|This article needs additional citations for verification. (December 2008)|
Bloomers are divided women's garments for the lower body.
- 1 Fashion bloomers (skirted)
- 2 Athletic bloomers (unskirted)
- 3 Undergarments
- 4 References
Fashion bloomers (skirted)
Also called the "Turkish dress", "American dress", or simply "reform dress", bloomers were an innovation of readers of the Water-Cure Journal, a popular health periodical that in October 1849 began urging women to develop a style of dress that was not so harmful to their health as the current fashion. It also represented an unrestricted movement, unprecedented by previous women's fashions, that allowed for greater freedom—both metaphorical and physical—within the public sphere. The fashionable dress of that time consisted of a skirt that dragged several inches on the floor, worn over layers of starched petticoats stiffened with straw or horsehair sewn into the hems. In addition to the heavy skirts, prevailing fashion called for a "long waist" effect, achieved with a whale-bone-fitted corset that pushed the wearer’s internal organs out of their normal place. The result was a feminine population which, as one medical professor warned his students, was of no use as cadavers from which to study human anatomy.
Women responded with a variety of costumes, many inspired by the pantaloons of Turkey, and all including some form of pants. By the summer of 1850, various versions of a short skirt and trousers, or "Turkish dress", were being worn by readers of the Water-Cure Journal as well as women patients at the nation’s health resorts. After wearing the style in private, some began wearing it in public. In the winter and spring of 1851, newspapers across the country carried startled sightings of the dresses.
Bloomer craze of 1851
In February 1851, Elizabeth Smith Miller of Peterboro, New York wore the "Turkish dress" to Seneca Falls, New York, home of Amelia Bloomer and her temperance journal, The Lily. The next month Bloomer announced to her readers that she had adopted the dress and, in response to many inquiries, printed a description of her dress and instructions on how to make it. By June many newspapers had dubbed it the "Bloomer dress".
During the summer of 1851, the nation was seized by a "bloomer craze". Health reformer Mary Gove Nichols drafted a Declaration of Independence from the Despotism of Parisian Fashion and gathered signatures to it at lectures on woman’s dress. Managers of the textile mills in Lowell, Massachusetts, gave a banquet for any of their female workers who adopted the safer dress before July 4. In Toledo, Ohio, sixty women turned out in Turkish costume at one of the city’s grandest social events. Bloomer balls and bloomer picnics were held; dress reform societies and bloomer institutes were formed. A grand festival in favor of the costume was held at New York City’s Broadway Tabernacle in September. In August, a woman who had spent six months sailing from Philadelphia around the Horn to California with the reform dress packed in her trunk disembarked to find that the dress had preceded her and was being displayed in the window of a San Francisco dress shop. Interest was sparked in England when Hannah Tracy Cutler and other women delegates wore the new dress to an international peace convention in London.
The Bloomer also became a symbol of women's rights in the early 1850s. The same women—Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucy Stone, and Susan B. Anthony—who adopted the new dress also advocated women's right to vote. Crowds gathered to not only hear the women's radical words, but also their scandalous dress. However, after three years, fearing that the new dress was drawing attention away from the suffragist cause, many of these women returned to corsets, long skirts, and more conventional forms of dress. In similar suit, the Dress Reform Association, formed in 1856, called the outfit the "American costume" and focused on its health benefits rather than political symbolism. Following the American Civil War, interest in the Bloomer costume waned almost completely until its resurgence in the 1890s. 
The “bloomer” was a physical and metaphorical representation of feminist reform, in the 1850s. This garment originated, in late 1849, for the purpose of developing a style of dress, for women that was less harmful to their health. Because it was less restricting than the previously popular attire, it provided more physical freedom for women.
Being a completely new and distinctively different form of dress, the bloomer garment also provided women with metaphorical freedom, in the sense that it gave women more diverse dress options and the opportunity and power to wear what they choose.
Some individuals, at the time, even argued that the Bloomer dress should be adopted for moral reasons. “A reporter noted that a group of “very intelligent appearing, lady-like women” met in Milford, Massachusetts, in July 1852. The purpose of their meeting was to consider the propriety of adopting bloomers. The women unanimously passed a resolution approving the costume, declaring the existing fashion to be “moral evils,” and arguing that the bloomer would facilitate women’s efforts to engage in good works.”
“And now I’m dressed like a little girl, in a dress both loose and short,
Oh with what freedom I can sing, and walk all ‘round about!
And when I get a little strength, some work I think I can do,
‘Twill give me health and comfort, and make me useful too.” — The Sibyl magazine, April 15,1859.
Although feminists, such as Elizabeth Cady Stanton and numerous others, essentially, claimed that women within society who took on the “feminist dress” look without being fully knowledgeable of all the issues were imposters, individuals could demonstrate reform without being an expert in the issues. In The Sibyl poem, the feeling and element of reform was demonstrated through simplicity and the subtle appreciation of this small step in women’s fashion parallel to a small step for women, in general. During the 1850s, feminist reformers were fighting numerous battles to bring change and further equality to women everywhere. Although feminists believed that it was more important to focus on the issues, and that giving into fashionable trends was exactly what they were battling against, their popularized simple change in dress, symbolically, furthered women’s liberation.
