Auditing (Scientology)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Auditing is defined by the Church of Scientology as "the application of Dianetics or Scientology processes and procedures to someone by a trained auditor. One formal definition of auditing is: The action of asking a person a question (which he can understand and answer), getting an answer to that question and acknowledging him for that answer."[1]

Some auditing actions use commands, for example "Recall a time you knew you understood someone", and some auditing actions use questions, for example "What are you willing for me to talk to others about?"[2]

Description[edit]

"Auditing" in the context of Dianetics or Scientology is an activity where a person trained in auditing listens and gives auditing commands to a subject, who is referred to as a "pre-clear", or more usually as a "pc". Whilst auditing sessions are confidential, the notes taken by the auditor during auditing sessions, and kept in the "pc folder(s)", are potentially subject to scrutiny by several staff members, especially if the pre-clear is later upset or having difficulty. The pre-clear never gets to see their own pc folder.

Auditing involves the use of "processes," which are sets of questions asked or directions given by an auditor. When the specific objective of any one process is achieved, the process is ended and another can then be used. By doing this, the subjects are said to be able to free themselves from unwanted barriers that inhibit their natural abilities.

Charge is that which prevents the pc from thinking on a subject. Prevents him from thinking on a subject or getting rid of a subject or approaching a subject. Sum it up to handling a subject. Charged.[3]

Scientologists state that the person being audited is completely aware of everything that happens and becomes even more alert as auditing progresses.

One of the great truths of Scientology is that INCREASED AWARENESS IS THE ONLY FACTOR WHICH OFFERS ANY ROAD OUT.[4]

The auditor is obliged by the church's doctrine to maintain a strict code of conduct toward the preclear, called the Auditor's Code.[5] Auditing is said to be successful only when the auditor conducts himself in accordance with the Code.[6] A violation of the Auditor's Code is considered a high crime under Scientology policy.

The code outlines a series of 29 promises which include pledges:[7]

  • “Not to evaluate for the preclear or tell him what he should think about his case in session”
  • “Not to invalidate the preclear’s case or gains in or out of session.”
  • “Never to use the secrets of a preclear divulged in session for punishment or personal gain.”

According to the religion researcher Hugh B. Urban, both current Scientologists and people who have become disaffected with Scientology generally agree that auditing can trigger personal insights, and cause dramatic changes in one's psychological state.[8] The recalling and expression of old hurts in response to the auditor's questions may feel like an unburdening, followed by a period of elation, as though a weight had been lifted off the practitioner's shoulders.[8]

The E-meter[edit]

Main article: E-meter
Mark Super VII Quantum E-meter

Most auditing sessions employ a device called the Hubbard Electropsychometer or E-Meter. This device measures changes in the electrical resistance of the preclear by passing a small electrical current (typically in the range from 50µA to 120µA) through the preclear's body by means of a pair of tin-plated tubes originally much like empty soup cans, attached to the meter by wires and held by the preclear during auditing. These changes in electrical resistance are believed by Scientologists to be a reliable and a precise indication of changes in the reactive mind of the preclear.

According to Scientologist doctrine, the E-meter allowed for a change in how auditing worked and made it more precise, although no clinical trials have shown its effectiveness.[citation needed] It later became a requirement to only run processes that reacted on the E-meter[9] and equally crucially, to determine when to stop running a particular action. As a repair tool, the auditor can also call out a list of possible difficulties and relevant phrases will react on the E-meter, again guiding the auditor to any difficulty.[10]

HCO Bulletin 3 December 1978

One of the governing laws of auditing is that you don’t run unreading items. It doesn’t matter what you are auditing. You don’t run unreading items. And you don’t run unreading flows. You don’t run an unreading anything. Ever. For any reason.

Auditing is aimed at reactivity. You run what reacts on the meter because it reacts and is therefore part of the reactive mind. A read means there is charge present and available to run. Running reading items, flows and questions is the only way to make a pc better. This is our purpose in auditing.

L Ron Hubbard

Hubbard claimed that the device also has such sensitivity that it can measure whether or not fruits can experience pain, claiming in 1968 that tomatoes "scream when sliced."[11][12]

Scientology teaches that individuals are immortal souls or spirits (called Thetans by Scientology) and are not limited to a single lifetime. The E-meter is believed to aid the auditor in locating subliminal memories ("engrams", "incidents", and "implants") of past events in a thetan's current life and in previous ones. In such Scientology publications as Have You Lived Before This Life, Hubbard wrote about past life experiences dating back billions and even trillions of years.

The Bridge[edit]

Back in 1950, at the very end of his book "Dianetics: the Modern Science of Mental Health", Hubbard talks about a bridge from one plateau of existence to another, higher plateau.

