Canada's Accredited Zoos and Aquariums

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Canada's Accredited Zoos and Aquariums
Caza logo.png
Founded 1975
Type National not-for-profit organization
Focus Zoo and aquarium accreditation and advocacy
Location
Area served
Canada
Method Accreditation
Slogan The national voice of the zoo and aquarium community[1]
Website www.caza.ca

Canada's Accredited Zoos and Aquariums - CAZA (French: Aquariums et Zoos Accrédités du Canada - AZAC) is an accreditation and advocacy organization representing zoos and aquariums within Canada. The organization states that its member zoos and aquariums care for more than 100,000 individual animals representing over 2000 species of wildlife, observed by an estimated 11 million visitors each year.[1] The organization is a member of the International Union for Conservation of Nature[2] and the World Association of Zoos and Aquariums.[3]

Founding[edit]

The organization was founded in 1975 at a conference of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (then named the American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums).[1]

Name changes[edit]

The organization's original name was Canadian Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums - L'Association Canadienne des Jardins Zoologiques et des Aquariums. In 1997 the name was changed to the Canadian Association of Zoos and Aquariums – L'Association des Zoos et Aquariums du Canada. In 2012, the name was changed again to its current name, Canada's Accredited Zoos and Aquariums - Aquariums et Zoos Accrédités du Canada (CAZA-AZAC).[1]

Mission and Vision[edit]

The organization's mission is to unite the Canadian zoo and aquarium community in connecting people to live animals and nature.[1] Its vision is that "Canada's accredited zoos and aquariums contribute to the sustainability of the natural world as recognized and trusted leaders."[1]

Accreditation program[edit]

CAZA-AZAC's main vehicle is its accreditation program. Standards of conduct are set out for animal care, animal transport, human and animal contact; as well as operational matters such as staffing, physical facilities, and emergency preparation.[4] Inspection teams, including at least one veterinarian and a senior zoology professional, audit all aspects of the operation of the potential member.[5]

Members must agree to a Code of Ethics.[6] Included in the Code is agreeing to "Ensure that when animals are obtained from the wild, that such acquisitions will not have a deleterious effect upon the wild population and are acquired incorporating all legal and ethical approval methods and documentation."[6] Further, mutilation of any animal for a cosmetic purpose or changing the animal's physical appearance without valid husbandry or medical reasons is also not permitted.[6]

Full re-inspections of members' facilities are made every five years. If, during that period, a concern is raised about any aspect of a member institution, the Accreditation Commission or Ethics Committee may conduct an interim review.[5]

Conservation[edit]

The organization states that member organizations have a long history of working to restore biodiversity and preserve species in Canada and abroad, collaborating regularly with government agencies, NGO's and volunteer organizations with those aims.[7] Members "participate in close to 800 conservation and science programs within their facilities and are directly involved in 20 field projects, most linked directly to helping save endangered species."[7]

The organization's Canadian Endangered Species Program (CESP) offers long-term breeding and conservation plans to aid selected Canadian endangered species, including the Vancouver Island Marmot, Burrowing Owl, Spotted Owl, Loggerhead Shrike, Wolverine, Black-Footed Ferret, Whooping Crane, and the Oregon Spotted Frog.[8] In 2012, it was reported that since the Burrowing Owl recovery efforts began in British Columbia in 1992, over 1,244 captive bred owls had been released and over 700 artificial burrows had been established.[8] These efforts involved the Burrowing Owl Conservation Society, the British Columbia Wildlife Park and more recently the Calgary Zoo.[8]

Advocacy[edit]

In 2013, the organization advocated for more stringent provincial rules on exotic animals and the licensing of zoos and aquariums, raising their concerns at a meeting of the Atlantic Canada Mayor's Congress.[9] Executive Director Massimo Bergamini stated: "The mayors know first hand the public safety, animal welfare and environmental issues that can arise when exotic animals are not properly cared for; just as they know that municipal governments do not have the legislative authority or the inspection and enforcement resources adequate to the task".[9] The mayors adopted a resolution supporting CAZA's position and intended to raise it with the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and their provincial governments.[9]

