Battle of Gazala

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Battle of Gazala
Part of the Western Desert Campaign of the Second World War
Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-784-0246-22A, Nordafrika, Rommel im Befehlsfahrzeug "Greif".jpg
Panzer Mk III and command vehicle in the western desert at the time of the Gazala battles.
Date 26 May – 21 June 1942 (25 days)
Location Gazala, near Tobruk, Libya
Result Axis victory[N 1]
 United Kingdom South Africa Union of South Africa
 Free French Forces
Commanders and leaders
United Kingdom Claude Auchinleck
United Kingdom Neil Ritchie
Nazi Germany Erwin Rommel
110,000 men[3]
843 tanks[4]
90,000 men[3]
560 tanks[4]
Casualties and losses
50,000 killed, wounded or captured[N 2][6]
1,188 tanks lost[N 3][7]
German: 3,360 overall
Italian: lower than the Germans[8]
~400 tanks destroyed or damaged[N 4]

The Battle of Gazala was a battle of the Western Desert Campaign of the Second World War, fought around the port of Tobruk in Libya from 26 May – 21 June 1942. The combatants on the Axis side were the Panzer Army Afrika, consisting of German and Italian units and commanded by the "Desert Fox" Colonel-General Erwin Rommel; the Allied forces were the Eighth Army, commanded by Lieutenant-General Neil Ritchie under the close supervision of the Commander-in-Chief Middle East, General Sir Claude Auchinleck. Rommel drove his armoured forces round the southern flank of the Gazala position, to engage the British armour behind the Allied defences. Despite success, Rommel found himself in a precarious position: interference to supply lines resulting from the resistance of Allied Forces, which anchored the southern end of the Allied Gazala defences and left a long route of supply to his forces behind the British line.

Rommel pulled back into a position abutting the British minefields, a defensive position termed "the Cauldron", creating a threatening presence in the midst of the British forces which was difficult to ignore. When Ritchie attacked his armoured forces lost many tanks and Rommel maintained the initiative.[9] As the British withdrew from the Gazala line, Rommel concentrated his forces and was able to punch through the defences of Tobruk in a day, resulting in the capture of Tobruk and a resounding victory for the Axis. The battle is considered the greatest victory of Rommel's career.[10] Rommel pursued the British into Egypt, trying to keep his opponent under pressure to deny him the opportunity to regroup. As both sides neared exhaustion, Auchinleck was able to check Rommel's advance at the First battle of El Alamein.[11]


Rommel advances from El Agheila again[edit]

Field Marshal Erwin Rommel, with aides during the desert campaign. 1942

Following Operation Crusader, in late 1941, the Eighth Army had driven the Axis forces back from Tobruk and out of Cyrenaica. Rommel withdrew to defensive positions he had prepared at El Agheila. However, Eighth Army's 800+ kilometre advance had over-stretched their lines of supply, and in January 1942 they had thinned out their front line troops to work on building lines of communications and supply dumps to enable a further thrust west to be made against Tripolitania. Meanwhile, the effective elimination of the Malta-based Force K in an Italian minefield off Tripoli in mid December combined with the arrival of powerful German air forces in Sicily (Fliegerkorps II) neutralised Malta's air and naval ability to interdict Axis supplies.[12] Rommel, after a gap of two months, was once more receiving supplies and reinforcements in men and tanks a situation which was to persist until the end of May 1942 (when Fliegerkorps II had been withdrawn to go to the Russian front) during which time most of the Axis shipping despatched to North Africa got through unscathed.[13] While aware from signals intelligence of these reinforcements, GHQ in Cairo underestimated their significance[14] and also very significantly underestimated the total Axis fighting strength because their estimates had greatly exaggerated the casualties suffered by Axis forces during Operation Crusader. In an appreciation made in January 1942 Auchinleck alluded to an Axis fighting strength of 35,000 when the true figure was about 80,000 (50,000 German, 30,000 Italian).[15] As a consequence, although Eighth Army did not expect to be in a position to resume their advance until February, GHQ Cairo believed that the Axis would be too weak and disorganised to mount a successful counter offensive in the meantime.[16]

Confounding GHQ Cairo's view, on 21 January Rommel sent out three strong armoured columns to make a tactical reconnaissance. Finding only the thinnest of screens in front of him he rapidly changed his reconnaissance into an offensive. He recaptured Benghazi on 28 January, and Timimi on 3 February and pressed on toward the fortified port of Tobruk on the Mediterranean coast.

