest R Hilgard, Ernest R (1965). "Robert M. Yerkes Biography". National Academy of Sciences.: 1–43. 
  12. ^ "Pioneers in Standardized Testing". Science and Technology 19 (9): 1–5. 2002.