Bury St. Edmunds witch trials

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Title page of report of the 1662 Trial, incorrectly dated as 1664.

The Bury St Edmunds witch trials were a series of trials conducted intermittently between the years 1599 and 1694 in the town of Bury St Edmunds in Suffolk, England.

Two specific trials in 1645 and 1662 became historically well known. The 1645 trial "facilitated" by the Witchfinder General saw 18 people executed in one day. The judgment by the future Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, Sir Matthew Hale in the 1662 trial acted as a powerful influence on the continuing persecution of witches in England and similar persecutions in the American colonies.[1]

Jurisdiction[edit]

As well as being the seat of county assizes, Bury St. Edmunds had been a site for both Piepowder Courts and court assizes, the latter since the Abbey was given a Liberty, namely the Liberty of St Edmund.[2][3][4] For the purposes of civil government the town and the remainder (or "body") of the county were quite distinct, each providing a separate grand jury to the assizes.[5]

The trials[edit]

The first recorded account of a witch trial at Bury St. Edmunds Suffolk was held in 1599 when Jone Jordan of Shadbrook (Stradbroke[6]) and Joane Nayler were tried, but there is no record of the charges or verdicts. In the same year, Oliffe Bartham of Shadbrook was executed,[7] for "sending three toads to destroy the rest (sleep[8]) of Joan Jordan".[6]

The 1645 trial[edit]

The trial was instigated by Matthew Hopkins, the self-proclaimed Witchfinder General[9] and conducted at a special court under John Godbolt.[10] On 27 August 1645, no fewer than 18 "witches" were hanged at Bury St. Edmunds.[11] They were:

It has been estimated that all of the English witch trials between the early 15th and early 18th centuries resulted in fewer than 500 executions, so this one trial, with its 18 executions, accounted for 3.6% of that total.[13]

Witch Finder General. From a broadside published by Hopkins before 1650.

According to John Stearn(e)[14] known at various times as the witch–hunter,[15][16] and "witch pricker",[17] associate to Matthew Hopkins, in his book A Confirmation and Discovery of Witchcraft there were one hundred and twenty others in gaol awaiting trial, of these 17 were men,[18] Thomas Ady in 1656 writes of "about a hundred",[19] though others record "almost 200".[20] Following a three-week adjournment made necessary by the advancing King's Army,[21] the second sitting of the court resulted in 68 other "condemnations";[21][22] though reports say – "mass executions of sixty or seventy witches".[23][24] Both Hopkins and Stearne treated the search for, and trials of witches as military campaigns, as shown in their choice of language in both seeking support for and reporting their endeavours.[25] There was much to keep the minds of Parliamentarians busy at this time with the Royalist Army heading towards Cambridgeshire, but concern about the events unfolding were being voiced. Prior to the trial a report was carried to the Parliament – "...as if some busie men had made use of some ill Arts to extort such confession;..."[11] that a special Commission of Oyer and Terminer was granted for the trial of these Witches.[11] After the trial and execution the Moderate Intelligencer, a parliamentary paper published during the English Civil War, in an editorial of 4–11 September 1645 expressed unease with the affairs in Bury:

But whence is it that Devils should choose to be conversant with silly Women that know not their right hands from their left, is the great wonder ... The(y) will meddle with none but poore old women: as appears by what we receive this day from Bury ... Divers[26] are condemned and some executed and more like to be. Life is precious and there is need of great inquisition before it is taken away.[25][27]

The 1662 trial[edit]

This took place on 10 March 1662,[28] when two elderly widows, Rose Cullender and Amy Denny (Deny / Duny), living in Lowestoft, were accused of witchcraft by their neighbours and faced 13 charges of the bewitching of several young children between the ages of a few months to 18 years old, resulting in one death.[29] They may have been aware of each other, inhabiting a small town,[30] but Cullender was from a property-owning family, whilst Denny was the widow of a labourer.[31] Their one other link was the fact that they had tried and failed to purchase Herrings from a Lowestoft merchant Samuel Pacy.[32] His two daughters Elizabeth,[33] and Deborah[34] were "victims" of the accused and along with his sister Margaret gave evidence against the women.[35] They were tried at the Assize held in Bury St. Edmunds under the auspices of the 1603 Witchcraft Act,[36] by one of England's most eminent judges of the time Sir Matthew Hale, Lord Chief Baron of the Exchequer.[37] The jury found them guilty of the thirteen charges of using malevolent witchcraft, and the judge sentenced them to death. They were hanged in the town on 17 March 1662.