Eighth Army digs in on the Gazala line[edit]

Between Gazala and Timimi (just west of Tobruk), the Eighth Army was able to concentrate its forces sufficiently to turn and fight. By 4 February, Rommel's advance had been halted and the front line had been stabilised running from Gazala on the coast (48 km (30 mi) west of Tobruk) to the old Turkish fortress of Bir Hakeim, 80 km (50 mi) to the south.

The "Gazala Line" was a series of occupied "boxes" each of brigade strength set out across the desert with minefields and wire watched by regular patrols between the boxes. The Free French were to the south at the Bir Hakeim box. The line was not equally staffed, with a greater number of troops covering the coast leaving the south less protected.

Both armies prepare[edit]

General Ritchie (holding pipe) addressing his commanders, 31 May 1942. Norrie holding map, Gott to right of Ritchie.

During the early spring, both sides prepared to take to the offensive. The heavy air assault Kesselring directed upon Malta led to it being neutralized, and supply shipments allowed the Axis forces to regain their strength.[17] For their part, Churchill continully pressed Auchinleck to go over onto the offensive. He needed the Eighth Army to push the Axis out of Cyrenaica and relieve the intense pressure on Malta, which Churchill felt was essential to the overall war effort.[18] [N 5] Thus, prior to the battle the Eighth Army was in the process of building up supply depots for offensive action. Their presence would be a hindrance to Eighth Army through the course of the upcoming battle.[18]

Grant tank is moved off railcar.

The British had surprises for Rommel, including the arrival of some 167 American built Grant tanks, with its 75 mm main gun, and large numbers of 6-pounder anti-tank guns.[19] In addition, Rommel thought the minefields ended well north of Bir Hacheim, and did not appreciate the "mine marsh" surrounding the Bir Hacheim box.[19] The Eighth Army was in the process of reorganising, changing the relationship between infantry and artillery, while airforce commander Arthur Tedder introduced a new strategy focusing the Desert Air Force on supporting the troops on the ground. Army commanders in the field relinquished the ability to direct air assets to targets, leaving such decisions to the air commanders. A new fighter-bomber concept was developed, and Air Vice-Marshal Arthur Coningham, commander of the Desert Air Force, moved his headquarters to the army commander's camp to improve communication.[20]

British M3 Grant (left) and Lee (right) in the Western Desert, 1942.

For his part, Rommel was quick to put his new armour to use. He was aware that the entry of America into the war would give the Eighth Army a supply base he would be unable to contend, and despite the relative superior numbers in tanks, guns and aircraft that the Eighth Army held, he had a window to press the issue. Though the Eighth Army supply base was relatively sure, it was lengthy. Except for the "Tiger Convoy" run in May 1941, vessels supplying the British in Egypt sailed around the Cape of Good Hope, a journey of some 23,000 km (14,000 mi).[21] [N 6]

By late May, Rommel was ready. Facing him on the Gazala defences were 1st South African Division nearest the coast, 50th (Northumbrian) Infantry Division (on their left) and 1st Free French Brigade furthest left at Bir Hakeim. The British 1st and 7th Armoured Divisions waited behind the main line as a mobile counter-attack force while 2nd South African Division formed a garrison at Tobruk and 5th Indian Infantry Division (which had arrived in April to relieve 4th Indian Infantry Division) were held in reserve.

Rommel's plan[edit]

Rommel's offensive.

