|Part of a series on|
Christian libertarianism describes the synthesis of Christian beliefs concerning human nature and dignity with libertarian political philosophy. It is also an ideology to the extent that its supporters promote their cause to others and join together as a movement. In contrast to the Christian left and the Christian right respectively, they believe charity and enforcement of personal-level morality should be the purview of the (voluntary) church and not the state. These responsibilities must not be abrogated, though any non-governmental organization (NGO) not publicly financed is free to pursue them as well.
As with secular libertarianism, socialism, fascism, and crony capitalism are strongly opposed, as is theocracy. The latter does not include merely being influenced by Christian concepts. Individual freedom of religion without state interference is fully supported regardless of one's beliefs. Nevertheless, a majority religion in a given locale could display its faith on government-owned property if it had the popular votes to do so. Public sector discrimination is strictly forbidden, while in the private sector, it is permitted, though discouraged (excepting bona fide associated costs, such as with insurance).
Christian libertarians believe these principles are supported in the Bible by Christ's teaching (see below), and His criticism of the laws (Halakha) as observed by the Pharisees. For example, it was prohibited to heal someone on the Sabbath, as this was considered actual "work." Christ opposed the Pharisees due to their self-righteousness man-made regulations added to God's law, which they obeyed outwardly, but with the wrong inward motivation.
In keeping with the fundamentals of libertarianism, laws of the state should be kept to the bare minimum. Acts that merely annoy others or slowly degrade their health might be dealt with at the local level, where the least amount of effort is needed to initiate or oppose change.
There is great concern that even in relatively free societies, laws and regulations are becoming increasingly numerous, irrelevant, and too complex for the average person to understand. While those on the Christian right may wish to outlaw what they see as immoral, this only makes the public more accustomed to having to deal with new laws. Thus, it "opens the floodgates" for liberals to pass their own laws when they are in control of the government, rather than having an aversion to all new laws.
Differences with Christian right
As Jesus of Nazareth does not call upon the political and legal authorities to enforce piety or discourage sinful behavior, Christian libertarians do not believe in a political mandate to Christianize culture. Behavior considered sinful by the Church—but which does not violate the lives, liberty, or property of others—must be disciplined within the Church itself. (This includes family discipline in the case of minor children.) Even if such behavior warrants cultural opposition in the private sector, it must not be prohibited by the state. Only sinful actions which legitimately constitute forms of physical assault, theft, or fraud may be criminalized and prosecuted by government, as they alone infringe upon the natural rights of others. Due to the large taxpayer expense to house nonviolent offenders, and immoral "prison culture," Christian libertarians generally maintain that only violent criminals and those who have demonstrated a willingness to transgress the natural rights of their neighbors should be quarantined from society and incarcerated. On an international scale, non-interventionism is promoted based upon the principles of state sovereignty and self-determination.
In summary, while there is a need for police, prosecutors, and prisons to uphold natural rights, these should not be so numerous and costly to enforce laws beyond natural rights where it becomes a burden for taxpayers. This affects churchgoers ability to give to their local church and support missions. The prohibition of drugs, for example, takes away funds from the church and gives them to the state, while greatly increasing violence due to the illicit drug trade. While drug abuse is considered immoral, it is within the realm of the church, and not the state.
Differences with Christian left
Unlike the versions of welfare statism traditionally favored by the Christian Left, libertarians generally see no need for government-provided social services. These activities are best entrusted to private nonprofit organizations, especially churches and faith-based charities. Voluntary giving is more just and efficient than forced redistribution through taxation. Christian libertarians believe public welfare is an ineffective means to lift the financially struggling out of poverty. This carries with it negative unintended consequences, such as people being less willing obtain higher education or employment, or having more children than they would otherwise. School choice including parochial schools for primary and secondary education is advocated over mandated government-run schools at taxpayer expense. The spontaneous order of the free marketplace is always preferable to central planning. Over-regulation of business reduces productivity and overall employment, while enabling new possible avenues of corruption. Free individuals are in a much better position to rationally pursue their own interests than being dictated to by a strong-armed central government. The state should not prohibit unwise financial or personal decisions, nor prosecute those who encourage them (short of fraud), as this is within the realm of the church. Likewise, the individual right to keep and bear arms for defensive purposes is also supported.
With respect to environmental concerns, Christian libertarians largely view regulatory policies and the politicization of Creation Care as only superficially "green" and essentially corporatist. Often they cite the large-scale pollution and environmental degradation caused by governments as a reason to minimize the activities and role of the state in society (see also green libertarianism and free-market environmentalism).
The Ten Commandments
The Ten Commandments have varing enforceability under Christian libertarianism. Note: Beliefs differ on whether to consolidate at the beginning or end to prevent forming more than ten commandments. This list consolidates coveting with the alternative numbering used by Catholics and most Lutherans in brackets.
