Battle of Baton Rouge (1779)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Battle of Baton Rouge
Part of the American Revolutionary War
BritishWestFlorida1776.jpg
Detail from a 1776 map showing British West Florida
Date September 12–21, 1779
Location Baton Rouge, then British West Florida, now Louisiana
Result Spanish victory
Belligerents
Spain Spain  Great Britain
Commanders and leaders
Bernardo de Gálvez Alexander Dickson (POW)
Strength
398 regulars
400 militia
400 regulars
150 militia
Casualties and losses
1 killed
2 wounded[1]
4 killed
2 wounded
375 captured
30 died of wounds in captivity[1]

The Battle of Baton Rouge was a brief siege during the American Revolutionary War that was decided on September 21, 1779. Baton Rouge was the second British outpost to fall to Spanish arms during Bernardo de Gálvez's march into British West Florida.

Background[edit]

Spain officially entered the American Revolutionary War on May 8, 1779, with a formal declaration of war by King Charles III. This declaration was followed by another on July 8 that authorized his colonial subjects to engage in hostilities against the British.[2] When Bernardo de Gálvez, the colonial Governor of Spanish Louisiana received word of this on July 21, he immediately began to plan offensive operations to take British West Florida.[3]

Fort Bute[edit]

On August 27, Gálvez set out by land toward Baton Rouge, leading a force that consisted of 520 regulars, of whom about two-thirds were recent recruits, 60 militiamen, 80 free blacks and mulattoes, and ten American volunteers headed by Oliver Pollock.[4] As they marched upriver, the force grew by another 600 men, including Indians and Acadians. At its peak, the force numbered over 1,400, but this number was reduced due the hardships of the march by several hundred before they reached Fort Bute.[5]

At dawn on September 7, this force attacked Fort Bute, a decaying relic of the French and Indian War that was defended by a token force.[6] After a brief skirmish in which one German was killed, most of the garrison surrendered.[5] The six who escaped capture made their way to Baton Rouge to notify the British troops there of the fort's capture.[7]

After several days' rest, Gálvez advanced on Baton Rouge, only 15 miles (24 km) from Fort Bute.[6] When Gálvez arrived at Baton Rouge on September 12, he found a well-fortified town garrisoned by over 400 regular army troops and 150 militia under the overall command of Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Dickson. The troops consisted of British Army regulars from the 16th and 60th Regiments, as well as some artillerymen, and several companies of Germans from the 3rd Waldeck Regiment.[8]

British defenses[edit]

Dickson had decided weeks earlier that Fort Bute, built in 1766 and in ruins,[9] was not defensible, and had placed most of his troops at Baton Rouge. Beginning in July 1779, he directed the construction of Fort New Richmond.[6] This fortification was an earthen redoubt with chevaux de frise on the outside. It was surrounded by a moat 18 feet (5.5 m) wide and 9 feet (2.7 m) deep, and fortified with thirteen cannons.[10]

Battle[edit]

Gálvez first sent a detachment of men further up the river to break communications between Baton Rouge and British sites further upriver. Before the fort he was unable to directly advance his own artillery, so Gálvez ordered a feint to the north through a wooded area, sending a detachment of his poorly trained militia to create disturbances in the forest. The British turned and unleashed massed volleys at this body, but the Spanish forces, shielded by substantial foliage, suffered only three casualties. While this went on, Gálvez dug siege trenches and established secure gunpits within musket range of the fort. He placed his artillery pieces there, opening fire on the fort on September 21.[8]

The British endured three hours of shelling before Dickson offered to surrender. Gálvez demanded and was granted terms that included the capitulation of the 80 regular infantry at Fort Panmure (modern Natchez, Mississippi), a well-fortified position that would have been difficult for Gálvez to take militarily. Dickson surrendered 375 regular troops the next day; Gálvez had Dickson's militia disarmed and sent home. Gálvez then sent a detachment of 50 men to take control of Panmure.[11] He also dismissed his own militia companies, left a sizable garrison at Baton Rouge, and returned to New Orleans with about 50 men.

Aftermath[edit]

Plaque in downtown Baton Rouge commemorating the battle

When informed that Dickson had surrendered Fort Panmure, its commander was irate, believing Dickson had surrendered Panmure to get better terms of surrender. Isaac Johnson, a local justice of the peace, wrote that "In the mighty battle between Governor Gálvez and Colonel Dickson, the Spaniards only lost one man and some say not one, the English lost twenty-five and the commanding officer wounded his head on his tea table".[12]

The victory at Baton Rouge cleared the Mississippi River estuary entirely of British forces and put the lower reaches of the river firmly under Spanish control. Within a few days of Gálvez' victory, American and Spanish privateers captured several British supply ships on Lake Pontchartrain, including the remarkable capture of one ship carrying 54 Waldecker troops and ten to twelve sailors by a sloop crewed by 14 native Louisianans.[13]

Gálvez was promoted to brigadier general for his successful campaign, and his exploits were immortalized in the poetry of Julien Poydras.[14] He immediately began planning an expedition against Mobile and Pensacola, the remaining British strongholds in West Florida, which would culminate in the capture of Pensacola, the West Florida capital, in 1781.[15]

Baton Rouge remained in Spanish hands for the rest of the war, and Britain ceded both West and East Florida to Spain in the 1783 Treaty of Paris. It would not become American territory until 1810.

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ a b Haarmann (1960), p. 113
  2. ^ Gayarré (1867), p. 121
  3. ^ Gayarré (1867), p. 122
  4. ^ Gayarré (1867), pp. 125–126
  5. ^ a b Gayarré (1867), p. 126
  6. ^ a b c Haarmann (1960), p. 111
  7. ^ Nester (2004), p. 232
  8. ^ a b Haarmann (1960), p. 112
  9. ^ Kaufmann (2004), p. 130
  10. ^ Gayarré (1867), p. 128
  11. ^ Gayarré (1867), p. 129
  12. ^ Haynes, p. 124
  13. ^ Gayarré (1867), pp. 130–131
  14. ^ Gayarré (1867), pp. 133–134
  15. ^ Nester, pp. 273–274,291–293

References[edit]

Coordinates: 30°27′00″N 91°08′00″W / 30.4500°N 91.1333°W / 30.4500; -91.1333