Box Elder Treaty

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The Box Elder Treaty is an agreement between the Northwestern Shoshone and the United States government, signed on July 30, 1863. It was adopted after a period of conflict which included the Bear River Massacre on January 29, 1863. The treaty had little effect until 1968, when the United States compensated the Northwestern band for their land claim at a rate of about 50¢ per acre.

Background[edit]

Of the large and disparate Shoshone nation, about ten villages of people lived in the "Northwest" area and followed Chief Bear Hunter. They understood how to live in the desert and followed a pattern of seasonal migrations.[1]

Incursions by the California Trail, the Oregon Trail and the Mormon pioneers created conflict between the Shoshone and the white settlers. The Shoshone attacked and killed a relatively small proportion of white immigrants—usually people who encroached far into Shoshone lands.[2]

The 3rd California Volunteers, led by Patrick Edward Connor, initiated military contact with the Shoshone around October 31, 1860, when they executed "about 14 or 15 Indians" in retaliation for a reported attack on a wagon train.[3][4] More were taken hostage and then killed when they did not produce Indians culpable for the wagon attack.[5] Violent conflict between the two groups continued.[6] Although the Mormon settlers generally disapproved of these actions by the U.S. military, they also became fearful of violent Indians, and executed an Indian resident of Brigham City after a dispute over payment.[7] Conditions for the Shoshone deteriorated quickly.[8]

The U.S. military launched an attack of unprecedented size on the Indian groups.[9] On January 29, 1863, they encountered a number of Indians at Bear River. The exact intensity of the battle that followed is not fully known. The U.S. troops used howitzers, rifles, and pistols to kill several hundred Indians (including women and children), in an incident now called the Bear River Massacre.[10] After the Indians were militarily defeated, the U.S. soldiers raped and violently attacked the survivors.[11] According to Shoshone oral histories, Chief Bear Hunters was captured and tortured before he was killed.[12]

This killing had a devastating effect on the indigenous people of the Great Basin, and compelled many groups to accept treaties in 1863.[13][14] White settlers in the Great Basin accused the Shoshone band led by Chief Pocatello of ongoing hostility. According to one story, Pocatello had been hostile to White people since around 1860, when his father was hanged by settlers in wagon train.[15]

James Duane Doty and General Patrick Edward Connor were the lead negotiators for the United States. Pocatello was the lead negotiator for the Indian groups.[16] Some of the bands who agreed to the treaty had been reduced to just a few members after the events of January.[17]

Terms[edit]

The treaty calls for peaceable relations between the two groups. It contains a promise by the U.S. to pay the Shoshone $5,000 yearly as compensation for the "utter destitution" inflicted by war. It also recognizes the claim of Chief Pocatello and his people to the land "bounded on the west by the Raft River and on the east by the Porteneuf Mountains".

Ratification[edit]

The U.S. Congress ratified the treaty, amending an additional article:

"Article V: Nothing herein contained shall be construed or taken to admit any other or greater title or interest in the lands embraced within the territories described in said treaty in said tribes or bands of Indians than existed in them upon the acquisition of said territories from Mexico by the laws thereof."

This amendment counteracted the Shoshone's land claim, which had never been incorporated into Spanish or Mexican law.[14] Lincoln announced the treaty publicly on January 17, 1865.

Outcome[edit]

After the treaty was signed, most of the Northwestern Shoshone gathered in the Cache Valley and Box Elder County. The U.S. successfully moved many of them to the Fort Hall Indian Reservation in Idaho after establishing it in 1868. Others converted to Mormonism and assimilated into Utah settler culture.[14][18]

Indians were forcefully ejected from areas they attempted to settle within their supposed territory. Continuing white immigration destroyed the ecosystems upon which they relied and made their nomadic life impossible.[19] They were resettled on a 500-acre tract in Box Elder County, which was owned and administered by the Church of the Latter Day Saints.[20] Later, they were encouraged to move to the Fort Hall Reservation.[21]

Outside humanitarian assistance to the Shoshone came not from the U.S. government but eventually from the LDS Church headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah.[22]

Chief Pabawena wrote Utah Senator Arthur V. Watkins in 1949 to report:[22]

"We are the northwestern band of the Shoshone pretty poor conditions and their childrens starving there fathers no work everything pretty hard for us no money."

And later in 1949:[22]

"We are have received no anything from the Government since the treaty was made in Box Elder treaty on July 30, 1863."

Action in U.S. legal system[edit]

In 1927–1929, the U.S. Congress passed a law allowing the United States Court of Claims to hear arguments from the Northwestern Shoshone.[23]

The Northwestern Shoshone brought a lawsuit in 1930 alleging that the U.S. had reneged on promises made in the Treaty. In 1942, the Court of Claims denied their claim. The U.S. at first told the Shoshone that they were owed $10,800.17; this decision was reversed after the U.S. invoked previous monies it had spent on Indian affairs.[23]

Northwestern Shoshone v. United States[edit]

The Supreme Court took the case and ruled in Northwestern Shoshone v. United States (324 U.S. 335 (1945) that the Box Elder Treaty was a non-binding "treaty of friendship".[24]

The Court split 5–4 on its decision. Stanley F. Reed wrote in the majority opinion that the signatories of the treaty "did not intend" to respect the Shoshone's right to the land in question. The majority opinion says that, as the original signatories were dead and the situation of their descendants was hopeless, white people had a "moral obligation" to address the "sociological" problem, but not a legal obligation under a treaty.[25]

Robert H. Jackson wrote in a concurring opinion that the 1929 law did not envision legal damages paid directly to indigenous groups.

