California foie gras law
|California foie gras law|
|California State Legislation|
|Full name||Force Fed Birds|
|Introduced||February 19, 2004|
|Assembly voted||August 24, 2004|
|Senate voted||May 18, 2004|
|Signed into law||September 29, 2004|
|Code||Health and Safety Code|
|Website||SB-1520 Force fed birds.(2003-2004)|
The California foie gras law, California S.B. 1520, is a California State statute that prohibits the "force feed[ing of] a bird for the purpose of enlarging the bird's liver beyond normal size" as well as the sale of products that are a result of this process. This outlaws the traditional method of producing foie gras in California. The law was enacted in 2004 and went into effect on July 1, 2012.
The law does not prohibit the consumption of foie gras, giving it as a gift, or its importation from outside California.
S.B. 1520 was introduced in the California State Legislature on February 19, 2004 by then-Senate President Pro-Tem John Burton at the request of a coalition of animal protection organizations that included Viva!USA, Farm Sanctuary, Los Angeles Lawyers for Animals, and the Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights.
Burton stated, "We just shouldn't be cramming a tube down a duck's throat and forcing in food to make foie gras," and that foie gras production is "an inhumane process that other countries have sensibly banned. I'm pleased California will be next on the list."
The law included a provision that it would take effect almost eight years after enactment, in order to allow time for techniques to be developed by which foie gras could be produced without force-feeding birds. As of the date the law took effect, no such technique had been developed that was deemed commercially viable.
During the months leading up to the date when the law would go into effect, some California restaurants hosted elaborate multi-course meals featuring foie gras in many forms, drawing patrons who wanted to eat foie gras before the ban went into effect.
Lawsuit seeking to overturn law
|Association des Eleveurs de Canards et D’Oies du Quebec, et al v. Harris, et al.|
|Court||United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit|
|Full case name||Association des Eleveurs de Canards et D’Oies du Quebec, HVFG LLC; Hots Restaurant Group Inc., and Gauge Outfitters Inc. v. Kamala Harris, Attorney General; and Edmund G. Brown, Governor|
|Date decided||August 30, 2013|
|Citation(s)||Association des Eleveurs de Canards et D’Oies du Quebec, et al v. Harris, et al., no. 12-56644 (9th Cir. Aug. 30, 2013)|
|Judge(s) sitting||Harry Pregerson, Raymond C. Fisher, and Wiley Y. Daniel (sitting by designation)|
|Prior action(s)||Us. District Court Judge Stephen Wilson denied a motion for preliminary injunction restraining Attorney General Harris from enforcing the California ban on foie gras|
|In a unanimous opinion authored by Judge Pregerson, the court held that the Attorney General was not subject to Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit; that the Governor and state of California were entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity and were dismissed from the suit; and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that there was no serious question of a Due Process violation or a violation of the Commerce Clause, and affirmed the denial of the motion.|
A lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles on July 2, 2012, seeking to overturn the California foie gras law on the ground that it is unconstitutionally vague. The plaintiffs are two foie gras producers and a southern California restaurant group that served foie gras until the ban took effect. On July 18, 2012, U.S. District Judge Stephen Wilson denied the plaintiffs' request for a temporary injunction that would have immediately suspended the foie gras ban. On September 19, 2012, Judge Wilson denied the plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the law.
Five animal welfare organizations (the "Proposed Defendant Intervenors") (Farm Sanctuary, Animal Legal Defense Fund, the Marin Humane Society, the Humane Society of the United States, and the Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association) who are sponsors of the challenged law had petitioned to be accepted as defendant intervenors in the case. Judge Wilson denied their petition. On September 7, 2012, the Proposed Defendant Intervenors (the appellants) filed an appeal with the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The appellants are appealing Judge Wilson's ruling that excluded them from the case.
Oral arguments were heard on May 8, 2013 before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Pasadena. In August 2013, the court, in a 3-0 decision, upheld the law, finding that it violated neither the Due Process Clause nor the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution as asserted by the plaintiffs.
Resistance to the law
Since the law went into effect, a number of restaurants reportedly have continued to serve foie gras, insisting that they are doing so as a gift to customers rather than selling it to customers.
- Eduardo Sousa produces natural, humane foie gras on a small farm in Extremadura Spain
- Foie gras controversy
- Animal welfare
- Factory farming
- California Senate Bill no. 1520, Force fed birds, approved September 9, 2004, codified at California Health and Safety Code §§ 25980–25984.
