Battle of the Beanfield

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The Battle of the Beanfield took place over several hours on the afternoon of Saturday 1 June 1985, when Wiltshire Police prevented a convoy of several hundred New Age travellers (known as "The Convoy") from setting up at what would have been the 11th Stonehenge Free Festival in Wiltshire, England. The incident resulted from a local branch of the English Heritage society, then custodians of the site, concerned about new age travellers, persuading the High Court to grant an exclusion zone of four miles around the stones. The incident is notorious, in the context of mid-1980s social unrest in England, as an example of police violence.[1]

Convoy members testified, and video evidence supports, that after a stand-off lasting several hours, members of the police attacked the procession by forcefully entering the field in which the vehicles were contained, methodically smashed windows, beat people about the head with truncheons, used sledgehammers to break and damage the interiors of their vehicles and arrested the convoy members. The accounts were supported by independent witnesses and upheld by subsequent court verdicts. The Beanfield was the field neighbouring the vehicles' location. When a large number of police entered the first field many of the convoy vehicles attempted to escape by breaking through the Beanfield, but most were pursued and arrested.

The police alleged that they retaliated after they had come under attack, being pelted with lumps of wood, stones and even petrol bombs. They did not repeat these allegations in any of the subsequent court cases and no proof for them has ever come to light. Whilst the full account of events remains in dispute, a court judgment six years later found the police guilty of wrongful arrest, assault and criminal damage.[2]

Historical context and events leading up to the battle[edit]

Stonehenge used to be part of the Antrobus family’s estate but was given to the British nation in 1918. Up until 1984, Stonehenge – and the patch of land that it rests on – was managed by the Department of Environment. Its management was then passed to English Heritage in 1984.[3]

The general public has utilised Stonehenge for centuries as a place for casual visitors and a place for special occasions. As early as 1680, a fair took place here. It was used for a midsummer sports day, as early as 1781. It was also used in the Victorian era for picnic parties and entertainments. Stonehenge’s solar alignment was discovered in the 1800s, which caused the focus of celebration to turn to the summer solstice. In 1901, Stonehenge was fenced off and an entry fee was imposed, much to the frustration of the general public who fought in court to gain free access again, but failed. People continued to come to Stonehenge in midsummer to watch the sun, and also to watch different neo-Druid groups conducting ceremonies in and around Stonehenge.[3]

Whether these Druid groups actually have a real connection to ancient druids or a real connection to Stonehenge itself is heavily disputed. However, most agree that authenticity cannot be the major determinant as to who is allowed access to Stonehenge.[3]

A more recent addition to the festivities surrounding Stonehenge includes the festival which came to Stonehenge in 1974. Many different groups came to the Stonehenge People’s Free Festival, many belonging to pagan religious groups. The festival grew in size. Critics said that in 1984, the festival had resulted in the destruction of archaeological information and on the site itself, "holes had been dug in Bronze Age barrows for latrines and as bread ovens, motorcycles had been ridden over them, churning the surface. Fences had been torn down, and a thousand young trees cut down for firewood" (Chippindale, 1986). The clean-up cost upwards of £20,000, besides the priceless archaeological information that was lost.[3] Land owners also claimed that trespassing, recreational drug use and bathing naked in rivers had occurred. A civil high court injunction was consequently imposed prohibiting the proposed 1985 festival from taking place.[4]

The events[edit]

After staying the previous night in Savernake Forest, the Convoy on the morning of 1 June numbered up to 140 vehicles, most of them buses and vans converted into living spaces; it is estimated they contained 600 people.[4][5] The police had laid down an exclusion zone four miles (6.4 km) around the perimeter of Stonehenge, which the convoy hoped to breach. The Convoy met resistance when the police set up a roadblock near Shipton Bellinger about seven miles (11 km) from Stonehenge. This was achieved by tipping three lorry loads of gravel across the road. According to The Observer, the convoy evaded the main roadblock on the A303 by slipping down a side road but were then met with a second roadblock.[5] At this juncture the police claim that some traveller vehicles rammed police vehicles in an attempt to escape the roadblock.[1][4] At around the same time the police smashed the windscreens of traveller vehicles and arrested occupants.[1][5]

