Cable car (railway)
A cable car in the context of mass transit is a system using rail cars that are hauled by a continuously moving cable running at a constant speed. Individual cars stop and start by releasing and gripping this cable as required. Cable cars are distinct from funiculars, where the cars are permanently attached to the cable, and cable railways, which are similar to funiculars, but where the rail vehicles are attached and detached manually.
- 1 History
- 2 Operation
- 3 Relation to Funiculars
- 4 List of cable car systems
- 4.1 Cities currently operating cable cars
- 4.2 Cities previously operating cable cars
- 5 See also
- 6 References
- 7 External links
The first cable-operated railway, employing a moving rope that could be picked up or released by a grip on the cars was the Fawdon railway (or wagonway) in 1826, a Colliery railway line. The London and Blackwall Railway, which opened for passengers in east London, England, in 1840 used such a system. The rope available at the time proved too susceptible to wear and the system was abandoned in favour of steam locomotives after eight years. In America, the first cable car installation in operation probably was the West Side and Yonkers Patent Railway in New York City, which ran from 1 July 1868 to 1870. The cable technology used in this elevated railway involved collar-equipped cables and claw-equipped cars, and proved cumbersome. The line was closed and rebuilt, and reopened with steam locomotives.
Other cable cars to use grips were those of the Clay Street Hill Railroad, which later became part of the San Francisco cable car system. The building of this line was promoted by Andrew Smith Hallidie with design work by William Eppelsheimer, and it was first tested in 1873. The success of these grips ensured that this line became the model for other cable car transit systems, and this model is often known as the Hallidie Cable Car.
In 1881 the Dunedin cable tramway system opened in Dunedin, New Zealand and became the first such system outside San Francisco. For Dunedin, George Smith Duncan further developed the Hallidie model, introducing the pull curve and the slot brake; the former was a way to pull cars through a curve, since Dunedin's curves were too sharp to allow coasting, while the latter forced a wedge down into the cable slot to stop the car. Both of these innovations were generally adopted by other cities, including San Francisco.
In Australia the Melbourne cable tramway system operated from 1885 to 1940. It was one of the most extensive in the world with 1200 trams and trailers operating over 15 routes with 103 km (64 miles) of track. Sydney also had a few cable tram routes.
Cable cars rapidly spread to other cities, although the major attraction for most was the ability to displace horsecar (or mule-drawn) systems rather than the ability to climb hills. Many people at the time viewed horse-drawn transit as unnecessarily cruel, and the fact that a typical horse could work only four or five hours per day necessitated the maintenance of large stables of draft animals that had to be fed, housed, groomed, medicated and rested. Thus, for a period, economics worked in favour of cable cars even in relatively flat cities.
For example, the Chicago City Railway, also designed by Eppelsheimer, opened in Chicago in 1882 and went on to become the largest and most profitable cable car system. As with many cities, the problem in flat Chicago was not one of grades but of transportation capacity. This caused a different approach to the combination of grip car and trailer. Rather than using a grip car and single trailer, as many cities did, or combining the grip and trailer into a single car, like San Francisco's California Cars, Chicago used grip cars to pull trains of up to three trailers.
In 1883 the New York and Brooklyn Bridge Railway was opened, which had a most curious feature: though it was a cable car system, it used steam locomotives to get the cars into and out of the terminals. After 1896 the system was changed to one on which a motor car was added to each train to maneuver at the terminals, while en route, the trains were still propelled by the cable.
On 25 September 1883 a test of a cable car system was held by Liverpool United Tramways and Omnibus Company in Kirkdale, Liverpool. This would have been the first cable car system in Europe, but the company decided against implementing it. Instead the distinction went to the 1884 route from Archway to Highgate, north London, which used a continuous cable and grip system on the 1 in 11 (9%) climb of Highgate Hill. The installation was not reliable and was replaced by electric traction in 1909. Other cable car systems were implemented in Europe, though, among which was the Glasgow District Subway, the first underground cable car system, in 1896. (London's first deep-level tube railway, the City & South London Railway, had earlier also been built for cable haulage but had been converted to electric traction before opening in 1890.) A few more cable car systems were built in the United Kingdom, Portugal and France, but European cities, having many more curves in their streets, were less suitable for cable cars than American cities.
Though some new cable car systems were still being built, by 1890 the cheaper to construct and simpler to operate electrically-powered trolley or tram started to become the norm, and eventually started to replace existing cable car systems. For a while hybrid cable/electric systems operated, for example in Chicago where electric cars had to be pulled by grip cars through the loop area, due to the lack of trolley wires there. Eventually, San Francisco became the only street-running manually operated system to survive—Dunedin, the second city with such cars, was also the second-last city to operate them, closing down in 1957.
