Automobile drag coefficient
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The drag coefficient is a common metric in automotive design, where designers strive to achieve a low coefficient. Minimizing drag is done to improve fuel efficiency at highway speeds, where aerodynamic effects represent a substantial fraction of the energy needed to keep the car moving. Indeed, aerodynamic drag increases as the square of speed. Aerodynamics are also of increasing concern to truck designers, where a lower drag coefficient translates directly into lower fuel costs.
About 60% of the power required to cruise at highway speeds is taken up overcoming air drag, and this increases very quickly at high speed. Therefore, a vehicle with substantially better aerodynamics will be much more fuel efficient.
Contents |
[edit] Drag in sports and racing cars
Reducing drag is also a factor in sports car design, where fuel efficiency is less of a factor, but where low drag helps a car achieve a high top speed. However, there are other important aspects of aerodynamics that affect cars designed for high speed, including racing cars. Notably, it is important to minimize lift, hence increasing downforce, to avoid the car ever becoming airborne. Increasing the downforce pushes the car down onto the race track -- allowing higher cornering speed for the vehicle. Also it is important to maximize aerodynamic stability: some racing cars have tested well at particular "attack angles", yet performed catastrophically, i.e. flipping over, when hitting a bump or experiencing turbulence from other vehicles (most notably the Mercedes-Benz CLR). For best cornering and racing performance, as required in Formula 1 cars, downforce and stability are crucial and these cars must attempt to maximize downforce and maintain stability while attempting to minimize the overall Cd value.
[edit] Typical values and examples
The average modern automobile achieves a drag coefficient of between 0.30 and 0.35. SUVs, with their typically boxy shapes and larger frontal area, typically achieve a Cd of 0.35–0.45. A very gently inclined windshield gives a lower drag coefficient but has safety disadvantages, including reduced driver visibility. Certain cars can achieve figures of 0.25–0.30, although sometimes designers deliberately increase drag in order to reduce lift.
Some examples of Cd follow. Figures given are generally for the basic model. Some "high performance" models may actually have higher drag, due to wider tires and extra spoilers.
|
|
|
[edit] CdA
While designers pay attention to the overall shape of the automobile, they also bear in mind that reducing the frontal area of the shape helps reduce the drag. The combination of drag coefficient and area is CdA (or CxA), a multiplication of the Cd value by the area.
In aerodynamics, the product of some reference area (such as cross-sectional area, total surface area, or similar) and the drag coefficient is called drag area. In 2003, Car and Driver adapted this metric and adopted it as a more intuitive way to compare the aerodynamic efficiency of various automobiles. Average full-size passenger cars have a drag area of roughly 8.50 sq ft (0.790 m2). Reported drag area ranges from the 1999 Honda Insight at 5.10 sq ft (0.474 m2) to the 2003 Hummer H2 at 26.3 sq ft (2.44 m2). The drag area of a bicycle is also in the range of 6.5–7.5 sq ft (0.60–0.70 m2).[24]