Most traveller vehicles broke into an adjacent field,[5] by driving through a hedgerow according to one source.[1] A stand-off consequently ensued.[4][5] Travellers made attempts to negotiate with police[4] but the officer in charge, Assistant Chief Constable Lionel Grundy, ordered that all travellers be arrested.[5] There were outbreaks of violence during which several members of the Convoy received head injuries. An ambulance was allowed through to take them to hospital.[6] Police Officer Bernie Lund, who was on scene, claimed that during the stand-off, petrol bombs and sticks were thrown at officers.[4] However travellers who were also present have strongly refuted claims of serious violence towards police. Alan Lodge told the BBC, "The idea that this is two opposing armies having a pitch battle in a field in medieval style is completely false - this was an ambush that happened on a small, mild mannered bunch of people - hippies, for God's sake".[4]

At 7pm officers in riot gear entered the field and launched a final attack.[5][6] Pregnant women and those holding babies were hit by police with truncheons according to The Observer,[5] who also noted journalist Nick Davies stating that, "There was no question of making a lawful arrest".[5] When some travellers tried to escape by driving away through the field police allegedly threw truncheons, shields, fire-extinguishers and stones at them to stop them.[5]

From convoy member Phil Shakesby's account:

The police came in [to the grass field] and they were battering people where they stood, smashing homes up where they were, just going wild. Maybe about two-thirds of the vehicles actually started moving and took off, and they chased us into a field of beans.

By this time there were police everywhere, charging along the side of us, and wherever you went there was a strong police presence. Well, they came in with all kinds of things: fire extinguishers and one thing and another. When they'd done throwing the fire extinguishers at us, they were stoning us with these lumps of flint and such.[citation needed]

The large majority of the travellers, over 500, were arrested.[5][6]

Most independent eyewitness accounts of the events relate that the police used violent tactics against men, women and children, including pregnant women; and purposely damaged the vehicles used by the convoy.[7][8] Official figures said eight police officers and sixteen travellers were taken to hospital with minor injuries.[citation needed] One traveller suffered from a fractured skull[citation needed]

The miners' strike ended earlier in the same year, and comparison was made[by whom?] with the tactics that were used by the police during the strikes. The news section of the Police Review of 8 June 1985 reported "The Police operation had been planned for several months and lessons in rapid deployment learned from the miners' strike were implemented."[citation needed]

There were insufficient holding cells in local jails to hold all those arrested. Convoy members were transported throughout the Midlands and even to northern England.[6] Not all children and parents ended up in the same region.[1] The Convoy vehicles were all towed to a single site where they could be claimed after their owners were released from custody.[citation needed]

Media coverage[edit]

Photographic evidence of the police action is extremely scant. Freelance photographer Ben Gibson, engaged by The Observer that day, was arrested on charges of obstruction. Although he was later acquitted, the arrest removed him from the scene. The Observer later claimed to have lost the negatives during an office move. [9]

Another freelance photographer, Tim Malyon, was chased from the field by police.

ITN reporter Kim Sabido, recorded a piece-to-camera:

What I have seen in the last thirty minutes here in this field has been some of the most brutal police treatment of people that I've witnessed in my entire career as a journalist. The number of people who have been hit by policemen, who have been clubbed whilst holding babies in their arms in coaches around this field, is yet to be counted. There must surely be an inquiry after what has happened today.

When broadcast that evening, the voice-over was removed, as was footage of the more contentious police acts. According to Sabido:

When I got back to ITN during the following week and I went to the library to look at all the rushes, most of what I'd thought we'd shot was no longer there. From what I've seen of what ITN has provided since, it just disappeared, particularly some of the nastier shots.

Some of the missing footage has since been rediscovered, and was incorporated into the Operation Solstice documentary shown on Channel 4 in 1991.

Nick Davies reported for The Observer:

There was glass breaking, people screaming, black smoke towering out of burning caravans and everywhere there seemed to be people being bashed and flattened and pulled by the hair. Men, women and children were led away, shivering, swearing, crying, bleeding, leaving their homes in pieces.

