Biological issues in Jurassic Park

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Jurassic Park, a book by Michael Crichton, with a film version directed by Steven Spielberg, revolves around the resurrection of dinosaurs via genetic engineering. Scientists and enthusiasts have brought up a number of issues with facts and feasibility. Some of the speculative or inaccurate features attributed to the dinosaurs of Jurassic Park have become embedded in popular culture, most popular among them being the idea of Tyrannosaurus only seeing motion; giant, featherless, intelligent Velociraptors, and dwarf, frilled, poison-spitting Dilophosaurus. In general, the novel is more accurate than the film, with Spielberg adding some features to the dinosaurs (like the frill on the dilophosaurs). However, it is stated on the tour in the first film that the gaps in the dinosaurs' DNA sequence were filled with amphibian DNA, so it could be argued that most of the following inaccuracies are genetic mutations resulting from the DNA tampering.

Contents

[edit] Extinct genera

[edit] Velociraptor

The actual size of Velociraptor mongoliensis, compared to a human.

The Velociraptor in the novel, and consequently the film, were larger than the actual animal. The misconception arose because Crichton used "Predatory Dinosaurs of the World" by Gregory S. Paul as a reference when writing his novel, and that work interpreted Deinonychus antirrhopus as a species of Velociraptor; it is closely related to Velociraptor mongoliensis, but is larger.[1][2] In the novel, Deinonychus is mentioned, but the character Alan Grant then says that scientists have reclassified it as a species of Velociraptor.

The film makers had the size of the film's Velociraptor increased for dramatic reasons, and changed the shape of the snout.[3] However, at the same time the film was being shot, paleontologists came across a larger dromaeosaurid species named Utahraptor and the larger raptors remained, even though Utahraptor was substantially larger (21 feet long) than the film's raptors. At the start of the film, a Velociraptor skeleton is uncovered in Montana; no examples of the dinosaur have been uncovered in the United States (although both Deinonychus and Utahraptor are American dinosaurs). The fossil skeleton is similarly inaccurately large. In the novel the character Alan Grant identifies the Montana fossil specimen as "antirrhopus" as opposed to the park's "mongoliensis"(as identified by Henry Wu) - meaning that the fossil specimen Grant's team found is actually Deinonychus.

Velociraptor mongoliensis restored with large wing feathers, as evidenced by fossil quill knobs.

The high intelligence of the film's Velociraptors is considered unlikely by scientists, given the relative size of their brains and comparisons with modern animals.[4]

It is now known that Velociraptor had feathers.[5] Neither the film nor the novel dinosaurs had feathers; however, both were created before the discovery of feathered dinosaurs closely related to Velociraptor (e.g. Microraptor).[6][7] In Jurassic Park III, the raptors were remodelled and small feather-like quills were added to the males' heads, while still looking similar to the original design.

As with other bipedal dinosaurs in the films, the hands of Velociraptor are depicted with the palms able to rotate, but this would have been anatomically impossible for the real animals, as their forearm bones (ulna and radius) could not rotate in this way. Their palms should have been relatively fixed facing each other, like a person about to clap.[7]

[edit] Dilophosaurus

Size comparison of Dilophosaurus and a human

The film's Dilophosaurus stands about 1.2 meters (4 ft) tall,[8] while its real-life counterparts measured on the order of 6 meters (20 ft) long and 1.4 meters (4.5 ft) tall at the hips.[9] According to a "Making-of" book, this was a deliberate deviation from accuracy for stylistic purposes, and to differentiate it from the velociraptors. Thus likely it could have been a juvenile,[8] as none other is seen whether in this film or another, and by Dennis Nedry adding: "I thought you were one of your big brothers" when encountering it. It also has a frill like the Australian frill-necked lizard, which is not considered accurate by paleontologists. The novel's version is full-sized and lacks the frill. Both depictions of the dinosaur eject a potent, blinding venom in both their bite and their spit, like a spitting cobra, and use it to hunt; the novel acknowledges the fact that this is not suggested by fossil evidence.[10]