In May 2014, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities' members passed an emergency resolution from the Atlantic Mayors' Congress on the same issue. The resolution called on "the federal government to play a leadership role in forging a pan-Canadian approach to exotic animal regulation" and supported "the efforts of Canada's Accredited Zoos and Aquariums (CAZA) for more stringent rules on exotic animals and the licensing of zoos and aquariums."[10] The Atlantic mayors pushed for the resolution in response to a tragedy in August 2013, when two Campbellton, New Brunswick boys lost their lives after they were asphyxiated in their sleep by an African rock python.[11]

Publications[edit]

In 2008, the organization published an Elephant Care Manual[12] and an Animal Care and Housing Manual.[13]

The organization's website sets out policies and position statements on a number of issues,[14] such as the limited use of wild or exotic animals for performances,[15] and around the issue of captive dolphins and whales.[16]

Controversy[edit]

Captive marine mammals[edit]

Zoos and aquariums are under increasing public pressure to stop keeping captive marine mammals and other wildlife.[17] Humane Society International states that inhumane whale and dolphin captures take place routinely around the world, resulting in many deaths; marine mammals in captivity have a history of premature deaths; and captive enclosures cannot simulate the complexity of the ocean and coasts.[18] CAZA does not appear to have issued a new policy on the maintenance and display of whales and dolphins since 2008.[19]

MarineLand quality of care[edit]

One of CAZA's accredited members, MarineLand, has been under intense public pressure for its treatment of animals.[20] CAZA investigated after receiving complaints, finding that "the marine mammals were in overall good health and there was no evidence of animal abuse, that water quality in all the pools was very good, and it appeared that staffing levels were adequate"; although examining records and interviewing ex-employees raised questions about how effectively the water quality systems in some pools were working.[21] MarineLand agreed to undertake an engineering study of its water quality systems, and in the interim, MarineLand agreed to unannounced inspections.[21] At the same time, the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals did their own investigation of both the marine and land animals, raising "some areas of concern where certain deficiencies exist"[22] and later issued six orders, which MarineLand completed by April 2013.[23]

The organization Zoocheck Canada criticized CAZA's findings, stating they showed "just how ineffective the organization is and how remarkably low their standards are. Did their inspectors not notice the complete social isolation of Kiska the killer whale, the utterly barren enclosures for both aquatic and terrestrial animals, the complete absence of enrichment, the near permanent sequestering of some pinnipeds in small indoor cages, the still inappropriate bear enclosure, the uncontrolled public feeding, etc., etc.. And CAZA says nothing about the fact that Marineland has an absurd number (nearly 40 at last count) of beluga whales, most of them wild caught. Even if you believe it's acceptable to keep whales in captivity, what facility needs that many."[24]

Protests of conditions at MarineLand continue, with a demonstration on May 17, 2014 when the park opened for the season.[25]

Accreditation process criticized[edit]

A 2001 report by Rob Laidlaw for Zoocheck Canada and the World Society for the Protection of Animals (now World Animal Protection) reviewed CAZA's accreditation process in the context of concerns about MarineLand, after CAZA granted it accredited status in October 2000 (p. 1).[26] Laidlaw stated that the standards for animal care and housing in CAZA's 11 page manual[27] "are overly generic and subject to interpretation. Some key animal care and accommodation provisions are too brief and ambiguous, while a number of words and terms used throughout the standards are not defined or are not provided with an appropriate explanatory context. To a large extent, interpretation of the standards is contingent on the expertise, experience and bias of accreditation inspection team members" (p. 20).[26]

Further, while the CAZA standards make reference to behavioural needs, nowhere is it "explicitly stated in the standards that the biological and behavioural needs of the animals must be satisfied" (p. 20).[26]

