Wikipedia:Bot requests

This is a page for requesting work to be done by bots per the bot policy. This is an appropriate place to simply put ideas for bots. If you need a piece of software written for a specific article you may get a faster response time at the computer help desk. You might also check Wikipedia:Bots/Status to see if the bot you are looking for already exists, in which case you can contact the operator directly on their talkpage.

If you have a question about one particular bot, it should be directed to the bot owner's talk page or to the Bot Owners' Noticeboard. If a bot is acting improperly, a note about that should be posted to the owner's talk page and to the Administrators' Noticeboard. A link to such a posting may be posted at the Bot Owners' Noticeboard.

If you are a bot operator and you complete a request, note what you did, and archive it. {{BOTREQ}} can be used to give common responses, and to make it easier to see at-a-glance what the response is.

There are a number of common requests which are regularly denied, either because they are too complicated to program, or do not have consensus from the Wikipedia community. Please see Wikipedia:Bots/Frequently denied bots for a list of such requests, and ensure that your idea is not among them.

If you are requesting that a bot be used to add a WikiProject banner to the talkpages of all articles in a particular category or its subcategories, please be very careful to check the category tree for any unwanted subcategories. It is best to give a complete list of categories that should be worked through individually, rather than one category to be analyzed recursively. Compare the difference between a recursive list and a properly vetted one.

Project tagging bot

The people who have tagged articles in WP:CHIBOTCATS with {{WikiProject Chicago}} have mostly gone inactive, except for one admin who no longer tags. Are there any bots that tag by category? If not we need a new one.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:47, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

I just got approval for one. What are you trying to do? Do you just want to tag as WPChicago or was that just an Example? --Kumioko (talk) 14:58, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Yes we need all the new articles in the cats listed at WP:CHIBOTCATS (but not their subcats) tagged with {{WikiProject Chicago}}. Auto rating unrated pages would be good. I.e., if a majority of other tags have a class=x, then fill that class in for Chicago.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

I have a request sitting with DodoBot - User_talk:DodoBot/Requests#WP:UKROADS - if you'd like to steal that one away and do it, I'd be much obliged. All details there, but you could come back to me - if you feel like doing it - should you need to know more. thanks --Tagishsimon (talk) 16:04, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Ok. I am currently going through some for WPUS and Oklahoma asked for a couple hundred too so after that I'll start working with these unless someone grabs them first. IN the Chicago one may I suggest also adding WikiProject Illinois if its not there already. --Kumioko (talk) 18:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for UKRoads. --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Just so you know, my bot, Hazard-Bot, is approved for such tasks.  Hazard-SJ  ㋡  23:47, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

If you'd like to steal UK Roads, I'm sure no-one would object. I'd just be fascinated to see it done ;) --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:50, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Please do Hazard. Got another 65000 in the que before I can do it. --Kumioko (talk) 00:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

I started, but not sure if I will do them all at once. I'll finish at a later time if so.  Hazard-SJ  ㋡  00:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘So is Chicago in somebody's queue now?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:30, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Hazard-SJ (talk · contribs), can you handle this for me?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:17, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Are you watching here? I will ping your page.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:08, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

I should be able to help with it in the next few days. Got a couple others in the hopper at the moment. --Kumioko (talk) 04:29, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry about the delay. I've started the UKROADS more than once and left it to run, but it seems an error prevented it from continuing. I believe I should make a page for these kinds of requests so it is easier to follow? I will continue working on UKROADS. If Chicago isn't done when I'm done, I'll attempt it too.  Hazard-SJ  ㋡  06:12, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Any estimate on when you will be done with UKROADS?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:06, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ Sorry for the late reply. I did some more, but I was having some problems, hence this. I'll get back to it ASAP, hopefully. As for Chicago, that would be a longer hold.  Hazard-SJ  ㋡  03:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

I can probably do some on Chicago but I'm not sure my bot is authorized yet to do that type of task. I can do WikiProject Banner replacement but I think I need to request a separate one for tagging new articles to a project. Its a pretty straightforward request with plenty of precadent though so it should be pretty quick. --Kumioko (talk) 04:28, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Chicago tagging task

I submitted a BRFA to allow my bot to do this type of task but before I get started I got a couple questions about this one.

