Attorneys in Japan
Historically, Japanese customs instituted an avoidance of legal involvement, based upon Confucianism doctrines, and Japanese principles of harmony; anyone brought before a court for a criminal or civil matter suffered public and private humiliation, since they disrupted harmony.
Nevertheless, by the 18th century, innkeepers in Edo began offering simple legal services for guests. They were known as Kujishi. By the 19th century, references began to appear in Japanese literature on the role of "European-style" lawyers.
Regulation of legal professionals began during the Meiji Restoration. In 1890, the Criminal Code was amended, which recognized the right to legal representation during a criminal trial. The state's representative at the trial, known as a Procurator, was given the prestige of being a government official. By association, it unofficially granted a modicum of official status to the daigennin.
The government also required the establishment of bar associations at each district court, and by 1893, the Lawyer's Law was promulgated, officially regulating the legal profession by setting standards for, as well as legitimatize, attorneys at law.
Post-World War II
The legal industry
Due to cultural traditions, Japanese have rarely used lawsuits as a means to settle disputes. With the rise of patent-disputes and international mergers, however, Japan is facing a shortage of lawyers, and the government has allowed universities to offer graduate courses on law, in order to ease the shortage. The recent push to produce lawyers has also been reflected in the demographics of the legal community, where 25.3% of the lawyers surveyed have only been admitted to the bar for less than 5 years.
Starting salaries for Japanese attorneys are typically around 10 million yen (US$100,000) in established law firms, and about half as much in Japanese companies. In-house counsel are still relatively rare in Japan, with only 770 of the 32,000 registered bengoshi working in corporate law departments as of January 2013.
Foreign law firms have been permitted to hire Japanese attorneys since 2005, and some such firms such as Morrison & Foerster and White & Case have built large Japanese law practices that handle domestic matters for domestic clients. Some foreign firms that built bengoshi practices under this system, such as Linklaters and Allen & Overy, have since downsized or eliminated their bengoshi teams, while others such as Herbert Smith Freehills elected to rely on referral relationships with the Big Four law firms rather than competing with them by employing bengoshi within the firm.
With several minor exceptions, attorneys at law are required to pass a national bar examination (司法試験 shihō shiken?, lit. "legal examination") followed by one year of internship, supervised by the Legal Research and Training Institute (司法研修所 Shihō Kenshūjo?) of the Supreme Court of Japan.
Before 2006, the bar examination consisted of three stages. The first stage, held in May, consisted of 60 multiple choice questions regarding constitutional law, civil law and criminal law. The second stage, held over two days in July, consisted of twelve essay questions regarding constitutional law, civil law, criminal law, commercial law, civil procedure law and criminal procedure law. The final stage, held in October, was an oral examination regarding constitutional law, civil law, criminal law, civil procedure law and criminal procedure law. Final results were published in mid-November. On average, 40,000 to 50,000 people took the first stage, 7,000 to 8,000 qualified for the second stage, and only 1,500 qualified for the oral examination each year.
In 2006, a new bar examination was instituted with only two stages. The first stage is a one-day short-answer examination concerning the six laws as well as administrative law. The second stage is a three-day essay examination concerning public law, civil law and criminal law, as well as subjects that can be selected by the examinee (including labor law, environmental law, public international law, and private international law). In addition, a law school requirement was introduced. All bar examination participants must complete a two or three-year graduate law program, and are limited to taking the examination within five years after graduation.
Those who have not graduated from law school may take the bar examination after passing a preliminary qualifying examination("Yobi-Shiken"). But passing a preliminary exam is still a minor path and most people are from law school.
Japanese Bar exam is known as one of the most difficult exams in the world. Although the bar pass rates are getting higher after the structural reform in 2006, only around 20% of the law school graduates pass the bar. Therefore the top law schools in Japan are competing with each other by achieving higher bar pass rate.
Bar association membership
In addition to passing bar examinations, an attorney must also be a member of the bar association (弁護士会 bengoshikai?) for the prefecture where the law office is located. According to a 2008 survey by the Japanese Federation of Bar Associations (JFBA), 39.4% of all lawyers belong to the three Tokyo bar associations (Tokyo Bar Association, First Tokyo Bar Association, and Second Tokyo Bar Association).
As of August 2014, there 6,326 female attorneys in Japan that are admitted to the bar, comprising about 18% of Japanese lawyers.
Membership for foreign attorneys
Before World War II, attorneys qualified in foreign countries could join a Japanese bar with special permission from the Supreme Court. These individuals were referred to as quasi-members (準会員 junkaiin?) of the bar. None remain in practice today.
The quasi-membership was abolished by judicial reforms in 1955, and was replaced by the attorney at foreign law (外国法事務弁護士 gaikokuhō jimu bengoshi?) membership in 1986. There are 384 attorneys at foreign law in Japan as of August 2014.
Attorneys in Okinawa who had been admitted as U.S. attorneys before the repatriation in 1972 were admitted as Japanese attorneys. They are classified by the Japanese Federation of Bar Associations (JFBA) as "Special members in Okinawa", and nine of them are still in practice as of August 2014.
Large law firms have been organized in Tokyo, Osaka and other major cities, and have grown dramatically in recent years. Since 2002, these law firms can also join as members in their own right. They are classified by the JBFA as Legal Profession Corporation (弁護士法人 bengoshi hōjin?), and there are 775 law firms who joined the bar in this capacity as of August 2014.
- Uchtmann, Donald; Blessen, Richard; Maloney, Vince. "The Developing Japanese Legal System: Growth And Chance In The Modern Era". Gonzaga Law Review. 23:349.
- Jones, Joe. "A brief history of lawyers in Japan". Mutantfrog Travelogue. Retrieved 6 August 2014.
- Hood, David (1997). "Exclusivity and the Japanese Bar: Ethics or Self-Interest?" (PDF). Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal (Pacific Rim Law & Policy Association) 6 (1). Retrieved 7 August 2014.
- "Japanese Law Translation - [Law text] - Attorney Act". Japanese Law Translation Database System. Ministry of Justice, Japan. Retrieved 7 August 2014.
- "日弁連の会員 (Translation: Members of the Japanese Federation of Bar Associations)" (in Japanese). Retrieved 3 August 2014.
- "JFBA: Outline of JFBA". 1 April 2005. Archived from the original on 27 October 2005.
- "Japan: Lawyers Wanted. No, Really". Bloomberg BusinessWeek. 3 April 2006. Retrieved 29 July 2010.
- "日弁連 - 弁護士実勢調査 (Translation: JFBA - Lawyer Survey)" (in Japanese). Japanese Federation of Bar Associations. June 2008. Retrieved 29 July 2010.
- Brennan, Tom (15 July 2013). "Foreign Firms Stumble Going Local in Japan". The Asian Lawyer. Retrieved 16 July 2013.
- "弁護士会別会員数 (Number of Attorneys)" (PDF). Japan Federation of Bar Associations (in Japanese). 1 August 2014. Retrieved 4 August 2014.
- "JFBA: Outline of JFBA". Archived from the original on 2 April 2010. Retrieved 14 March 2010.