Bethe formula

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Fast charged particles moving through matter interact with the electrons of atoms in the material. The interaction excites or ionizes the atoms. This leads to an energy loss of the traveling particle. The Bethe formula describes[1] the energy loss per distance travelled of swift charged particles (protons, alpha particles, atomic ions, but not electrons[Footnote 1]) traversing matter (or alternatively the stopping power of the material). The non-relativistic version was found by Hans Bethe in 1930; the relativistic version (shown below) was found by him in 1932 (Sigmund 2006).

The Bethe formula is sometimes called "Bethe-Bloch formula", but this is misleading (see below).

The formula[edit]

For a particle with speed v, charge z, and energy E, traveling a distance x into a target of electron number density n and mean excitation potential I, the relativistic version of the formula reads, in SI units (Sigmund 2006):

- \frac{dE}{dx} = \frac{4 \pi}{m_e c^2} \cdot \frac{nz^2}{\beta^2} \cdot \left(\frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\right)^2 \cdot \left[\ln \left(\frac{2m_e c^2 \beta^2}{I \cdot (1-\beta^2)}\right) - \beta^2\right]

 

 

 

 

(1)

where c is the speed of light and ε0 the vacuum permittivity,  \beta = \frac{v}{c} , e and me the electron charge and rest mass respectively.

Stopping Power of Aluminum for Protons versus proton energy, and the Bethe formula without (red) and with corrections (blue)

Here, the electron density of the material can be calculated by

n=\frac{N_{A}\cdot Z\cdot\rho}{A\cdot M_{u}}\,,

where ρ is the density of the material, Z its atomic number, A its relative atomic mass, NA the Avogadro number and Mu the Molar mass constant.

In the figure to the right, the small circles are experimental results obtained from measurements of various authors (taken from http://www.exphys.jku.at/Stopping/). The red curve is Bethe's formula. Evidently, Bethe's theory agrees very well with experiment at high energy. The agreement is even better when corrections are applied (see below).

For low energies, i.e., for small velocities of the particle β << 1, the Bethe formula reduces to

- \frac{dE}{dx} = \frac{4 \pi nz^2}{m_e v^2}  
\cdot \left(\frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\right)^2
\cdot \left[\ln \left(\frac{2m_e v^2 }{I}\right)\right].

 

 

 

 

(2)

This can be seen by first replacing βc by v in eq. (1) and then neglecting β2 because of its small size.

At low energy, the energy loss according to the Bethe formula therefore decreases approximately as v−2 with increasing energy. It reaches a minimum for approximately E = 3Mc2, where M is the mass of the particle (for protons, this would be about at 3000 MeV). For highly relativistic cases β ≈ 1, the energy loss increases again, logarithmically due to the transversal component of the electric field.

The mean excitation potential[edit]

The mean excitation potential I of atoms, versus atomic number Z, in eV, divided by Z

In the Bethe theory, the material is completely described by a single number, the mean excitation potential I. In 1933 Felix Bloch showed that the mean ionization potential of atoms is approximately given by

 I = (10eV) \cdot Z

 

 

 

 

(3)

where Z is the atomic number of the atoms of the material. If this approximation is introduced into formula (1) above, one obtains an expression which is often called Bethe-Bloch formula. But since we have now accurate tables of I as a function of Z (see below), the use of such a table will yield better results than the use of formula (3).

The figure shows normalized values of I, taken from a table.[2] The peaks and valleys in this figure lead to corresponding valleys and peaks in the stopping power. These are called "Z2-oscillations" or "Z2-structure" (where Z2 = Z means the atomic number of the target).

Corrections to the Bethe formula[edit]

The Bethe formula is only valid for energies high enough so that the charged atomic particle (the ion) does not carry any atomic electrons with it. At smaller energies, when the ion carries electrons, this reduces its charge effectively, and the stopping power is thus reduced. But even if the atom is fully ionized, corrections are necessary.

Bethe found his formula using quantum mechanical perturbation theory. Hence, his result is proportional to the square of the charge z of the particle. The description can be improved by considering corrections which correspond to higher powers of z. These are: the Barkas-Andersen-effect (proportional to z3, after Walter H. Barkas and Hans Henrik Andersen), and the Bloch-correction (proportional to z4). In addition, one has to take into account that the atomic electrons of the material traversed are not stationary ("shell correction").

The introduction of the Bloch correction may be another reason for the common name Bethe-Bloch formula. But logically, one would then have to speak of the Bethe-Barkas-Andersen-Bloch formula, and nobody does that.

The corrections mentioned have been built into the programs PSTAR and ASTAR, for example, by which one can calculate the stopping power for protons and alpha particles.[3] The corrections are large at low energy and become smaller and smaller as energy is increased.

At very high energies, Fermi's density correction[2] has to be added also.

The problem of nomenclature[edit]

In describing programs PSTAR and ASTAR, the National Institute of Standards and Technology[3] calls formula (1) "Bethe's stopping power formula".

On the other hand, in the 2008 Review of Particle Physics[4] the formula was called "Bethe-Bloch equation", even though Bloch's expression (3) did not appear in the formula. But in more recent editions, the formula is now called the "Bethe formula".[5][6] Presumably, the "Bloch" in "Bethe-Bloch" meant the Bloch-correction (see above). But then the designation "Bethe-Barkas-Bloch" would have seemed more logical.

See also[edit]

Footnotes[edit]

  1. ^ For electrons, the energy loss is slightly different due to their small mass and their indistinguishability, and since they suffer much larger losses by Bremsstrahlung

References[edit]

  1. ^ H. Bethe und J. Ashkin in "Experimental Nuclear Physics, ed. E. Segré, J. Wiley, New York, 1953, p. 253
  2. ^ a b Report 49 of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, "Stopping Powers and Ranges for Protons and Alpha Particles", Bethesda, MD, USA (1993)
  3. ^ a b NISTIR 4999, Stopping Power and Range Tables, www.physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Star/Text/programs.html
  4. ^ 2008 Review of Particle Physics, C. Amsler et al., Physics Letters B 667 (2008) 1
  5. ^ K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 37, 075021 (2010) and 2011 partial update for the 2012 edition.
  6. ^ J. Beringer et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D86, 0100001 (2012)

Sources[edit]

  • Sigmund, Peter (2006). Particle Radiation and Radiation Effects. Springer Series in Solid State Sciences, 151. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 3-540-31713-9

External links[edit]