This category is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
This is currently a container category, and as such should just include categories. However at the moment it has 272 articles in it. Either these need to be taken out and re-homed, or this category should not be a container category. Dunarc (talk) 20:18, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Dunarc:@Koavf: added the tag in 2017. I don't see any reason for it to be here. There aren't good subcategories for many of the entries, and the category isn't that large. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the replies. I think the change to diffuse is probably the best for the moment. Dunarc (talk) 20:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dunarc, Agreed. Someday by state, century, and subfield but even then, it wouldn't strictly speaking be a container category as such where it's inappropriate for an article to be in there: it would just be a system that is completely diffused so there's no need for any article to be in there directly. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]