Hubbard wanted to make the processes structured in such a way that one could take a new person and walk them through standardized steps, one after another, to cross this hypothesized "Bridge," leading to the development of the Standard Operating Procedure for Theta Clearing by 1952. [13] Standard Operating Procedure for the Church of Scientology changed rapidly, meaning that when somebody was trained as an auditor they were almost immediately out of date with the latest procedures.[citation needed]

In 1970, the Standard Operating Procedure was used to create the Classification and Gradation Chart. This chart, first published in 1965 and revised in 1966, 1968 and 1969, had the steps of the bridge plotted out from a beginner at the bottom to the highest states attainable at the top.[14] The left-hand side of the chart contains auditor skill levels, while the right-hand side contains pre-clear grades and OT (Operating Thetan) levels.

The 1970 version of the chart is entitled “Classification Gradation and Awareness Chart of Levels and Certificates”. By 1974 the above title had slipped down a little to make way for “THE BRIDGE” as the top line, with "TO A NEW WORLD" underneath in a smaller font. A more recent (circa 2008) chart is entitled “THE BRIDGE TO TOTAL FREEDOM” and subtitled "SCIENTOLOGY CLASSIFICATION GRADATION AND AWARENESS CHART OF LEVELS AND CERTIFICATES."

For Scientologists, position on the Bridge confers status, especially for auditors of Class IV and above and people who are Clear or better still OT III and above. People who only go up the right hand side (processing side) of the Bridge have less status than those who are also auditor trained.

Auditing Procedure[edit]

For each Grade on the Bridge there is a list of processes that auditors are supposed to systematically work through. Below are typical processes for each Grade. Some processes have a set of 6 commands that that are run one after another.

ARC Straightwire: “Recall a communication.” [15]
Grade 0: “Recall a place from which you have communicated to another.” [16]
Grade I: “Recall a problem you have had with another.” [17]
Grade II: “Recall a secret.” [18]
Grade III: “Can you recall a time of change?” [19]
Grade IV: “What about a victim could you be responsible for?” [20]

Each Grade is targeted at a specific area of potential difficulty a person might have. The working hypothesis is that if the subject matter is not “charged”, in other words if it is not causing any difficulty, then it will not read on the E-meter, and therefore will not be run.[citation needed]

The above processes demonstrate a key aspect of Scientology processes. The question or command can be quite vague, and it is up to the pre-clear to find an answer. It is absolutely forbidden (by the Auditor’s Code) for the auditor to interpret the preclear’s answer or discuss it in any way.[citation needed]

A possible audit could be performed like this:

auditor: “Recall a secret.”
pc: “I deliberately broke the window in the hall with my ball.”
auditor: “Thank you. . Recall a secret.”
pc: “I saw my sister kissing the postman.”
auditor: “Ok. . Recall a secret.”
pc: “I hate my mum’s apple pie, but my dad told me not to tell her.”
auditor: “Thank you. Recall a secret.”

This would be continued until a preclear has a realization about something in their life and feels good about it.[citation needed]

Auditors are not meant to state their opinions on preclear's actions, as in the following example:

councillor: “Recall a secret.”
person: “I deliberately broke the window in the hall with my ball”
councillor: “That wasn’t very nice. You shouldn’t do that sort of thing. Who owned the window?”


Case supervisors are meant to check how well an Auditor and pc are doing based on the amount of Tone Arm action that occurs in the sessions.[citation needed]

Controversy[edit]

Preclear folders[edit]

The Scientology and Dianetics auditing process has raised concerns from a number of quarters, as auditing sessions are permanently recorded in the form of handwritten notes in preclear folders, which are supposed to be kept private. Judge Paul Breckenridge, in Church of Scientology of California vs. Gerald Armstrong, noted that Mary Sue Hubbard (plaintiff in that case) "authored the infamous order 'GO 121669', which directed culling of supposedly confidential P.C. [Preclear] files/folders for the purposes of internal security". This directive was later canceled because it was not part of Scientology as written by L. Ron Hubbard. Bruce Hines has noted in an interview with Hoda Kotb that Scientology's collecting of personal and private information through auditing can possibly leave an adherent vulnerable to potential "blackmail" should they ever consider disaffecting from the church.[21] Jon Atack's book "A Piece of Blue Sky" asserts that preclear folders have indeed been used for intimidation and harassment.[22][23][24]

Anderson Report[edit]

In 1965 the Anderson Report, an official inquiry conducted for the state of Victoria, Australia, found that auditing involved a form of "authoritative" or "command" hypnosis, in which the hypnotist assumes "positive authoritative control" over the subject. "It is the firm conclusion of this Board that most scientology and dianetic techniques are those of authoritative hypnosis and as such are dangerous. ... the scientific evidence which the Board heard from several expert witnesses of the highest repute ... which was virtually unchallenged - leads to the inescapable conclusion that it is only in name that there is any difference between authoritative hypnosis and most of the techniques of scientology. "[25]

As of 2011 auditing is considered a spiritual practice by the government of Australia.

Claims[edit]

Scientologists[who?] have claimed benefits from auditing including improved IQ, improved ability to communicate, enhanced memory and alleviation of dyslexia and attention deficit disorder. Licensed psychotherapists[who?] have alleged that the Church's auditing sessions amount to mental health treatment without a license, but the Church disputes these allegations, and claims to have established in courts of law that its practice claims only to lead to spiritual relief. So, according to the Church, the psychotherapist treats mental health and the Church treats the spiritual being.

