Book (graph theory)
|
|
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2010) |
In graph theory, a book graph (often written Bp ) may be any of several kinds of graph.
One kind, which may be called a quadrilateral book, consists of p quadrilaterals sharing a common edge (known as the "spine" or "base" of the book).[1] A book of this type is the Cartesian product of a star and K2 .
A second type, which might be called a triangular book, is the complete tripartite graph K1,1,p. It is a graph consisting of p triangles sharing a common edge.[2] A book of this type is a split graph. This graph has also been called a Ke(2,p).[3]
Given a graph G, one may write bk(G) for the largest book (of the kind being considered) contained within G.
The term "book-graph" has been employed for other uses. Barioli[4] used it to mean a graph composed of a number of arbitrary subgraphs having two vertices in common. (Barioli did not write Bp for his book-graph.)
[edit] Theorems on books
Denote the Ramsey number of two (triangular) books by 
- There exists a constant c = o(1) such that
whenever
. - If
, and q is large, the Ramsey number is given by 2q + 3.
- Let C be a constant, and k = Cn. Then every graph on n vertices and m edges contains a (triangular) Bk.[5]
[edit] References
- ^ [Eric W. Weisstein, "Book Graph." From MathWorld–A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BookGraph.html]
- ^ Lingsheng Shi and Zhipeng Song, Upper bounds on the spectral radius of book-free and/or K2,l-free graphs. Linear Algebra and its Applications, vol. 420 (2007), pp. 526–529.
- ^ Erdős, Paul (1963). "On the structure of linear graphs". Israel Journal of Mathematics vol. 1: pp. 156–160. doi:10.1007/BF02759702.
- ^ Francesco Barioli, Completely positive matrices with a book-graph. Linear Algebra and its Applications, vol. 277 (1998), pp. 11–31.
- ^ P. Erdos, On a theorem of Rademacher-Turan. Illinois Journal of Mathematics, vol. 6 (1962), pp. 122–127.

, then
(proved by
.
, and