Thomas Browne, the philosopher, physician and author, attended the trial.[38] The reporting of similar events that had occurred in Denmark by someone as eminent as Browne seemed to confirm the guilt of the accused.[39][40] He also testified that "the young girls accusing Denny and Cullander were afflicted with organic problems, but that they undoubtedly also had been bewitched".[41] He had expressed his belief in the existence of witches twenty years earlier,[39] and that only: "they that doubt of these, do not only deny them, but spirits; and are obliquely, and upon consequence a sort not of infidels, but atheists"[42] in his work Religio Medici, published in 1643:

... how so many learned heads should so farre forget their Metaphysicks, and destroy the ladder and scale of creatures, as to question the existence of Spirits: for my part, I have ever beleeved, and doe now know, that there are Witches;

The original pamphlet A Tryal of Witches, taken from a contemporary report of the proceedings, erroneously dates the trial as March 1664, both on the front page and introduction. Original documents in the Public Record Office[43] and other contemporary records clearly states it took place in the 14th year of the reign of Charles II (30 January 1662 to 29 January 1663).[44][45]

This case became a model for, and was referenced in, the Salem Witch Trials in Massachusetts, when the magistrates were looking for proof that spectral evidence could be used in a court of law.[36][46][47] Reverend John Hale, whose wife was accused at Salem, in his publication Modest Inquiry into the Nature of Witchcraft noted how the judges consulted for precedents and lists the 60-page publication A Tryal of Witches.[24]

Cotton Mather, in his 1693 book The Wonders of the Invisible World, concerning the Salem Witch Trials, specifically draws attention to the Suffolk trial,[48] and the Salem judge stated that although spectral evidence should be allowed in order to begin investigations, it should not be admitted as evidence to decide a case.[49]

Later trials[edit]

The next recorded trial was in 1655 when a mother and daughter by the name of Boram were tried and said to have been hanged. The last was in 1694 when Lord Chief Justice Sir John Holt, "who did more than any other man in English history to end the prosecution of witches",[50] forced the acquittal of Mother Munnings' of Hartis (Hartest[51]) on charges of prognostications causing death.[52] The chief charge was 17-years-old, the second brought by a man on his way home from an alehouse. Sir John "so well directed the jury that she was acquitted".[53]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Notes