1. Can I remove the red linked categories from the above page so it doesn't conflict?
   • Yes.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:39, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
2. Does the project support all types of content classes (i.e. Category, template redirect, etc.)? If not which ones does it support.
   • Not really sure.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:39, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
3. Are you just looking for me to add the Chicago banner or do you want me to do assessment as well? If you do want me to do some assessment what projects do you want me to inherit the class from? --Kumioko (talk) 17:46, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
   • In the past I believe we inherited by majority. Can you do that? Just make sure not to automatically do subcategories.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:39, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick reply. I have to admit I don't know how to inherit by majority. I'm afraid that programming is above my level. What do you mean by not to automatically do subcategories? --Kumioko (talk) 17:45, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

The list at WP:CHIBOTCATS includes the categories that are associated with WP:CHICAGO. Some of the subcategories of those categories include things that are far afield from the project. I will wait for Hazard-SJ (talk · contribs).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:12, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

No problem. --Kumioko (talk) 04:04, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Me sees.  Hazard-SJ  ㋡  07:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

What is the latest?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Any update?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:52, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Broken links to Encyclopædia Iranica Online

The online version of Encyclopædia Iranica has changed domain from iranica.com to iranicaonline.org. (This happened in 2010, apparently.) The domain iranica.com is now inactive and displays only an error message. Is it possible to update all the links on Wikipedia to iranica.com? At least links of the type http://www.iranica.com/articles/title (which constitute the bulk of the broken links) can be safely changed to http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/title. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 17:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

BRFA filed - see Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BattyBot 6 --GoingBatty (talk) 20:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Doing... - Trial complete - see diffs. --GoingBatty (talk) 22:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Doing... - Bot running now. GoingBatty (talk) 01:39, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Y Done - Done. Should the remaining links to iranica.com be tagged with {{dead link}}? GoingBatty (talk) 03:47, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! Yes, I think that is the best solution. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 15:52, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Way too many links remaining to tag manually, so I asked User:Dispenser for assistance. GoingBatty (talk) 00:20, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Bot to group talk page categories together

Just picking an article out of the hat, we can use Talk:Bill_Auberlen for example. He has two project tags on his Talk page currently. There should be a bot to wrap project tags into a WikiProjectBannerShell so that they are always grouped together. My only thoughts would perhaps having a minimum number of project tags on a talk page before the bot rolls in and groups them. For starters I think 2 or more would be fine. Or perhaps 3 as the minimum. --Sabre ball ^{t c} 18:24, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

2 banners aren't grouped. Currently 3 is a recommended minimum. Also, unless the bot makes another change as well, I don't think this is a task pressing enough to do it alone. May be for when there are 5+ banners. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 18:39, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Just for general info. AWB will group them into the banner shell if there are 3 or more and they all start with WikiProject. There are just too many redirect possibilities to try and account for every redirect possibility. --Kumioko (talk) 19:33, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Perhaps it could be fairly easily added to an existing bot? Its not as if Wikipedia has a lack of bots. --Sabre ball ^{t c} 19:37, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

My bot's been used for {{WikiProjectBannerShell}}-related tasks in the past, but I would tend to agree with H3llkn0wz that this isn't really a task pressing enough to do alone. — madman 19:40, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

(ec)Mine could also do this. Another consideration is that some people get rather annoyed when you "hide" their WikiProject banner so you could find that what seems to be a fairly easy and helpful change to group the banners could turn into a nasty discussion. --Kumioko (talk) 19:52, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

True. Story. — madman 00:27, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Deprecated {{pron-en}}

Deprecated template {{pron-en}} is no longer used in mainspace. However, there are still ca. 350 transclusions in portal space. Could you convert these to {{IPA-en}}, which is still supported? The conversion is simple: if there is only one parameter, add 'pronounced' to the beginning and a pipe at the end:

{{pron-en|ABC}} → pronounced {{IPA-en|ABC|}}

(The pipe prevents the default behaviour of IPA-en.)

