Bernoulli's inequality
|
|
This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (March 2013) |
In real analysis, Bernoulli's inequality (named after Jacob Bernoulli) is an inequality that approximates exponentiations of 1 + x.
The inequality states that
for every integer r ≥ 0 and every real number x ≥ −1. If the exponent r is even, then the inequality is valid for all real numbers x. The strict version of the inequality reads
for every integer r ≥ 2 and every real number x ≥ −1 with x ≠ 0.
Bernoulli's inequality is often used as the crucial step in the proof of other inequalities. It can itself be proved using mathematical induction, as shown below.
Contents |
Proof of the inequality[edit]
For r = 0,
is equivalent to 1 ≥ 1 which is true as required.
Now suppose the statement is true for r = k:
Then it follows that
However, as 1 + (k + 1)x + kx2 ≥ 1 + (k + 1)x (since kx2 ≥ 0), it follows that (1 + x)k + 1 ≥ 1 + (k + 1)x, which means the statement is true for r = k + 1 as required.
By induction we conclude the statement is true for all r ≥ 0.
Generalization[edit]
The exponent r can be generalized to an arbitrary real number as follows: if x > −1, then
for r ≤ 0 or r ≥ 1, and
for 0 ≤ r ≤ 1.
This generalization can be proved by comparing derivatives. Again, the strict versions of these inequalities require x ≠ 0 and r ≠ 0, 1.
Related inequalities[edit]
The following inequality estimates the r-th power of 1 + x from the other side. For any real numbers x, r > 0, one has
where e = 2.718.... This may be proved using the inequality (1 + 1/k)k < e.
Alternate form[edit]
An alternate form of Bernoulli's inequality for
and
is:
This can be proved (for integer t) by using the formula for geometric series: (using y=1-x)
or equivalently 
Proof for rational case[edit]
An "elementary" proof can be given using the fact that geometric mean of positive numbers is less than arithmetic mean
First assume 
By comparing Arithmetic and Geometric mean of
numbers (
occurs
times):

we get

or equivalently

This proves inequality for
case.
For
case, let
As
we get with
,

This proves inequality for
case.
As these inequalities are true for all rational numbers
and
, they are also true for all real numbers. this is because, any real number can be approximated by rational numbers to arbitrary precision (this formally follows from the Cauchy construction of real numbers).
References[edit]
- Carothers, N. (2000). Real Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 9. ISBN 978-0-521-49756-5. More than one of
|author=and|last=specified (help) - Bullen, P.S. (1987). Handbook of Means and Their Inequalities. Berlin: Springer. p. 4. ISBN 978-1-4020-1522-9. More than one of
|author=and|last=specified (help) - Zaidman, Samuel (1997). Advanced Calculus. City: World Scientific Publishing Company. p. 32. ISBN 978-981-02-2704-3.
External links[edit]
- Weisstein, Eric W., "Bernoulli Inequality", MathWorld.
- Bernoulli Inequality by Chris Boucher, Wolfram Demonstrations Project.
- Arthur Lohwater (1982). "Introduction to Inequalities". Online e-book in PDF format.
- Sanjeev Saxena, "A Simple Proof of Bernoulli's Inequality", viXra:1205.0068, May 2012
and
shown in red and blue respectively. Here, 








