Cation-exchange capacity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Cation exchange capacity)
Jump to: navigation, search

In soil science, cation-exchange capacity or CEC is the number of exchangable cations per dry weight that a soil is capable of holding, at a given pH value, and available for exchange with the soil water solution. CEC is used as a measure of soil fertility, nutrient retention capacity, and the capacity to protect groundwater from cation contamination. It is expressed as milliequivalent of hydrogen per 100 g of dry soil(meq+/100g), or the SI unit centi-mol per kg (cmol+/kg). The numeric values are the same in any system of units.

Clay and humus have electrostatic surface charges that attract and hold ions. The holding capacity of clay varies with the type of clay. Humus has a CEC that is two to three times that of the best clay.

One way to increase the CEC of a soil is to enhance the formation of humus.

In general, the higher the CEC, the higher the fertility of that soil.

Calculation of CEC[edit]

The CEC is the number of positive charges (cations) that a soil representative sample of soil can hold. It is usually described as the number of hydrogen ions (H+) necessary to fill the soil cation holding sites per 100 grams of dry soil. Alternatively, an equivalent amount of another cation (Al3+ or Ca2+) can be used in the measure. In soil science, an equivalent is defined by the number of charges in terms of a given number of hydrogen ions. As hydrogen ions have only one positive charge (H+), this makes calculations relatively simple. An equivalent of Al3+ that could be held would amount to one third as many of those ions, and Ca2+ would have half as many ions.

Translation from meq/100g to an applicable unit, like lb/acre of available nutrients, can be made via calculation, that considers the atomic weight, the ion's valence, and by estimating the soil depth and its density. Mengel gives the following correspondence for 1 meq/100g:[1]

Calcium, 400 lb/acre

Magnesium, 240 lb/acre

Potassium, 780 lb/acre

Ammonium, 360 lb/acre

Base saturation[edit]

Closely related to cation-exchange capacity is the base saturation,[2] which is the fraction of exchangeable cations that are base cations (Ca, Mg, K and Na). It can be expressed as a percentage, and called percent base saturation. The higher the amount of exchangeable base cations, the more acidity can be neutralised in the short time perspective. Thus, a soil with high cation-exchange capacity takes longer time to acidify (as well as to recover from an acidified status) than a soil with a low cation-exchange capacity (assuming similar base saturations). A rain, with its load of acidic hydrogen ions, upon a soil that has a high CEC will be quickly returned (buffered) to its original pH in a very short time. A rain on a low CEC soil, such as in the Amazon Basin with its acid soils, will not be restored and the pH will drop sharply and remain there for a relatively long time.

The base-cation saturation ratio (BCSR) is a method of interpreting soil test results that is widely used in sustainable agriculture, supported by the National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service (ATTRA)[3] and claimed to be successfully in use on over a million acres (4,000 km²) of farmland worldwide.

pH and CEC[edit]

For many soils, the CEC is dependent upon the pH of the soil. This is due mostly to the Hofmeister series (lyotrophic series), which describes the relative strength of various cations' adsorption to colloids, and is generally as follows:

Al3+ > H+ > Ca2+ > Mg2+ > K+ = NH4+ > Na+

As soil acidity increases (pH decreases), more H+ ions are attached to the colloids. They have pushed the other cations from the colloids and into the soil water solution. Inversely, when soils become more basic (pH increases), the available cations in solution decreases because there are fewer H+ ions to push cations into the soil solution from the colloids (CEC increases).[4]


Various colloids and soils' CEC[edit]

The CEC of various soils and soil constituents varies greatly.