Rommel's plan for Operation Venezia[23] was to have his armour execute a flanking manoeuvre south of the fortified "box" at Bir Hacheim (or Bir Hakeim). On the left of his formation, the Italian 132 Armoured Division Ariete would neutralise the Bir Hacheim box while on their right 21st Panzer Division and 15th Panzer Division would advance north behind the Eighth Army defences to engage and destroy the British armour and cut off the divisions on the Gazala line. On the far right of the attacking formation, the German 90th Light Afrika Division Battle Group was to advance to El Adem, south of Tobruk to interfere with the lines of supply to the Gazala position and pin potential reinforcements to the Tobruk area by simulating a strong armoured force through the use of dust machines (aero engines and propellers mounted on trucks).[24]

Meanwhile the other half of the Italian XX Motorized Corps, the Italian 101st Motorized Division Trieste would open a gap in the minefield north of the Bir Hacheim box near the Sidi Muftah box to create a supply route to the armour. Rommel anticipated that having dealt with the British armour he would have captured El Adem, Ed Duda and Sidi Rezegh by nightfall as well as the Knightsbridge defensive box some 40 km (25 mi) northeast of Bir Hacheim. He would then be in a position for his armour the next day to thrust west against the Eighth army defensive positions between Gazala and Alem Hamza, meeting the attack from the west by the Italian X and XXI Corps.[25]


Rommel strikes first[edit]

A Panzer III moves past burning British transport vehicles.

At 14:00 on 26 May, the Italian X and XXI Corps, after a heavy artillery concentration, launched a frontal attack on the central Gazala positions. For deception purposes small elements of the Afrika and XX Mobile Corps were attached to the assault groups to give the impression that all the Axis forces were committed to this assault. The deception was reinforced by further elements of the mobile units continuing to move north toward the point of attack. However, that evening, under cover of darkness, all the armoured and mobile elements returned to their concentration point at the southern end of the Gazala line.[26]

In the early hours of 27 May, Rommel personally led the elements of Panzer Army Afrika—the Afrika Korps, the Italian XX Motorised Corps and the German 90th Light Afrika Division—in a brilliant but risky flanking maneuver around the southern end of the Allied lines, trusting to the enemy's own minefields to protect his flank and rear.

Area of Rommel's advance from El Agheila to El Alamein 21 January – 21 June 1942 (Click to enlarge)

The Ariete division of XX Motorized Corps was held up for about one hour by 7th Armoured Division's 3rd Indian Motor Brigade, dug in some 6 kilometres (3.7 mi) south east of Bir Hacheim but finally overcame the defenders suffering modest losses (23 tanks, some repairable on the field, 30 killed and 50 wounded).[27] The Indian losses were about 200 killed, many wounded and about 1,000 prisoners, including Admiral Sir Walter Cowan.[28] As many sources stated, the 21st Panzer Division was advancing south of the position and did not take part in the action.[29][30][31] The Bir Hacheim box, fully fortified and defended by the 1st Free French Brigade under Marie-Pierre Koenig, proved to be a bigger problem than Rommel had anticipated (see Battle of Bir Hakeim) and the Ariete failed to take the position while suffering heavy losses from the French 75 mm guns and mines in the process.[32][33][34]

M3 Grant tanks wait to advance.

Further to the east, the 15th Panzer Division had engaged 7th Armoured Division's 4th Armoured Brigade which had been ordered south to support the 3rd Indian and 7th Motorised Brigades in a mutually-costly engagement, the Germans being surprised by the range and power of the 75 mm guns on the new M3 (Grant) tanks.[35][36] The 4th Armoured Brigade then withdrew toward El Adem and spent the night near the Belhamed supply base east of El Adem.[35]

By late morning, the Axis armoured units had advanced more than 25 mi (40 km) north but by midday their momentum had been blunted when they came into contact with and were held by 1st Armoured Division in heavy fighting which saw both sides taking losses.[35]