William O. Douglas and Frank Murphy wrote two dissenting opinions.[26] Douglas argued that by 1863 standards, the territory agreement described by the Box Elder Treaty "could hardly have been plainer".[27]

The American Civil Liberties Union condemned the ruling as a restriction of rights based on "dubious technical grounds".[28]

Indian Claims Commission[edit]

The Indian Claims Commission later acknowledged the validity of the claim, by way of the 1868 Fort Bridger Treaty. The Commission found on 13 February 1968 that 38,319,000 acres had been wrongfully taken from the northwestern Shoshone. Subtracting acres awarded by the Fort Hall Reservation and Wind River Reservation, it awarded $15,700,000—a price of slightly less than $0.50 per acre.[24]

Attempted termination[edit]

Watkins and other members of Congress sought to "terminate" the special relationship with the Northwestern Shoshone in 1957. The group was persistent in arguing that it should retain its sovereignty, and avoided the termination of status which befell other groups.[29][30]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Miller, Massacre at Bear River (2008), p. 40.
  2. ^ Miller, Massacre at Bear River (2008), pp. 41–42. "Careful research into the peak years of overland emigration, 1840 through 1860, shows that of more than 300,000 white travelers, only 362 were killed by Indians. Very few were killed by the celebrated tribes of the Great Plains. [...] the vast majority of clashes and killings between natives tribes and westbound settlers occurred in the heart of the Shoshoni homelands.
  3. ^ Miller, Massacre at Bear River (2008), p. 52.
  4. ^ Madsen, "Encounter" (1984), p. 10.
  5. ^ Miller, Massacre at Bear River (2008), p. 53.
  6. ^ Miller, Massacre at Bear River (2008), p. 59.
  7. ^ Miller, Massacre at Bear River (2008), p. 77.
  8. ^ Madsen, "Encounter" (1984), p. 11.
  9. ^ Miller, Massacre at Bear River (2008), p. 87.
  10. ^ Miller, Massacre at Bear River (2008), pp. 102–105.
  11. ^ Madsen, "Encounter" (1984), p. 22.
  12. ^ Miller, Massacre at Bear River (2008), p. 106.
  13. ^ Fleisher, The Bear River Massacre (2004), p. 66.
  14. ^ a b c William B. Fawcett & Walter Robert Lewelling, "Lemuel's Garden: Confronting Issues of Race, Class, and Power Through the Preferential Preservation of Archaeological Sites in Northern Utah"; in Lines That Divide: Historical Archaeologies of Race, Class, and Gender, ed. James A. Delle, Stephen A. Mrozowski, & Robert Paynter; Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 2000; pp. 43–44.
  15. ^ King, "Do Not Execute Chief Pocatello" (1985), pp. 240–241.
  16. ^ Wilkins, Masking of Justice (1997), pp. 141–142.
  17. ^ Miller, Massacre at Bear River (2008), pp. 124–125.
  18. ^ Crawford, "The People of Bear Hunter" (2007), p. 30.
  19. ^ Miller, Massacre at Bear River (2008), p. 130.
  20. ^ Crawford, "The People of Bear Hunter" (2007), pp. 30–32.
  21. ^ Miller, Massacre at Bear River (2008), p. 131.
  22. ^ a b c Grattan-Aiello, "Watkins and the Termination of Utah's Souther Paiute Indians", pp. 279–280.
  23. ^ a b Wilkins, Masking of Justice (1997), pp. 143–144. "The Court of Claims ruled in 1942 that the Shoshone were not entitled to any recovery under the treaty of July 3, 1863, or any other treaty for a taking of any portion of their lands described in the agreements. The Shoshone were initially informed that they were entitled to recover $10,800.17 for unfulfilled treaty annuities. But, upon a further hearing, even this amount was dismissed on the grounds that the United States’ gratuitous expenditures offset this amount."
  24. ^ a b Parry, "The Northwestern Shoshone" (2000), pp. 70–71.
  25. ^ Wilcomb E. Washburn, ‘’Red Man’s Land, White Man’s Law: The Past and Present Status of the American Indian’’, 1971; second edition, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1995; p 102.
  26. ^ "Shoshones Lose Suit for $15,000,000: Supreme Court, 5-4, Rejects Claim Over Indian Land Taken by White Settlers", New York Times, 13 March 1945; p. 21. Accessed via ProQuest, 24 July 2013.
  27. ^ Robert H. Keller, Jr., American Indian Law Review 3(2), 1975, p. 340. Accessed via JStor, 24 July 2013.
  28. ^ "Our Own Minority", Washington Post, 7 April 1945; p. 4. Accessed via ProQuest, 24 July 2013.
  29. ^ Parry, "The Northwestern Shoshone" (2000), p. 72.
  30. ^ Grattan-Aiello, "Watkins and the Termination of Utah's Souther Paiute Indians", p. 273.

References[edit]