Arts and Crafts movement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Arts and Crafts)
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the art and design movement. For handicrafts generally, see Handicraft. For other uses, see Arts & Crafts (disambiguation).
William Morris design for "Trellis" wallpaper, 1862

The Arts and Crafts movement was an international movement in the decorative and fine arts that flourished in Europe and North America between 1880 and 1910,[1] emerging later in Japan in the 1920s. It stood for traditional craftsmanship using simple forms and it often used medieval, romantic or folk styles of decoration. It advocated economic and social reform and has been said to be essentially anti-industrial.[2][3][4] Its influence was felt in Europe until it was displaced by Modernism in the 1930s[5] and continued among craft makers, designers and town planners long afterwards.[6]

The term was first used by T. J. Cobden-Sanderson at a meeting of the Arts and Crafts Exhibition Society in 1887.[7] although the principles and style on which it was based had been developing in England for at least twenty years. It was inspired by the writings of the architect Augustus Pugin (1812–1852), the writer John Ruskin (1819–1900) and the artist William Morris (1834–1896).[1]

The movement developed earliest and most fully in the British Isles[5] and spread across the British Empire and to the rest of Europe and North America.[8] It was largely a reaction against the perceived impoverished state of the decorative arts at the time and the conditions in which they were produced.[2]

Origins in England[edit]

William Morris's Red House in London
William Morris

The influence of John Ruskin[edit]

The Arts and Crafts philosophy derived partly from Ruskin's social criticism, which related the moral and social health of a nation to the qualities of its architecture and to the nature of work. Ruskin considered the sort of mechanized production and division of labour that had been created in the industrial revolution to be "servile labour" and he thought that a healthy and moral society required independent workers who designed the things they made. His followers in the Arts and Crafts movement favoured craft production over industrial manufacture and were concerned about the loss of traditional skills, but they were arguably more troubled by effects of the factory system than by machinery itself[9] and William Morris's idea of "handicraft" was essentially work without any division of labour rather than work without any sort of machinery.[10]

The Pre-Raphaelites[edit]

The aesthetic and social vision of the Arts and Crafts movement also derived from ideas developed in the 1850s by the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. The Brotherhood was formed by a group of friends at the University of Oxford, including William Morris, Edward Burne-Jones and some of Burne-Jones' associates from Birmingham at Pembroke College, who became known as the Birmingham Set.[11] The Birmingham Set had first-hand experience of modern industrial society and combined their love of the Romantic literature of Tennyson, Keats and Shelley with a commitment to social reform.[12] By 1855 they had discovered the writings of John Ruskin and, conscious of the contrast between the barbarity of contemporary culture and the art of the Middle Ages, in particular the art preceding Raphael (1483-1530), they formed themselves into the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood to pursue their literary and artistic aims. In Burne-Jones' words, they intended to "wage Holy warfare against the age".[13]

Morris and Burne-Jones had originally intended to join the priesthood, but in 1855, returning to Burne-Jones' house in Birmingham from touring the cathedrals of Northern France, they decided instead to pursue careers in the visual arts, Burne-Jones resolving to become a painter and Morris an architect.[14] The following day they discovered a copy of Mallory's Morte d'Arthur in a Birmingham bookshop; this work, more than any other, was to define the medievalism of their early style.[14] In early 1856 Morris joined the Oxford office of the Gothic Revival architect G. E. Street, where he met fellow-architect Philip Webb and began experimenting with stone carving, wood carving, embroidery, metalwork and the making of illuminated manuscripts.[15] Burne-Jones had become a pupil of the Pre-Raphaelite painter Dante Gabriel Rossetti in London, and in the summer of 1856 both Morris and Burne Jones moved into premises in Red Lion Square in Bloomsbury.

There they wrote articles on the politics of art for The Oxford and Cambridge Magazine with other members of the Birmingham Set, and Morris began to design furniture and interiors.[15] Morris's radical departure was his personal involvement in the manufacture as well as the design of his products.[15] Ruskin had argued that the separation of the intellectual act of design from the manual act of physical creation was both socially and aesthetically damaging. Morris further developed this idea, insisting that no work was carried out in his workshops before he had mastered the techniques and materials himself, and arguing that "without dignified, creative human occupation people became disconnected from life".[15]

Red House, in Bexleyheath, London, designed for Morris in 1859 by architect Philip Webb, exemplifies the early Arts and Crafts style, with its well-proportioned solid forms, wide porches, steep roof, pointed window arches, brick fireplaces and wooden fittings. Webb rejected the grand classical style and based the design on British vernacular architecture expressing the texture of ordinary materials, such as stone and tiles, with an asymmetrical and quaint building composition.[16]

Morris, Marshall, Faulkner & Co.[edit]

The weaving shed in Morris & Co's factory at Merton, which opened in the 1880s

In 1861 Morris and some friends founded a company, Morris, Marshall, Faulkner & Co., which, as supervised by the partners, designed and made decorative objects for homes, including wallpaper, textiles, furniture and stained glass. Later the company (which Morris and his friends called "The Firm") was re-formed as Morris & Co. In 1890 Morris established the Kelmscott Press, for which he designed a typeface based on Nicolas Jenson's 15th-century letter forms.[17] The press printed fine and de-luxe editions of contemporary and historical English literature.