Legal action[edit]

After nearly six years, a verdict was given in the court case taken out by twenty-four of the travellers, who had sued Wiltshire Police for wrongful arrest, assault and criminal damage as a result of the damage to themselves and their property.[2]

In the main, they were only able to take action against the police force – it proved difficult to pursue charges against individual police officers as none of the riot police involved had been wearing identifying numbers. Despite this, one police sergeant was convicted of an assault occasioning actual bodily harm on a member of the Convoy.[2]

The police radio had been recorded, and was used in evidence against Wiltshire Police. It was to prove inconclusive as there were gaps in the recording at vital points.

The travellers had left from Savernake Forest, land managed by the Earl of Cardigan (David Brudenell-Bruce, Earl of Cardigan) on behalf of his father, the Marquess of Ailesbury. Lord Cardigan decided to follow the convoy on motorbike, together with his friend John Moore.

Lord Cardigan witnessed the events, and later testified in court against Wiltshire Police, saying that he had seen a heavily-pregnant woman being "clubbed with a truncheon." He was criticised as an unreliable witness by several national newspapers. On Monday 3 June 1985, the editorial in The Times even went as far as to state that being "barking mad was probably hereditary", probably a reference to a previous Lord Cardigan's involvement with the Charge of the Light Brigade. Lord Cardigan started legal action against The Times, The Telegraph, the Daily Mail, the Daily Express and the Daily Mirror for their attacks on him, and received written apologies and damages from each.

Lord Cardigan also described how he was approached by the police the following day, who wanted permission to remove travellers who were still at Savernake:[9]

They said they wanted to go into the campsite 'suitably equipped' and 'finish unfinished business'. Make of that phrase what you will. I said to them, that if it was my permission they were after, they did not have it. I did not want a repeat of the grotesque events that I'd seen the day before.

After four months of hearings, twenty-one of the travellers were successful in their case and were awarded £24,000 in damages. The judge refused to award them their legal costs, thereby significantly reducing the amount received.

Their barrister, Lord Gifford QC (Anthony Maurice Gifford, 6th Baron Gifford), stated "It left a very sour taste in the mouth."[9]


The Levellers' song "Battle of the Beanfield", from their 1991 album Levelling the Land, was inspired by the Battle of the Beanfield.

The song "Itinerant Child", by Ian Dury and Chaz Jankel, which appears on the 1998 album Mr. Love Pants, by Ian Dury & The Blockheads, was inspired by Dury's experiences during the incident.[10]

British progressive-rock band Solstice wrote a song which comments on the Battle. "Circles" is found on their 1997 album of the same name, and includes what sounds like reporting from the battle, with Kim Sabido's voice-over.


  1. ^ a b c d e Ed. Andy Worthington, 2005, The Battle of the Beanfield, Enabler Publications, ISBN 0-9523316-6-7
  2. ^ a b c Hippies clash with police at Stonehenge (1985), BBC News archive Accessed 22 January 2008.
  3. ^ a b c d Chippindale, Christopher (June 1986). "Stoned Henge: Events and Issues at the Summer Solstice, 1985". World Archaeology. Perspectives in World Archaeology 18 (1): 38–58. doi:10.1080/00438243.1986.9979988. Retrieved 7 November 2012. 
  4. ^ a b c d e f g "BBC - Summer solstice: How the Stonehenge battles faded"
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k "The Observer - Twenty years after, mystery still clouds Battle of the Beanfield"
  6. ^ a b c d What happened next? | From the Observer | The Observer
  7. ^ The Battle of the Beanfield, Edited by Andy Worthington Accessed 22 January 2008.
  8. ^ "Police damage to vehicles" BBC article
  9. ^ a b c The Battle of the Beanfield, In A Criminal Culture? by Jim Carey, Accessed 22 January 2008.
  10. ^ Birch, W. Ian Dury: The Definitive Biography (2011), London: Pan Books, ISBN 0-330-5114-83, p.329.

External links[edit]