Audianism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Audianism was a fourth-century group in Christianity, named after their leader, Audius (or Audaeus). They were seen as a heresy.

Beliefs[edit]

The distinguishing beliefs and practices included both theological anthropomorphism and quartodecimanism.

  • Anthropomorphism holds that God has human form. Audius took the text of Genesis, chapter 1, verse 27, literally, and held that God has a human form.[1]
  • Quartodecimans were honouring the death of Christ on the eve of the Jewish Passover instead of following the Roman tradition of celebrating Easter at a Sunday.

History[edit]

Audius lived in Syria in the fourth century. His views extended into Scythia. Towards the end of the fourth century the opinion of the Audians appeared among some African Christians.[1]

In 325 at the First Council of Nicaea, it was decreed that all Christians should follow the Roman tradition of celebrating Pascha (Easter) at the Easter Sunday, and no longer at the date of 14 Nisan, like the Jewish Passover, as the so-called Quartodecimans were used to do.[2] The Audians, however, continued the Quartodeciman practice.

Epiphanius of Salamis called attention to the Audians (as well as other sects he considered heretical) in his Panarion. Although Epiphanius is not always a trustworthy source, but correctly quotes the viewpoint of the Audians,[3] that the church had "abandoned the fathers' Paschal rite in Constantine's time from deference to the emperor, and changed the day to suit the emperor".[4]

Roman Emperors Constantine I the Great and Theodosius I legislated against the Audians, but the sect was still practicing quartodecimanism in Syrian Antioch in the 380s.

The Church Father Theodoret wrote on this heresy the following, as Chapter IX of his Ecclesiastical History (Book IV), titled "Of the heresy of the Audiani":

The illustrious emperor thus took heed of the apostolic decrees, but Audaeus, a Syrian alike in race and in speech, appeared at that time as an inventor of new decrees. He had long ago begun to incubate iniquities and now appeared in his true character. At first he understood in an absurd sense the passage "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." From want of apprehension of the meaning of the divine Scripture he understood the Divine Being to have a human form, and conjectured it to be enveloped in bodily parts; for Holy Scripture frequently describes the divine operations under the names of human parts, since by these means the providence of God is made more easily intelligible to minds incapable of perceiving any immaterial ideas. To this impiety Audaeus added others of a similar kind. By an eclectic process he adopted some of the Manichean doctrines of Manes and denied that the God of the universe is creator of either fire or darkness. But these and all similar errors are concealed by the adherents of his faction.

They allege that they are separated from the assemblies of the Church. But since some of them exact a cursed usury, and some live unlawfully with women without the bond of wedlock, while those who are innocent of these practices live in free fellowship with the guilty, they hide the blasphemy of their doctrines by accounting as they do for their living by themselves. The plea is however an impudent one, and the natural result of Pharisaic teaching, for the Pharisees accused the Physician of souls and bodies in their question to the holy Apostles "How is it that your Master eateth with publicans and sinners?" and through the prophet, God of such men says "Which say, 'come not near me for I am pure' this is smoke of my wrath." But this is not a tithe to refute their unreasonable error. I therefore pass on to the remainder of my narrative.[5]

Other church fathers who wrote against it included Jerome[6] and Cyril of Alexandria, who encountered it among some Egyptian monks. Cyril composed a short refutation of their error, which he attributed to extreme ignorance.[7]

Anthropomorphism[edit]

Also other early Christian writers such as Melito, Tertullian, Origen and Lactantius were accused of anthropomorphism.[1]

Anthropomorphism was revived in northern Italy during the tenth century, but was effectually suppressed by the bishops, notably by the Ratherius, bishop of Verona.[1]

In modern times, Benny Hinn has also taught a form of anthropomorphism.[8]

See also[edit]

Sources and references[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d Wikisource-logo.svg James Joseph Fox (1907). "Anthropomorphism". Catholic Encyclopedia 1. New York: Robert Appleton Company. 
  2. ^ Philip Schaff, The Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Vol. 14, (NPNF2-14) The Seven Ecumenical Councils, The Canons of the 318 Holy Fathers Assembled in the City of Nice, in Bithynia, On the Keeping of Easter
  3. ^ Samuele Bocchiacchi, From Sabbath to Sunday, Rome, Pontifical Gregorian University Press, 1977, p. 150.
  4. ^ Epiphanius of Salamis, Panarion, Book III, Haer. 70, Chap. 9.
  5. ^ Theodoret, Chapter IX.—Of the heresy of the Audiani; in: Philip Schaff, The Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Vol. 3, (NPNF2-03) Theodoret, Jerome, Gennadius, & Rufinus: Historical Writings, p. 114
  6. ^ Jerome, Epist. vi, Ad Pammachium, referred to in: Wikisource-logo.svg James Joseph Fox (1907). "Anthropomorphism". Catholic Encyclopedia 1. New York: Robert Appleton Company. 
  7. ^ Cyril of Alexandria, Adv. Anthrop. in P.G., LXXVI, referred to in Wikisource-logo.svg James Joseph Fox (1907). "Anthropomorphism". Catholic Encyclopedia 1. New York: Robert Appleton Company. 
  8. ^ "Why Benny Hinn Became Our Wacky Neighbor".