Morris was influenced by the Gothic Revival (1830–1880) and was interested in medieval styles, using bold forms and strong colors based on medieval designs. His products were simple in form, without superfluous or excessive decoration, and in order to express the beauty of craft some products were deliberately left slightly unfinished, expressing the qualities of the materials used and producing a certain rustic and robust effect. He tended to use patterns inspired by British flora and fauna and forms inspired by the vernacular or domestic traditions of the British countryside. He carried out detailed research into old techniques, such as wood-block printing of fabrics. Truth to material, structure and function had also been advocated by A.W.N. Pugin (1812–1852), an exponent of the Gothic Revival in architecture.[16] This approach to designing and making became characteristic of the Arts and Crafts movement.

Morris & Co. traded until 1940. Its designs were sold by Sanderson and Sons and some are still in production.[18]

Furnishings and decoration gallery[edit]

Social and design principles[edit]

"Unlike their counterparts in the United States, most Arts and Crafts practitioners in Britain had strong, slightly incoherent, negative feelings about machinery. They thought of 'the craftsman' as free, creative, and working with his hands, 'the machine' as soulless, repetitive, and inhuman. These contrasting images derive in part from John Ruskin's (1819-1900) The Stones of Venice, an architectural history of Venice that contains a powerful denunciation of modern industrialism to which Arts and Crafts designers returned again and again. Distrust for the machine lay behind the many little workshops that turned their backs on the industrial world around 1900, using preindustrial techniques to create what they called 'crafts.'"

Alan Crawford, "W. A. S. Benson, Machinery, and the Arts and Crafts Movement in Britain"[19]

The Arts and Crafts style emerged from the attempt to reform design and decoration and the reaction against contemporary styles that the reformers associated with machine-production, partly a reaction against the style of many of the items shown in the Great Exhibition of 1851, which were ornate, artificial and ignored the qualities of the materials used. The art historian Nikolaus Pevsner has said that exhibits in the Great Exhibition showed "ignorance of that basic need in creating patterns, the integrity of the surface" and "vulgarity in detail".[20] Design reform began with the organisers of the Exhibition itself, Henry Cole (1808–1882), Owen Jones (1809–1874), Matthew Digby Wyatt (1820–1877) and Richard Redgrave (1804–1888),[21] and Morris's dislike of excessive ornament and badly made things was not exclusive to the Arts and Crafts movement.[22] Owen Jones, for example, declared that "Ornament ... must be secondary to the thing decorated", that there must be "fitness in the ornament to the thing ornamented", and that wallpapers and carpets must not have any patterns "suggestive of anything but a level or plain".[23] Where a fabric or wallpaper in the Great Exhibition might be decorated with a natural motif made to look as real as possible, a Morris & Co. wallpaper, like the Artichoke design illustrated above, would use a flat and simplified natural motif.

Morris mixed design criticism with social criticism, insisting that the artist should be a craftsman-designer working by hand[20] and advocating a society of free craftspeople, such as he believed had existed during the Middle Ages. "Because craftsmen took pleasure in their work", he wrote, "the Middle Ages was a period of greatness in the art of the common people. ... The treasures in our museums now are only the common utensils used in households of that age, when hundreds of medieval churches - each one a masterpiece - were built by unsophisticated peasants."[24]

The Nature of Gothic by John Ruskin, printed by William Morris at the Kelmscott Press in 1892 in Golden type inspired by the 15th century printer Nicolas Jenson. This chapter from The Stones of Venice was a sort of manifesto for the Arts and Crafts movement.

