Blind deconvolution
|
|
This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please help improve the article with a good introductory style. (October 2009) |
|
|
This article needs attention from an expert on the subject. See the talk page for details. WikiProject Statistics or the Statistics Portal may be able to help recruit an expert. (November 2008) |
In image processing and applied mathematics, blind deconvolution is a deconvolution technique that permits recovery of the target scene from a single or set of "blurred" images in the presence of a poorly determined or unknown point spread function (PSF). [2] Regular linear and non-linear deconvolution techniques utilize a known PSF. For blind deconvolution, the PSF is estimated from the image or image set, allowing the deconvolution to be performed. Researchers have been studying blind deconvolution methods for several decades, and have approached the problem from different directions.
Blind deconvolution can be performed iteratively, whereby each iteration improves the estimation of the PSF and the scene, or non-iteratively, where one application of the algorithm, based on exterior information, extracts the PSF. Iterative methods include maximum a posteriori estimation and expectation-maximization algorithms. A good estimate of the PSF is helpful for quicker convergence but not necessary.
Examples of non-iterative techniques include SeDDaRA, the cepstrum transform and APEX. The cepstrum transform and APEX methods assume that the PSF has a specific shape, and one must estimate the width of the shape. For SeDDaRA, the provides information about the scene in the form of a reference image. The algorithm estimates the PSF by comparing the spatial frequency information in the blurred image to that of the target image.
Contents |
[edit] Mathematical concept
Suppose we have a signal transmitted through a channel. The channel can usually be modeled as a linear system, so the receptor receives a convolution of the original signal with the impulse response of the channel. If we want to reverse the effect of the channel, to obtain the original signal, we must process the received signal by a second linear system, inverting the response of the channel. This system is called an equalizer.
If we are given the original signal, we can use a supervising technique, such as finding a Wiener filter, but without it, we can still explore what we do know about it to attempt its recovery. For example, we can filter the received signal to obtain the desired spectral power density. This is what happens, for example, when the original signal is known to have no auto correlation, and we "whiten" the received signal.
Whitening usually leaves some phase distortion in the results. Most blind deconvolution techniques use higher-order statistics of the signals, and permit the correction of such phase distortions. We can optimize the equalizer to obtain a signal with a PSF approximating what we know about the original PDF.
[edit] High-order statistics
Blind deconvolution algorithms often make use of high-order statistics, with moments higher than two. This can be implicit or explicit.
[edit] Algorithms
Important algorithms for blind deconvolution are:
- Bussgang blind deconvolution
- Constant modulus algorithm
- Decision-directed estimation
- Godard algorithm
- Shalvi-Weinstein algorithm
- SeDDaRA method
[edit] See also
- Channel model
- Inverse problem
- Regularization (mathematics)
- Blind equalization
- Maximum a posteriori estimation
- Maximum likelihood
[edit] External links
- SVI-wiki on 3D microscopy and deconvolution
- Information and software for the non-iterative Blind Deconvolution of images
[edit] References
- ^ P. Barmby; D. E. McLaughlin et al. (2007). "Structural Parameters for Globular Clusters in M31 and Generalizations for the Fundamental Plane". The Astronomical Journal 133 (6): 2764–2786. Bibcode 2007AJ....133.2764B. doi:10.1086/516777.
- ^ E. Lam; J.W. Goodman (2000). "Iterative statistical approach to blind image deconvolution". Journal of the Optical Society of America A 17 (7): 1177–1184. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.17.001177. http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?uri=josaa-17-7-1177.