- 1st [1a] Commandment (forbid other gods): Church only
- 2nd [1b] Commandment (forbid idols): Church only
- 3rd  Commandment (forbid God's name in vain): Church only
- 4th  Commandment (keeping Sabbath): Church only
- 5th  Commandment (honoring parents): Church only
- 6th  Commandment (forbid murder): Both church and state
- 7th  Commandment (forbid adultery): Church only (assuming full consent of those who committed the adultery; otherwise state prosecution for rape)
- 8th  Commandment (forbid theft): Both church and state
- 9th  Commandment (forbid false witness): Both church and state (but only civil enforcement for defamation unless perjury or fraud occurs)
- 10th [9/10] Commandment (forbid coveting neighbor's wife  and property ): Church only (unless it rises to the legal threshold of harassment)
Not all specific crimes that the state can enforce are addressed directly. For example, kidnapping would be part of the eighth [seventh] commandment.
The origins of Christian libertarianism in the United States can be traced back to the roots of libertarianism. According to Murray Rothbard, of the three libertarian experiments begun during the European colonization of the Americas in the mid 17th century, all three of them were begun by Christian groups.
Going back farther, Martin Luther, one of the authors of the Protestant Reformation, has been called a libertarian. In the introduction to "Luther and Calvin on Secular Authority", the editor, Harro Hopfl, says that libertarian, egalitarian, communal motifs were part of the texture of Luther's theology.
Lord Acton was a theoretician of Christian libertarianism who suggested that political liberty is the essential condition and guardian of religious liberty. The Acton Institute, an American Christian libertarian think tank, is named after him.
Christian Bible References
The quotes below come from the translation commonly referenced as the New King James Version.
From the last book of the Christian New Testament, called the Apocalypse or Revelation, chapter 22, verses 10-16; this passage references the principle of non-interference in the lives of others:
- And he said to me, “Do not seal the words of the prophecy of this book, for the time is at hand. He who is unjust, let him be unjust still; he who is filthy, let him be filthy still; he who is righteous, let him be righteous still; he who is holy, let him be holy still.”
- “And behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to give to every one according to his work. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last.” Blessed are those who do His commandments, that they may have the right to the tree of life, and may enter through the gates into the city. But outside are dogs and sorcerers and sexually immoral and murderers and idolaters, and whoever loves and practices a lie.
- “I, Jesus, have sent My angel to testify to you these things in the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, the Bright and Morning Star.”
The New Testament book, 1 Corinthians 5:9-13, addresses this same principle:
- I wrote to you in my epistle not to keep company with sexually immoral people.
- Yet I certainly did not mean with the sexually immoral people of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or idolaters, since then you would need to go out of the world.
- But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner — not even to eat with such a person.
- For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? But those who are outside God judges. Therefore “put away from yourselves the evil person.”
From the first book of the Christian New Testament, called the Gospel of Matthew, chapter 15, verses 1-20; this passage references the simplicity of spiritual purity, and the non-necessity of a multitude of contradictory physical rules:
- Then the scribes and Pharisees who were from Jerusalem came to Jesus, saying,
- “Why do Your disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? For they do not wash their hands when they eat bread.”
- He answered and said to them, “Why do you also transgress the commandment of God because of your tradition? For God commanded, saying, ‘Honor your father and your mother’; and, ‘He who curses father or mother, let him be put to death.’ But you say, ‘Whoever says to his father or mother, “Whatever profit you might have received from me is a gift to God”—then he need not honor his father or mother.’ Thus you have made the commandment of God of no effect by your tradition.
- Hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy about you, saying:
- ‘These people draw near to Me with their mouth,
- And honor Me with their lips,
- But their heart is far from Me.
- And in vain they worship Me,
- Teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.’ ”
- ‘These people draw near to Me with their mouth,
- When He had called the multitude to Himself, He said to them, “Hear and understand: Not what goes into the mouth defiles a man; but what comes out of the mouth, this defiles a man.”
- Then His disciples came and said to Him, “Do You know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this saying?”
- But He answered and said, “Every plant which My heavenly Father has not planted will be uprooted. Let them alone. They are blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind leads the blind, both will fall into a ditch.”
- Then Peter answered and said to Him, “Explain this parable to us.”
- So Jesus said, “Are you also still without understanding? Do you not yet understand that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and is eliminated? But those things which proceed out of the mouth come from the heart, and they defile a man. For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies. These are the things which defile a man, but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile a man.”
- Andrew Sandlin, The Christian Statesman, "The Christian Libertarian Idea", October 1996
- The Origins of Individualist Anarchism in the US, Murray N. Rothbard, February 1, 2006
- Hopfl, Harro. Luther and Calvin on Secular Authority, Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought, September 27, 1991, p. xii
- "History of Acton Institute". Acton Institute. Retrieved July 12, 2012.