There was inconsistency and disagreement about whether machinery should be rejected altogether. At one point Morris said that production by machinery was "altogether an evil",[20] but when he could find manufacturers willing to work to his own exacting standards, he employed them to make his designs[25] and he said that, in a "true society", where neither luxuries nor cheap trash were made, machinery could be improved and used to reduce the hours of labour.[26] C.R.Ashbee shared his ambivalence. At the time of his Guild of Handicraft, initiated in 1888, he said, "We do not reject the machine, we welcome it. But we would desire to see it mastered."[20][27] After unsuccessfully pitting his Guild and School of Handicraft guild against modern methods of manufacture, he acknowledged that "Modern civilization rests on machinery",[20] but he continued to criticize the deleterious effects of what he called "mechanism", saying that "the production of certain mechanical commodities is as bad for the national health as is the production of slave-grown cane or child-sweated wares."[28]

Ruskin's and Morris's idea that the division of labour was undesirable did not result in Arts and Crafts artists carrying out every stage in the making of goods and it was only in the twentieth century that that became an essential part of the definition of craftsmanship. The founders of the Arts and Crafts Exhibition Society did not insist that the designer should also be the maker or the 'executant'. Peter Floud, writing in the 1950s, said that "The founders of the Society ... never executed their own designs, but invariably turned them over to commercial firms."[29] Floud argues that the idea that the designer should be the maker and the maker the designer derived "not from Morris or early Arts and Crafts teaching, but rather from the second-generation elaboration doctrine worked out in the first decade of [the twentieth] century by men such as W. R. Lethaby.[29]

The movement was associated with socialist ideas in the persons of Morris, T. J. Cobden Sanderson, Crane, Ashbee and others. In the early 1880s Morris was spending more of his time on socialist propaganda than on designing and making.[30] Ashbee established a community of craftsmen, the Guild of Handicraft, in east London, later moving to Chipping Campden.[7] Those adherents who were not socialists, for example, Alfred Hoare Powell,[9] advocated a more humane and personal relationship between employer and employee. In Britain the movement was associated with dress reform,[31] ruralism, the garden city movement[6] and the folk-song revival, and in continental Europe with the preservation of national traditions in building, the applied arts, domestic design and costume.[citation needed]

Development[edit]

Coleton Fishacre was designed in 1925 as a holiday home in Kingswear, Devon, England, in the Arts and Crafts tradition.
The Robert Owen Museum, Newtown, by Frank Shayler.

Morris's designs quickly became popular, attracting interest when The Firm exhibited at the 1862 International Exhibition. Much of The Firm's early work was for churches and Morris won important interior design commissions at St James's Palace and the South Kensington Museum (now the Victoria and Albert Museum). Later his work became popular with the middle and upper classes, despite his wish to create a democratic art, and by the end of the 19th century, Arts and Crafts design in houses and domestic interiors was the dominant style in Britain, copied in products made by conventional industrial methods.

The spread of Arts and Crafts ideas during the late 19th and early 20th centuries resulted in the establishment of many associations and craft communities, although Morris was not involved with them because of his preoccupation with socialism in the 1880s. A hundred and thirty Arts and Crafts organisations were formed in Britain, most between 1895 and 1905.[30]

In 1881, Eglantyne Louisa Jebb, Mary Fraser Tytler and others initiated the Home Arts and Industries Association to encourage the working classes, especially those in rural areas, to take up handicrafts under supervision, not for profit, but in order to provide them with useful occupations and to improve their taste.

In 1882, architect A.H.Mackmurdo formed the Century Guild, a partnership of designers including Selwyn Image, Herbert Horne, Clement Heaton and Benjamin Creswick.[30]

In 1884, the Art Workers Guild was initiated by five young architects, William Lethaby, Edward Prior, Ernest Newton, Mervyn Macartney and Gerald C. Horsley, with the goal of bringing together fine and applied arts and raising the status of the latter. It was directed originally by George Blackall Simonds. By 1890 the Guild had 150 members, representing the increasing number of practitioners of the Arts and Crafts style.[30] It still exists.

The London department store Liberty & Co., founded in 1875, was a prominent retailer of goods in the style and of the "artistic dress" favoured by followers of the Arts and Crafts movement.

In 1887 the Arts and Crafts Exhibition Society, which gave its name to the movement, was formed with Walter Crane as president, holding its first exhibition in the New Gallery, London, in November 1888.[32] It was the first show of contemporary decorative arts in London since the Grosvenor Gallery's Winter Exhibition of 1881.[33] Morris & Co. was well represented in the exhibition with furniture, fabrics, carpets and embroideries. Edward Burne-Jones observed, "here for the first time one can measure a bit the change that has happened in the last twenty years".[30] The society still exists as the Society of Designer Craftsmen.[34]