If there is a 2nd parameter, double the pipe between them:

{{pron-en|ABC|En-ABC.ogg}} → pronounced {{IPA-en|ABC||En-ABC.ogg}}

If you could drop me a line if/when this is done, I'll clean up any remainders and mark the template as deprecated.

Thanks! — kwami (talk) 22:16, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Looks fairly easy and non-controversial. I'll probably do this in a semi-automated fashion very shortly. — madman 00:27, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Yeah, these were all converted in main space months ago. I've cleaned up everything else apart from user space, talk, and archives. — kwami (talk) 02:21, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

On hold – My apologies for taking so long to find this out, but I actually don't have access to my bot account at the moment until my toolserver account is restored, and I'm not comfortable making semi-automated edits under my primary account. Can another bot operator pick this up? (If not, I should get the account restored within a couple days.) — madman 03:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

It seems pretty straightforward I can probably do it with mine if its ok with everyone. --Kumioko (talk) 03:04, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Ok I did a few edits and got a couple comments so I have a followup question.

Should I be changing these templates on Archived talk pages or should I skip those? --Kumioko (talk) 14:48, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

I won't speak for the original requester, but generally changing archived talk pages is frowned upon unless it contributes to the archive's quality (e.g. changing WP:AN/I links to the relevant archive, &c.) I can't say without looking at context, but it appears the original request was only for the portal namespace and it'd probably be best to restrict it to that without more community input in a BRFA or the like. — madman 15:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Makes sense to me. I'll start with that and go from there. Just FYI for all there are a lot of transclusions on User and User talk pages as well. --Kumioko (talk) 16:44, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ Incidentally, I now have access to my bot account, so if Kwamikagami needs anything more than that or if you need any help, I'm now available. — madman 13:04, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

That would be great. I stopped his bot because it wasn't overriding the default behavior of the new template per the above. (I didn't revert the edits he did make, however. There were 43 of them.) — kwami (talk) 03:54, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Also, I received a request some time ago to convert our IPA key for Serbocroatian to use the letters e and o instead of ɛ and ɔ, which would match our phonology article (they are also more accessible to readers). The transclusions are inconsistent; maybe half follow the key, half the phonology article. We'd need to convert all instances of ɛ and ɔ in transclusions of the {{IPA-sh}} template to e and o, and also to get rid of the up & down tacks under any of those four letters (or any other letters). (The tacks are these: [̞̝] in case it's easier for you to clip & paste.)

AWB at least has a hard time with diacritics, so you may need to convert e and o plus circumflex or caron to hard-coded ê ô ě ǒ.

Getting rid of the tie bars [͡] would also be nice, since they're distracting and not used in the key (they're found on t and d: t͡ d͡ ), and a lot of the articles use v (or v̞) for ʋ. — kwami (talk) 07:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

There are some other inconsistencies, but they're not so numerous, so I can take care of them. — kwami (talk) 06:30, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

I can fulfill the original request; it's non-controversial and an example of what's normally done when a template is deprecated. Can you link me to more consensus (the request, discussion, etc.) on changing the IPA within the template? Also, I'm not using AWB, so I don't anticipate problems with diacritics, though I will have to read up on normalization and such to run this if the changes have consensus. Thanks, — madman 16:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Here,Wikipedia_talk:IPA_for_Serbo-Croatian#Mid_or_open-mid.3F but there's very little comment. A remark that e and o are more accessible, and what are used in our phonology article. — kwami (talk) 07:00, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Forgive me, I don't know much about IPA, but I don't think the proposed changes would only affect Serbo-Croatian articles and thus the scope of the discussion's a little narrow... if it's all right with you, I'd like to proceed by just processing the templates according to your initial request, just changing the name and how the parameters are passed. If you actually want content changes, I think that would be something we'd have to discuss in a BRFA or at the Village Pump, because I'm not completely sure they'd be non-controversial. I can give you a list of pron-en templates with whatever characters you'd like, though, so you or the appropriate WikiProjects could review them. — madman 22:03, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

URGENT - Bot to remove {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} from files uploaded by users currently at CCI

There are a couple of users whose uploads with false own work claims have landed them at CCI. An unforseen side effect of Fbot's tagging of freely licensed files is that many of these copyvios are tagged for transfer.