Cation exchange capacity for soils; soil textures; soil colloids[5]
Soil State CEC meq/100 g
Charlotte fine sand Florida 1.0
Ruston fine sandy loam Texas 1.9
Glouchester loam New Jersey 11.9
Grundy silt loam Illinois 26.3
Gleason clay loam California 31.6
Susquehanna clay loam Alabama 34.3
Davie mucky fine sand Florida 100.8
Sands ------ 1 - 5
Fine sandy loams ------ 5-10
Loams and silt loams ----- 5-15
Clay loams ----- 15-30
Clays ----- over 30
Sesquioxides ----- 0-3
Kaolinite ----- 3-15
Illite ----- 25-40
Montmorillonite ----- 60-100
Vermiculite (similar to illite) ----- 80-150
Humus ----- 100-300

Aluminum ions and CEC[edit]

Many heavily leached or oxidized soils, especially in the wet tropics, have a high concentration of Al+3 occupying the soil colloids cation exchange sites. Since aluminum is toxic in high quantities for most plants, there are certain advantages to this. Due to the relatively high adsorption rate of aluminum to soil colloids, it will be taken out of the soil, hence the plant cannot be adversely affected by it. On the other hand, because it has three positive charges, it takes up a large amount of charge on a colloid. For example, Al+3 fills the same space as three NH4+ ions. As a result, the ammonium is left in the soil water solution where it can be washed away by a heavy rain. This makes many aluminum heavy soils relatively infertile. There is no easy way to remove aluminum ions from the soil colloid and free the CEC for other ions.

Organic matter[edit]

Organic materials in soil increase the CEC through an increase in available negative charges. As such, organic matter build-up in soil usually positively impacts soil fertility. However, organic matter CEC is heavily impacted by soil acidity as acidity causes many organic compounds to release ions to the soil solution.

Anion exchange capacity[edit]

Similar to the CEC, the anion exchange capacity is a measurement of the positive charges in soils affecting the amount of negative charges which a soil can adsorb. There are relatively few anions that are restrictive in agriculture, but they are important, such as sulfur or phosphorus. The anion lyotrophic series is:

H2PO4- > SO4−2 > NO3- > Cl-

Converse to CEC, AEC generally will increase when pH drops and decrease when pH rises.

Laboratory determination[edit]

There are two standardised International Soil Reference and Information Centre methods for determining CEC:

There exist slightly conflicting ideas on which mechanisms to include in the term, "cation exchange", in soil chemistry. From a theoretical point of view, one should distinguish cation exchange from ligand exchange, and exchange of diffuse layer adsorbed cations. On the other hand, from a practical point of view, e.g. in forest and agricultural management, what is important is the soils' ability to replace one cation with another rather than the exact mechanism by which this replacement occurs. What is included in the term, "cation exchange", in soil science thus varies with the scientific context.

Standard values[edit]

Kaolinite 3–15
Halloysite 2H2O 5–10
Halloysite 4H2O 40–50
Montmorillonite-group 70–100
Illite 10–40
Vermiculite 100–150
Chlorite 10–40
Glauconite 11–20+
Palygorskite-group 20–30
Allophane ~70

These are the values reported by Carroll (1959)[6] for the cation-exchange capacity of minerals in meq/100g at pH of 7.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Mengel, David D., Department of Agronomy, Purdue University. "Fundamentals of Soil Cation Exchange Capacity". Retrieved 2011-05-03. 
  2. ^ Turner, R.C. and Clark J.S., 1966, Lime potential in acid clay and soil suspensions. Trans. Comm. II & IV Int. Soc. Soil Science, pp. 208–215
  3. ^ NCat Soil Management
  4. ^ Havlin, Tisdale, Beaton, Nelson (2011). Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. New Delhi: PHI. 
  5. ^ Donahue, Miller, Shickluna (1977). Soils: an introduction to soils and plant growth (4 ed.). Inglewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632: Prentice- Hall. pp. 115,116. ISBN 0-13-821918-4. 
  6. ^ Carroll, Dorothy (1959). "Ion exchange in clays and other minerals". Geological Society of America Bulletin 70 (6): 749‐780. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1959)70[749:IEICAO]2.0.CO;2. 

External references[edit]