In 1888, C.R.Ashbee, a major late practitioner of the style in England, founded the Guild and School of Handicraft in the East End of London. The guild was a craft co-operative modelled on the medieval guilds and intended to give working men satisfaction in their craftsmanship. Skilled craftsmen, working on the principles of Ruskin and Morris, were to produce hand-crafted goods and manage a school for apprentices. The idea was greeted with enthusiasm by almost everyone except Morris, who was by now involved with promoting socialism and thought Ashbee's scheme trivial. From 1888 to 1902 the guild prospered, employing about 50 men. In 1902 Ashbee relocated the guild out of London to begin an experimental community in Chipping Campden in the Cotswolds. The guild's work is characterized by plain surfaces of hammered silver, flowing wirework and colored stones in simple settings. Ashbee designed jewellery and silver tableware. The guild flourished at Chipping Camden but did not prosper and was liquidated in 1908. Some craftsmen stayed, contributing to the tradition of modern craftsmanship in the area.[16][35][36]

Charles Francis Annesley Voysey (1857–1941) was an Arts and Crafts architect who also designed fabrics, tiles, ceramics, furniture and metalwork. His style combined simplicity with sophistication. His wallpapers and textiles, featuring stylised bird and plant forms in bold outlines with flat colors, were used widely.[16]

Morris's ideas were adopted by the New Education philosophy in the late 1880s, which incorporated handicraft teaching in schools at Abbotsholme (1889) and Bedales (1892), and his influence has been noted in the social experiments of Dartington Hall during the mid-20th century.

Morris's thought influenced the distributism of G. K. Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc.[37]

By the end of the nineteenth century, Arts and Crafts ideals had influenced architecture, painting, sculpture, graphics, illustration, book making and photography, domestic design and the decorative arts, including furniture and woodwork, stained glass, leatherwork, lacemaking, embroidery, rug making and weaving, jewelry and metalwork, enameling and ceramics.[38] By 1910, there was a fashion for "Arts and Crafts" and all things hand-made and a proliferation of amateur handicrafts of variable quality.[39]

The London suburb of Bedford Park, built mainly in the 1880s and 1890s, has about 360 Arts and Crafts style houses and was once famous for its Aesthetic residents. Several Almshouses were built in the Arts and Crafts style, for example, Whiteley Village, Surrey, built between 1914 and 1917, with over 280 buildings, and the Dyers Almshouses, Sussex, built between 1939 and 1971. Letchworth Garden City, the first garden city, was inspired by Arts and Crafts ideals.[6] The first houses were build in the vernacular style popularized by the movement and the town became associated with high-mindedness and simple living. The sandal-making workshop set up by Edward Carpenter moved from Yorkshire to Letchworth Garden City and George Orwell's jibe about "every fruit-juice drinker, nudist, sandal-wearer, sex-maniac, Quaker, ‘Nature Cure’ quack, pacifist, and feminist in England" going to a socialist conference in Letchworth has become famous.[40]

Art education[edit]

Arts and Crafts practitioners were critical of the national system of art education, which was based on design in the abstract with little teaching of craft. The lack of practical craft training also caused concern in industrial and official circles, and in 1884, a Royal Commission - accepting the advice of William Morris - recommended that art education should pay more attention to the suitability of design to the material in which it was to be executed.[41]

The first school to make this change was the Birmingham School of Arts and Crafts, which "led the way in introducing executed design to the teaching of art and design nationally (working in the material for which the design was intended rather than designing on paper). In his external examiner's report of 1889, Walter Crane praised Birmingham School of Art in that it 'considered design in relationship to materials and usage.'"[42] Under the direction of Edward Taylor, its headmaster from 1877 to 1903, and with the help of Henry Payne and Joseph Southall, the Birmingham School became a leading Arts-and-Crafts centre.[43]

Other local authority schools also began to introduce more practical teaching of crafts. In London, the Central School of Arts and Crafts was founded in 1896 by the London County Council, with Lethaby and George Frampton as its first principals, and the Camberwell School of Arts and Crafts was founded shortly after by the local borough. Crane became head of the Royal College of Art in 1898 and tried to reform it along more practical lines, but resigned after a year, defeated by the bureaucracy of the Board of Education, who then appointed Augustus Spencer to implement his plan. Spencer brought in Lethaby to head its school of design.[44]

Influences[edit]

Ireland and Scotland[edit]

The movement spread to Ireland, representing an important time for the nation's cultural development, a visual counterpart to the literary revival of the same time[45] and was a publication of Irish nationalism. The Arts and Crafts use of stained glass was popular in Ireland, with Harry Clarke the best-known artist and also with Evie Hone. The architecture of the style is represented by the Honan Chapel (1916) in Cork in the grounds of University College Cork. Other architects practicing in Ireland included Sir Edwin Lutyens (Heywood House in Co. Laois, Lambay Island and the Irish National War Memorial Gardens in Dublin) and Frederick 'Pa' Hicks (Malahide Castle estate buildings and round tower). Irish Celtic motifs were popular with the movement in silvercraft, carpet design, book illustrations and hand-carved furniture.