On the far right of the Axis advance, the 90th Light Afrika Division had engaged the 7th Motorised Brigade at Retma and forced it to withdraw east toward Bir el Gubi.[37] Resuming their advance toward El Adem, at mid-morning the 90th Light came upon the advanced HQ of 7th Armoured Division near Bir Beuid, dispersing it and capturing a number of key officers including the commander, Frank Messervy, who pretended to be a batman and escaped.[38] Nevertheless, the disruption caused by this meant that the division was without effective command for the next two days.[35]

As planned, 90th Light division reached the El Adem area by mid-morning and captured a number of supply bases. The Allies were slow to react but by afternoon there was stiff fighting.[39] The following day, the 4th Armoured Brigade were sent to El Adem and the 90th Light were driven back to the south west.[40]

Rommel directs Italian armoured formation.

The tank battle continued for three days. With Bir Hacheim holding out, Rommel pulled the Afrika Korps back into a defensive position called "the Cauldron", using the extensive Allied mine belts of the original front line to block Allied approach from the west. The Allied armour repeatedly assailed the position from the north and east and were met by accurate return-fire. Rommel's supply situation was becoming increasingly desperate; defending the German rear, the Ariete Armoured Cavalry Division repulsed attacks by the British armoured brigades on 29 May and during the first week of June.[33]

From German Generalmajor Alfred Toppe's account of this action:[41]

Our attacks repeatedly bogged down in the excellent French fortifications. During the first ten days of out (sic) attack against the French the British had remained amazingly calm. The "Ariete" Division alone was attacked by them on 2 June but it defended itself stubbornly. After a counterattack by the 21st Panzer Division the situation there again became quiet.

Panzerarmee Afrika in "the Cauldron"[edit]

8,8 cm Flak gun fires at approaching armour.

Caught between the minefields and the British, cut off from Axis supplies, Rommel's situation was precarious. Early on 29 May, supply vehicles supported by the Italian "Trieste" and "Ariete" Divisions, worked through the minefield north of Bir Hacheim and reached the Afrika Korps, temporarily supplying the forward units.[42][43] On 30 May, Rommel pulled the Afrika Korps back westward against the edge of the minefields, creating a defensive position from which to fight. A link was formed with elements of the Italian X Corps, which were clearing two routes through the minefields from the west.[42][44] In the process, the Sidi Muftah box was overrun, and the British 150th Infantry Brigade destroyed. This action is described by Rommel in his diary:

In the afternoon [30th May] I personally reconnoitred the possibilities for an attack on Got el Ualeb [the Sidi Muftah box], and detailed units of the Afrika Korps, 90th Light Division and the italian Trieste Division for an assault on the British positions next morning. The attack was launched on the morning of the 31st May. German-Italian units fought their way forward yard by yard against the toughest British resistance imaginable.[...]Nevertheless, by the time evening came we had penetrated a substantial distance into the British positions. On the following day the defenders were to receive their quietus. After heavy Stuka attacks, the infantry again surged forward against the British field positions.[...] Piece by piece the elaborate British defences were won until by early afternoon the whole position was ours. The last British resistance was quenched. We took in all 3000 prisoners and destroyed or captured 101 tanks and armoured cars, as well as 124 guns of all kinds.[45]

On the night of 1–2 June, the 90th Light and Trieste divisions were then sent south to renew the attack on Bir Hacheim. Once again, the assault failed. The struggle to reduce the box at Bir Hacheim would continue on for another 10 days.[41]

Buoyed by over-optimistic intelligence assessments of the casualties suffered by the German armour, Auchinleck strongly urged Ritchie to mount a counter-attack along the coast, to take advantage of the German armour's absence and to break through to Timimi and then Mechili. Ritchie was more concerned by Tobruk and instead brought reinforcements up to the El Adem box and created new defensive boxes opposite the gaps in the minefield.[46]

Ritchie finally directed the Eighth Army to counter-attack against the Afrika Korps on 5 June but they were met by accurate fire from tank and anti-tank guns positioned in the cauldron. In the north, XIII Corps made no progress. The attack by 7th Armoured and 5th Indian Infantry divisions on the eastern flank of the cauldron, launched at 02:50 on 5 June initially went well. An important element of the plan was the destruction of the Axis anti-tank screen with an artillery bombardment but because of an error in plotting the position screen of the, the bombardment fell too far to the east of the screen.[47] When 22nd Armoured Brigade pressed on through, they were met by massed anti-tank fire and their advance was checked.[48] The 32nd Army Tank Brigade, advancing from the north, joined the attack at dawn but also ran into massed fire, losing 50 of their 70 tanks.[49]

Rommel shifts to the attack from the Cauldron, 12–13 June.