Opposition to Bloomer dress
Bloomer’s promotion of the style as a freedom dress rather than as a health dress did nothing to recommend it to the orthodox clergy and other critics of the woman’s rights movement, who denounced the wearing of pants by women as a usurpation of male authority. Associating it with the woman’s rights movement, the New York Sunday Mercury published a woodcarving representing the woman’s rights convention held in Akron, Ohio, in May 1851. It depicted every woman in coat, breeches, and high boots, sitting cross-legged and smoking cigars, when in truth not a bloomer was present. Some young women were denied church membership for wearing the dress. Public meetings were called to put down the fad, and the very same newspapers that had previously praised the dress began ridiculing and condemning "Bloomerism". In August 1851, Harper’s Monthly reprinted a cartoon and article from a London newspaper ridiculing the American dress, one month after it had printed a sketch of the "Oriental Costume" and pronounced it tasteful, elegant, and graceful.
Bloomers in the West
Lucy Stone, one of the nation’s most famous orators and the woman’s rights movement’s most prominent spokesperson during the 1850s, helped popularize the dress by wearing it as she addressed immense audiences in over twenty states, the District of Columbia, and Ontario between 1851 and 1855. She had begun wearing the dress as a health measure while recuperating from typhoid fever during the winter of 1850–51, and she wore it exclusively for three years. In 1856 a National Dress Reform Association organized and one of its officers, Dr. Lydia Sayer Hasbrouck, who had worn the dress since 1849, established a journal, the Sibyl, as the society's organ. From July 1856 through June 1864, that paper carried news of dress reform to subscribers from New England to California and published the names of nearly a thousand women who sent in their names as wearers of the reform dress. A letter-writer from Iowa said it was especially suited for life on the prairie and reported that many women from various parts of the state wore it all the time. Readers from Illinois, Arkansas, Michigan, Wisconsin, Kansas, Nebraska, Dakota, and Oregon attested to its popularity among western women. In 1860, an English traveler reported meeting a bloomer wearer in Laramie, Wyoming, and a traveler to Pike’s Peak reported that "the bloomer costume is considerably in vogue and appears peculiarly adapted to overland travel".
Civil War nurses and the bloomer
When Dorthea Dix was appointed superintendent of army nurses in June 1861, she issued a statement banning the bloomer from army hospitals and requiring women to abandon it before entering nursing service. But as western communities organized battalions of soldiers, they also formed corps of volunteer nurses to accompany them, and many of these nurses adopted the reform dress for field service. All members of one such corps, organized by Dr. Fedelia Harris Reid of Berlin, Wisconsin, and called the "Wisconsin Florence Nightengale Union", wore the bloomer not only in the field, but also while caring for patients at a military hospital in St. Louis. Four bloomer wearers were among the nurses who accompanied Minnesota’s First Regiment. Dr. Mary E. Walker, who earned the Congressional Medal of Honor for her medical services during the Civil War, wore the reform dress while working in a military hospital in Washington, D.C., as well as for field work. As she accompanied troops in the South, she wrote to the Sibyl that New Orleans women of wealth and standing had worn it to Haiti and Cuba. The dress was still being worn by members of the utopian Oneida Community in 1867 but gradually it was abandoned by all but a very few stalwart wearers willing to defy society's mores.
Bloomers and bicycles
In 1893, the Woman’s Congress of the World’s Columbian Exposition revived interest in the bloomer as an aid in improving women’s health through physical exercise. Their session on women’s dress opened with Lucy Stone reminiscing about the bloomer movement of the 1850s; her extolling the bloomer as the "cleanest, neatest, most comfortable and most sensible garment" she had ever worn; and young women modeling different versions of the dress. The following year Annie "Londonderry" Cohen Kopchovsky donned the bloomer during her famous bicycle trip around the world, and an updated version of the bloomer soon became the standard "bicycle dress" for women during the bicycle craze of the 1890s.
Athletic bloomers (unskirted)
In the 19th and 20th centuries
During the late 19th century, athletic bloomers (also known as "rationals" or "knickerbockers") were skirtless baggy knee-length trousers, fastened to the leg a little below the knees; at that time, they were worn by women only in a few narrow contexts of athletic activity, such as bicycle-riding, gymnastics, and sports other than tennis (see 1890s in fashion). Bloomers were usually worn with stockings and after 1910 often with a sailor middy blouse.
Bloomers became shorter by the late 1920s. In the 1930s, when it become respectable for women to wear pants and shorts in a wider range of circumstances, styles imitating men's shorts were favored, and bloomers tended to become less common. However, baggy knee-length gym shorts fastened at or above the knees continued to be worn by girls in school physical education classes through to the 1950s in some areas. Some schools in New York City and Sydney still wore them as part of their uniforms into the 1980s. In Japan their use persisted into the early 2000s.