What is needed is a bot that looks at all files linked to at a page in the Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/ tree, such as Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Arab League, removes the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} tag if there is one, and adds a template specifiably warning against transferring the file.

This is an urgent task, as I'm already seeing copyvios getting transferred over in the ongoing transfer drive. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:01, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

I can do this if it isn't done already. Give me a few minutes and I'll make another comment here. — Carl (CBM · talk) 17:06, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

There are 621 images that meet the criteria. I'll work on editing them with VeblenBot. — Carl (CBM · talk) 17:12, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

I have just created {{File at CCI}} for this task. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:21, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

The bot will make edits like this [1] [2]. Is that what you are looking for? — Carl (CBM · talk) 17:28, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Perfect! Sven Manguard Wha? 17:29, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

OK, it will take a little bit to edit them all. You can watch VeblenBot's contribs. — Carl (CBM · talk) 17:32, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

I was. I added the template to the first three, which were done before the template appeared. I've also updated the Fbot blacklists so that these files won't get retagged so long as the template is present. Once the initial run is done, I'd like to explore how best to create a system in which the template is added as soon as a CCI is formally opened, and removed when a CCI is closed. That's not as urgent, however, as CCI is a slow process. Thanks for this. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:45, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

There were actually only 498 of them; I had double counted some. I had the bot scan them all to make sure they were tagged with the CCI tag. Glad to help, — Carl (CBM · talk) 18:09, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Backlog queue Category:Requested edits

Paid editing has been back in the news in the past month big time, and our process to prevent it is somewhat broken or at least not sufficiently smooth and well-known, and that encourages socking. How about a way for Category:Requested edits members (from {{Request edit}}) more than a few days old to show up in the feedback request service or similar? Selery (talk) 19:01, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

How about having a noticeboard, which lists edit requests/editprotected/editsemiprotected in an ordered by date manner similar to WP:PRODSUM ? -- Page, Date, Request type (ER/EP/ESP) . 70.24.249.190 (talk) 01:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Great idea! Y Done diff. I still think adding stale member announcements to the Feedback Request Service has merit, but this will certainly help a great deal. Selery (talk) 20:24, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

IMDb Template Use

I've on occasion "corrected" IMDb external links that don't utilize the template (usually just a simple URL of the page), but it's a tedious process that can never correct all of them, which could number in the thousands. Could there be a bot that would automatically correct every IMDb link so it uses the proper template, both in external links and references? Exceptions to this would be the links to pages such as full cast, box office, technical specs, trivia, goofs, etc., which the template cannot be directly linked to. A related bot could perhaps correct all of the many instances where the template incorrectly repeats the article title, instead of using the title or name as it appears on the IMDb. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.254.87.80 (talk) 21:55, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Bot to detect cut-and-paste page moves

Would it be possible to create a bot that would either notify a board or reverse the edits of a cut-and-paste page move? I've come across two in the last week (Clock Tower II: The Struggle Within and Serious Sam), which makes me think they are often unnoticed. Presumably, if one page goes blank and the text appears at a previous redirect or new page, it should be pretty obvious.▫ JohnnyMrNinja 06:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

CorenSearchBot often does detect them, but I'm likely to file a BRFA soon for a similar task and/or start semi-automated work on the list collected by Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge. — madman 13:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Fix Computing banner assessment conflicts

If you review the last few days of Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Computing articles by quality log you'll see that a number of the "reassessed" entries repeat each day, even though the talk pages haven't been changed in months.

A number of templates such as Category:WikiProject Computer science, Category:WikiProject Microsoft Windows, Category:WikiProject Computer Security, and Category:WikiProject Software automatically include the parent WikiProject Computing. When these templates are used in combination, but do not specify the same importance level, or one provides an importance level but the other does not, the articles end up in multiple assessment categories.

I reported this at Wikipedia_talk:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Index/Archive_6#Help_with_Computing_reassessment_log but was advised that I needed to fix the categories – that this wasn't a problem with the bot. Which makes sense – the articles are indeed in Unassessed-importance computing articles and High-importance computing articles.