By early afternoon on 5 June, Rommel split his forces, deciding to attack east with the Ariete and 21st Panzer Divisions while he sent elements of 15th Panzer Division northwards against the Knightsbridge defensive box.[50] The eastward thrust towards Bir el Hatmat dispersed the tactical HQs of the two British divisions, as well as the HQs of the 9th Indian Infantry Brigade, the 10th Indian Infantry Brigade and other smaller units. Command and control broke down completely.[50] The 22nd Armoured Brigade, having lost 60 of its 156 tanks, was forced from the battlefield by renewed attacks from 15th Panzer. Of the Allied attackers, three Indian infantry battalions, a reconnaissance regiment and four artillery regiments were left behind. Unsupported by armour, they were overwhelmed and overrun.[51]

Rommel continued to hold the initiative, maintaining his strength in the Cauldron while the number of operational British tanks were eroded. A number of probes were sent to test the various opposing strong points. Between 6 and 8 June, further attacks were launched on Bir Hacheim but the French defenders continued to hold. The 7th Motor Brigade and 29th Indian Infantry Brigade continued to harass the Axis lines of communications.[52] Reinforced with a further combat group, the Axis attacked Bir Hacheim again on 9 June and overran the defences by the following day.[53] Ritchie ordered the remaining troops to evacuate as best they could under the cover of darkness that evening.[54] Under fire through the night, many of the French were able to find gaps in the line through which to withdraw. The survivors then made their way some 8 km (5.0 mi) to the west, to rendezvous with transport from 7th Motor Brigade.[55] About 2,700 troops (including 200 wounded) of the original garrison of 3,600 made it out of Bir Hacheim.[55] 500 Frenchmen, many of whom were wounded, were taken into captivity when the 90th Light Division occupied the position on 11 June.[56]

British Armour defeated[edit]

Abandoned British Valentines are inspected for maps, code books, and tins of food.

On 11 June, Rommel pushed 15th Panzer and 90th Light Afrika toward El Adem and by 12 June had forced 201st Guards Brigade to withdraw from the Knightsbridge Box to the Tobruk perimeter.[38] 29th Indian Infantry Brigade repulsed an attack on the El Adem box on 12 June but 2nd and 4th Armoured Brigades on their left were pushed back 6 kilometres (3.7 mi) by 15th Panzer and obliged to leave their damaged tanks on the battlefield. On 13 June, the 21st Panzer Division advanced from the west to join the battle, engaging 22nd Armoured Brigade. The Afrika Korps demonstrated a superiority in tactics, combining tanks with anti-tank guns while on the offensive; Rommel acted rapidly on intelligence obtained from Allied radio traffic intercepts.[57] By the end of the day, the British tank strength had been reduced from 300 tanks to nearer 70 and the Afrika Korps had established armour superiority and a dominating line of positions, posing a severe threat to cutting off the XIII Corps units on the Gazala line.[58] By the end of 13 June, the Knightsbridge box was virtually surrounded and it was abandoned by the Guards Brigade later that night.[50] Due to these defeats, 13 June became known as "Black Saturday" throughout the Eighth Army.[59]

Eighth Army withdraws from the Gazala line[edit]