Automobile examples of CdA ft² are shown below: [25]
| CdA (ft²) | Automobile model |
|---|---|
| 2.50 sq ft (0.232 m2) | 1986 Twike [26] |
| 2.69 sq ft (0.250 m2) | 2009 Loremo |
| 3.95 sq ft (0.367 m2) | 1996 GM EV1 |
| 5.10 sq ft (0.474 m2) | 1999 Honda Insight |
| 5.40 sq ft (0.502 m2) | 1989 Opel Calibra |
| 5.71 sq ft (0.530 m2) | 1990 Honda CR-X Si |
| 5.74 sq ft (0.533 m2) | 2002 Acura NSX |
| 5.76 sq ft (0.535 m2) | 1968 Toyota 2000GT |
| 5.80 sq ft (0.539 m2) | 1986 Toyota MR2 |
| 5.81 sq ft (0.540 m2) | 1989 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX |
| 5.86 sq ft (0.544 m2) | 2001 Audi A2 1.2 TDI 3L |
| 5.88 sq ft (0.546 m2) | 1990 Nissan 240SX hatchback / 200SX / 180SX |
| 5.92 sq ft (0.550 m2) | 1994 Porsche 911 Speedster |
| 5.95 sq ft (0.553 m2) | 1990 Mazda RX7 |
| 6.00 sq ft (0.557 m2) | 1970 Lamborghini Miura |
| 6.08 sq ft (0.565 m2) | 2008 Nissan GTR |
| 6.13 sq ft (0.569 m2) | 1991 Acura NSX |
| 6.17 sq ft (0.573 m2) | 1995 Lamborghini Diablo |
| 6.24 sq ft (0.580 m2) | 2004 Toyota Prius |
| 6.27 sq ft (0.583 m2) | 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera |
| 6.27 sq ft (0.583 m2) | 1992 Chevrolet Corvette |
| 6.35 sq ft (0.590 m2) | 1999 Lotus Elise |
| 6.40 sq ft (0.595 m2) | 1990 Lotus Esprit |
| 6.54 sq ft (0.608 m2) | 1991 Saturn Sports Coupe |
| 6.57 sq ft (0.610 m2) | 1985 Chevrolet Corvette |
| 6.63 sq ft (0.616 m2) | 2001 Audi A2 |
| 6.66 sq ft (0.619 m2) | 1996 Citroën Saxo |
| 6.77 sq ft (0.629 m2) | 1995 BMW M3 |
| 6.79 sq ft (0.631 m2) | 1993 Toyota Corolla DX |
| 6.80 sq ft (0.632 m2) | 2007 BMW 335i Coupe |
| 6.81 sq ft (0.633 m2) | 1991 Subaru Legacy |
| 6.90 sq ft (0.641 m2) | 1993 Saturn Wagon |
| 6.93 sq ft (0.644 m2) | 1982 Delorean DMC-12 |
| 6.96 sq ft (0.647 m2) | 1988 Porsche 944 S |
| 6.96 sq ft (0.647 m2) | 1995 Chevrolet Lumina LS |
| 7.02 sq ft (0.652 m2) | 1992 BMW 325I |
| 7.04 sq ft (0.654 m2) | 1991 Honda Civic EX |
| 7.10 sq ft (0.660 m2) | 1995 Saab 900 |
| 7.14 sq ft (0.663 m2) | 1995 Subaru Legacy L |
| 7.34 sq ft (0.682 m2) | 2001 Honda Civic |
| 7.39 sq ft (0.687 m2) | 1994 Honda Accord EX |
| 7.48 sq ft (0.695 m2) | 1993 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 |
| 7.57 sq ft (0.703 m2) | 1992 Toyota Camry |
| 7.69 sq ft (0.714 m2) | 1994 Chrysler LHS |
| 7.72 sq ft (0.717 m2) | 1993 Subaru Impreza |
| 8.02 sq ft (0.745 m2) | 2005 Bugatti Veyron |
| 8.70 sq ft (0.808 m2) | 1990 Volvo 740 Turbo |
| 8.70 sq ft (0.808 m2) | 1992 Ford Crown Victoria |
| 8.71 sq ft (0.809 m2) | 1991 Buick LeSabre Limited |
| 9.54 sq ft (0.886 m2) | 1992 Chevrolet Caprice Wagon |
| 10.7 sq ft (0.99 m2) | 1992 Chevrolet Blazer |
| 11.6 sq ft (1.08 m2) | 2005 Ford Escape Hybrid |
| 11.7 sq ft (1.09 m2) | 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee |
| 16.8 sq ft (1.56 m2) | 2006 Hummer H3 |
| 17.4 sq ft (1.62 m2) | 1995 Land Rover Discovery |
| 26.5 sq ft (2.46 m2) | 2003 Hummer H2 |
[edit] Selected photographs
|