[edit] Tyrannosaurus

The film theorizes that the Tyrannosaurus would be unable to see someone if he stayed still; however, evidence has shown T. rex to have had high visual acuity and binocular vision.[11] Some argue that it would still be able to smell them regardless.[12] In the novel, it is mentioned that the reason the dinosaurs cannot see someone standing still may be due to the frog DNA in their genome, and it is shown that other dinosaurs, such as the island's Maiasaura, have this problem as well. This is not mentioned in the film; instead it is shown as if the inability to see without movement was an actual trait of Tyrannosaurus (Dr. Grant poses this as a paleontological fact even before knowing about Jurassic Park and its use of genetic engineering). In the sequel novel, The Lost World, it is suggested that the Tyrannosaurus can in fact see inanimate objects, and was actually not hungry, but merely "playing" or attempting to threaten in the first encounter. A character who specifically attempted this technique dies when the T. rex sees him there and kills him; the character Ian Malcolm mentions that he was listening to "the wrong scientists."[13][14]

Tyrannosaurus is also shown as being able to keep (sprinting) pace with a jeep traveling at considerable speed; however, it is debated within the paleontological community whether a T. rex could even achieve this speed in real life, much less maintain it for as long a period of time as the film depicts.[15] Anatomically, its short forelimbs would have been unable to cushion an impact if it were to fall, meaning that accidents at such speeds could have been fatal. Also, biomechanical studies by Dr. John Hutchinson of the Royal Veterinary College have shown that in order to run at this speed in a crouched position, Tyrannosaurus would have needed over 43% of its muscle mass in each leg. That would mean 86% of its muscle mass would be in its legs, leaving little room for anything else in its body: a physical impossibility. Dr. Hutchinson’s work also suggests that an upper speed limit for Tyrannosaurus would, actually, only fall in the 10–25 mph range.[16] Animators at Industrial Light & Magic were forced to use optical illusions in order to make the computer-generated Tyrannosaurus appear to convincingly keep pace with the vehicle.[17]

[edit] Brachiosaurus

The Brachiosaurus in the film is shown to be chewing its food with a side to side motion of its lower jaw. In reality, it could not feed like this. Brachiosaurid skulls and jaws were limited to up and down motions, and their teeth were specialized for shearing and cropping plant material. Other sauropods, such as diplodocoids, could move their jaws backward and forward, but were probably using this motion to strip branches, not to chew plants [18]. Instead of processing food in the mouth, sauropods probably relied on taking in as much food as possible and processing it farther down the digestive tract, either through gastroliths (rocks swallowed and used for grinding in a gizzard-like organ; note however that this hypothesis, while common in the popular literature, is now considered unlikely in sauropods),[19] or simply by digestion through fermentation by microorganisms.[20]

One of the most well known scenes of the movie shows a brachiosaur rearing into a bipedal stance. However, a biomechanical analysis of sauropod rearing abilities shows that Brachiosaurus is probably the sauropod least able to rear.[21] It has a center of mass placed further forward than any other sauropod,[22] which means that a bipedal or tripodal pose would be highly unstable. The legs and feet of the brachiosaurs were also portrayed as too bulky, whereas they would have been slender in reality.[23]

[edit] Pteranodon

Variation in the crest of Pteranodon (right), which is not reflected in the movies

Like the Cearadactylus in the novel, the Pteranodon in Jurassic Park III is interpreted as aggressive and able to pick a teenager up with its feet (a similar scene was planned for the climax of The Lost World: Jurassic Park, but scrapped when Steven Spielberg decided to instead use the Tyrannosaurus rampage in San Diego as a better finale). Both pterosaur genera were thought to have eaten fish,[24] and were incapable of grasping with their feet[citation needed]. A Pteranodon could possibly have used its pointed beak as an alternative weapon, but in a hypothetical scenario would be unlikely to use it on a human being unless provoked. However, in the novelization it states that they were able to carry things with their feet due to them being genetically engineered. Also, although the name Pteranodon means 'winged without teeth' or 'toothless wing', the Pteranodon in Jurassic Park III have small, sharp teeth in their bills. Their beaks are also straight, whereas they should have an upwards bend. There was great variation in individual Pteranodon crests, with large ones being interpreted as those of males, and short ones being female or juvenile.[25][26] In the films, all adults have identical crests, and the crests of the juveniles are too large.

[edit] Procompsognathus and Compsognathus

The Procompsognathus are given several attributes in the novels that cannot be determined from the fossil evidence to date. They are presented as living and hunting in large groups; as scavengers and coprophagists (eaters of feces), useful in keeping the park clean of sauropod excrement; and as secreting a venom described as similar to that of a cobra, although more primitive. In the films, they are dropped in favour of Compsognathus, as well as their venomous bite.

