Bowling Alone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Bowling Alone
Author Robert D. Putnam
Country United States
Language English
Genre Nonfiction social science
Publication date
2000
Media type Print (Hardback & Paperback)
ISBN 0-7432-0304-6

Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community is a 2000 nonfiction book by Robert D. Putnam. It was developed from his 1995 essay entitled Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. Putnam surveys the decline of "social capital" in the United States since 1950. He has described the reduction in all the forms of in-person social intercourse upon which Americans used to found, educate, and enrich the fabric of their social lives. He believes this undermines the active civil engagement which a strong democracy requires from its citizens.

Contents[edit]

Putnam discusses ways in which Americans have disengaged from political involvement including decreased voter turnout, public meeting attendance, serving on committees and working with political parties. Putnam also cites Americans' growing distrust in their government. Putnam accepts the possibility that this lack of trust could be attributed to "the long litany of political tragedies and scandals since the 1960s" (see paragraph 13 of the 1995 article), but believes that this explanation is limited when viewing it alongside other "trends in civic engagement of a wider sort" (par. 13).

Putnam notes the aggregate loss in membership of many existing civic organizations and points out that the act of individual membership has not migrated to other, succeeding organizations. To illustrate why the decline in Americans' membership in social organizations is problematic to democracy, Putnam uses bowling as an example. Although the number of people who bowl has increased in the last 20 years, the number of people who bowl in leagues has decreased. If people bowl alone, they do not participate in social interaction and civic discussions that might occur in a league environment.

Putnam then contrasts the countertrends of ever increasing mass-membership organizations, nonprofit organizations and support groups to the data of the General Social Survey. This data shows an aggregate decline in membership of traditional civic organizations, supporting his thesis that U.S. social capital has declined. He then asks the obvious question "Why is US social capital eroding?" (par. 35). He believes the "movement of women into the workforce" (par. 36), the "re-potting hypothesis"[1] (par. 37) and other demographic changes have made little impact on the number of individuals engaging in civic associations. Instead, he looks to the technological "individualizing" (par. 39) of our leisure time via television, Internet and eventually "virtual reality helmets" (par.39).

Putnam suggests closer studies of which forms of associations can create the greatest social capital, how various aspects of technology, changes in social equality, and public policy affect social capital. He closes by emphasizing the importance of discovering how the United States could reverse the trend of social capital decay.

Criticism[edit]

Everett Carll Ladd claimed that Putnam completely ignored existing field studies, most notably the landmark sociological Middletown studies, which during the 1920s raised the same concerns he does today, except the technology being attacked as promoting isolation was radio, instead of television and video games.[2] In addition, Putnam ignored the work of other scholars who had previously made similar, in some cases almost identical claims. Neil Postman's work in particular seems to anticipate much of Putnam's argument by nearly a decade.[3]

Likewise, Putnam expresses worries that involvement with "community groups" is in decline.[citation needed] However, in the Middletown studies, researchers noted that traditional neighborly ties were in decline although membership in such community groups was rising, which may suggest that new forms of social ties emerge which are not immediately visible to the observer.[citation needed]

Research by Andersen, Curtis and Grabb,[4] which explored time-use diaries over a 40-year period in the U.S., Canada, the Netherlands, and the UK, suggests that only in the U.S. has there been a decline in civic participation.

Other critics have also directly attacked the veracity of Putnam's major finding—that civic participation has in fact been declining. Journalist Nicholas Lemann proposed that rather than declining, civic activity in the US during the 1990s assumed different forms. Instead of bowling leagues, parents integrated themselves into social networks and contribute to the social capital e.g. via youth soccer leagues.[5]

Publication data[edit]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ An increasing mobility of the Americans evoked that effects just like a frequent re-potting damages plants' roots. The Hour, Jan. 5th 1995, p. 6
  2. ^ Foley, Michael W.; Edwards, Bob (1996). "The Paradox of Civil Society". Journal of Democracy. Archived from the original on 2008-08-18. 
  3. ^ Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. Penguin: 1985.
  4. ^ Andersen, Robert; Grabb, Edward; Curtis, James (2006). "Trends in Civic Association Activity in Four Democracies: The Special Case of Women in the United States". American Sociological Review 71 (3): 376–400. doi:10.1177/000312240607100302. 
  5. ^ Nicholas Lehmann, The Atlantic Online, April 1996, Kicking in Groups

External links[edit]