If we processed a specific type of aberration, we of course would be in the field of mental healing, and so forth. But long ago we actually discovered that we must not process specific aberrations, which takes us out of the field of mental healing.

It is quite fatal to do this because in the first place it's an evaluation for the case. In the second place, it's a negative type process; you're condemning the individual for hitting girls. Doesn't validate the individual at all. Do you follow? And if carried on very long, does not result in the betterment of an individual. All we're interested in is the spiritual betterment of the individual ...[26]

A 1971 ruling of the United States District Court, District of Columbia (333 F. Supp. 357), specifically stated that the E-meter "has no proven usefulness in the diagnosis, treatment or prevention of any disease, nor is it medically or scientifically capable of improving any bodily function."[27] As a result of this ruling, Scientology now publishes disclaimers in its books and publications declaring that the E-meter "by itself does nothing" and that it is used specifically for spiritual purposes.[27]

Notes[edit]

Note: HCOB refers to "Hubbard Communications Office Bulletins", HCOPL refers to "Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letters", and SHSBC refers to "Saint Hill Special Briefing Courses". All have been made publicly available by the Church of Scientology in the past, both as individual documents or in bound volumes.

  1. ^ "Scientology glossary". Retrieved 7 August 2013. 
  2. ^ Hubbard, L Ron. "Mini List of Grade 0-IV Processes". HCO Bulletin 8 September 1978RB. 
  3. ^ Hubbard, L Ron (8 Feb 1962). "3DXX Assessment". Tape 6202C08. SHSBC 109. 
  4. ^ Hubbard, L Ron (1 Sep 1957). "The Big Auditing Problem". Professional Auditor's Bulletin. PAB 119. 
  5. ^ Hubbard, L Ron (29 October 1954). "The Auditor's Code 1954". Professional Auditor's Bulletin (PAB 38). 
  6. ^ Hubbard, L Ron. "Questionable Auditing". HCO Bulletin 11 July 1982, Iss II. 
  7. ^ website: Scientology.org / THE AUDITOR’S CODE
  8. ^ a b Urban (2011), p. 47
  9. ^ Hubbard, L Ron. "Unreading Questions and Items". HCO Bulletin 27 May 1970 VII. 
  10. ^ Hubbard, L Ron. "Auditing by Lists Revised". HCO Bulletin 3 July 1971 VII. 
  11. ^ "30 Dumb Inventions". Life. 1968-01-01. Archived from the original on 31 October 2009. Retrieved 2009-10-28. 
  12. ^ "Scientology Mythbusting with Jon Atack: The Tomato Photo!". tonyortega.org. 2013-02-02. Retrieved 2013-02-10. 
  13. ^ Hubbard, L Ron (Nov 1952). "Procedures for Theta Clearing". Journal of Scientology (6-G). 
  14. ^ Hubbard, L Ron. "Programming of Cases". HCO Bulletin 12 June 1970. C/S series 2. 
  15. ^ Hubbard, L Ron. "Expanded ARC Straightwire Grade Process Checklist". HCO Bulletin 14 Nov 1987 (I). 
  16. ^ Hubbard, L Ron. "Expanded Grade 0 Process Checklist". HCO Bulletin 14 Nov 1987 (II). 
  17. ^ Hubbard, L Ron. "Expanded Grade I Process Checklist". HCO Bulletin 14 Nov 1987 (III). 
  18. ^ Hubbard, L Ron. "Expanded Grade II Process Checklist". HCO Bulletin 14 Nov 1987 (IV). 
  19. ^ Hubbard, L Ron. "Expanded Grade III Process Checklist". HCO Bulletin 14 Nov 1987 (V). 
  20. ^ Hubbard, L Ron. "Expanded Grade IV Process Checklist". HCO Bulletin 14 Nov 1987 (VI). 
  21. ^ Hines, Bruce. Inside Scientology. Interview with Hoda Kotb. Countdown with Keith Olbermann. CNBC. 
  22. ^ Atack, Jon (1990). "Chapter Four - The Clearwater Hearings". A Piece of Blue Sky. Lyle Stuart. p. 448. ISBN 0-8184-0499-X. 
  23. ^ Girardi, Steven (1982-05-09). "Witnesses Tell of Break-ins, Conspiracy". Clearwater Sun. pp. 1A. 
  24. ^ Barnes, John (1984-10-28). "Sinking the Master Mariner". Sunday Times Magazine. 
  25. ^ Report of the Board of Enquiry into Scientology) by Kevin Victor Anderson, Q.C. Published 1965 by the State of Victoria, Australia.
  26. ^ Hubbard, L Ron (6 Dec 1966). "Scientology Definitions II". Tape 6612C06. SHSBC 83(446). 
  27. ^ a b http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Secrets/E-Meter/Mark-VII/

References[edit]

External links[edit]