Procompsognathus is known from a single partial skeleton from the Late Triassic of Germany, with a partial skull that may belong to it or, more likely, an early relative of modern crocodilians.[27][28] Because only one individual is known, there is no direct evidence that it lived in groups; however, related animals such as Coelophysis and Megapnosaurus have been found in groups of numerous individuals, such as at Ghost Ranch.[28] As there are no uncontroversial remains of the head of Procomposognathus, its diet cannot be inferred from the form of its teeth and jaws; other coelophysoids are seen as carnivores with skull adaptations that may have been advantageous when handling small prey.[28]

There is no evidence that the bite of Procompsognathus was venomous. A venomous bite has been proposed for a possible theropod from the Late Cretaceous of Baja California, known from a single tooth with grooving similar to that found on the teeth of venomous snakes and lizards.[29] A venomous bite has also been proposed for the Lower Cretaceous Chinese dromaeosaurid Sinornithosaurus, based on its long grooved teeth similar to those of rear-fanged snakes, as well as a possible venom-gland cavity in the bone of the upper jaw.[30][31]

[edit] References

  1. ^ Paul, Gregory S. (1988). Predatory Dinosaurs of the World. New York: Simon and Schuster. p. 464pp. ISBN 978-0671619466. 
  2. ^ http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bs-md-dinosaurs-paul-profile-20110208,0,7030885.story?page=2
  3. ^ Duncan, Jody (2006). The Winston Effect. London: Titan Books. pp. 175. ISBN 1845763653. 
  4. ^ Larson, Hans C.E.; Sereno, Paul C.; & Wilson, Jeffrey A. (2000). "Forebrain enlargement among nonavian theropod dinosaurs". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 20 (3): 615–8. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2000)020[0615:FEANTD]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0272-4634. http://vertpaleo.org/publications/jvp/contents-20-3.cfm. 
  5. ^ Turner, A.H.; Makovicky, P.J.; Norell, M.A. (2007). "Feather quill knobs in the dinosaur Velociraptor" (pdf). Science 317 (5845): 1721. doi:10.1126/science.1145076. PMID 17885130. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/317/5845/1721.pdf. 
  6. ^ Xu Xing, Xing; Zhou Zhonghe, Wang Xiaolin, Kuang Xuewen, Zhang Fucheng & Du Xiangke (2003). "Four-winged dinosaurs from China". Nature 421 (6921): 335–340. doi:10.1038/nature01342. PMID 12540892. 
  7. ^ a b Paul, Gregory S. (2002). Dinosaurs of the Air: The Evolution and Loss of Flight in Dinosaurs and Birds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 472pp. ISBN 978-0801867637. 
  8. ^ a b Shay, Don; Jody Duncan (1993). The making of Jurassic Park. Ballantine Books. pp. 35–36. ISBN 1852837748. 
  9. ^ Paul, Gregory S. (1988). "Genus Dilophosaurus". Predatory Dinosaurs of the World. New York: Simon & Schuster. pp. 268–270. ISBN 0-671-61946-2. 
  10. ^ Crichton, Michael (1990). Jurassic Park. Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 0-394-58816-9. "It was Muldoon's view that some dinosaurs were too dangerous to be kept in a park setting. In part, the danger existed because they still knew so little about the animals. For example, nobody even suspected the dilophosaurs were poisonous until they were observed hunting indigenous rats on the island—biting the rodents and then stepping back, to wait for them to die. And even then nobody suspected the dilophosaurs could spit until one of the handlers was almost blinded by spitting venom." 
  11. ^ Stevens KA (2006). "Binocular vision in theropod dinosaurs". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 26 (2): 321–330. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2006)26[321:BVITD]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0272-4634. 
  12. ^ Jaffe, Eric. "Sight for 'Saur Eyes: T. rex vision was among nature's best". Science News. Archived from the original on 2007-09-13. http://web.archive.org/web/20070913043925/http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20060701/fob2.asp. Retrieved 2007-10-02. 
  13. ^ Carpenter K., Smith M.B. (2001). "Forelimb osteology and biomechanics of Tyrannosaurus". In Tanke D.H., Carpenter K.. Mesozoic Vertebrate Life. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. pp. 90–116. 
