Benjamin Wittes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Benjamin Wittes is a Senior Fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution, where he is the Research Director in Public Law, and Co-Director of the Harvard Law School - Brookings Project on Law and Security.[1] He works principally on issues related to American law and national security. Along with Robert M. Chesney and Jack Goldsmith, Wittes cofounded the Lawfare Blog, which is devoted to the nonideological discussions of hard U.S. national security choices. Wittes is also a member of the Hoover Institution's Task Force on National Security and Law.[2][3] Wittes is a frequent speaker on topics of detention, interrogation, and national security, before academic, government, policy, and military audiences.

Career[edit]

Though Wittes writes almost exclusively about law, he is not a lawyer. Rather, he is a journalist by background. From 1997 to 2006, he was an editorial writer for The Washington Post concentrating on legal affairs. Before that, he covered the U.S. Justice Department and federal regulatory agencies for Legal Times.[4]

Wittes has written for a wide range of publications,including The Atlantic and The New Republic for which he wrote regular columns, and Slate, Wilson Quarterly, The Weekly Standard, Policy Review, and First Things.

Books[edit]

Wittes has written or edited seven books:

  • Campaign 2012: Twelve Independent Ideas for Improving American Foreign Policy (2012) provides short analysis of twelve policy issues facing America. Wittes edited Campaign 2012, and also contributed a chapter with Daniel L. Byman on how the next U.S. president should continue fighting al Qaeda while improving relations with Congress over terrorism policy.[5]
  • Constitution 3.0, Freedom and Technical Change, edited with Jeffrey Rosen (2011), details how technological changes that were unimaginable at the time of the Founding Fathers are challenging our notions of things like personal vs. private space, freedom of speech, and our own individual autonomy. Wittes also contributed a chapter on biosecurity, technologies of mass empowerment, and the Constitution.[6]
  • Detention and Denial: The Case for Candor after Guantánamo (2010), is Wittes writing about how U.S. detention policy is a tangle of obfuscation, rather than a conscious serious set of moral, legal, and policy choices. He says there is a need for greater coherence, clarity, and public candor from the American government regarding its detention policy and practices, and greater citizen awareness of the same.[7]
  • Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform (2009) presents an agenda for reforming the statutory law governing counterterrorism and U.S. national security, balancing the need for security, the rule of law, and the constitutional rights that protect American freedom. Wittes both edited Legislating the War on Terror, and contributed to a chapter with Stuart Taylor Jr., on refining interrogation law.[8]
  • Law and the Long War: The Future of Justice in the Age of Terror (2008) is Wittes's analysis of how America came to an impasse in the debate over liberty, human rights, and counterterrorism and draws a road map for how the country and the next president might move forward.[9]
  • Confirmation Wars: Preserving Independent Courts in Angry Times (Rowman & Littlefield, 2006) addresses the transformations the judicial confirmation process has undergone in recent times. Wittes argues that these changes should not be understood principally in partisan terms, but as an institutional response on the part of the legislative branch to the growth of judicial power over the previous five decades.[10]
  • Starr: A Reassessment, Yale University Press (2002). Through ten hours of interviews with the controversial former independent counsel, Wittes examines the role that Ken Starr played in implementing the independent counsel statute and investigating the Clinton scandals. Wittes argues that Starr should be best understood as a decent man who fundamentally misconstrued his function under the independent counsel law.[11]

Additional publications[edit]

In addition to his books and shorter writing, Wittes has produced reports and monographs:

  • "Against a Crude Balance: Platform Security and the Hostile Symbiosis Between Liberty and Security" (September 21, 2011). In “Against a Crude Balance”, Wittes argues that we should think of liberty and security as existing in a kind of a “hostile symbiosis” with one another—that is, mutually dependent and yet also, under certain circumstances, mutually threatening.[12]
  • "The Emerging Law of Detention 2.0: The Guantánamo Habeas Cases as Lawmaking" with Robert Chesney, Larkin Reynolds, and the Harvard law School National Security Research Committee (May 12, 2011). “The Emerging Law of Detention 2.0” describes in detail and analyzes the district and appellate courts’ work on defining the rules of military detention, to date—and thus maps the contours of the nascent law of non-criminal counterterrorism detention that are emerging from the Guantanamo habeas cases.[13]
  • "Databuse: Digital Privacy and the Mosaic" (April 1, 2011): In “Databuse,” Wittes explores the possibility that technology’s advance and the proliferation of personal data in the hands of third parties has left us with a conceptually outmoded debate over the protection of personal information, one whose reliance on the concept of privacy does not usefully guide the public policy questions we face.[14]
  • "Rationalizing Government Collection Authorities: A Proposal for Radical Simplification" with Wells Bennett and Rabea Benhalim (January 7, 2011). In “Rationalizing Government Collection Authorities,” Wittes looks at part of the problem of regulating privacy—the problem of access by government investigators to individuals’ personal data stored in the hands of third parties and the inconsistent patchwork of laws that currently governs this sort of collection.[15]
  • "The Emerging Law of Detention: The Guantánamo Habeas Cases as Lawmaking" with Robert Chesney (January 22, 2010). “The Emerging Law of Detention” describes the enormous diversity of opinion among the lower court judges to whom the inactivity of the Supreme Court, Congress, and the Executive Branch had effectively delegated the task of writing the law of detention.[16]
  • "The Current Detainee Population of Guantánamo: An Empirical Study" with Zaathira Wyne (December 16, 2008). The “Current Detainee Population of Guantanamo” documents and describes in as much detail as the public record would then permit, the detainee population in American military custody at the Guantánamo Bay Naval Station in Cuba as of 2008.[17]

Personal life[edit]

Wittes was born November 5, 1969 in Boston, Massachusetts, and graduated from Oberlin College in 1990. He is married to Tamara Cofman Wittes.

References[edit]

  1. ^ / Wittes bio at Brookings Institution
  2. ^ Benjamin Wittes - Penguin Group (USA) Authors - Penguin Group (USA).
  3. ^ Wittes bio at Hoover Institution.
  4. ^ / Wittes bio at Brookings Institution
  5. ^ Campaign 2012, Brookings Institution
  6. ^ Constitution 3.0, Brookings Institution
  7. ^ Detention and Denial, Brookings Institution
  8. ^ Legislating the War on Terror, Brookings Institution
  9. ^ Law and the Long War, Brookings Institution
  10. ^ Confirmation Wars, Hoover Press
  11. ^ Starr: A Reassessment, Washington Post
  12. ^ Against A Crude Balance, Brookings Institution
  13. ^ The Emerging Law of Detention 2.0, Brookings Institution
  14. ^ Databuse, Brookings Institution
  15. ^ Rationalizing Government Collection Authorities, Brookings Institution
  16. ^ The Emerging Law of Detention, Brookings Institution
  17. ^ Current Detainee Population of Guantánamo, Brookings Institution