These are examples of the fixes I'd like the bot to make:

Wintel:

{{WikiProject Computing|class=start|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Technology|class=start|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Microsoft Windows|class=start|importance=}}

to

{{WikiProject Computing|class=start|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Technology|class=start|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Microsoft Windows|class=start|importance=|computing-importance=Top}}

Sun Microsystems:

{{WikiProject California|class= C  |importance=Mid |sfba=yes|sfba-importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Companies|class= C|importance=Mid }}
{{WikiProject Computing |class=C |importance=Mid }}
{{WikiProject Software}}
{{WikiProject Technology}}
{{WikiProject Electronics}}

to

{{WikiProject California|class= C  |importance=Mid |sfba=yes|sfba-importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Companies|class= C|importance=Mid }}
{{WikiProject Computing |class=C |importance=Mid }}
{{WikiProject Software|class=C|computing-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Technology}}
{{WikiProject Electronics}}

A theoretical example, which would result from someone naively adding Computing/Databases to a previously categorized Windows article:

{{WikiProject Microsoft Windows|class=A|importance=High|computing-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Computing|databases=yes}}

to

{{WikiProject Microsoft Windows|class=A|importance=High|computing-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Computing|class=A|importance=mid|databases=yes}}

And finally a contrived theoretical example:

{{WikiProject Computing|class=A|importance=mid|science=yes}}
{{WikiProject Computer science|class=A|importance=mid}}

to

{{WikiProject Computing|class=A|importance=mid|science=yes|science-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Computer science|class=A|importance=mid|computing-importance=mid}}

These spurious entries make the assessment report much less useful. In 2010 the list was so long that a single day's report spanned 2–3 pages, and I cleared hundreds of them. I used to keep up with the subsequent errors contributors introduce when they add tags without synchronizing the parent project assessments, but it was tedious work and it's a task better suited to automation.

Banner consolidation is a simpler solution, but requires consensus about how to handle the multiple projects. In some cases I think there would be consensus to consolidate (e.g. Software, Computer Security) but in others there would be consensus to keep separate (e.g. Computer Science). So it is necessary to fix the articles which are tagged with multiple projects – on its own banner consolidation will not solve the problem.

This would need to be a recurring bot run. If it's too difficult to identify all the articles which appear in conflicting assessment categories, it could use the results of the various WP 1.0 bot's "reassessed" lists to select which articles need examination. Would someone be willing to set this up? – Pnm (talk) 17:42, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Remove all use of < categorytree >

The code < categorytree > is used in categories to display all of the subcats. There has been a change to the MediaWiki software at some point and now all of the subcats are displayed on all the category pages if the limit of 200 is exceeded. this makes < categorytree > redundant. See an example at Category:Japanese musicians. I don't know how often it is used but it I have seen it quite regularly. I would like to have all instances of its use removed. It is often creates quite a clutter on a category page. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:19, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

I think you're absolutely right, but think this may have to be brought up at the Village Pump/Technical or something just so we're sure there's consensus for this broad a change. — madman 05:44, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Extlinks request

This is not a bot request per se, so feel free to move it to a more appropriate page. StatsCan is about to release a flood of new data and we have started to talk about it. One way to tackle it is to look at all the articles linking to www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/*.

So can ayone produce a list of article with extlinks to that address prefix? It would need to be sorted or secondary-keyed by province (get article categories and look for unique use of "Ontario", "Alberta", etc.), not sure whether a wiki-formatted or tab-delimited output would be best, probably both so I could awk the raw text. If someone could do a raw list so I can look at it, that would be great. More refinement requests would likely follow, as we are just looking to update the base population (&c) data for this release. Thanks for any help! Franamax (talk) 02:33, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Sure, I can do that this afternoon or evening. — madman 22:04, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

already done at User:Δ/Sandbox 5 ΔT _{^{The only constant}} 22:06, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Never mind then. :P Cheers! — madman 22:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

A bot notification request

Given that over WP:100 editors were involved overall, I think a bot is the best method to notify all the editors mentioned in Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Fæ#Of_note. ASCIIn2Bme (talk) 05:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

If someone else could come up with the wording, I'm sure this could be done via AWB or something fairly quickly. — madman 05:45, 28 January 2012 (UTC)