On 14 June, Auchinleck authorised Ritchie to withdraw from the Gazala line. The defenders in the El Adem and two neighbouring boxes held firm and the 1st South African Division was able to withdraw along the coast road, practically intact.[60] The road could not accommodate two divisions, so the remaining two brigades of the 50th (Northumbrian) Division had to find an alternative. They could not retreat directly east because of the presence of the Axis armour so, instead, they attacked south-west, breaking through the lines of the Italian X Corps' Brescia and Pavia divisions and headed south into the desert, before turning east and heading back to friendly territory.[61]

It was clear to Auchinleck that London would not contemplate a withdrawal, to the better defensive positions around the Egypt–Libya frontier. Auchinleck's orders to Ritchie on 14 June, were to hold a line running south east from Acroma (west of Tobruk) through El Adem to Bir El Gubi.[62] By the evening of 15 June, the strong point at Point 650 had been overrun and on 16 June, the defenders at Point 187 had been forced by lack of supplies to evacuate. Throughout that day, the defensive boxes at El Adem and Sidi Rezegh were also attacked by the Afrika Korps. On 17 June, both had been evacuated and any chance of preventing the encirclement of Tobruk had vanished. Ritchie ordered Eighth Army to withdraw to the defensive positions at Mersa Matruh, some 100 mi (160 km) east of the frontier, leaving Tobruk to hold out and threaten the Axis lines of communication in much the same way as in 1941.[63]

Tobruk falls[edit]

British prisoners leaving Tobruk

Gott, the XIII Corps commander, appointed the 2nd South African Division commander Klopper as commander of the Tobruk garrison. In addition to the two South African brigades, he had the 201st Guards (Motorised), 11th Indian Infantry Brigade, 32nd Army Tank and 4th Anti-Aircraft Brigade under his command.[63] Tobruk had withstood a siege of nine months, before being relieved by Operation Crusader in December 1941 but this time the Royal Navy could not make a commitment to keep the garrison supplied. Allied leaders expected it to be able to hold out for two months with the supplies in the fortress.[64] Auchinleck viewed the defence of Tobruk as non-essential and had already told Neil Ritchie that he did not intend to hold it at all costs.[65]

It was commonly known that in February 1942 the Army, Navy and Air Force Commanders-in-Chief in Cairo had agreed that Tobruk should not stand another siege. Given this and the subsequent emphasis on building strength at the Gazala position for an attack (which had been forestalled by the Axis offensive) it is likely that the defences at Tobruk had not been maintained in first rate condition.[66] Seven days later, on 21 June 1942, in circumstances that even with the benefit of a court of enquiry remain obscure and contradictory, 35,000 Allied troops (including the South African 2nd Division) surrendered to General Enea Navarrini's 30,000 troops. The Axis capture of Tobruk echoed the surrender of 80,000 Commonwealth troops to three Japanese divisions following the Battle of Singapore, a few months earlier.


Rommel at the port of Tobruk

Upon the capture of Tobruk, Hitler rewarded Rommel with a promotion to the rank of field-marshal, the youngest German officer ever to achieve this rank.[67] Rommel, for his part, remarked he would have preferred Hitler had given him another panzer division instead.[68] The British defeat at Gazala and the loss of Tobruk led Churchill to press for changes. Auchinleck dismissed Ritchie on 25 June and assumed personal command of the Eighth Army through the First Battle of El Alamein, where he stopped Rommel's advance. However having lost the confidence of his civilian and military superiors, Auchinleck was soon replaced with General Harold Alexander.

Axis armour losses from the battle were high.[N 7] The British armour had suffered very heavily as well, to the point that by the battle's close Ritchie had virtually no armoured units left fit to fight. Consequently, the British were unable to hold the Mersa Matruh line, with its open southern border, while Rommel was restrained from fully pressing the advantage of his success.

With the capture of Tobruk, the Axis gained a port nearer supply vessels coming from along the Aegean-Crete route, and a large amount of British supplies in the bargain. Rommel's forces now represented a very serious threat to the British Empire. If the British could not stop the Germans in Egypt, they would take the Suez Canal (forcing Britain to use supply lines twice as long, often targeted by U-boats) and potentially drive for the oilfields in the Middle East.