The beginnings of the Arts and Crafts movement in Scotland were in the stained glass revival of the 1850s, pioneered by James Ballantine (1808–77). His major works included the great west window of Dunfermline Abbey and the scheme for St. Giles Cathedral, Edinburgh. In Glasgow it was pioneered by Daniel Cottier (1838–91), who had probably studied with Ballantine, and was directly influenced by William Morris, Ford Madox Brown and John Ruskin. His key works included the Baptism of Christ in Paisley Abbey, (c. 1880). His followers included Stephen Adam and his son of the same name.[46] The Glasgow-born designer and theorist Christopher Dresser (1834–1904) was one of the first, and most important, independent designers, a pivotal figure in the Aesthetic Movement and a major contributor to the allied Anglo-Japanese movement.[47] The movement had an "extraordinary flowering" in Scotland where it was represented by the development of the 'Glasgow Style' which was based on the talent of the Glasgow School of Art. Celtic revival took hold here, and motifs such as the Glasgow rose became popularised. Charles Rennie Mackintosh and the Glasgow School of Art were to influence others worldwide.[5][38]

Continental Europe[edit]

The Swedish artists Carl Larsson and Karin Bergöö Larsson were inspired by the Arts and Crafts movement when designing their home.

Widely exhibited in Europe, the Arts and Crafts style's simplicity inspired designers like Henry van de Velde and styles such as Art Nouveau, the Dutch De Stijl group, Vienna Secession, and eventually the Bauhaus style. Pevsner regarded the style as a prelude to Modernism, which used simple forms without ornamentation.[20]

The earliest Arts and Crafts activity in continental Europe was in Belgium in about 1890, where the English style inspired artists and architects including can de Velde, Gabriel Van Dievoet, Gustave Serrurier-Bovy and a group known as La Libre Esthétique (Free Aesthetic).

In Germany, after unification in 1871, the Arts and Crafts movement developed nationalist associations under the encouragement of the Bund für Heimatschutz (1897)[48] and the Vereinigte Werkstätten für Kunst im Handwerk founded in 1898 by Karl Schmidt. The Deutscher Werkbund, formed in 1899, was an arts and crafts association influenced by William Morris. Its leading members, van de Velde and Hermann Muthesius, had opposing opinions about the place of machinery in production: van de Velde thought mass production threatened creativity and individuality; Muthesius championed mass production, standardisation and an affordable, democratic art.

In Austria, the style became popular in Vienna, inspired by an exhibition of the works of Charles Rennie Mackintosh and Charles Robert Ashbee. The Wiener Werkstätte, founded in 1903 by Josef Hoffmann and Koloman Moser, had an independent role in the development of Modernism, with its Wiener Werkstätte Style.

In Finland, an idealistic artists' colony in Helsinki was designed by Herman Gesellius, Armas Lindgren and Eliel Saarinen,[5] who worked in the National Romantic style, akin to the British Gothic Revival.

In Hungary, under the influence of Ruskin and Morris, a group of artists and architects, including Károly Kós, Aladár Körösfői-Kriesch and Ede Toroczkai Wigand, discovered the folk art and vernacular architecture of Transylvania. Many of Kós's buildings, including those of the Budapest zoo, show this influence.[49]

In Russia, Viktor Hartmann, Viktor Vasnetsov and other artists associated with Abramtsevo Colony sought to revive the quality of medieval Russian decorative arts quite independently from the movement in Great Britain.

In Iceland, Sölvi Helgason's work shows Arts and Crafts influence.

North America[edit]

Warren Wilson Beach House (The Venice Beach House), Venice, California
House at 1333 Alvarado Terrace, Los Angeles.JPG
Arts and Crafts Tudor Home in the Buena Park Historic District, Uptown, Chicago
Example of Arts and Crafts style influence on Federation architecture Observe the faceted bay window and the stone base.

In the United States, the terms American Craftsman or Craftsman style are often used to denote the style of architecture, interior design, and decorative arts that prevailed between the dominant eras of Art Nouveau and Art Deco, or approximately the period from 1910 to 1925. The movement was particularly notable for the professional opportunities it opened up for women as artisans, designers and entrepreneurs who founded and ran, or were employed by, such successful enterprises as the Kalo Shops, Rookwood Pottery, and Tiffany Studios.

