Breathability

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about Breathability (fabric). For other uses, see Breathability (disambiguation).

Breathability is the ability of a fabric to allow moisture vapor to be transmitted through the material.

Mechanism[edit]

Air Permeability is the ability of a fabric to allow air to pass through it. While Air Permeable fabrics tend to have relatively high moisture vapor transmission, it is not necessary to be Air Permeable to be breathable.

Moisture Vapor Transfer (MVT) in waterproof fabrics occurs by two processes:

  • Physical: Hydrophobic (water hating) microporous coatings or laminations have pores that are so small that liquid water cannot go through. However, water in vapor state is many times smaller than water in the liquid state and can pass through these “micro pores”.
  • Chemical: Hydrophillic (water loving) / non-porous lamination or coating move moisture by chemical diffusion. The water molecule is positively charged and the hydrophilic PU is negatively charged, attracting the water through the intermolecular gaps of the PU. Because the ionic bond is relatively weak, the water then gets pushed through the gaps until the water vapor passes all the way through.

Driving Force is the difference in the level of heat and humidity on one side of the material compared to the other side. Also known as the Differential Pressure. By 2nd law of thermodynamics moisture will move towards dry. Therefore, warm, moist air will flow towards cold, dry air until there is an equilibrium.

Due to body heat and moisture there is almost always higher heat and humidity inside a clothing system. This creates a differential pressure forcing the heat and humidity toward the outside. The greater the difference between the heat and humidity inside the clothing system and the outside, the greater the Differential Pressure to push that heat and humidity out.

Testing[edit]

Upright Cup test[edit]

Also known as JIS L 1099, JIS Z 0208, ISO 2528, Desiccant Method of ASTM E96, JIS K 6328 (JIS is short for Japanese Industry Standards). The A-1 method uses Calcium Chloride solution to simulate sweat while A-2 method uses just water. A desiccant, calcium chloride, is put into a cup. A piece of fabric is then secured over the cup and placed in a controlled environment. Then after period of time the cup is weighed to see how much water has been “pulled” into the cup through the fabric. The weight is then extrapolated to show the number of grams per 24hours per sq meter of fabric that will pass through the fabric.

Range Performance
Low Under 4,000 gr/m2/day
Moderate 4,000 to 8,000 gr/m2/day
High 9,000+ gr/m2/day

Typical maximum with current technologies are in 15,000 range. High performance fabrics may get A1 test scores in 10,000 to 15,000 gr/24hrs range and usually shows that a fabric has a fairly quick release of moisture, but may not be the best over longer periods of use.

Inverted Cup[edit]

Also known as JIS L 1099 is similar to the ASTM E96-BW test method. A desiccant, Potassium Acetate, is put into a cup and sealed with a piece of ePTFE (Teflon/Gore-Tex film). The fabric to be tested is then placed over the cup with the fabric side to the cup.

The cup is then inverted into a pan of water. Then after period of time the cup is weighed to see how much water has been “pulled” into the cup through the fabric. The weight is then extrapolated to show the number of grams per 24hours / per sq meter of fabric that will pass through the fabric.

The B-1 variant of test method puts membrane in direct contact with water while B-2 variant adds an ePTFE film between the water and the fabric. While B-2 is a good test, it eliminates the effect of fabric when in direct contact with water. When sweat condenses on the inside of a fabric with a Hydrophobic laminate, like MemBrain, the lamination will actively pull the water through the fabric reducing condensation. This can be a tremendous addition to the comfort of the user. The B-2 test is also best used for non-waterproof fabrics, so the water in the pan does not pass directly through the uncoated fabric.

Range Performance
Low Under 10,000 gr/m2/day
Moderate 10,000 to 20,000 gr/m2/day
High 20,000+ gr/m2/day

Current upper range is 30,000 gr/m2/day.

Sweating Hot Plate[edit]

Also known as ISO – 11092 or the Ret or Hohenstien test. In this test fabric is placed above a porous (sintered) metal plate. The plate is heated and water is channeled into the metal plate, simulating perspiration. The plate is then kept at a constant temperature. As water vapor passes through the plate and the fabric, it causes Evaporative Heat Loss and therefore more energy is needed to keep the plate at a constant temperature. Ret is the measurement of the resistance to evaporative heat loss. The lower the Ret value, the less resistance to moisture transfer and therefore higher breathability.

Hohenstein added a unique aspect to their testing. They had real people wear garments made with the fabrics of varying Ret values and work out on a treadmill. They gathered the comments of the testers and correlated this to the Ret values of the fabrics and came up with a Comfort Rating System.

Range Performance
Ret 0-6 Very good or Extremely Breathable. Comfortable at higher activity rate.
Ret 6 to 13 Good or Very Breathable. Comfortable at moderate activity rate.
Ret 13 to 20 Satisfactory or Breathable. Uncomfortable at high activity rate.
Ret 20 to 30 Unsatisfactory or Slightly Breathable. Moderate comfort at low activity rate.
Ret 30+ Unsatisfactory or Not Breathable. Uncomfortable and short tolerance time.

The testers could not perceive a difference in the garments made with fabrics within these ranges. So, a garment made with a 40 Ret fabric and one made with 55 Ret fabric did not have a perceivable comfort difference in use.

Comparison of Test Methods[edit]

Ret, A1, B1 and B2 test results do not correlate with each other. Two fabrics may have a B1 of 10,000gr, but one can be 10,000 A1 and the other 4,000 A1. It all depends on the type of coating or lamination and how it moves moisture. Typically hydrophobic coatings perform better than hydrophilic laminations on the A1 Test. And vice versa, the hydrophilic laminations will perform better on the B1 test.

In general, the Ret and B1 tests are better field indicators than the A1 test.

Technology Comparison[edit]

Below is very generalized positioning of technologies.

Technologies Ret B1 A1
Non-coated fabrics 2-4 25,000++ Not applicable
MemBrain, and Gore-Tex Pro 2L-3L 4-6 25,000+ 4,000 - 8,000
Gore-Tex PacLite, Performance 2L, Entrant HB, PreCip Plus 6 – 8 15,000+ 8,000 – 15,000+
Gore-Tex Performance 3L, PreCip, MemBrain 10, Entrant GII 7 - 10 10 – 15,000 5,000 – 12,000
Windstopper Softshell, Low end Entrant, most Softshells with film 8 - 13 6 to 10,000 Not applicable

See also[edit]