Artificial satellites in retrograde orbit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Artificial satellites are rarely placed in retrograde orbit.[1][2] This is partly due to the extra velocity (and fuel[3]) required to go against the direction of the rotation of the Earth.

Most commercial earth observing satellites use retrograde orbit,[4] and almost all communication satellites use prograde orbits.[5]

Examples[edit]

Israel has successfully launched seven Ofeq satellites in retrograde orbit aboard a Shavit launcher. These reconnaissance satellites complete one earth orbit every 90 minutes and initially make a half-dozen or so daylight passes per day over Israel and the surrounding countries though this optimal sun synchronized orbit degrades after several months. They were launched in retrograde orbit so that launch debris would land in the Mediterranean Sea, and not over populated neighboring countries on an eastward flight path.[6][7]

The USA launched two Future Imagery Architecture (FIA) radar satellites into 122 degree inclined retrograde orbits in 2010 and 2012. The use of a retrograde orbit suggest these satellites employ SAR techniques.[3]

Earth-observing satellites may also be launched into a sun-synchronous orbit, which is slightly retrograde.[8] This is typically done in order to keep a constant surface illumination angle, which is useful for observations in the visible or infrared spectrums. SEASAT and ERS-1 are examples of satellites launched into sun-synchronous orbits for this reason.

Space warfare and accidents[edit]

Arthur C. Clarke wrote an article called, "War and Peace in the Space Age," in which he suggested that an artificial satellite in retrograde orbit could use "a bucket of nails" to destroy an SDI (anti-warhead) satellite. This premise was ridiculed[citation needed] on account of the vastness of space and the low probability of an encounter.

Nevertheless, a satellite in retrograde orbit could pose a major hazard to other satellites, especially if it was placed in the Clarke belt, where geostationary satellites orbit. This risk highlights the fragility of communication satellites and the importance of international cooperation in preventing space collisions due to negligence or malice.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2009/istanbul/TELE-INFO/TELE-INFO-08.pdf "Most satellites are launched in a prograde orbit because the Earth's rotational velocity provides part of the orbital velocity with a consequent saving "
  2. ^ http://books.google.com/books?id=hfZnkqSPSeAC&pg=PA23&lpg=PA23&dq="Most+satellites+are+launched+in+a+prograde+orbit"
  3. ^ a b http://www.satobs.org/seesat/Oct-2010/0008.html
  4. ^ http://www.ioccg.org/training/turkey/DrLynch_lectures2.pdf "Most Earth observing satellites are launched so as to have retrograde orbits."
  5. ^ http://www.sac.gov.in/Satcom_Overview.doc "Orbits of almost all communication satellites are prograde orbits, as it takes less propellant to achieve the final velocity of the satellite in prograde orbit by taking advantage of the earth's rotational"
  6. ^ http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1376231/Shavit
  7. ^ http://www.deagel.com/Space-Launch-Systems/Shavit_a001901001.aspx
  8. ^ http://books.google.com/books?id=zk5656l9ulkC&pg=PA109&dq=artificial+satellite+retrograde

Sources and external links[edit]