  14. ^ Derstler, K., and Miller, M.M. (2007). "Anatomy and function of digit III of the Tyrannosaurus rex manus." Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 39(6): 77. Abstract.
  15. ^ Levy, Dawn (February 27, 2002) T. rex's new image: still ferocious, not quite as quick, stanford.edu
  16. ^ "T.rex - Warrior or Wimp? - questions and answers". BBC - Science & Nature. http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2004/trexqa.shtml. Retrieved 09-05-25. 
  17. ^ Hutchinson JR, Garcia M (2002). "Tyrannosaurus was not a fast runner". Nature 415 (6875): 1018–21. doi:10.1038/4151018a. PMID 11875567. 
  18. ^ Barrett, Paul M.; and Upchurch, Paul (2005). "Sauropodomorph diversity through time". In Curry Rogers, Kristina A.; and Wilson, Jeffrey A.. The Sauropods: Evolution and Paleobiology. Berkeley, CA: University of California. pp. 125–156. ISBN 0-520-24623-3. 
  19. ^ Wings O (2007). "A review of gastrolith function with implications for fossil vertebrates and a revised classification" (PDF). Palaeontologica Polonica 52 (1): 1–16. http://app.pan.pl/article/item/app52-001.html?pdf=39. Retrieved 2010-11-10. 
  20. ^ Carpenter, Kenneth (2006). "Biggest of the big: a critical re-evaluation of the mega-sauropod Amphicoelias fragillimus". In Foster, John R.; and Lucas, Spencer G. (eds.). Paleontology and Geology of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 36. Albuquerque: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science. pp. 131–138. 
  21. ^ Mallison, H. (2009). "Rearing for food? Kinetic/dynamic modeling of bipedal/tripodal poses in sauropod dinosaurs." P. 63 in Godefroit, P. and Lambert, O. (eds), Tribute to Charles Darwin and Bernissart Iguanodons: New Perspectives on Vertebrate Evolution and Early Cretaceous Ecosystems. Brussels.
  22. ^ Henderson D (2006). "Burly gaits: center of mass, stability, and the trackways of sauropod dinosaurs". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 26 (4): 907–921. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2006)26[907:BGCOMS]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0272-4634. 
  23. ^ http://gspauldino.com/pdfs/PTJurassicBooBoos.pdf
  24. ^ Wellnhofer, Peter (1991). The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Pterosaurs. Salamander Books Ltd. p. 159. ISBN 0861015665. ""They [known pterosaurs] fed on aquatic organisms. ... Fossilized stomach contents of some pterosaurs such as... Pteranodon, have been found, these being the remains of the last meal before they died. In all cases they are remains of fish."" 
  25. ^ Bennett, S.C. (1992). "Sexual dimorphism of Pteranodon and other pterosaurs, with comments on cranial crests". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 12 (4): 422–434. doi:10.1080/02724634.1992.10011472. 
  26. ^ Bennett, S.C. (2001). "The osteology and functional morphology of the Late Cretaceous pterosaur Pteranodon. General description of osteology". Palaeontographica, Abteilung A 260: 1–112. 
  27. ^ Glut, Donald F. (1997). "Procompsognathus". Dinosaurs: The Encyclopedia. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Co. pp. 729–731. ISBN 0-89950-917-7. 
  28. ^ a b c Tykoski, Ronald B.; and Rowe, Timothy (2004). "Ceratosauria". In Weishampel, David B.; Dodson, Peter; and Osmólska, Halszka (eds.). The Dinosauria (Second ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 47–70. ISBN 0-520-24209-2. 
  29. ^ Hecht, Jeff. "Re: Venomous Therapsid". The Dinosaur Mailing List. http://dml.cmnh.org/2002Aug/msg00551.html.  (contains a copy of a draft of material author Hecht wrote for New Scientist regarding 2000 abstract and reaction)
  30. ^ Gong E, Martin LD, Burnham DA, Falk AR (January 2010). "The birdlike raptor Sinornithosaurus was venomous". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 (2): 766–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.0912360107. PMC 2818910. PMID 20080749. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=20080749. 
  31. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8425200.stm | Bird-like dinosaur was 'venomous'

[edit] Further reading

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export