- California Health and Safety Code § 25982.
- Brown, Patricia Leigh (2004-10-06). "Is Luxury Cruel? The Foie Gras Divide". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2012-07-02. Retrieved 2012-07-02. "THE signing of a bill by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger last week banning the production and sale of foie gras in California"
- Moore, Martha T. (2006-06-05). "Foes see foie gras as a fat target". USA Today. Archived from the original on 2012-07-02. Retrieved 2012-07-02. "It is already coming off the menu in California, which in 2004 set a 2012 deadline to end production and sale."
- "SB 1520 Complete Bill History". California State Senate. 2004-09-29. Retrieved 2010-06-30.
- Barnato, Teri (2004-02-23). "California Bill Would Ban Force Feeding of Ducks and Sales of Foie Gras; Animal Protectionists Say Practice is Cruel". Viva!USA. Archived from the original on 2012-07-02. Retrieved 2012-07-02.
- Macias, Chris (2012-06-25). "As California ban on foie gras looms, some press for repeal". The Sacramento Bee (The McClatchy Company). ISSN 0890-5738. Archived from the original on 2012-07-02. Retrieved 2012-07-02. "We just shouldn't be cramming a tube down a duck's throat and forcing in food to make foie gras"
- Vekshin, Alison (2012-06-26). "California Foie Gras Fans Seek to Beat Curb as Ban Begins". Bloomberg Businessweek. ISSN 0007-7135. Archived from the original on 2012-07-05. Retrieved 2012-07-04. "The California law had postponed enforcement of the ban for almost eight years to allow producers to find an alternative to force-feeding."
- "Foie Battle Kickoff Dinner! (Downtown SJ)". Cupertino, California: Dishcrawl. March 2012. Archived from the original on 2012-11-06. Retrieved 2012-11-06. "Chefs from San Jose, Peninsula and San Francisco will be hosting foie gras dinners in undisclosed locations."
- Association des Eleveurs de Canards et d'Oies du Quebec v. Harris, No. 12-5735, (C.D. Cal. filed July 2, 2012).
- Finz, Stacy; Lucchesi, Paolo (2012-07-03). "Foie gras ban triggers California lawsuit". San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on 2012-08-24. Retrieved 2012-08-24.
- Hsu, Tiffany (2012-07-18). "Judge denies effort to stop California foie gras ban". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2012-08-24. Retrieved 2012-08-24.
- Pettersson, Edvard (2012-07-18). "California Foie Gras Ban to Remain in Force, Judge Says". Bloomberg L.P. Archived from the original on 2012-08-24. Retrieved 2012-08-24.
- Justia.com Dockets & Filings page
- Lifsher, Marc (2012-09-19). "Judge denies block of California's foie gras ban". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2012-09-24. Retrieved 2012-09-24. "U.S. District Court Judge Stephen Wilson denied a request for an injunction while the lawsuit continues."
- Association des Eleveurs de Canards et D’Oies du Quebec, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al., no. 12-56644 (9th Cir. filed Sept. 7, 2012)(docket)
- Reynolds, Matt (2013-05-09). "9th Circuit Urged to Suspend Foie Gras Ban". Courthouse News Service. Archived from the original on 2013-05-09. Retrieved 2013-05-09. "Judge Fisher was skeptical, saying the law had only indirect effects on the market for foie gras outside California."
- Elias, Paul (September 3, 2013). "Court upholds California ban on foie gras". San Jose Mercury News. Associated Press. Retrieved September 6, 2013.
- Association des Eleveurs de Canards et D’Oies du Quebec, et al v. Harris, et al., no. 12-56644 (9th Cir. Aug. 30, 2012)
- Veronin, Nick (2012-07-19). "Fighting the law with free foie gras: Chez TJ chef believes loophole in new legislation puts restaurant in clear". Mountain View Voice (Embarcadero Media). Retrieved 2013-05-21. "The Cupertino-born chef reasons that as long as he is giving the traditional French delicacy away, 'for free,' the restaurant is in the clear."
- Noyes, Dan (2013-05-06). "Bay Area restaurants still selling banned foie gras". ABC7 News (San Francisco). Retrieved 2013-05-21. "The ABC7 News I-Team has learned that restaurants around the Bay Area are quietly serving a food that's banned in California -- foie gras, the fatty liver of a duck that's been force fed."
- BBC News magazine The Holy Grail of foie gras? By Claire Heald and Diarmuid Mitchell