  1. ^ Notestein 1911: p261 –262
  2. ^ "Days when the monks held all the aces". East Anglian Daily Times (Archant). 10 December 2007. Retrieved 20 December 2007. 
  3. ^ Knott, Simon. "Suffolk Churches". Retrieved 15 December 2007. 
  4. ^ "The history of Bury St. Edmunds markets". St Edmundsbury Borough Council. Retrieved 15 December 2007. 
  5. ^ "Houses of Benedictine monks; Abbey of Bury St Edmunds". British-History.ac.uk. British History On Line. Retrieved 15 December 2007. 
  6. ^ a b Wright 2005: p13
  7. ^ Notestein 1911: p393
  8. ^ Geis & Bunn 1997: p50
  9. ^ Geis & Bunn 1997: p188
  10. ^ Montague Summers Geography of Witchcraft
  11. ^ a b c Notestein 1911: p178
  12. ^ Robbins 1959: p252
  13. ^ Sharpe 2002, p. 3.
  14. ^ A detailed account of Hopkins and his fellow witchfinder John Stearne can be found in Malcolm Gaskill's Witchfinders: A Seventeenth Century English Tragedy (Harvard, 2005). The duo's activities were portrayed, unreliably but entertainingly, in the 1968 cult classic Witchfinder-General (US: The Conqueror Worm).
  15. ^ "Reformation and Civil War 1539–1699". St Edmundsbury Borough Council. Retrieved 15 December 2007. 
  16. ^ Notestein 1911: p166
  17. ^ Notestein 1911: p248
  18. ^ Wright 2005: p26
  19. ^ Robbins 1959: p. 252
  20. ^ Robbins 1959: p. 251
  21. ^ a b Notestein 1911: p179
  22. ^ Stearne, John (1648). "A Confirmation and Discovery of Witchcraft". Retrieved 15 March 2008.  Transcribed into modern English by Steve Hulford, 2005.
  23. ^ Notestein 1911: p404
  24. ^ a b Robbins 1959: p66
  25. ^ a b Purkiss, Diane. "Desire and Its Deformities: Fantasies of Witchcraft in the English Civil War". Retrieved 20 December 2007. 
  26. ^ divers is an adjective meaning "diverse, various" or "many and varied", in older English usage:- see divers
  27. ^ Notestein 1911: p179 –180
  28. ^ Geis & Bunn 1997: p36
  29. ^ Seth 1969: p105
  30. ^ Geis & Bunn 1997: p125
  31. ^ Geis & Bunn 1997: p32–33
  32. ^ Seth 1969: p109
  33. ^ Bunn, Ivan. "The Lowestoft Witches: Elizabeth Pacy". LowestoftWitches.com. Retrieved 8 October 2009. 
  34. ^ Bunn, Ivan. "The Lowestoft Witches: Deborah Pacy". LowestoftWitches.com. Retrieved 2009-10-08. 
  35. ^ Bunn, Ivan. "The Lowestoft Witches: Samuel Pacy". LowestoftWitches.com. Retrieved 8 October 2009. 
  36. ^ a b Bunn, Ivan. "The Lowestoft Witches". LowestoftWitches.com. Retrieved 14 March 2009. 
  37. ^ Notestein 1911: p261
  38. ^ Bunn, Ivan. "The Lowestoft Witches: The Trial Report". LowestoftWitches.com. Retrieved 29 December 2007. 
  39. ^ a b Notestein 1911: p266
  40. ^ Thomas 1971: pp524–525
  41. ^ Geis & Bunn 1997: p6
  42. ^ Browne 1645: p64
  43. ^ (ASSI/16/4/1)see
  44. ^ reign = actual: 29 May 1660 – 6 February 1685 but according to royalists de jure from 30 January 1649 the day of execution of his father. At this time the new year did not occur until March, so the father's death (and Charles II succession) would have been recorded as 1648. Further clarification if required
  45. ^ Bunn, Ivan. "The Lowestoft Witches: Report notes". LowestoftWitches.com. Retrieved 15 December 2007. 
  46. ^ Geis & Bunn 1997: p185
  47. ^ Jensen, Gary F. (2006). The Path of the Devil: Early Modern Witch Hunts. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 0-7425-4697-7. 
  48. ^ Mather 1693: p44
  49. ^ Mather 1693: p42
  50. ^ Notestein 1911: p320
  51. ^ Wright 2005: p37
  52. ^ Robbins 1959: p69
  53. ^ Robbins 1959: p248

Bibliography

Further reading[edit]

  • Gaskill, Malcolm. Witchfinders: A Seventeenth-Century English Tragedy. Harvard University Press: 2005. ISBN 0-674-01976-8
  • Geis, Gilbert, and Bunn Ivan. A Trial of Witches: A Seventeenth-century Witchcraft Prosecution. Routledge: London & New York, 1997. ISBN 0415171091
  • Jensen Gary F. The Path of the Devil: Early Modern Witch Hunts. Rowman & Littlefield 2006 Lanham ISBN 0-7425-4697-7
  • Notestein, Wallace A History of Witchcraft in England from 1558 to 1718 Kessinger Publishing: U.S.A. 2003 ISBN 0-7661-7918-4

External links[edit]