Panzerarmee Afrika moved on in an advance upon Egypt, while Auchinleck fell back to defensive positions he was preparing at El Alamein. He had decided to abandon the Mersa Matruh line, choosing instead to buy time there by using two corps, the X and the XIII, to fight a delaying action. Though the two corps were able to engage and slow the Afrika Korps at Mersa Matruh, poor command communication resulted in X Corps' line of retreat along the coast road being cut off. The unit had to break out at night to the south and work its way around the German positions, suffering significant losses as they became entangled in a number of firefights along the way. The Axis forces captured more than 6,000 prisoners, in addition to 40 tanks and a large quantity of supplies.[70]

Meanwhile, Auchinleck had pulled the bulk of the Eighth Army back another 160 kilometres further to El Alamein, a mere 100 kilometres from the essential port of Alexandria. However, the farther Auchinleck moved east the nearer he approached his base of supply. Furthermore, the steep slopes of the Qattara Depression blocked the possibility of an armoured attack sweeping around an open southern flank. The two forces drew up across from each other at El Alamein, where over the next four months three major battles would be fought: the aforementioned First Battle of El Alamein, the Battle of Alam el Halfa and the decisive Second Battle of El Alamein.

In August, Auchinleck was replaced as Eighth Army commander by XIII Corps commander Lieutenant-General William Gott and as C-in-C Middle East Command by General Sir Harold Alexander. Gott was killed when his aircraft was intercepted by a group of Me 109s and shot down. Bernard Montgomery was appointed in his place.

The British attempted a landing at Tobruk during the night of 13–14 September 1942 to rescue the allied prisoners there. The attempted mission, known as Operation Agreement, was unsuccessful.

Orders of battle[edit]


Middle East Command (Claude Auchinleck)

Eighth Army (Ritchie)
XIII Corps (Gott)
XXX Corps (Norrie)
Army Reserve


Panzer Armee Afrika (Erwin Rommel)