2.1 - a smooth brick having twice drag coefficient twice a flat edgy plate seems to be the ideal parachute shape |
0.7 to 1.1 - typical values for a Formula 1 car |
0.9 -a typical bicycle plus cyclist |
0.7 - Caterham Seven |
at least 0.6 - a typical truck |
|
0.57 - Hummer H2, 2003 |
0.51 - Citroën 2CV due to the mudguard, despite the round roof |
0.48 - Volkswagen Beetle due to vertical headlights, wider tires and mudguard |
0.425 - Duple 425 coach |
0.42 - Lamborghini Countach, 1974 |
|
0.42 - Triumph Spitfire Mk IV, 1971-1980 |
0.38 - Volkswagen Beetle original design |
0.38 - Mazda Miata, 1989 |
0.38 - Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph, 1998 [1] |
0.374 - Ford Capri Mk III, 1978-1986 |
|
0.372 - Ferrari F50, 1996 high drag due to aerodynamic aids and cooling ducts. |
0.36 - Citroën DS, 1955, relative high drag despite the aerodynamic headlights, due to the rough windshield-roof transition. |
0.36 - Ferrari Testarossa, 1986 |
0.36 - Honda Civic, 2001 |
0.36 - Citroën CX, 1974 (the car was named after the term for drag coefficient) |
|
0.355 - NSU Ro 80, 1967 despite the edgy front |
0.35 - Dodge Viper GTS |
0.34 - Ford Sierra, 1982, at least one combi in this gallery! The passat 2003, has 0.32 |
||
|
0.34 - Ferrari F40, 1987 |
0.338 - Chevrolet Camaro, 1995 |
0.33 - Citroën SM, 1970 low drag despite edgy front |
0.32 - Buick Riviera, 1995 |
0.31 - Citroën AX, 1986 low drag due to down pulled hood |
|
0.31 - Citroën GS, 1970 |
0.31 - Renault 25, 1984 |
0.31 - Saab Sonett III, 1970 |
0.30 - Audi 100, 1983 smooth nose to flow transition |
0.30 - BMW E90, 2006 |
|
0.30 - Porsche 996, 1997 |
0.30 - Saab 92, 1947 - developed using wind tunnel testing |
0.29 - Honda CRX HF 1988 |
0.29 - Subaru XT, 1985 |
0.29 - Lancia Dedra, 1990-1998 |
|
0.29 - Lotus Elite, 1958 |
0.28 - Rumpler Tropfenwagen, 1921 thin tires have low aerodynamic drag |
0.28 - Toyota Camry and sister model Lexus ES, 2005 |
0.28 - Porsche 997, 2004, and that with the wide tires |
0.28 - Renault 25 TS, 1984, low drag despite its overall edgy shape |
|
0.28 - Saab 9-3, 2003 |
0.28 - Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 2006 |
0.27 - Infiniti G35, 2002 (0.26 with "aero package") |
0.27 - Toyota Camry Hybrid, 2007 |
|
|
0.26 - Mercedes-Benz W221 S-Class, 2006, low drag despite wheelarches an a large grill and a Mercedes sign in the airflow |
0.26 - Lexus LS 430, 2001 (0.25 with air suspension) |
0.26 - Toyota Prius, 2004 |
0.26 - Vauxhall Calibra, 1989 even the transition from the bumpers to the head light is smooth |
|
|
0.25 - Honda Insight, 1999, low drag due to down pulled hood,fastback and wheel fairings |
0.212 - Tatra T77 a, 1935, low drag due to a tail and a smooth underbody and despite an edgy windscreen-roof transition. |
0.195 - General Motors EV1 (electric), 1996, low drag due to having wheel fairings, relative central head lights, submerged wiper |
0.15 - Aptera Motors Typ-1 (2008 planned) having a tail, wheel fairings, smooth underbody, aerodynamic suspension |
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- ^ "The Mayfield Homepage - Coefficient of Drag for Selected Vehicles". Mayfco.com. http://www.mayfco.com/dragcd~1.htm. Retrieved 2009-10-24.