In the last decades of the 20th century cable traction in general has seen a limited revival as automatic people movers, used in resort areas, airports (for example, Toronto Airport), huge hospital centers and some urban settings. While many of these systems involve cars permanently attached to the cable, the Minimetro system from Poma/Leitner Group and the Cable Liner system from DCC Doppelmayr Cable Car both have variants that allow the cars to be automatically decoupled from the cable under computer control, and can thus be considered a modern interpretation of the cable car.
The cable is itself powered by a stationary motor or engine situated in a cable house or power house. The speed at which it moves is relatively constant depending on the number of units gripping the cable at any given time.
The cable car begins moving when a clamping device attached to the car, called a grip, applies pressure to ("grips") the moving cable. Conversely the car is stopped by releasing pressure on the cable (with or without completely detaching) and applying the brakes. This gripping and ungripping action may be manual, as was the case in all early cable car systems, or automatic, as is the case in some recent cable operated people mover type systems. Gripping must be an even and gradual process in order to avoid bringing the car to cable speed too quickly and unacceptably jarring the passengers.
In the case of manual systems, the grip resembles a very large pair of pliers, and considerable strength and skill are required to operate the car. As many early cable car operators discovered the hard way, if the grip is not applied properly, it can damage the cable, or even worse, become entangled in the cable. In the latter case, the cable car may not be able to stop and can wreak havoc along its route until the cable house realizes the mishap and halts the cable.
One apparent advantage of the cable car is its relative energy efficiency, because of the economy of centrally located power stations, and the ability of descending cars to transfer energy to ascending cars. However, this advantage is totally negated by the relatively large energy consumption required to simply move the cable over and under the numerous guide rollers and around the many sheaves. Approximately 95% of the tractive effort in the San Francisco system is expended in simply moving the four cables at 9.5 miles per hour. Electric cars with regenerative braking do offer the advantages, without the problem of moving a cable. In the case of steep grades, however, cable traction has the major advantage of not depending on adhesion between wheels and rails. There is also the obvious advantage that keeping the car gripped to the cable will also limit the downhill speed to that of the cable.
Because of the constant and relatively low speed, a cable car's potential to cause harm in an accident can be underestimated. Even with a cable car traveling at only 9 miles per hour, the mass of the cable car and the combined strength and speed of the cable can do quite a lot of damage in a collision.
Relation to Funiculars
A cable car is superficially similar to a funicular, but differs from such a system in that its cars are not permanently attached to the cable and can stop independently, whereas a funicular has cars that are permanently attached to the propulsion cable, which is itself stopped and started. A cable car cannot climb as steep a grade as a funicular, but many more cars can be operated with a single cable, making it more flexible, and allowing a higher capacity. During the rush hour on San Francisco's Market Street Railway, a car would leave the terminal every 15 seconds.[when?]
A few funicular railways operate in street traffic, and because of this operation are often incorrectly described as cable cars. Examples of such operation, and the consequent confusion, are:
Even more confusingly, a hybrid cable car/funicular line once existed in the form of the original Wellington Cable Car, in the New Zealand city of Wellington. This line had both a continuous loop haulage cable that the cars gripped using a cable car gripper, and a balance cable permanently attached to both cars over an undriven pulley at the top of the line. The descending car gripped the haulage cable and was pulled downhill, in turn pulling the ascending car (which remained ungripped) uphill by the balance cable. This line was rebuilt in 1979 and is now a standard funicular, although it retains its old cable car name.
List of cable car systems
Cities currently operating cable cars
Traditional cable car systems
The best known existing cable car system is the San Francisco cable car system in the city of San Francisco, California. San Francisco's cable cars constitute the oldest and largest such system in permanent operation, and it is the only one to still operate in the traditional manner with manually operated cars running in street traffic.
Modern cable car systems
Several cities operate a modern version of the cable car system. These systems are fully automated and run on their own reserved right of way. They are commonly referred to as people movers, although that term is also applied to systems with other forms of propulsion, including funicular style cable propulsion.
These cities include:
- Laon, France (Poma 2000)
- Las Vegas, United States Two lines linking the Mandalay Bay, Luxor, and Excalibur hotels.
- Milan, Italy (connecting the San Raffaele Hospital with Cascina Gobba (Milan Metro))
- Mississauga, Ontario, connecting terminals 1 and 3 and the Viscount parking lot at Toronto Pearson International Airport
- Venice, Italy. The Venice People Mover connects the Isola del Tronchetto with Piazzale Roma.
- Perugia, Italy (MiniMetro)
Cities previously operating cable cars
- Dunedin (1881–1957, the Dunedin cable tramway system)
- Wellington (1902–1979, the original Wellington Cable Car hybrid system)
- Manila (Early 1900's- 1930's, the Manila- Malabon railway.)