In Canada, the term Arts and Crafts predominates, but Craftsman is also recognized.[50]

While the Europeans tried to recreate the virtuous crafts being replaced by industrialisation, Americans tried to establish a new type of virtue to replace heroic craft production: well-decorated middle-class homes. They claimed that the simple but refined aesthetics of Arts and Crafts decorative arts would ennoble the new experience of industrial consumerism, making individuals more rational and society more harmonious. The American Arts and Crafts movement was the aesthetic counterpart of its contemporary political philosophy, progressivism. Characteristically, when the Arts and Crafts Society began in October 1897 in Chicago, it was at Hull House, one of the first American settlement houses for social reform.[51]

In the United States, the Arts and Crafts style initiated a variety of attempts to reinterpret European Arts and Crafts ideals for Americans. These included the "Craftsman"-style architecture, furniture, and other decorative arts such as designs promoted by Gustav Stickley in his magazine, The Craftsman and designs produced on the Roycroft campus as publicized in Elbert Hubbard's The Fra. Both men used their magazines as a vehicle to promote the goods produced with the Craftsman workshop in Eastwood, NY and Elbert Hubbard's Roycroft campus in East Aurora, NY. A host of imitators of Stickley's furniture (the designs of which are often mislabelled the "Mission Style") included three companies established by his brothers.

Arts and Crafts ideals disseminated in America through journal and newspaper writing were supplemented by societies that sponsored lectures and programs.[51] The first was organized in Boston in the late 1890s, when a group of influential architects, designers, and educators determined to bring to America the design reforms begun in Britain by William Morris; they met to organize an exhibition of contemporary craft objects. The first meeting was held on January 4, 1897, at the Museum of Fine Arts (MFA) in Boston to organize an exhibition of contemporary crafts. When craftsmen, consumers, and manufacturers realised the aesthetic and technical potential of the applied arts, the process of design reform in Boston started. Present at this meeting were General Charles Loring, Chairman of the Trustees of the MFA; William Sturgis Bigelow and Denman Ross, collectors, writers and MFA trustees; Ross Turner, painter; Sylvester Baxter, art critic for the Boston Transcript; Howard Baker, A.W. Longfellow Jr.; and Ralph Clipson Sturgis, architect.

The first American Arts and Crafts Exhibition began on April 5, 1897, at Copley Hall, Boston[citation needed] featuring more than 1000 objects made by 160 craftsmen, half of whom were women. Some of the advocates of the exhibit were Langford Warren, founder of Harvard's School of Architecture; Mrs. Richard Morris Hunt; Arthur Astor Carey and Edwin Mead, social reformers; and Will H. Bradley, graphic designer. The success of this exhibition resulted in the incorporation of The Society of Arts and Crafts (SAC), on June 28, 1897, with a mandate to "develop and encourage higher standards in the handicrafts." The 21 founders claimed to be interested in more than sales, and emphasized encouragement of artists to produce work with the best quality of workmanship and design. This mandate was soon expanded into a credo, possibly written by the SAC's first president, Charles Eliot Norton, which read:

This Society was incorporated for the purpose of promoting artistic work in all branches of handicraft. It hopes to bring Designers and Workmen into mutually helpful relations, and to encourage workmen to execute designs of their own. It endeavors to stimulate in workmen an appreciation of the dignity and value of good design; to counteract the popular impatience of Law and Form, and the desire for over-ornamentation and specious originality. It will insist upon the necessity of sobriety and restraint, or ordered arrangement, of due regard for the relation between the form of an object and its use, and of harmony and fitness in the decoration put upon it.[52]

Also influential were the Roycroft community initiated by Elbert Hubbard in Buffalo and East Aurora, New York, Joseph Marbella, utopian communities like Byrdcliffe Colony in Woodstock, New York, and Rose Valley, Pennsylvania, developments such as Mountain Lakes, New Jersey, featuring clusters of bungalow and chateau homes built by Herbert J. Hapgood, and the contemporary studio craft style. Studio pottery—exemplified by the Grueby Faience Company, Newcomb Pottery in New Orleans, Marblehead Pottery, Teco pottery, Overbeck and Rookwood pottery and Mary Chase Perry Stratton's Pewabic Pottery in Detroit, as well as the art tiles made by Ernest A. Batchelder in Pasadena, California, and idiosyncratic furniture of Charles Rohlfs all demonstrate the influence of Arts and Crafts.

Architecture[edit]

The "Prairie School" of Frank Lloyd Wright, George Washington Maher and other architects in Chicago, the Country Day School movement, the bungalow and ultimate bungalow style of houses popularized by Greene and Greene, Julia Morgan, and Bernard Maybeck are some examples of the American Arts and Crafts and American Craftsman style of architecture. Restored and landmark-protected examples are still present in America, especially in California in Berkeley and Pasadena, and the sections of other towns originally developed during the era and not experiencing post-war urban renewal. Mission Revival, Prairie School, and the 'California bungalow' styles of residential building remain popular in the United States today.