- ^ "Aero Testing - Part 3". AutoSpeed. http://autospeed.com/cms/A_108675/article.html. Retrieved 2009-10-24.
- ^ "Subaru Forester specs available". CarsDirect. http://www.carsdirect.com/research/specs?cat=all&make=SU&modelid=223&acode=USC00SUS041A0&year=null. Retrieved 2009-10-24.
- ^ "Technique of the VW Beetle". Maggiolinoweb.it. http://www.maggiolinoweb.it/technique.html. Retrieved 2009-10-24.
- ^ Evworld Feature: Giving The New Beetle Wings:Vw | Rogers | Beetle | Wing | Drag | Porsche | Volkswagen | Thiokol | Utah | Fuel | Economy | Biodiesel | Diesel | Aerodynamics
- ^ - Aero Testing - Part 3
- ^ "Subaru Canada". Subaru.ca. http://subaru.ca/SubaruData.aspx?WebPageID=13725&WebSiteID=282&CompareType=S&CarIds=430&Category=AllSpecCategory. Retrieved 2009-10-24.
- ^ Ramsey, Jonathon (2009-03-26). "Tesla Model S: $50,000 EV sedan seats seven, 300-mile range, 0-60 in 5.5s" (in English). autobloggreen. http://www.autobloggreen.com/2009/03/26/tesla-model-s-50-000-ev-sedan-seats-seven-300-mile-range-0-6/. Retrieved 2009-04-12.
- ^ "2002 Renault Clio II 1.5 dCi 80 technical specifications and data - 3 door 1.5 litre (1461 cc) S4 79.1 PS - Carfolio.com car specifications pages". Carfolio.com. http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car/?car=112816. Retrieved 2009-10-24.
- ^ http://www.celicasupra.com/brochures/82binder.pdf
- ^ "Subaru Canada". Subaru.ca. http://subaru.ca/SubaruData.aspx?WebPageID=13725&WebSiteID=282&CompareType=S&CarIds=422&Category=AllSpecCategory. Retrieved 2009-10-24.
- ^ "Ford Fusion specs available". CarsDirect. http://www.carsdirect.com/research/specs?cat=6&make=FO&modelid=583&acode=USC00FOC201A0&year=2010. Retrieved 2009-10-24.
- ^ http://www.internetautoguide.com/car-specifications/09-int/2001/kia/rio/index.html
- ^ a b gtmash. "Honda Civic CRX - Car Cutaway - Modern Racer - Features". Modern Racer. http://www.modernracer.com/features/carcutawayhondaciviccrx.html. Retrieved 2009-10-24.
- ^ "2009 Nissan 370Z Coupe Specs". Nissan USA. 2009-08-31. http://www.nissanusa.com/zcoupe/specifications.html. Retrieved 2009-10-24.
- ^ [www.all-about-car-selection.com/ford-escape-hybrid.html]
- ^ http://www.mazda.de/NR/rdonlyres/4AD941AC-2043-479A-92AA-B3E9F3F03DAC/0/Mazda6_Broschuere.pdf
- ^ Interone Worldwide GmbH (2008-06-17). "BMW 3 Series Sedan : Technical data". Bmw.com. http://www.bmw.com/com/en/newvehicles/3series/sedan/2008/allfacts/engine/technical_data.html. Retrieved 2009-10-24.
- ^ Avion specs, vehicle set the 1986 Guinness World Record for fuel efficiency at 103.7 mpg.
- ^ 50 000 km avec une Citroën Ax diesel, mon avis d'utilisateur ainsi que son coût kilométrique réel
- ^ Mercedes Bionic Concept Car
- ^ Daihatsu UFE-III | Concept Cars
- ^ D & H Enterprises, composites and fibreglass technology
- ^ (a bicycle's lower frontal area is offset by a higher drag coefficient)
- ^ The Mayfield Company Homepage - Coefficient of Drag Tables and Curves
- ^ Program: hpvplot (updated 11/12/07)