Group Crüwell (Ludwig Crüwell)[N 8]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Churchill declared, "This was one of the heaviest blows I can recall during the war. Not only were its military effects grievous, but it had affected the reputation of the British armies."[1] The historian Ducan Anderson, in his work on the battle, stated: "The Battle of Gazala was a calamitous defeat for the Eighth Army that resulted in heavy losses, the fall of Tobruk and a pell-mell retreat to El Alamein. ...The battle had begun with the British stronger in terms of numbers and quality of equipment, especially in the Grant tank, than their opponents. ...The German High Command, however, had shown superior generalship throughout."[2]
  2. ^ ~35,000 prisoners at Tobruk[5]
  3. ^ The British received several hundred tanks as reinforcement during the fighting. Many tanks which were only damaged could not be salvaged because of the 8th Army's retreat. The British lost virtually all their tanks, although a number of damaged tanks could be evacuated.
  4. ^ Exact number unknown. During the battle Axis tank strength fell even below 100 tanks operational. A significant number of tanks could be repaired during and after the battle.
  5. ^ In a cable pressing Auchinleck, Churchill underscored the reason he needed 8th Army to go on the offensive: "...having particular regard to Malta, the loss of which would be a disaster of the first magnitude to the British Empire, and probably fatal in the long run to the defense of the Nile delta."[18]
  6. ^ The "Tiger Convoy" of May 1941 ran the gauntlet of the Mediterranean to get supplies of tanks and ammunition to the Western Desert Force, bringing them straight through the Mediterranean, instead of the usual safer route around the Cape of Good Hope. The convoy lost one ship, carrying 57 tanks and 10 Hurricanes but the rest got through, thus saving forty days in transit time.[22] These forces were used in Operation Battleaxe; the Allies did not send another through convoy to Alexandria until 26 May 1943.
  7. ^ At the end of the Battle the 15th Panzer and 21st Panzer Division had only 44 operational tanks between them.[69]
  8. ^ Group Crüwell was part of Panzer Army Afrika, but as a practical matter Rommel temporarily split his force in half; with Crüwell commanding the infantry formations along the original front line while Rommel joined the mobile forces in the flanking move. After Crüwell was captured on 29 May 1942, Group Crüwell was placed under the temporary command of Field Marshal Albert Kesselring who had been visiting the front.[72]
  1. ^ Barr, p. 1
  2. ^ Anderson, p. 75
  3. ^ a b Barr, p. 13
  4. ^ a b Carver, p. 167
  5. ^ Barr, p. 16
  6. ^ Ford, Ken. El Alamain 1942. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 1-84176-867-7, p. 10
  7. ^ Barr, p. 39
  8. ^ Carver, p. 249
  9. ^ Lewin p. 118
  10. ^ Hoffman p. 66
  11. ^ Lewin p. 145 Rommel: "The one thing that had mattered to him was to halt our advance, and that, unfortunately, he had done."
  12. ^ Hinsley, pp. 324–325
  13. ^ Hinsley, pp. 348, 418
  14. ^ Hinsley, pp. 335–336
  15. ^ Hinsley, p. 334
  16. ^ Hinsley, p. 330
  17. ^ Lewin p. 108
  18. ^ a b c Lewin p. 109
  19. ^ a b Lewin p. 112
  20. ^ Clifford, pp. 237–238
  21. ^ Clifford, pp. 238–239
  22. ^ Playfair, p. 114
  23. ^ Playfair 1960, p. 223
  24. ^ Toppe, p. A-8-18–19
  25. ^ Mackenzie, p. 541
  26. ^ Toppe, p. A-8-19
  27. ^ Montanari, p. 208
  28. ^ Carver, Castoldi Ed., p. 219
  29. ^ Ford, p. 35
  30. ^ Greene and Massignani, p. 156
  31. ^ Montanari, p. 206
  32. ^ Clifford, p. 247
  33. ^ a b Avalanche Press website Ariete at Gazala Accessed 25 November 2007
  34. ^ Montanari, p. 211
  35. ^ a b c d Playfair 1960, p. 224
  36. ^ Toppe, p. A-8-25
  37. ^ Playfair 1960, pp. 223–224
  38. ^ a b c Mead, p. 298
  39. ^ Toppe, p. A-8-22
  40. ^ Playfair 1960, p. 225
  41. ^ a b Toppe, p. A-9-1
  42. ^ a b French, p. 219
  43. ^ "Paterson, Battle of Gazala and the Cauldron". [dead link]
  44. ^ Toppe, p. A-8-30
  45. ^ The Rommel Papers, US version, p. 212
  46. ^ Mackenzie, p. 548
  47. ^ Hinsley, p. 373
  48. ^ Playfair 1960, pp. 232–233
  49. ^ Playfair 1960, p. 233
  50. ^ a b c Playfair 1960, p. 234
  51. ^ Playfair 1960, pp. 233–234
  52. ^ Playfair 1960, pp. 235–236
  53. ^ Toppe, pp. A-9-5–A-9-7
  54. ^ Clifford, pp. 260–262
  55. ^ a b Playfair 1960, p. 237
  56. ^ Toppe, p. A-9-6
  57. ^ von Mellenthin p. 107
  58. ^ Hoffman p. 77
  59. ^ Clifford, p. 264
  60. ^ Mackenzie, pp. 554–555
  61. ^ Clifford, pp. 269–272
  62. ^ Mackenzie, pp. 556–559
  63. ^ a b Mackenzie, p. 561
  64. ^ Mackenzie, p. 559
  65. ^ Bierman and Smith (2002), p. ??[page needed]
  66. ^ Playfair 1960, p. 261
  67. ^ Playfair 1960, p. 275
  68. ^ Rommel 1953, p. 233.
  69. ^ Ellis, p. 57
  70. ^ Panzer Army Africa Battle Report dated 29 June 1942 K.T.B. 812 page 1 and page 2
  71. ^ Playfair 1960, p. 227
  72. ^ Playfair 1960, pp. 227–228

External links[edit]