Even if the standards were adequate, based on Laidlaw's documented observations of conditions at MarineLand in July 2001 (p. 2),[26] the park "did not appear to satisfy CAZA’s standards in several key areas" (p. 20).[26] Examples included "Overcrowding and uncontrolled public feeding of the American black bears" (p. 9), with most of the more than 25 bears having no way to find shelter from the cold and snow of the winter season (p. 15).[26] Dolphins in the indoor dolphin tank were "not able to remove themselves from visual contact with the public as they can be viewed through the gallery windows at all times during visitor hours" contrary to CAZA standards (p. 17).[26] Similarly, underwater viewing of orcas and beluga whales in the Friendship Cove pool allowed the public to see the animals at all times during visitor hours, in relatively small and barren tanks (p. 17).[26] He concluded that CAZA's "accreditation process is an inherently flawed system of evaluation that needs to be reviewed and improved" (p. 20).[26]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f "CAZA-AZAC "About us"". caza.ca. Canada's Accredited Zoos and Aquariums. Retrieved August 22, 2014. 
  2. ^ "Members Database". iucn.org. International Union for Conservation of Nature. Retrieved August 22, 2014. 
  3. ^ "World Association of Zoos and Aquariums". waza.org. World Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Retrieved 24 September 2013. 
  4. ^ "CAZA Accreditation Standards: October 2012 edition", CAZA-AZAC.
  5. ^ a b "CAZA-AZAC Accreditation Program". caza.ca. Canada's Accredited Zoos and Aquariums. Retrieved August 22, 2014. 
  6. ^ a b c "CAZA-AZAC "Code of Professional Ethics"". caza.ca. Canada's Accredited Zoos and Aquariums. Retrieved August 22, 2014. 
  7. ^ a b "Conservation", CAZA-AZAC, accessed August 22, 2014.
  8. ^ a b c Canadian Endangered Species Programme Update 2012, John Carnio, CAZA, available for download at "Conservation", CAZA-AZAC, accessed August 22, 2014.
  9. ^ a b c "Canada's Accredited Zoos and Aquariums welcomes Atlantic Mayors' support in push for more stringent exotic animal rules", CNW, October 18, 2013.
  10. ^ "Federation of Canadian Municipalities urges federal role in push for more stringent exotic animal rules", CNW, May 31, 2014.
  11. ^ "Federation of Canadian Municipalities urges federal role in push for more stringent exotic animal rules", CNW, May 31, 2014; see also 2013 New Brunswick python attack.
  12. ^ "CAZA Elephant Care Manual", CAZA-AZAC, October 1, 2008.
  13. ^ "CAZA Animal Care and Housing Manual", CAZA-AZAC, October 1, 2008.
  14. ^ "Policies and Positions", CAZA-AZAC, accessed August 22, 2014.
  15. ^ "CAZA Position Re: Use Of Wild or Exotic Animals for Performance, Shows or Acts.", CAZA-AZAC, October 1, 2008.
  16. ^ "CAZA Position on: Maintenance and Display of Cetaceans (whales and dolphins) In Human Care", CAZA-AZAC, October 1, 2008.
  17. ^ "Smart, Social and Erratic in Captivity", James Gorman, New York Times, July 29, 2013.
  18. ^ "The Case Against Marine Mammals in Captivity: The Fourth Revised Edition", HSI, accessed August 22, 2014.
  19. ^ "CAZA Position on: Maintenance and Display of Cetaceans (whales and dolphins) In Human Care", CAZA-AZAC, October 1, 2008.
  20. ^ "Hundreds gather for largest ever protest at Marineland", John Law, Toronto Sun, August 29, 2012; and "'The seal was writhing in pain... with blood coming from his eye:' Ex-trainer at aquarium reveals horrific conditions animals were forced to endure", Jill Reilly, DailyMail, 16 August 2012.
  21. ^ a b CAZA Accreditation Commission Decision on MarineLand Investigation", CAZA-AZAC, accessed August 22, 2014.
  22. ^ "Conflicting reports for Marineland", Dan Dakin, Toronto Sun, October 3, 2012.
  23. ^ "Marineland back in OSPCA's good books", Ray Spiteri, Toronto Sun, April 25, 2013.
  24. ^ "Latest on MarineLand: CAZA Does Damage Control?", Zoocheck Facebook page, October 4, 2012.
  25. ^ "Marineland opening day protest", St. Catharines Standard, May 17, 2014.
  26. ^ a b c d e f g h i "Commentary on the Canadian Association of Zoos and Aquariums (CAZA) accreditation process: Marineland of Canada, Niagara Falls", Rob Laidlaw, January 2012.
  27. ^ "CAZA Animal Care and Housing Manual", CAZA-AZAC, October 1, 2008.

External links[edit]