Bloomers in Japan
Known as buruma (ブルマ), also burumā (ブルマー), bloomers were introduced in Japan as women's clothing for physical education in 1903. After the 1964 Summer Olympics in Tokyo, a newer style of bloomers which fit the body closer, similar to volleyball uniforms, became commonplace. Around the mid-1990s, however, schools and individuals began to choose sports shorts instead, citing modesty concerns. Some people are interested in bloomers in clothing fetish context.
Gallery of athletic bloomers
An example of late 19th-century athletic bloomers: the Smith College class of 1902 basketball team
Women's baggy underpants fastened to just below or above the knee are also known as "bloomers" (or as "knickers" or "directoire knickers"). They were most popular from the 1910s to the 1930s but continued to be worn by older women for several decades thereafter. Often the term "bloomers" has been used interchangeably with the pantalettes worn by women and girls in the mid 19th century and the open leg knee length drawers of the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Bloomers.|
- Greig, Catherine Smith & Cynthia (2003). Women in pants: manly maidens, cowgirls, and other renegades. New York: H.N. Abrams. p. 28. ISBN 0810945711.
- Water-Cure Journal, reprinted in Lily, March 1851.
- Reprints in Lily, March, May, June 1851.
- Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s husband wrote to her, asking, "How does Lib Miller look in her new Turkish dress?" Henry B. Stanton to Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Stanton Papers, Library of Congress, Film 1:68.
- To assertions that she was the innovator of the dress, Bloomer replied: "The first we heard of it, it was worn as an exercise dress at the Water-Cures; the first article we saw advocating it was an editorial in the Seneca County Courier, [Jan. 1851], which article we nsferred to our columns; the first person we saw wearing such a dress was Mrs. Charles D. Miller of Peterboro, daughter of Gerrit Smith, who has worn it for the last five or six months", Lily, June 1851, p. 45.
- Liberator, July 1851, p. 124.
- Lowell Courier, reprinted in Lily, July 1851, p. 53.
- Toledo Republican, reprinted in Lily, August 1851, p. 60.
- Lily, Aug., Oct., Nov. 1851
- Water-Cure Journal, August 1851.
- Tinling, Marian, "Bloomerism Comes to California", California History 61 (spring 1982): 21.
- Lily, Nov. 1851.
- Greig, Catherine Smith & Cynthia (2003). Women in pants : manly maidens, cowgirls, and other renegades. New York: H. N. Abrams. p. 28. ISBN 0810945711.
- Kriebl, Karen. "From Bloomers to Flappers: The American Women’s Dress Reform Movement, 1840-1920." Electronic Thesis or Dissertation. Ohio State University, 1998. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. 18 Apr 2014.
- Fischer, Gayle V. ""Pantalets" and "Turkish Trowsers": Designing Freedom in the Mid-Nineteenth-Century United States." Feminist Studies 23.1 (1997): 110-40. JSTOR. Web. 18 Apr. 2014. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3178301?ref=search-gateway:02a153dd92d5bfe99715a2ef4b327812>.
- Noun, Louise, "Amelia Bloomer, A Biography, Part I, The Lily of Seneca Falls", Annals of Iowa, 7 (winter 1985), pp. 598–99; Tinling, p. 24.
- History of Woman Suffrage, 1: 815.
- New York Daily Tribune, reprinted in Lily, July 8, 1851, p. 6.
- Million, Joelle, Woman's Voice, Woman's Place: Lucy Stone and the Birth of the Women's Rights Movement. Praeger, 2003. ISBN 0-275-97877-X, pp. 114, 135, 159–62.
- Liberator, March 14, 1856, p. 44; Water-Cure Journal, April 1856, p. 81.
- Sibyl, July 15, 1859, pp. 588–89
- Sibyl, July, August, 1856
- Tinling, p. 23.
- Sibyl, May 1, June 1 and 15, July 15, Oct., 1861
- "Letter from Dr. Walker", Sibyl, Nov. 1862, p. 1092.
- Holloway, Mark, Heavens on earth: Utopian Communes in America, 1680–1880, Dover Publications, 1966, p. 192.
- "Dress Her Theme", Chicago Times, May 17, 1893.
- Marks, Patricia, Bicycles, Bangs, and Bloomers: The New Woman in the Popular Press, University Press of Kentucky, 1990.
- Allen Guttmann and Lee Thompson, Japanese sports: a history, University of Hawaii Press, 2001, pp. 93ff. ISBN 0-8248-2414-8.
- Ichiro Takahashi, et al., Social History of Bloomers: a Vision to Physical Education for Women, Seikyūsha, 2005, chap. 4. ISBN 4-7872-3242-8. (in Japanese)
- Gordenker, Alice, "So, what the heck is that? Buruma", Japan Times, 17 February 2011, p. 14.