Asia[edit]

In Japan, Yanagi Sōetsu, creator of the Mingei movement which promoted folk art from the 1920s onwards, was influenced by the writings of Morris and Ruskin.[24] Like the Arts and Crafts movement in Europe, Mingei sought to preserve traditional crafts in the face of modernising industry.

Later influences[edit]

One of Yanagi Soetsu's collaborators in Japan was the British artist potter Bernard Leach, who brought to England many of Yanagi's ideas about the moral and social value of simple crafts when he set up the St. Ives Pottery in the early 1920s. Leach was an active propagandist for these ideas, which struck a chord with practitioners of the crafts in the inter-war years, and he expounded them in his book The Art of the Potter, published in 1940, which denounced industrial society in terms as vehement as those of Ruskin and Morris. Thus the Arts and Crafts philosophy was perpetuated in the small world of the crafts in the 1950s and 1960s, long after the demise of the Arts and Crafts movement and at the high tide of Modernism.

The British Utility furniture of the 1940s was simple in design and also derived from Arts and Crafts principles.[53] Gordon Russell, chairman of the Utility Furniture Design Panel, manufactured in the Cotswold Hills, which had become a region of Arts and Crafts furniture making when Ashbee relocated there.

William Morris's biographer, Fiona MacCarthy, detected the Arts and Crafts philosophy behind the Festival of Britain (1951), the work of the designer Terence Conran[6] and the founding of the British Crafts Council in the 1970s.[54]

Museums[edit]

The Museum of the American Arts and Crafts Movement is under construction in St. Petersburg, Florida, scheduled to open in 2017.[55][56]

Architectural examples[edit]


Architectural Gallery[edit]