- Lisbon (converted to regular tram lines in the early 20th century: São Sebastião, Estrela, and Graça)
- Edinburgh (Edinburgh Corporation Tramways, 1899–1923 (replaced by electric trams))
- Glasgow (Glasgow Subway, 1896–1935, converted to electric traction)
- Liverpool (trial in 1883)
- London (1884–1909, connecting Archway with Highgate, the first cable car in regular operation in Europe)
- The Lynton and Lynmouth Cliff Railway (1890 onwards)
- Matlock (1893–1927, the Matlock Cable Tramway)
- Llandudno, Wales (The Great Orme Tramway), although it operates as a funicular railway this is the only cable powered street tramway that is still carrying passengers in Great Britain.
Isle of Man
- Douglas (1896–1929)
- Baltimore, Maryland (1890–1897)
- Binghamton, New York (trial in 1885)
- Brooklyn, New York
- Butte, Montana (1889–1897)
- Chicago, Illinois (1882–1906)
- Chicago City Railway
- North Chicago Street Railway
- West Chicago Street Railway
- Cincinnati, Ohio
- Cleveland, Ohio
- Denver, Colorado (1886–1900, the Denver Tramway)
- Grand Rapids, Michigan
- Hoboken, New Jersey (1886–1892, the North Hudson County Railway's Hoboken Elevated)
- Kansas City, Missouri (1885-1913), including 9th St Incline (1888-1902)
8th St. Tunnel in use (1887-1956)
- Los Angeles, California (1885–1889) Second Street Cable Railway, (1886-1902) Temple Street Cable Railway, (1889-1896) Los Angeles Cable Railway
- New York City, New York
- West Side and Yonkers Patent Railway's Ninth Avenue Line
- New York and Brooklyn Bridge Railway
- Third Avenue Railroad's 125th Street Crosstown Line
- Third Avenue Railroad's Third Avenue Line
- Metropolitan Street Railway's Broadway Line
- Metropolitan Street Railway's Broadway and Columbus Avenue Line
- Metropolitan Street Railway's Broadway and Lexington Avenue Line
- Newark, New Jersey (1888–1889)
- Oakland, California (1886–1899)
- Omaha, Nebraska
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Portland, Oregon (1890–1904)
- Providence, Rhode Island
- St. Louis, Missouri
- Saint Paul, Minnesota
- San Diego, California (1890–1892)
- Seattle, Washington (1888–1940)
- Sioux City, Iowa
- Spokane, Washington
- Tacoma, Washington (1891–1938)
- Tulsa, Oklahoma
- Washington, D.C. (1890–1899, part of the Washington streetcar system)
- Wichita, Kansas
- Hilton, George W. (1982). The Cable Car in America (Revised Edition). San Diego, California: Howell–North Books. Reprinted 1997 by Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-3051-2.
- Of Cables and Grips: The Cable Cars of San Francisco, by Robert Callwell and Walter Rice, published by Friends of the Cable Car Museum, first edition, 2000.
- Chicago Cable Cars, by Greg Borzo, published by The History Press (2012), ISBN 978-1-60949-327-1
- Hilton, George W. (1971). The Cable Car in America. Berkeley, CA.: Howell NorthBooks.
- The Cable in Chicago: Speeding along the Streets Rapid Transit there for Miles (Nov 9, 1889). The Baltimore Sun, page 8.
- Erskine Hazard, Observations upon Rail-roads, The Franklin Journal and American Mechanics' Magazine, Vol. III, No. 4 (April 1827); page 275.
- Fawdon Wagonway, Structural Images of the North East, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 26 Mar. 2004.
- Robertson, Andrew (March 1848). "Blackwall Railway Machinery". The Civil engineer and architect's journal (New York: Wiley & Putnam) 11.
- Taylor, Sheila (2001). The Moving Metropolis. London: Calmann and King. p. 82. ISBN 1-85669-241-8.
- Source: San Francisco Municipal Railway
- "POMA" (in French). Transports Urbain Laonnois. Retrieved 2009-04-02.
- "Doppelmayr Cable Car". Doppelmayr. Retrieved 2009-10-22.
- Mandalay Bay Tram
- Hilton (1982), p. 167.
- Hilton (1982), pp. 389–407.
- Hilton (1982), p. 465.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Cable car on rails.|
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Cable transport.|
- Cable Car Museum
- Cable Car Guy
- a scripophily based article re. the San Francisco Cal Cable and the Swiss Borel Bankers (in German)
- The Cable Building (New York City) Broadway Cable car line.
- How Cable Cars Operate San Francisco Cable Car Museum
- San Francisco Cable Car Movie from 1905