Leading practitioners[edit]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Triggs, Oscar Lovell (1902). Chapters in the History of the Arts and Crafts Movement. 
  2. ^ a b Brenda M. King, Silk and Empire
  3. ^ Moses N. Ikiugu and Elizabeth A. Ciaravino, Psychosocial Conceptual Practice models in Occupational Therapy
  4. ^ "Arts and Crafts Style Guide". British Galleries. Victoria and Albert Museum. Retrieved 2007-07-17. 
  5. ^ a b c d Campbell, Gordon (2006). The Grove Encyclopedia of Decorative Arts, Volume 1. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-518948-3. 
  6. ^ a b c d Fiona MacCarthy, Anarchy and Beauty: William Morris and his Legacy 1860-1960, London: National Portrait Gallery, 2014 ISBN 978 185514 484 2
  7. ^ a b Alan Crawford, C. R. Ashbee: Architect, Designer & Romantic Socialist, Yale University Press, 2005. ISBN 0300109393
  8. ^ Wendy Kaplan and Alan Crawford, The Arts & Crafts Movement in Europe & America: Design for the Modern World, Los Angeles County Museum of Art
  9. ^ a b Jacqueline Sarsby" Alfred Powell: Idealism and Realism in the Cotswolds", Journal of Design History, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 375-397
  10. ^ David Pye, The Nature and Art of Workmanship, Cambridge University Press, 1968
  11. ^ Naylor 1971, p. 96.
  12. ^ Naylor 1971, pp. 96-97.
  13. ^ Naylor 1971, p. 97.
  14. ^ a b Wildman 1998, p. 49.
  15. ^ a b c d MacCarthy 2009.
  16. ^ a b c d "Victoria and Albert Museum". Vam.ac.uk. Retrieved 2010-08-28. 
  17. ^ John Lewis and John Brinckley, Graphic Design, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1954
  18. ^ "Morris & Co". William-morris.co.uk. Retrieved 2010-08-28. 
  19. ^ Alan Crawford, "W. A. S. Benson, Machinery, and the Arts and Crafts Movement in Britain", The Journal of Decorative and Propaganda Arts, Vol. 24, Design, Culture, Identity: The Wolfsonian Collection (2002), pp. 94-117
  20. ^ a b c d e f Nikolaus Pevsner, Pioneers of Modern Design, Yale University Press, 2005, ISBN 0-300-10571-1
  21. ^ V&A, "Wallpaper Design Reform"
  22. ^ Gillian Naylor, The Arts and Crafts Movemenr, London: Studio Vista, 1971 ISBN 978-0262640183
  23. ^ Quoted in Nikolaus Pevsner, Pioneers of Modern Design
  24. ^ a b Elisabeth Frolet, Nick Pearce, Soetsu Yanagi and Sori Yanagi, Mingei: The Living Tradition in Japanese Arts, Japan Folk Crafts Museum/Glasgow Museums, Japan: Kodashani International, 1991
  25. ^ Graeme Shankland, "William Morris - Designer", in Asa Briggs (ed.) William Morris: Selected Writings and Designs, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980 ISBN 0-14-020521-7
  26. ^ William Morris, "Useful Work versus Useless Toil", in Asa Briggs (ed.) William Morris: Selected Writings and Designs, Harmondsworth: Pengin, 1980 ISBN 0-14-020521-7
  27. ^ Ashbee, C.R., A Few Chapters on Workshop Construction and Citizenship, London, 1894.
  28. ^ "C.R.Ashbee, Should We Stop Teaching Art?, New York and London: Garland, 1978, p.12 (Facsimile of the 1911 edition)
  29. ^ a b Peter Floud, "The crafts then and now", The Studio, 1953, p.127
  30. ^ a b c d e Fiona MacCarthy, William Morris, London: Faber and Faber, 1995 ISBN 0-571-17495-7
  31. ^ V&A, "Victorian Dress at the V&A"
  32. ^ Parry, Linda, William Morris and the Arts and Crafts Movement: A Sourcebook, New York, Portland House, 1989 ISBN 0-517-69260-0
  33. ^ "Crane, Walter, "Of the Arts and Crafts Movement", in ''Ideals In Art: Papers Theoretical Practical Critical'', George Bell & Sons, 1905". Chestofbooks.com. Retrieved 2010-08-28. 
  34. ^ "Society of Designer Craftsmen". Society of Designer Craftsmen. Retrieved 2010-08-28. 
  35. ^ "Utopia Britannica". Utopia Britannica. Retrieved 2010-08-28. 
  36. ^ "Court Barn Museum". Courtbarn.org.uk. Retrieved 2010-08-28. 
  37. ^ Letter, Joseph Nuttgens, London Review of Books, 13 May 2010 p 4
  38. ^ a b Nicola Gordon Bowe and Elizabeth Cumming, The Arts And Crafts Movements in Dublin and Edinburgh
  39. ^ "Arts and Crafts", Journal of the Royal Society of Arts, Vol. 56, No. 2918, 23 October 1908, pp. 1023-1024
  40. ^ George Orwell, The Road to Wigan Pier
  41. ^ Charles Harvey and Jon Press, "William Morris and the Royal Commission on Technical Instruction", Journal of the William Morris Society 11.1, August 1994, pp. 31-34
  42. ^ "Birmingham Institute of Art and Design",fineart.ac.uk
  43. ^ Everitt, Sian. "Keeper of Archives". Birmingham Institute of Art and Design. Retrieved 17 September 2011. 
  44. ^ Stuart Macdonald, The History and Philosophy of Art Education, London: University of London Press, 1970. ISBN 0 340 09420 6
  45. ^ Nicola Gordon Bowe, The Irish Arts and Crafts Movement (1886-1925), Irish Arts Review Yearbook, 1990-91, pp. 172-185
  46. ^ M. MacDonald, Scottish Art (London: Thames and Hudson, 2000), ISBN 0500203334, p. 151.
  47. ^ H. Lyons, Christopher Dresser: The People Designer - 1834–1904 (Antique Collectors' Club, 2005), ISBN 1851494553.
  48. ^ Ákos Moravánszky, Competing visions: aesthetic invention and social imagination in Central European Architecture 1867-1918, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998
  49. ^ Széleky András, Kós Károly, Budapest, 1979
  50. ^ "Metropolitan Museum of Art: Monica Obniski, "The Arts and Crafts Movement in America"". Metmuseum.org. 1972-02-20. Retrieved 2010-08-28. 
  51. ^ a b Obniski.
  52. ^ Brandt, Beverly Kay. The Craftsman and the Critic: Defining Usefulness and Beauty in the Arts and Crafts-era Boston. University of Massachusetts Press, 2009. p. 113.
  53. ^ Designing Britain
  54. ^ Fiona MacCarthy, William Morris: A Life for our Time, 1994 (ISBN 0-394-58531-3)
  55. ^ "Construction Begins on $40 Million Museum of the American Arts & Crafts in Florida". ARTFIX Daily. 18 February 2015. Retrieved 3 March 2015. 
  56. ^ Nichols, Steve (18 February 2015). "New, bigger, art museum coming to St. Pete". FOX 13 Pinellas Bureau Reporter. Retrieved 3 March 2015. 

Bibliography and further reading[edit]

External links[edit]